Pay for performance initiatives a growing trend, but are they effective? Josephine Borghi London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Ifakara Health Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Experiences of Implementing a Demand Side Financing Scheme for Maternal Health Services in Eastern Uganda.
Advertisements

PAYING FOR PERFORMANCE In PUBLIC HEALTH: Opportunities and Obstacles Glen P. Mays, Ph.D., M.P.H. Department of Health Policy and Administration UAMS College.
New Challenges in M&E Lets go. Scaling Up Monitoring & Evaluation Strategic Information PROGRAM GUIDANCE RESULT NEEDS OPPORTUNITIES Resources New directions.
EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND Innovation and mainstreaming: Relevance To meet the Lisbon targets: Europe has to develop a knowledge based economy and to improve.
Implementing NICE guidance
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Improving health and social care outcomes for over 65s in Croydon: A new approach to commissioning integrated provision Governing Body 7 October 2014.
Department for International Development Payment by Results.
Incorporating considerations about equity in policy briefs What factors are likely to be associated with disadvantage? Are there plausible reasons for.
Peter Hansen Perspectives on Performance Based Financing within the GAVI Alliance Clermont-Ferrand, 11 May 2011.
Health System Strengthening for Greater Health Impact Dan Kraushaar Management Sciences for Health We all say we do it and do it well, but what is it?
RBM Communications Assessment Challenges and Opportunities in Ghana, Mali, Senegal, Tanzania and Uganda.
ARQ part II data management Training pack 2: Monitoring drug abuse for policy and practice.
Building the Foundations for Better Health Health Services Organization.
Our Focus On Benefits Realisation >> Delivering Accelerated and Sustainable Business Benefits An introduction to our Project Definition & Benefits Templates.
Lecture 1: Introduction Health inequality monitoring: with a special focus on low- and middle-income countries.
Generating evidence for change: Implementing the post-ICIUM research agenda Dennis Ross-Degnan, ScD Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care.
STRENGTHENING HEALTH SYSTEMS Anne Mills DCPP Editor London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
ASSESSMENT AND PRIORITISATION OF USER NEEEDS Norah Madaya RRSF Meeting, Kigali, Rwanda August 2011.
AN INTRODUCTION Country Systems. Outline 1. What are Country Systems? 2. What does it mean to use country systems? 3. Why does the ‘use of country systems’
February 2010 Petra Vergeer, Health Specialist RBF Team, World Bank At a glance… Verification of performance linked to financial incentives by Joe Naimoli.
Debriefing for the Study Tour of the Malian and Senegalese Delegations to Rwanda October 25-30, 2009.
How to determine medicines benefits policy and program needs?
Markets for Watershed Services Background Where How Duration Partners.
MALARIA TRACK SESSION SUMMARIES_ICIUM 2011 TEAM MEMBERS: EVELYN ANSAH, KOJO YEBOAH-ANTWI, CHARLES EZENDUKA, DAVID OFORI-ADJEI.
What is RBF? A paradigm shift for health systems in low-income countries Cape Town – 30 th September 2014 Bruno Meessen, Institute of Tropicale Medicine,
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
WHO–ITU National eHealth Strategy Toolkit An effective approach to national Strategy Development and Implementation Clayton Hamilton WHO Regional Office.
Summary of ICIUM Chronic Care Track Prepared by: Ricardo Perez-Cuevas Veronika Wirtz David Beran.
Summary from the Economics Track With thanks to all track participants, presenters, rapporteurs, moderators and organizers.
Performances Based Financing scheme in Rwanda INVESTING MORE STRATEGICALLY 1.
“Coal Sector Policy Support Programme” This project is funded by the European Union Implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium TACIS Project: “Coal Sector.
Pharmaceutical system strengthening – Is there a need for a new paradigm? Andreas Seiter The World Bank ICIUM 2011, Antalya 1.
Uganda Health Information Strategy Eddie Mukooyo, MD, MSc Assistant Commissioner Health Services Dublin, Ireland 13 th September 2010.
Private involvement in education: Measuring Impacts Felipe Barrera-Osorio HDN Education Public-Private Partnerships in Education, Washington, DC, March.
