North Carolina Standard for School Executives Standard 1 By: Barbara Bumgardner Aleen Besmer James Westbrook Kristy Christenberry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
Creating a Roadmap for Change: Utilizing School Planning to Reculture Schools Darius S. Adamson, Sr. School Transformation Coach District and School Transformation.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
The Principal and Assistant Principal Evaluation Process: Integrating the Teacher Working Conditions Survey.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
Curriculum & Instruction Webinar October 18, 2013.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Calhoun County School System Jacksonville, Alabama April 27-30, 2014.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
A School Approach to Designing for Learning Learning Intentions : To know that purposefully designing for learning that is contextually appropriate, strengthens.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Beginning Teacher Support Program Peer Review Process Training for Charter Schools June 2013.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
NC PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS AND EVALUATION PROCESS.
The Third Year Review A Mini-Accreditation Florida Catholic Conference National Standards and Benchmarks.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Segment 5: Sample Activities Federal Accountability Requirements School Leadership Instructional Supervision 1.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
ADMN 6130 Class 4 “Cheap teaching is like cheap dentistry, cheap cotton, or cheap anything else.” - Annual Report of the Owensboro Public Schools
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
North Carolina Standard for School Executives Standard 1 Aleen Besmer Barbara Bumgarner Kristy Christenberry James Westbrook.
Strategic Leadership Share vision of changing world in 21 st century Create processes to ensure school’s identity Create processes to distribute leadership.
NELA Professional Growth Plan: Growth Analysis C. Miller-Walker Cohort 3.
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
CESD Board and Admin Retreat March 20-22, FIND YOUR TEAM & TABLE:  Look at the icon on the left hand side of your nametag  your name is also on.
CSA Retreat July 2012 LEADERSHIP AT THE TOP. Focus District leadership Building leadership Coaching of principals Developing a culture dedicated to improvement.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
FACE Symposium Michele P Brooks M.Ed Assistant Superintendent, Office of Family & Student Engagement Boston Public Schools.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Maxey Elementary December 9 and 10, 2013.
School Improvement Plan & Accreditation
Beginning Teacher Support Program Charter Schools New Principal Institute June 2015.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
PESB Standards Standard 4: Program Design. How Standards are Judged Standards are deemed unmet, met or exemplary. A standard is deemed ‘met’ if: A program.
ADMN 6130 Class 3 If you don’t organize the chaos, the chaos will organize you.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards These standards serve as the basis for teacher preparation, teacher evaluation, and professional development.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
A Productive Partnership
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Supporting Beginning Teachers
Align Combine Design.
Planning for Continuous Improvement: The importance of goal setting
Using data for instructional decision-making
February 21-22, 2018.
What Does a 21st Century School Administrator Look Like?
Presentation transcript:

North Carolina Standard for School Executives Standard 1 By: Barbara Bumgardner Aleen Besmer James Westbrook Kristy Christenberry

Is able to share a vision of the changing world in the 21 st century that schools are preparing children to enter

Systematically challenges the status quo by leading change with potentially beneficial outcomes

Systematically consider new ways of accomplishing tasks and is comfortable with major changes in how processes are implemented

Utilized data from the NC Teacher Working Conditions Survey in developing the framework for continual improvement in the School Improvement Plan

Is a driving force behind major initiative that help student acquire 21 st century skills

Creates with all stakeholders a vision for the school that captures peoples’ attention and imagination

Creates processes that provide for the periodic review and revision of the school’s vision, mission and strategic goals by all school stakeholders

Creates processes to ensure the school’s identity (vision, mission, values, beliefs and goals) actually drive decisions and inform the culture of the school

Adheres to statutory requirements regarding the School Improvement Plan

Facilitates the collaborative development of annual school improvement plans to realize strategic goals and objectives

Facilitates the successful execution of the school improvement plan aligned to the mission and goal set by the State Board of Education

Facilitates the implementation of State Board of Education

Facilitate the setting of high, concrete goals and the expectations the all students meet them

Communicates strong professional beliefs about schools, teaching and learning that reflects latest research and best practice in preparing students for success in college or in work

Creates processes to distribute leadership though out the school

Creates processes for identifying benchmarking and providing students access to a variety of 21 st century instructional tools (ex. technology) and best practices for meeting diverse students needs.

Creating processes that ensure the strategic allocation and use of resources to meet instructional goals and support teachers needs

Creates processes to provide formal feedback to teachers concerning the effectiveness of their classroom instruction

Creates processes that protect teachers from issues and influences that would detract from their instructional time

Systematically and frequently observes in classroom and engages in conversation with students about their learning

Artifacts:

School Improvement Plan

NC Teachers Working Conditions Survey

Student Achievement data

Teacher retention data

Documented use of formative assessment instruments to impact instruction

Development and communication of goal oriented personalized education plans

Evidence of team development and evaluation of classroom lessons

Work Cite