Measuring Progress and Planning Learning William E. Dugger, Jr. Shelli D. Meade.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Understanding by Design Stage 3
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
PORTFOLIO.
Professional Development Standards William E. Dugger, Jr., DTE Shelli Meade Lisa Delany.
Student Assessment Standards
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
It defines acceptable evidence of student’s attainment of desired results. It determines authentic performance tasks that the student is expected to do.
Lecturette 1: Culturally Responsive Progress Monitoring: Universally Designed Classroom Assessment.
Consistency of Assessment
Leadership Role in Creating an Effective Mathematics Classroom.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Aligning Curriculum Standards, Instructional Practices and Assessment.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Baldwin-Whitehall School District
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Assessment in the early years © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.
Principles of Assessment
Session Materials  Wiki
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Developing Professionals: Preparing Technology Teachers Developing Professionals: Preparing Technology Teachers ITEA Standards Specialist and CATTS Meeting.
Best Teaching Practices. Technology Important for success in education Kindergarten through high school Electronic tools to enhance learning Information.
Presented by: Joseph Ginotti PLN Director
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
Session 2: Are We There Yet? Integrating Understanding by Design and Historical Thinking.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
William E. Dugger, Jr., DTE Shelli Meade Lisa Delany The Complete Picture STL and AETL.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Professional Certification Professional Certification October 11, 2007 Standard: Effective Teaching Criteria 1(b) Using a variety of assessment strategies.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Supports K–12 School Effectiveness Framework: A Support for School Improvement and Student Success (2010). The integrated process of assessment and instruction.
Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Helen Timperley, Aaron Wilson and Heather Barrar Learning Languages March 2008.
Fourth session of the NEPBE II in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 25th, 2013 Assessment Instruments.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Summary of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and NCATE's Educational Computing and Technology facilitation Standards for K-12.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Session 1 Introduction: Assessment & Evaluation Assessment & Evaluation.
Standards-Based Education
Michael Bohannan National University Domain B: ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING.
The School Effectiveness Framework
+ Literature Review: Domain B Authors: Nancy Safer & Steve Fleischman Title: How Schools Improve, “Research Matters / How Student Progress Monitoring Improves.
CAPS: COACHING TEACHERS Facilitator: Dr. Lynne Paradis BELIZE LITERACY PROGRAM June 2011.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Incorporating Instructional Design into Library Instruction Classes NEFLIN Live Online July 7, 2011.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
Realizing Excellence: Structuring Technology Programs Realizing Excellence: Structuring Technology Programs ITEA Standards Specialist and CATTS Meeting.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
William E. Dugger, Jr. Shelli D. Meade
Understanding by Design
William E. Dugger, Jr. Shelli D. Meade
Presentation transcript:

Measuring Progress and Planning Learning William E. Dugger, Jr. Shelli D. Meade

Measuring Progress and Planning Learning

Measuring Progress AETL contains 3 sets of technological literacy standards: Student Assessment Standards (Chapter 3) Professional Development Standards (Chapter 4) Program Standards (Chapter 5) Serves as a companion to the standards in STL.

A-1.Assessment of student learning will be consistent with STL. A-1.Assessment of student learning will be consistent with STL. A-2.Assessment of student learning will be explicitly matched to the intended purpose. A-2.Assessment of student learning will be explicitly matched to the intended purpose. A-3.Assessment of student learning will be systematic and derived from research- based assessment principles. A-3.Assessment of student learning will be systematic and derived from research- based assessment principles. A-4.Assessment of student learning will reflect practical contexts consistent with the nature of technology. A-4.Assessment of student learning will reflect practical contexts consistent with the nature of technology. A-5.Assessment of student learning will incorporate data collection for accountability, professional development, and program enhancement. A-5.Assessment of student learning will incorporate data collection for accountability, professional development, and program enhancement.

Planning Learning There are no technological literacy standards for curriculum development per se.

