Module name & code Evaluation survey. How to use Zappers A 60-second training course. You will be using the handsets to give your feedback on the module.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Powerful Proofreading Developed By Elisa P. Paramore Student Support Services Counselor.
Advertisements

Eva Sørensen Department of Chemical Engineering University College London Experiences of using peer assessment in a 4th year design module.
Designing Scoring Rubrics. What is a Rubric? Guidelines by which a product is judged Guidelines by which a product is judged Explain the standards for.
Workshop: Translating graduate attributes into classroom learning A/Prof Simon Barrie Institute for Teaching and Learning Hong Kong Institute of Education.
Effective Communication: A Resource for SPIRE Students Dr Sherilyn MacGregor School of Politics, IR and Philosophy Teaching Innovation Project
External & Strategic Development Services (ESDS) NSS and Gender Comparison of : Male and female students Sector and UEL Year 2006 to 2009 Strategic Planning,
1 Sources:  SusanTurner - Napier University  C. Robson, Real World Research, Blackwell, 1993  Steve Collesano: Director, Corporate Research and Development.
EDP 303 Portfolio Jill Ann Broermann Spring 2004.
Blackboard student guidepage 1 of 21 Blackboard Basics – finding your way  this guide explains how to find your way around a Blackboard course.  click.
+ Selection Tests. + Selection Tests Lecture content Types of tests Employers’ views Preparing to take selection tests During the tests Resources to help.
Using Lexmark for Tests Elaine Wood Data Analyst, Assessment and Program Evaluation x7394.
Training of Adults Useful tips to know to conduct a good training Presentation 22.
Advanced Research Methodology
Business and Management Research
Oral Communication The description of the oral communication task indicates two priorities – the development of basic research skills and the communication.
Dr. MaLinda Hill Advanced English C1-A Designing Essays, Research Papers, Business Reports and Reflective Statements.
Seminar for International Teaching Assistants Session Three introducing Navigating the Classroom.
Tutoring Workshop Department of Electrical Engineering 21 Feb 2012 Facilitated by: Simon Winberg & Renee Smit.
Assessment: Creating and Using Rubrics. Workshop Goals Review rubrics and parts of rubrics Use your assignment to create a rubric scale & dimension Peer.
Eric Cohen Books 2007 Simply Writing - Task to Project to Bagrut What's expected and what you can do! Clarity, Expectation and Format.
Minding the Gap whilst Moving Forward Student Attainment Summit Dr Debra Cureton The University of Opportunity.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
@sparqs_scotland Course Rep Training name of trainer associate trainer | sparqs.
CM602: Effective Systems Development Exam Preparation Slide 1 Exam Preparation Preparing for the CM602 Examination D.Miller J. Horton.
HEA Conference June 22nd – 23rd 2010 Shaping the Future: Future Learning It’s all in the words: the impact of language on the design and development of.
Month BeforeWeek BeforeDay Before The 5 Minute CPD Plan ….print and scribble your way to a well planned INSET Day or CPD Session The BIG Picture Stephen.
Keys to success on the Gateway: A checklist  Demonstrate that you understand the writing task  Address and develop all parts of the writing task  Organize.
How PIs and the NIH Communicate: eRA Commons and Progress Reports Susan McCarthy DCB New Grantee Workshop March 15, 2013.
The Conclusion and The Defense CSCI 6620 Spring 2014 Thesis Projects: Chapters 11 and 12 CSCI 6620 Spring 2014 Thesis Projects: Chapters 11 and 12.
