Michael Hopkins, P.E., Assistant Chief, DAPC Andrew Hall, Permit Manager, DAPC

Newburgh Steel Works, Cleveland circa 1893 Case Western Reserve Historical Society

 Statistics on current installation permit status  Installation Goals for 2011  Statistics on current operating permit status  Operating Permit Goals for 2011

 Reviewed data from Stars2 from November 2009 through October 2010  Looked at issuance of installation permits including GPs, PBRs, PTIs, PTIOs  Looked at the current workload of installation permits

 690 PBR accepted  13.5 days average processing

 8 % install permits issued were GPs  Issued 42 GP  29.7 days average processing

 506 Installation permits (GP & Non)  Included 1152 EUs  ~2 EU per Installation Permit  avg OEPA days  avg Total days

 Reduce workload to “no backlog” level  Reduce number of “old” permits  Meet 14-day Completeness review goal  Continue timely processing of CO reviews  Further develop high priority “high communication” process  Process Section Manager identified high priority permits using “high communication” process

 Tracked through Stars2 Report  Mgmt Reports…  Permits Status…  DO/Laa: select one  Types: PTI & PTIO  Reasons: Initial Installation & Chapter 31 Mod & Not Yet Assigned

DO/Laa Current Installation Workload* and 2011 Goals DO/LaaCurrent Workload“Old” Permits*2011 Goal 01 – CDO NEDO NWDO Toledo SWDO SEDO Portsmouth RAPCA Cleveland HAMCO Canton Akron9110 Total *As of November 26, 2010, Old = DO/Laa/CO workflow >180

 Continue current practice of limited review and rapid turn-around (CO goal)  Develop guidance concerning when the “high communication” process is to be used, the processed used and a revised fee procedure (CO goal)  Develop guidance concerning processing of “old” permits

 NSR Permits: Number of applications rec’d for Initial Installation/CH31Mods are variable but follow historic trends  Title V Permits: fixed number  FEPTIO: fixed number  PTIO: fixed number or decrease

Input + Generation – Output – Consumption = Accumulation  Input: applications received  Generation: splitting of applications  Output : permits issued  Consumption : facility shutdowns  Accumulation : permit buildup within the system

DO/Laa Title V Facilities, 2010 Issuance* and 2011 Goals DO/LaaTitle V Facilities2010 Finals Issued2011 Goal 01 – CDO NEDO NWDO Toledo SWDO SEDO Portsmouth RAPCA Cleveland HAMCO Canton Akron2435 Total *Final Title V permits issued as of November 26, 2010

 Initial Title V  Renewal Title V (Expired or Extended)  Sig Mod (9 month goal)  MPM (90 day goal)  APA  Off Permit Change  See TOPs Report, STARS2 Management Reports

DO/Laa FEPTIO Facilities, 2010 Issuance* and 2011 Goals DO/LaaFEPTIO Facilities2010 FinalFEPTIO2011 Goal 01 – CDO NEDO NWDO Toledo SWDO SEDO Portsmouth RAPCA Cleveland HAMCO Canton Akron69714 Total *PTIO Renewal with “Draft/Final Issuance” as of Nov. 26, 2010

DO/Laa PTIO Facilities, 2010 Issuance* and 2011 Goals** DO/LaaPTIO Facilities2010 PTIOs2011 Goal 01 – CDO NEDO NWDO Toledo SWDO SEDO Portsmouth RAPCA Cleveland HAMCO Canton Akron Total *As of Nov. 26, 2010 ** Based on 10-yr Renewal Cycle

 Report Tree (Permit Classification): to identify facility classifications  Expiration Report: identify expired permits within selected time frames  Workload Trend Report: shows month-by- month permit applications rec’d/permits issued

 Questions?