Measuring Progress and Planning Learning

Front Matter Table of Contents Preface Listing of Publications in ITEA Professional Series

MPPL Section 1 Rationale for technological literacy Rationale for technological literacy Standards for technological literacy Standards for technological literacy The big picture perspective The big picture perspective Section 1 Role and definition of curricula Role and definition of curricula Standards for technological literacy Standards for technological literacy The big picture perspective The big picture perspective

MPPL Section 1 Continued Planning Framework Planning Framework Standards-Based vs. Standards-Reflected Standards-Based vs. Standards-Reflected Sharing the Vision Sharing the Vision Section 1 Continued Developing Effective Curricula Developing Effective Curricula Section 2 Standards-Based vs. Standards-Reflected Standards-Based vs. Standards-Reflected Planning Framework Planning Framework Revising Existing Curricula Revising Existing Curricula

Presentation of Standards-Based Versus Standards-Reflected MPPL See p. 7 See pp. 11 & 12

MPPL Section 2 An Approach to Standards-Based Student Assessment Section 3 Standards-Based Curriculum Development or Revision

Measuring Progress Student Assessment: The systematic, multi-step process of collecting evidence on student learning, understanding, and abilities and using that information to inform instruction and provide feedback to the learner, thereby enhancing learning.

All Addenda Guides Assessment vs. Evaluation The term “assessment” is used when referring to the collection of data on the knowledge and abilities of individual students for use in improving the teaching and learning process. The term “assessment” is used when referring to the collection of data on the knowledge and abilities of individual students for use in improving the teaching and learning process. The term “evaluation” refers to the collection and processing of information and data to determine how well a design meets the requirements and to provide direction for improvement. The term “evaluation” refers to the collection and processing of information and data to determine how well a design meets the requirements and to provide direction for improvement.

Purposes of Assessment 1. Assessment to assist learning. 2. Assessment of individual achievement. 3. Assessment to evaluate programs. (NRC, 2000)

Goals of Student Assessment Monitor student progress. Monitor student progress. Enhance teaching and learning. Enhance teaching and learning.

Planning Learning Curriculum/Curricula: Specification of the way content is delivered, including the structure, organization, balance, and presentation of content in the laboratory- classroom.

The Big Picture

Planning Learning p. 6

Planning Learning Appendix D: Where are We Now?

MPPL Section 2 An Approach to Standards-Based Student Assessment Section 3 Standards-Based Curriculum Development or Revision

Waste no more time talking about great souls and how they should be. Become one yourself! Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Roman Emperor, A.D (121 AD AD)

Measuring Progress Section 2 An Approach to Standards-Based Student Assessment

Measuring Progress Step 1: Select Content Standards, Then Identify Benchmarks STL standards STL standards –The Nature of Technology –Technology and Society –Design –Abilities for a Technological World –The Designed World Other content area standards Other content area standards

Measuring Progress Step 2: Extract and Organize Content STL Standard 2, Benchmark N: Systems thinking involves considering how every part relates to others STL Standard 2, Benchmark N: Systems thinking involves considering how every part relates to others STL Standard 17, Benchmark L: Information and communication technologies include the inputs, processes, and outputs associated with sending and receiving information. STL Standard 17, Benchmark L: Information and communication technologies include the inputs, processes, and outputs associated with sending and receiving information.

Measuring Progress Step 3: Define Assessment Criteria Assessment criteria are the expectations of student learning that are used for collecting information on student learning. Assessment criteria are the expectations of student learning that are used for collecting information on student learning. Define what a student should “look like” and can be measured and/or observed. Define what a student should “look like” and can be measured and/or observed.

Measuring Progress Section 3 Student Assessment Tools and Methods

Measuring Progress Step 4: Select and Use Assessment Tools and/or Methods Use a variety of assessment tools and methods to collect evidence of student learning. Use a variety of assessment tools and methods to collect evidence of student learning. The use of any single assessment practice is not adequate. The use of any single assessment practice is not adequate.