The National Student Survey (NSS) Penny Jones, Strategic Planning Office Tracy Goslar and Miles Willey, Academic Standards & Partnership Wednesday 16 March.
An Integrated Approach to Using I- annotate for Academic Writing Feedback on ESAP Courses Nancy Carter and Alex Golding.
Hello My name is Christine Wamunyima Kanyengo. I am a Deputy Librarian at the University of Zambia Library. I am presenting this “Scholarly Communication.
19 th October 2011 GTA Training Student Support Dr Elaine Clark Fellow in Action Learning and Health Care Management.
ENGL Today’s Agenda  Fast Write  Bias  Surveys  Homework.
Student Peer Review An introductory tutorial. The peer review process Conduct study Write manuscript Peer review Submit to journal Accept Revise Reject.
CMPGN3007 & CMPGN3008 BSc Project Dr T.A.Etchells BSc Project Tutor
ACU Student Evaluation of Unit & Student Evaluation of Teaching surveys.
English 28: Last Class Class Reflection PLO Survey Discussing the Final Exam.
QAA Review Incorporating the GOsC Recognised Qualification (RQ) Renewal.
Thank you for the kind feedback. I truly do hope you have enjoyed the course and have had a good learning experience. Most people said they found the course.
CS4042 / CS4032 – Directed Study 28/01/2009 Digital Media Design Music and Performance Technology Jim Buckley Directed Study (CS4042.
Delphi Evaluation Results PBA Back-End development, Autumn 2012.
Poster Presentations Today’s agenda: Each of you will present your poster describing the publication you have been studying. You must limit your talk to.
Making your teaching inclusive Improving Disabled Student Learning Experiences presented to Widening Participation to University Study Through Flexible.
Primary MCQ Course Evaluation September Mean score represented as bar charts. 1= poor 5= excellent Mean score for each subject is presented as bar.
Counting Quarks University of Southampton. Our goal is to learn about the particles of nature using real data from accelerators We will not explore the.
Internet Literacy Evaluating Web Sites. Objective The Student will be able to evaluate internet web sites for accuracy and reliability The Student will.
Micro Teach Presentations All to carry out an individual presentation on a topic of your choice. Presentations must: Be 30 minutes long. Explain the point.
Faculty Forum: Evaluation of Teaching Sponsored by the Faculty Senate November 10, 2006.
Patient Experience, Annual Questionnaire
CSM06: Information Retrieval Notes about writing coursework reports, revision and examination.
Low Level Programming Introduction & Recap Duncan Smeed.
Improve Own Learning and Performance. Progression from levels 1-3 Progression from levels 1-3 At all levels, candidates are required to show they can.
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education ‘Tutoring for the 21 st Century’ 28 January 2015 Harriet Barnes Natalja Sokorevica Standards, Quality.
Viewpoints of Academics and Students on Using the E-EPOSTL at University of Prešov Barbora Popovičová and Nikola Mihoková.
ON-LINE TOPIC THE ROLE OF THE TUTOR.  Spend a few minutes thinking about and making notes of all the different roles you fulfil as a tutor. Once you.
Do you feel there should be a prerequisite for this module concerning the knowledge level? The result of evaluation forms.
Evaluation of PH-ELIM trainings
Designing Scoring Rubrics
Distinguishing scholarly from nonscholarly periodicals
Assessment brief Post graduate route.
Evaluating performance management
Primary MCQ Course Evaluation
Neither likely or unlikely
Internet Literacy Evaluating Web Sites.
Introduction to Comparative Effectiveness Course (HAP 823)
Other authors: Jenni Dyer, Margret Meehan
Assessment and Quality Assurance
Higher/ National 5 Drama
Jill Ann Broermann Spring 2004
Presentation transcript:

Module name & code Evaluation survey

How to use Zappers A 60-second training course. You will be using the handsets to give your feedback on the module evaluation questions

A question to test your zapper What did you drink with your breakfast this morning? Remember to check that the light flashes green when you vote! 1.What’s breakfast? 2.Coffee 3.Tea 4.Fruit Juice 5.Water 6.Nothing 7.Other

Start of evaluation survey  Your answers are anonymous: we don’t know who has which zapper!  It should take about 10 minutes to complete the survey  You won’t see the results on-screen  You have 15 seconds to answer each question

Module Content 5 questions

The prior knowledge assumed was… 1.Too high 2.High 3.About right 4.Low 5.Too low Countdown 15

The amount of material covered in the module was… 1.Too much 2.High 3.About right 4.Low 5.Too little Countdown 15

The degree of difficulty in the module was… 1.Too difficult 2.Difficult 3.About right 4.Easy 5.Too easy Countdown 15

Was there a coherent progression of the module from beginning to end? 1.No, rarely 2.Not often 3.Sometimes 4.Usually 5.Yes, always Countdown 15

Was the content inclusive in terms of the language used and examples given? 1.No, rarely 2.Not often 3.Sometimes 4.Usually 5.Yes, always Countdown 15

Module Organisation 4 questions

The quality of the module outline (the document detailing the module’s aims, content, organisation, assignments, reading, assessments etc.) was… 1.Very good 2.Good 3.Acceptable 4.Poor 5.Very poor Countdown 15

The statement of learning outcomes was… 1.Very clear 2.Clear 3.Acceptable 4.Unclear 5.Very vague Countdown 15

The module expectations (i.e. what was expected of you) were… 1.Very clear 2.Clear 3.Acceptable 4.Unclear 5.Very vague Countdown 15

The organisation of the module activities (lectures, seminars etc.) was… 1.Very good 2.Good 3.Acceptable 4.Poor 5.Very poor Countdown 15

Teaching and Learning Support 7 questions

The helpfulness of the teaching staff was… 1.Very good 2.Good 3.Acceptable 4.Poor 5.Very poor Countdown 15

Staff awareness of my own special needs was… 1.Very good 2.Good 3.Acceptable 4.Poor 5.Very poor 6.Not applicable Countdown 15

The availability and accessibility of module material (e.g. handouts, web pages etc.) was… 1.Very good 2.Good 3.Acceptable 4.Poor 5.Very poor Countdown 15

The usefulness of support materials was… 1.Very good 2.Good 3.Acceptable 4.Poor 5.Very poor Countdown 15

The feedback on my progression was… 1.Very good 2.Good 3.Acceptable 4.Poor 5.Very poor Countdown 15

The clarity of presentation was… 1.Very good 2.Good 3.Acceptable 4.Poor 5.Very poor Countdown 15

My interest in the subject as a result of the module has… 1.Significantly increased 2.Increased 3.Stayed the same 4.Decreased 5.Significantly decreased Countdown 15

Overall Evaluation 4 questions

Overall, my rating of the module content is… 1.Very good 2.Good 3.Acceptable 4.Poor 5.Very poor Countdown 15

Overall, my rating of the module organisation is… 1.Very good 2.Good 3.Acceptable 4.Poor 5.Very poor Countdown 15

Overall, my rating of the quality of teaching is… 1.Very good 2.Good 3.Acceptable 4.Poor 5.Very poor Countdown 15

Overall, my rating of the module is… 1.Very good 2.Good 3.Acceptable 4.Poor 5.Very poor Countdown 15

Lecturer Evaluation

Overall, my rating of Lecturer_A_name is… 1.Very good 2.Good 3.Acceptable 4.Poor 5.Very poor Countdown 15

Overall, my rating of Lecturer_B_name is… 1.Very good 2.Good 3.Acceptable 4.Poor 5.Very poor Countdown 15

Overall, my rating of Lecturer_C_name is… 1.Very good 2.Good 3.Acceptable 4.Poor 5.Very poor Countdown 15

Overall, my rating of Lecturer_D_name is… 1.Very good 2.Good 3.Acceptable 4.Poor 5.Very poor Countdown 15

About You In order that we can understand how students' experiences may differ between different groups, we would be grateful if you could provide us with the following information about yourself. However, there is no requirement to answer them if you do not wish to do so.

Are you male or female? 1.Male 2.Female Countdown 10

How would you describe your ethnic origin? 1.White 2.Black 3.Asian 4.Other Countdown 10

Were you over 21 when you started your degree? 1.Yes 2.No Countdown 10

Do you have a specific learning difficulty, such as dyslexia? 1.Yes 2.No Countdown 10

Do you have a disability or medical condition which might affect your experience as a student? 1.Yes 2.No Countdown 10

If yes, have you disclosed the disability or medical condition to the University? 1.Yes 2.No Countdown 10

One final question

Thank you for taking part in this initiative. What do you think about giving your evaluation feedback using zappers? 1.I really prefer zappers 2.Better than a paper form 3.No strong opinion 4.Prefer a paper form 5.I really don’t like this Countdown 15

Thank You Please return your zapper handset to the tutor at the end of the lecture.