Logo area Compliance with CERN Safety Rules – Role of CERN Health, Safety & Environment protection (HSE) Unit C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE) International.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EHMA bofcon Bo Frank Consulting June 2005 European requirements and practice in heat metering by Bo Frank EHMA.
Advertisements

Comparison between American and European Pressure Vessel Rules
Standardisation, regulation, worldwide strategies 1 Modules of conformity assessment.
INSTITUTE FOR PRESSURE VESSEL & PLANT TECHNOLOGY VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Harmonized Standards / Materials Josef L. Zeman Vienna University of Technology.
S4: Market Surveillance Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Session 4: Market surveillance Peter Ulbig, Harry Stolz Belgrade, 31 October.
Source: ec.europa.eu/CEmarking CE marking makes Europe’s market yours!
Safety & Safety Documentation 2 3 Safety in three Questions Why ? Providing a safe workplace is a legal and moral obligation on every undertaking, and.
Low Voltage Directive New Approach. Directive Overview Guidelines on application and Recommendations Safety objectives Documentation LVD standardisation.
ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE GENERAL European Commission Anna Solé Mena Policy Officer - European Commission DG Enterprise and Industry.
Manfred Kochsiek Wilfried Schulz Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Braunschweig und Berlin Modernisation of Legal Metrology in Germany.
S3: Module D Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Session 3: Conformity Assessment Module D Peter Ulbig, Harry Stolz Belgrade, 31 October.
Materials Bratislava 11/12/13 April 2005 Presented by Peter Hanmore For the benefit of business and people TAIEX Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive.
U D T Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Warsaw June 2004 INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC SYSTEM OF ENSURING.
Prof R T KennedyEMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING 1 EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING.
Phare SL Implementation of Technical Regulations on Company Level Top Management Seminar Expert: Willem Wolf Chamber of Commerce and Industry,
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Assemblies Intentions and enforcement. Intentions Free movement  CE marking for vessels, accessories and assemblies Well-defined responsibilities  Manufacturer,
1 MARKET SURVEILLANCE IN THE EUROPEAN UNION A coordinate approach for metrology Lucia Palmegiani Policy Officer, DG ENTR I.5 WELMEC, WG 5, Malta, 23 October.
1 REPUBLIC OF TURKEY PRIME MINISTRY UNDERSECRETARIAT OF FOREIGN TRADE General Directorate of Standardization for Foreign Trade Presented by Selin ÖZŞAHİN.
1 PED: equivalent overall level of safety PED Annex 1, clause 7: The following provision apply as a general rule. However, where they are not applied,
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
1 EARLY SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF PROJECTS AND EXPERIMENTS HSE UNIT PH DSO EDMS No
The New Approach and GPSD. Council Resolution of 7 May 1985 on a new approach to technical harmonization and standards [OJ C136 of June 1985] New Approach.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry European Commission The New Legislative Framework - Market Surveillance UNECE “MARS” Group meeting Bratislava,
The Pressure Equipment Directive and Innovation Guy BAYLAC Technical Advisor of EPERC TP European Commission/TAIEX PED Worshop in.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
National Legislation on in- service inspections and the PED.
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Training on standardisation Support to the Modernisation.
PED and Swedish regulations
PED Workshop, Bratislava April 2005 PED and Presumption of Conformity Product Standards for pressure vessels, boilers and piping, and “Horizontal” standards.
06/02/20161 Benny Hoff TÜV NORD Sweden AB AFS 2005:2 Installations.
The New Legislative Framework
Prof R T KennedyEMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING 1 EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING.
HL-LHC Standards and Best Practices Workshop (11-13 June 2014)
Prof R T KennedyEMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING 1 EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING.
Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform conditions for periodical technical inspections of wheeled vehicles and the reciprocal recognition of such.
C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements Technical.
CE Marking as Related to CPR Regulation (EU) No 305/2011
Workshop on Accreditation of Bodies Certifying Medical Devices Kiev, November 2014.
CLAUDIA PANAIT TAIEX Expert – European Commission Legal Adviser Ministry of Health, ROMANIA.
Logo area 11 T Review: Safety and Codes Thomas Otto HL-LHC Project Safety Officer With contributions by -Frédéric Savary, Hervé Prin, TE-MSC -Carlos Arregui,
Prof R T KennedyEMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING 1 EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING.
1 Pressure equipment directive 97/23/EC PED. 2 Scope of validity  design  manufacture  conformity assessment of pressure equipment and assembly with.
Logo area MQXF Review: Safety Thomas Otto HL-LHC Project Safety Officer With contributions by -Paolo Ferrcin and Ezio Todesco, TE-MSC -Francesca Viggiano,
Logo area MQXF Review: Safety Thomas Otto HL-LHC Project Safety Officer International Review of the Inner Triplet Quadrupoles (MQXF) for HL-LHC.
Cryogenic safety organisation at CERN
Crab Cavity Technical Coordination meeting:
EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING
Strategy for conformity of non-standard cryogenic equipment
HSE rules & regulations
EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING
EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING
Third Party Activities for FH1 Project
Thomas Otto, TE Department, CERN
Training on standardisation
Harmonized Standards / Materials Josef L
Pressure Equipment Workshop September 2007 – Day 1
Assemblies Intentions and enforcement
For the benefit of business and people
ESS approach and support for Declaration of Conformity (CE-marking) Fredrik Håkansson 9th SRF ESS
Mattias Skafar Head of Quality Division
Quality Regulation for Mechanical Equipment RESSQ – Mech
ESS approach and support for Declaration of Conformity (CE-marking) Fredrik Håkansson 9th SRF ESS
INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC
Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Riga,
Pressure Equipment (PED):
Pressure Equipment (PED) --- Baltic Pressure Equipment Workshop
National Legislation in the Pressure Sector and the PED
General principles of the New Approach legislation
Presentation transcript:

logo area Compliance with CERN Safety Rules – Role of CERN Health, Safety & Environment protection (HSE) Unit C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE) International Review of the Inner Triplet Quadrupoles (MQXF) for HL-LHC 9 th June 2016

logo area Contents C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE), MQXF Review  Safety at CERN  CERN Mechanical Safety Rules  Pressure Equipment Directive (PED)  Launch Safety Agreement (LSA)  Application of CERN Mechanical Safety Rules  Conformity assessment by HSE  Conclusions

logo area Safety at CERN C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE), MQXF Review  CERN Safety Policy  Objectives: “ to ensure the best possible protection in health and safety matters of all persons participating in the Organization’s activities or present on its site […]”  Means: “the Organization establishes and updates Safety Rules and ensures compliance therewith”.  HSE Unit shall:  Support and monitor the implementation of the CERN Safety Policy, the CERN Safety Rules, the CERN Safety Objectives and best practices at all levels;  Grant Safety clearance for installations, activities, projects and CERN Experiments with major Safety implications.

logo area CERN Mechanical Safety Rules C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE), MQXF Review  Purpose of the rules  To define the minimum Safety requirements applying to mechanical equipment used or intended for use at CERN. Applicable to all stages of the equipment’s life cycle, from design to decommissioning.  Takes into account:  Laws and regulations of the Host States;  EU regulations and directives;  International regulations, standards and directives.  Scope  Mechanical equipment: lifting, pressure equipment, cryogenic equipment, lifts.

logo area Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE), MQXF Review  European Directive: legislative act that sets out a goal that all EU countries must achieve.  Goal of PED: to guarantee free movement of pressure equipment products in the EU internal market while ensuring a high level of safety.  Scope: pressure equipment with a maximum allowable pressure PS* > 0.5 barg  Vessels;  Piping;  Pressure accessories;  Safety accessories;  Assemblies. (*PS = Maximum allowable pressure)

logo area Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE), MQXF Review  Essential Safety Requirements - pressure equipment must be:  And they qualitatively cover: Designed Manufactured Checked Equipped and installed (if applicable) Put into service as per manufacturer’s instructions Other foreseeable conditions (including potential misuse) As to ensure its safety when Design Adequate strength Appropriate Safety factors Calculation/experimental method Provisions for safe handling/operation Safety accessories against overpressure Manufacturing WPS and welding personnel to be approved by NoBo or recognized third party NDT Operating instructions Final proof test (normally hydrostatic, other tests allowed with additional measures, such as NDT) Materials Appropriate properties Covered by EN, EAM or PMA Compulsory declaration from material supplier affirming compliance with a specification. Traceability of material from receipt of material through final testing

logo area Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE), MQXF Review  Essential Safety Requirements - few quantitative requirements though:  Allowable stresses:  Joint coefficients: 0.7, 0.85 or 1 depending of extent of NDT;  Momentary pressure surge allowed: 110% of PS;  Hydrostatic test pressure: 1,43 x PS. MaterialPermissible general membrane stress Austenitic steel A > 30%2/3 of R e/t A > 35%Min [5/6 of R e/t ; 1/3 of R m/t ] Aluminium alloysMin [2/3 R e/t ; 5/12 R m/20 ]