Policy track summary ICIUM 2011 – 18 Nov Policy track topics 1.The pharmaceutical policy process 2.Quality and safety of medicines in LMIC 3.Policy.
Tanzanian German Programme to Support Health The Health Financing Component Supporting Social Health Protection and Health Financial Management in Tanzania.
Epilepsy and WHO | 17 Oct |1 | WHO's six-point agenda The overarching health needs 1.Promoting development 2.Fostering health security The strategic.
Results-based financing Why? What? How?. Jagaman district just erected a new health center and the health workers have started work. What are health workers.
Paulin Basinga Rwanda School of Public Health A collaboration between the Rwanda Ministry of Health, CNLS, SPH, INSP Mexico, UC Berkeley and the World.
PERFORMANCE BASED FINANCING FOR HEALTH IN RWANDA Dr RUSA U. Louis Ministry of Health Kigali-Rwanda Montreux 16th- 19th.
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTIVITY AND EMPLOYMENT. OUTLINE Introduction 1. Summary of issues 2.What is working 3.Looking ahead: Focus on outcomes 4.What makes.
Vision and Goal Vision Option -1 = 6 Option-2=4 Goal Vision -1= 10.
Creating an Enabling Environment for PE/E Interventions 23 February 2011 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Lindsay Morgan 1 Interventions for Impact in Essential Obstetric.
Paulin Basinga Rwanda School of Public Health Christel Vermeersch World Bank A collaboration between the Rwanda Ministry of Health, CNLS, SPH, INSP Mexico,
1 Joint Donor Staff Training Activity Tanzania, June 2002 Partnership for Poverty Reduction Module 4 - Links between PRSP, Sector Programmes and.
From the Ground Up: The Case of Integrating Family Planning and HIV/AIDS Services in Tanzania Integrated Approaches, Local Answers Presenter: Ms. Christine.
Partnership Definition and Principles The imprecise nature of the word "partnership" has created confusion in CARE and other organizations. “Partnering.
HEALTH FINANCING MOH - HPG JAHR UPDATE ON POLICIES Eleventh Party Congress -Increase state investment while simultaneously mobilizing social mobilization.
Selecting performance indicators and setting targets Joseph Naimoli The World Bank October 2008 Presented by Kate Gilroy Institute for International Programs,
Quality improvement and CHW performance: a mixed method research study Dr Lilian Otiso LVCT Health, Kenya 1 Innovating for Maternal and Child Health in.
Overview of Steps to Design and Implement Results Based Financing Schemes Susna De, MSc, MPH Results Based Financing to Reduce Maternal, Newborn, and Child.
Overview of Health Systems Constraints in Developing Countries David Peters November 30, 2005.
Tanzanian German Programme to Support Health Monitoring and Evaluation Susanne Pritze-Aliassime.
Scottish Improvement Science Collaborating Centre Strengthening the evidence base for improvement science: lessons learned Dr Nicola Gray, Senior Lecturer,
IMPLEMENTATION AND PROCESS EVALUATION PBAF 526. Today: Recap last week Next week: Bring in picture with program theory and evaluation questions Partners?
Strengthening Integration between RMNCH and HIV services Nuhu Yaqub WHO Tanzania.
12/06/20161 ObjectiveProcess Risk Inherent Risk – risk of not achieving objectives Inherent risk Inherent risk – before the assessment of any controls.
Definition of indicators Facilitators’ Workshop on District Health Performance Improvement Lilongwe, 25 th – 27 th March 2015.
The Alberta Health Technologies Decision Process: Post Policy Implementation Review Presenter: Sarah Flynn Authors: Dr. Anderson Chuck, Institute of Health.
TB AND HIV: “THE STRATEGIC VISION FOR THE COUNTRY” Dr Lindiwe Mvusi 18 May 2012 MMPA Congress 2012.
Salford’s Market Position Statement
What do we know and don’t know…
Malaria Programmes and Implication on Strengthening the overall Health System Presentation by Dr Maryse Dugué RBM Partnership Secretariat, Malaria Medicines.
Evaluation of Nutrition-Sensitive Programs*
Descriptive Analysis of Performance-Based Financing Education Project in Burundi Victoria Ryan World Bank Group May 16, 2017.
Presenter: Beverly Reynolds, DPM, Health Sector Development
MANAGEMENT, STAFF, NATIONAL COALITION, FINANCIAL RESOURCES,
MANAGEMENT, STAFF, NATIONAL COALITION, FINANCIAL RESOURCES,
Members Meeting Leadership Consortium for a Value & Science-Driven Health System March 21, 2019 Vision  Research  Evidence  Effectiveness  Trials.
Presentation transcript:

Pay for performance initiatives a growing trend, but are they effective? Josephine Borghi London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Ifakara Health Institute

Objective Provide an overview of the challenges in measuring the effectiveness of PBF – PBF refers to a diverse set of interventions – Implementation may not match the ideal ‘vision’ – Need a better understanding of the health system impact of PBF – What kinds of evaluation should we be doing? – What is feasible and politically acceptable?

Performance based financing – A range of applications Based on who is the recipient of the bonus payment – Donor to government (aid modalities) – Within the public sector (facilities or districts / regions) – Government/donor to non-state provider – Health workers Process or outcome indicator/target Payment method and size When we say PBF is effective what do we mean?

Implementation – potential constraints in low income settings Design constraints – Complexity versus simplicity – designing a simple system which is effective? Roll out constraints – Logistics Timely availability of funds Appropriate management of information Training of managers and health workers Monitoring constraints – Need for external validation - costly – Lack of reliable HMIS data

Tanzanian experience – vision versus reality Ideal Vision for P4PActual policy design HMIS strengthened alongside P4P HMIS not strengthened – no baseline Flexibility in way incentives are structured by district No flexibility – single system applied everywhere Financial autonomy at facility level Funds managed at district level Variable targets based on baseline performance Absolute targets irrespective of baseline performance Phased implementation to allow to learn from experience and fine tune policy National roll out in order to ensure rapid impact

PBF: Impact on the Health System? Potential Risks Understanding the processes of change as well as the impact on health outcomes

Potential risks Impact on health worker behaviour – Supplier induced demand – unnecessary service delivery – Quantity over quality – Opportunity cost – focus on targeted conditions Equity effects – Patients: Focus on easy to reach groups – Geographic: areas where health system stronger may have advantage – Health worker migration

Need for improved evaluation design

Key Components of an Evaluation Process Evaluation What is the status of implementation? How does it vary by area? What facilitates and impedes implementation? Impact Evaluation What changes take place that result in the observed impacts? Economic Evaluation What are the ‘positive’ effects of PBF on coverage of health services? Are there any unintended consequences of PBF? Is PBF a good use of resources? Need for qualitative assessment to determine causal pathway What are the health benefits of PBF?

An evaluation framework based on Tanzania

Introduction of PBF Training of key stakeholders and provision of guidelines Bonus payment to Providers Bonus payment to District and Regional stakeholders Positive EffectsNegative Effects Re-allocate resources Improve quality of care / increased patient satisfaction Increased utilisation of targeted health services Reduced maternal and newborn mortality Increased motivation and trust Coercive strategies to increase utilisation Mis-reporting performance Crowding out of non-targeted health services / reduced quality of care Damage intrinsic motivators Recommendations for improved performance

Impact Evaluation Design Options Probability design Plausibility design Adequacy design Randomised Control Strongest evidence of impact Political acceptability Non-randomised Control Interrupted time series Need to control for inherent differences Need good historical data Historical or no control Weakest evidence of impact

Practical challenges and need for innovative thinking Political resistance to controls Randomisation may not be possible – Randomisation of performance contracts (Rwanda) In absence of control or historical data importance of documenting the process

Summary Need for better understanding of which aspects of PBF are effective and pre-conditions for their effectiveness What is implemented may not match what was intended, need for simple and saleable models Some unanswered questions on health system impact Need for process evaluations and more impact evaluations within realm of political feasibility