Measuring Progress Selected Assessment Tools/Methods Concept Mapping Concept Mapping Debate Debate Demonstration/ Presentation Demonstration/ Presentation Discussion/Interview Discussion/Interview Journal/Log Journal/Log Modeling/Prototyping Modeling/Prototyping Multiple-Choice Test Multiple-Choice Test Observation Observation Open-ended Questioning Open-ended Questioning Portfolio Portfolio Project Project

MP (p. 11) PL (p. 15)

Planning Learning Section 2 (p. 17) Revising Existing Curricula

Planning Learning Section 3 (p. 22) Appendices E and F only take the user through Steps 1-5 of the approach. Steps 6 and 7 are crucial to the ongoing nature of curriculum development and must not be forgotten in the process. Step 6:Evaluate Curriculum Step 7:Make Use of Evaluation Results

Planning Learning Section 3 (p. 22) While the approach presents seven steps, experienced teachers and other curriculum developers know that organizing curricula does not always occur in a linear fashion. As users of the approach become comfortable developing standards-based curricula, they will revisit and re-examine steps to help thoroughly link curricula to technological literacy standards.

Planning Learning Section 3 (p. 23) A unit is an organized series of lessons that focuses on a specific topic and typically lasts from a few days to a few weeks. A lesson defines individual learning activities, lectures, projects, and other teaching strategies for delivering content day-by-day in the laboratory-classroom.

Backwards Design Backwards Design (modified) Identify desired results Identify desired results –Consider what you want the students to know and be able to do. –Align with Standards/Benchmarks –Frame in terms of questions. Determine acceptable evidence Determine acceptable evidence –Use a variety of assessments to determine if students’ knowledge and abilities meet the desired results. Plan learning experiences and instruction Plan learning experiences and instruction –Demonstrate understanding through performance –Develop / List major units / lesson / activities Identify Desired Results Identify Desired Results –Standards / Benchmarks Determine acceptable evidence (General) Determine acceptable evidence (General) Plan Learning Experiences and instruction Plan Learning Experiences and instruction –Unit Outlines –Lesson Plans –Activities Enrichment (adding other appropriate standards / benchmarks) Enrichment (adding other appropriate standards / benchmarks) Determine acceptable evidence (Specific) Determine acceptable evidence (Specific) Evaluation of curriculum and continual refinement Evaluation of curriculum and continual refinement Steve Shumway

Evaluation Neither MP nor PL present a process for evaluation. MP Section 4 Principles of Principles ofAssessment MP Section 5 Applying Assessment Data and Evaluating Assessment PL Section 4 Principles of Evaluation Process of Curriculum Evaluation

Measuring Progress: Section 4 Principles of Student Assessment Utilizes fair and equitable methods. Utilizes fair and equitable methods. Establishes valid and reliable measurements. Establishes valid and reliable measurements. Reflects current research. Reflects current research. Incorporates formative and summative assessment. Incorporates formative and summative assessment. Enhances student learning. Enhances student learning. Allows for student commonality and diversity. Allows for student commonality and diversity. Includes students in the process. Includes students in the process. Reflects current technological content. Reflects current technological content. Utilizes authentic assessment. Utilizes authentic assessment.

Student assessment is an integral part of teaching and learning, and assessment results improve the teaching and learning process for all students.

Measuring Progress: Section 5 Applying Assessment Data and Evaluating Assessment Assessment results are used to: Assessment results are used to: –Improve teaching and learning. –Assign grades. –Monitor progress. –Identify levels of technological literacy. –Determine instructional effectiveness. –Communicate results. –Market and promote technological study. –Guide professional development decisions. –Guide program enhancement decisions.

Planning Learning: Section 4 Evaluating Curricula Topics Addressed: Evaluation Versus Assessment Evaluation Versus Assessment Principles of Evaluation Principles of Evaluation Approaching Curriculum Evaluation Approaching Curriculum Evaluation

Planning Learning: Section 5 Impacting Student Learning Topics Addressed: Curriculum Adoption Curriculum Adoption Education for Teachers and Other Curriculum Developers Education for Teachers and Other Curriculum Developers State/Provincial/Regional Leadership State/Provincial/Regional Leadership Support and Advocacy for Technological Literacy Support and Advocacy for Technological Literacy Call to Action Call to Action

“Improvements in learning will depend on how well assessment, curriculum, and instruction are aligned and reinforce a common set of learning goals, and on whether instruction shifts in response to the information gained from assessments.” NRC, 2001, p. 25