logo area Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE), MQXF Review  Classification of equipment: 4 categories (I-IV) + Sound Engineering Practice.  Classification related to perceived level of hazard. 3 elements to take into account:  Type of fluid: hazardous (group 1) or other (group 2);  State of fluid: gas or liquid;  Features of vessel: PS, Volume or DN. e.g. Table 2 Vessels Group 2 gas

logo area Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE), MQXF Review  Conformity assessment  Conformity assessment modules: Higher the category, more demanding requirements (increase of supervision from Notified body over the whole fabrication process).  Notified bodies  Organizations appointed by EU states to assess conformity of a product to the ESRs before being put in the market.  Categories II-IV require having conformity assessed by external independent Notified bodies.  CE marking  Affixed to equipment by the manufacturer.  Statement that the equipment meets requirements of all relevant Directives – Declaration of conformity.  Permitted only after Notified body attests full conformity to the Directive(s).

logo area Launch Safety Agreement (LSA) C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE), MQXF Review  Launch Safety Agreement (LSA):  Agreement between HSE and the project for the compliance with CERN Safety rules;  Not only for pressure equipment, but other domains too, i.e. fire safety, electrical safety, environment protection, etc.).  Terms of compliance defined in LSA:  Definition of Safety requirements as per CERN Safety Rules;  Classification as equipment liable to have ‘major Safety implications’ (mSi).

logo area Application of CERN Mechanical Safety Rules C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE), MQXF Review  Baseline approach for pressure equipment  Compliance with Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) 97/23/EC.  CE marking.  Exceptions to the baseline approach:  Foreseen by the rules – equipment liable to have ‘major Safety implications’;  mSi equipment requires Safety clearance from HSE;  HSE defines the Safety requirements that need to be met for the Safety clearance;  HSE performs conformity assessment.

logo area Conformity assessment by HSE C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE), MQXF Review  Requirements for HSE Safety clearance:  Compliance with applicable Essential Safety Requirements from PED compulsory.  Use of harmonized European standards wherever applicable (presumption of conformity) for design, manufacturing and testing.  EN – Unfired pressure vessels;  EN – Cryogenic vessels – static vacuum-insulated vessels;  EN 13648, ISO 4126 – Cryogenic safety devices;  EN – Flat products made of steels for pressure purposes;  …

logo area Conformity assessment by HSE C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE), MQXF Review  Requirements for HSE Safety clearance:  Where foreign standards may be used provided compliance with ESRs is fully demonstrated.  Eventual non-compliances to be assessed individually. The project shall propose compensatory measures to ensure commensurate level of Safety.  Assessment of conformity to the ESRs may be carried out by HSE acting as an ‘independent’ party.  Provided Safety requirements are met and Safety clearance is achieved, CE marking is not compulsory as per the Safety Rules.  HSE acts as de facto Notified body; involvement of external Notified body not required.

logo area Conformity assessment by HSE C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE), MQXF Review  Design examination  HSE will validate the design of the equipment prior to the commencement of fabrication;  Manufacturer must produce technical documentation as to enable an assessment of the conformity of the equipment with the ESRs.  Production quality assurance  HSE and project to agree on the Inspection and Test Plan, including Safety relevant Hold Points;  Manufacturer to provide quality records for the manufacturing part of the QA system, such as inspection reports and test data, qualifications of personnel concerned, etc.;  Documentation to ensure full traceability of components and processes.

logo area Conclusions C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE), MQXF Review  CERN sets out Safety objectives for the Organization, HSE supports CERN in the attainment of said objectives.  Pressure equipment at CERN must respect the ESRs of the PED.  European standards to be implemented wherever possible. Alternative foreign standards may be accepted provided full compliance with ESRs is demonstrated.  Non-compliances to be dealt with on a case-by-case basis. Compensatory measures may be required.  Safety clearance from HSE required for mSi equipment. HSE defines Safety clearance requirements and assesses conformity.  HSE becomes the de facto Notified body.  Provided that HSE grants Safety clearance, exemption from CE marking is permitted.

logo area Thank you for your attention C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE), MQXF Review CERN HSE website: hse.cernhse.cern CERN Safety Rules: regulations/en/rules/byType/Pages/home.aspxhttps://espace.cern.ch/safety-rules- regulations/en/rules/byType/Pages/home.aspx