Objective Measurements of Levels of Visual Stress Niru K. Nahar 1, Sowjanya Gowrisankaran 2, James E. Sheedy 3 1 Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Drowsy State, Errors of Omission in a Visual Reaction-time Test Occur with Eyes Open or Closed Chapman RJ, Johns MW, Crowley KE Sleep Diagnostics.
Advertisements

Reliability of an EMG Fatigue Test for Erector Spinae Muscles D. Gordon E. Robertson 1, Heidi Sveistrup 1,2 and Cécile Réal 3 School of Human Kinetics.
Introduction to Refractive Error and Prescription Writing Walter Huang, OD Yuanpei University Department of Optometry.
LIGHT AND THE RETINAL IMAGE: KEY POINTS Light travels in (more or less) straight lines: the pinhole camera’s inverted image Enlarging the pinhole leads.
Bridget C. Hendricks, James Comerford, Frank Thorn, and Eli Peli The New England College of Optometry, Boston, MA Contrast Matching With Complex and Natural.
60 th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Salt Lake City, Utah Control and Scaling of Radius-Vectored Turbulent Boundary Layers Using.
P.S.Selvakumar Faculty Aravind School of Optometry
Involved in bench press and squats. Muscle Forces  The force generated by a muscle action  Depends on: number and type of motor units activated the.
Introduction Methods Results Conclusion  The relative contribution of the neural and muscular mechanisms to muscle fatigue varies with the specifics of.
Introduction To be an effective teacher it is essential to capture and maintain the attention of the student. Toward this end it is very helpful to find.
Introduction to Biomechanics Chapter 1. Definition of Biomechanics Biomechanics is the scientific study of the mechanics of biological systems. Uses mathematics,
Evaluation of a Scanned Laser Display as an Alternative Low Vision Computer Interface Conor Kleweno, Eric Seibel, Ph.D., Kyle Kloeckner, Bob Burstein,
Keratometry Walter Huang, OD Yuanpei University Department of Optometry.
W. A. Maxwell, MD, PhD ASCRS 2008 Comparison of the Optical Image Quality for Presbyopia Correcting IOLs using Modulation Transfer Function Testing W.
W. Maxwell, MD, PhD California Eye Institute Fresno, California
Age-Differences in the Visual Information Processing Demands of Vehicle Instrument Panel Interfaces Heimstra Laboratories University of South Dakota Frank.
Austin Roorda, Ph.D. University of Houston College of Optometry
The Duration of Eyelid Movements During Blinks: Changes with Drowsiness Tucker, AJ, Johns, MW Sleep Diagnostics Pty Ltd Melbourne, Australia Introduction.
Setting Fire to CIS - or- Small Scale Combustion Chamber and Instrumentation Dave Pogorzala Bob Kremens, PhD, Advisor Center For Imaging Science Rochester.
Measuring Soil Bulk Density by Using Vibration-induced Conductivity Fluctuation A. Sz. Kishné, C. L.S. Morgan Dept. of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M.
Free Phone $25 a month 100 minutes then 35c per min Free Phone $25 a month 100 minutes then 35c per min Free Phone $20 a month 75 minutes then 25c per.
Counting How Many Words You Read
PROFESSIONAL LECTURE SERIES Click to add Seminar Category (E.g. Health Science, Electrical Engineering. Biological Science, Architectural Engineering,
Contrast sensitivity testing maybe a better estimate of real life visual performance when compared to Snellen acuity testing Contrast sensitivity maybe.
AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Aspheric IOL. Aspheric IOL AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® 2 AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Aspheric IOL SN6AD3 Add Power: +4 D Spectacle Plane: 3.2 D Range:
Toric IOLs: wavefront aberrometry and quality of life Mencucci Rita Giordano Cristina, Stiko Ermelinda, Miranda Paolo, Eleonora Favuzza, Ugo Menchini Authors.
Sub-Pixel Text Rendering – Preference, Legibility and Reading Performance Jim Sheedy Jim Sheedy Yu-Chi Tai Yu-Chi Tai Manoj Subbaram Manoj Subbaram Sowjanya.
Accommodative Response to Desktop & Handheld Video Displays Yu-Chi Tai, PhD, James Kundart, OD, MEd, FAAO, John R. Hayes, PhD, James Sheedy OD, PhD, FAAO.
0.75 cm Inferior OO 0.75 cm Superior OO 1.75 cm Inferior OO 0.75 cm Inferior OO Corrugator 1.75 cm Inferior OO 0.75 cm Superior OO Corrugator Frontalis.
It is planned to recruit 60 subjects to complete this study. The data presented was based on results from 36 subjects. Subjects were asked to make a lexical.
TFT-LCD and Visual Performance 이현철. Nuclear I&C and Information Engineering Laboratory Preface  From the previous seminar, it.
The effect of inter-letter spacing on reading Yu-Chi Tai, John Hayes, James Sheedy College of Optometry Pacific University, Forest Grove, Oregon ABSTRACT.
Eye Strain, What a Pain! Computer Vision Syndrome Ashley S. Reddell, OD, FCOVD HOACLS 2015.
Subjects. Thirty-four young adults 19 males & 15 felames, age 18-33, mean age = 24.8) participated in this study. They all have 20/20 or better vision.
Lifestyle and Refractive Factors Affecting Progressive Addition Lens Preference Padmapriya Ramamoorthy 1, James E Sheedy 2 and John Hayes 2 1 The Ohio.
Lifestyle and Refractive Factors Associated with Progressive Addition Lens Preference The Center for Ophthalmic Optics Research, The Ohio State University.
Innovative Approaches to Displaying Words -- The effect of segmentation on word identification Yu-Chi Tai, Shun-nan Yang, John R. Hayes, & James Sheedy.
Although we perceive a pixel as being white, it is actually comprised of 3 colored sub-pixels. The sub-pixels can be separately addressed in order to triple.
Blink Is Not A Random Event In Reading Yu-Chi Tai, James Sheedy, & John Hayes Pacific University, College of Optometry.
Computer Use, Symptoms, and Quality Of Life John Hayes, Jim Sheedy, Joan Stelmack*, Catherine Heaney** College of Optometry, Pacific University, Forest.
Audio-spinal reflex response in human limb muscles
What is Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS)?
Crystal Growth in OTP VINCENT MULL and DR. STEPHEN HALL
Acoustic to Articoulatory Speech Inversion by Dynamic Time Warping
Silent Classroom Timer
Yu-Chi Tai, Shun-nan Yang, John Hayes , James Sheedy
The Effect of Inter-letter Spacing on Reading Yu-Chi Tai, PhD James E
Does size-threshold text legibility relate to performance with suprathreshold-sized text? Yu-Chi Tai, PhD James E. Sheedy, OD, PhD, FAAO John R. Hayes,
Yu-Chi Tai, PhD, John R. Hayes, PhD , James E. Sheedy, OD, PhD
Multidisciplinary Engineering Senior Design Project P06441 See Through Fog Imaging Preliminary Design Review 05/19/06 Project Sponsor: Dr. Rao Team Members:
Visual Stress and Cognition: An investigation of the impacts of visual stress on lexical decision making Joshua Gietzen, Yu-Chi Tai, PhD, John R. Hayes,
The Health Risks Of Computer Work
Title of Presentation Another Text Box
Niru K. Nahar Sowjanya Gowrisankaran James E. Sheedy
Viewing Distance & Visual Discomfort While Using Handheld Displays
Real-Time Objective Measurement of the Accommodation While Reading
Within a Mixed-Frequency Visual Environment
During Anterior-Posterior Optic Flow
Tinted Lenses for Improving Comfort During Computer Use
Ionospheric Effect on the GNSS Radio Occultation Climate Data Record
Problem Solving Using Conversion Factors
Shun-nan Yang, PhD, Hannu Laukannen, OD, Yu-Chi Tai, PhD, James E
Free-Response-Questions
Relationship Between Visual Stress & Generalized Body Stress
Priya Ramamoorthy BSOptom, MS
ON A SEPARATE PAPER TO TURN IN
Neural Network Pipeline CONTACT & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Shun-nan Yang, PhD, Hannu Laukkanen, OD, Yu-Chi Tai, PhD, James E
Lenses This Presentation was used for Year 12 students.
Apparatus and equipment configuration used for trace eyeblink conditioning in head-fixed mice (A), analysis of high-speed video (B), and example behavioral.
Presentation transcript:

Objective Measurements of Levels of Visual Stress Niru K. Nahar 1, Sowjanya Gowrisankaran 2, James E. Sheedy 3 1 Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2 College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH College of Optometry| Pacific University | [2043 College Way] | [Forest Grove] | [97116] | Oregon OBJECTIVES  To determine Orbicularis Oculi Response to Visual Stress Inducing Conditions  To test EMG as an Objective Measure of Eyestrain CONCLUSIONS RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON THE TOPIC CONTACT INFORMATION Study1  Group1: Refractive Error (RE) & Glare (GL), which reduce image quality and benefit from eyelid squint, caused  Increased EMG power  Eyelid squint response  Increased blink rate  Group2: Low Contrast (LC) & Small Font (SF), which reduce image quality but do not benefit from eyelid squint, resulted in  Increased EMG power  No changes in aperture size  Reduced blink rate (for LC)  Group3: Accommodative & Convergence Stress did not cause changes in EMG power, aperture size or blink rate.  Results suggest that contraction of the orbicularis oculi is a part of the asthenopia mechanism related to compromised image quality Study2  Results suggest that the squint-beneficial conditions are operated by a local mechanism involving  Contraction of the orbicularis  Increase in reflex blinking  Stress conditions that do not benefit from squint  Do not engage the orbicularis  Decreases blink rate, possibly through central inhibition of spontaneous blinking.  EMG response is a sensitive objective measure for the squint-beneficial conditions.  Blink rate may be a more sensitive objective measure for the non-squint-beneficial conditions  EMG with longer trial durations should be tested for more conclusive results.  Sowjanya GowrIsankaran, James E. Sheedy, John R. Hayes, “Eyelid Squint Response to Asthenopia-Inducing Conditions”, Vol. 84, No. 7, pp.611–619, Optometry and Vision Science  Niru K Nahar, James E. Sheedy, John R. Hayes, and Yu-Chi Tai, “Objective Measurements of Lower-Level Visual Stress”, Vol. 84, No. 7, pp. 620–629 Optometry and Vision Science Principal Investigator Jim Sheedy, OD, PhD College of Optometry Pacific University, OR97116 Phone: METHODS Two Studies were done with a set-up  Reading from LCD Monitor  Viewing distance 55cm  Subject position fixed by a chin & forehead rest  Surface EMG response of the orbicularis oculi was recorded with (1 pair of 3mm) electrodes located 1.25cm below the lower right eyelid. Sampling frequency  1kHz  ISCAN video camera recorded palpebral fissure height  Conditions were presented in Latin Square order Study1 (15mins Reading)  20 subjects (18–36 years) with 20/20 vision  Baseline: silent picture viewing for 5 mins & non-stress condition for 15mins  Stress Inducing Conditions:  Glare  Refractive Error (OU: +2.00/-4.00x180)  Low Contrast (3.5%)  Small font 60cms)  Up Gaze (20cm above straight gaze)  Accommodative Stress (±1.50DS)  Convergence Stress 16.7cms) Study2 (Shorter 5mins Reading)  31 subjects (ages 18 & above) with 20/20 vision  Controls  Verdana CT, 12 pt, highest contrast, no glare, no ref. error (RE)  Presented 6 times at equal time spacing within the testing session  27 trials: 5 minutes reading for each trial ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS These Studies were Supported by a Grant from Microsoft Corporation, Advanced Reading Technologies Group Study 2 Stress Conditions Not Improved by Squint Font Size VCT7 VCT8 VCT10 VCT12 Font Type TNR12CT TNR12nonCT V12CT V12nonCT Contrast 5% 10% 20% 40% Improved by Squint Ref. Error Cyls 0.5 Cyls 1.0 Cyls 1.5 Cyls 2.0 Cyls 2.5 Glare 25% 50% 75% 100% RESULTS: Study1 with High Level Visual Stress  Duration 15mins RESULTS: Study2 with Lower Level Visual Stress  Duration 5mins EMG Power: Measured from 3sec Blink Free Traces Aperture Size: Measured from the Video Blink Rate: Calculated from the Video Discomfort Level : From Subjects assessment Inducing Conditions Group 1 Group 2Group 3 Refractive error Glare Low contrast Small font Convergence stress Accommodative stress Up gaze ConditionEMG PowerAperture SizeBlink RateDiscomfortPerceived Duration Non-Stress (NS) 0.137(  )0.016 (  )0.913(  )10.90  (  ) Up Gaze (UG) 0.001(  )<0.001 (  )0.157(  )40.85  (  ) Group 3 Accommodation (AC) 0.088(  )0.059 (  )0.084(  )38.95  (  ) Convergence Stress (CO) 0.390(  )0.061 (  )0.911(  )50.55  (  ) Group 2 Low Contrast (LC) 0.007(  )0.130 (  )0.035(  )63.65  (  ) Small Font (SF) 0.034(  )0.061(  )0.231(  )49.85  (  ) Group 1 Glare (GL) <0.001(  )<0.001(  )0.010(  )45.70  (  ) Refractive Error (RE) <0.001(  )<0.001(  )0.005(  )86.45  (  )