L.R. Baylor 1, N. Commaux 1, T.C. Jernigan 1, S.J. Meitner 1, N. H. Brooks 2, S. K. Combs 1, T.E. Evans 2, M. E. Fenstermacher 3, R. C. Isler 1, C. J.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASIPP Characteristics of edge localized modes in the superconducting tokamak EAST M. Jiang Institute of Plasma Physics Chinese Academy of Sciences The.
Advertisements

A. Kirk, 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu, China, October 2006 Evolution of the pedestal on MAST and the implications for ELM power loadings.
Jul LRB L.R. Baylor, T.C. Jernigan, N. Commaux, P.Parks, M. Fenstermacher, T. Osborne, S. K. Combs, C. R. Foust, M. Hansink, B. Williams 14 th ITPA.
Toroidally resolved measurements of ELMs in RMP and non-RMP H-mode discharges on DIII-D M.W. Jakubowski 1, T.E. Evans 3, C.J. Lasnier 4, O. Schmitz 2,
A. Kirk, 20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Vilamoura, Portugal, 2004 The structure of ELMS and the distribution of transient power loads in MAST Presented.
1 J-W. Ahn a H.S. Han b, H.S. Kim c, J.S. Ko b, J.H. Lee d, J.G. Bak b, C.S. Chang e, D.L. Hillis a, Y.M. Jeon b, J.G. Kwak b, J.H. Lee b, Y. S. Na c,
Nonlinear Simulations of ELMs with NIMROD D.P. Brennan Massachussetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA S.E. Kruger Tech-X Corp, Boulder, CO A. Pankin,
R Sartori - page 1 20 th IAEA Conference – Vilamoura Scaling Studies of ELMy H-modes global and pedestal confinement at high triangularity in JET R Sartori.
V. A. SOUKHANOVSKII, POSTER EX/P4-22, 22 ND IAEA FEC, OCTOBER 2008, GENEVA, SWITZERLAND 1 of 22 Divertor Heat Flux Mitigation in High- Performance.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
Energy loss for grassy ELMs and effects of plasma rotation on the ELM characteristics in JT-60U N. Oyama 1), Y. Sakamoto 1), M. Takechi 1), A. Isayama.
11 th European Fusion Physics Conference, Aix-en-Provence, France, Samuli Saarelma, Edge stability in tokamak plasmas Edge stability in tokamak.
A. HerrmannITPA - Toronto /19 Filaments in the SOL and their impact to the first wall EURATOM - IPP Association, Garching, Germany A. Herrmann,
Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.
M.E. Fenstermacher - Summary of Progress and Outlook for Work Plan in PEP ITPA WG on RMP ELM Control 4/23/09 11:15 PM 1 PEP ITPA Working Group on RMP ELM.
H. Urano, H. Takenaga, T. Fujita, Y. Kamada, K. Kamiya, Y. Koide, N. Oyama, M. Yoshida and the JT-60 Team Japan Atomic Energy Agency JT-60U Tokamak: p.
SIMULATION OF A HIGH-  DISRUPTION IN DIII-D SHOT #87009 S. E. Kruger and D. D. Schnack Science Applications International Corp. San Diego, CA USA.
6 th Japan-Korea Workshop on Theory and Simulation of Magnetic Fusion Plasmas Hyunsun Han, G. Park, Sumin Yi, and J.Y. Kim 3D MHD SIMULATIONS.
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgements: M. G. Bell 2, R. Kaita 2, H. W. Kugel 2, R. Raman 3, A. L. Roquemore 2 1 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
Edge Localized Modes propagation and fluctuations in the JET SOL region presented by Bruno Gonçalves EURATOM/IST, Portugal.
V. A. Soukhanovskii NSTX Team XP Review 31 January 2006 Princeton, NJ Supported by Office of Science Divertor heat flux reduction and detachment in lower.
V. A. Soukhanovskii 1 Acknowledgement s: R. Maingi 2, D. A. Gates 3, J. Menard 3, R. Raman 4, R. E. Bell 3, C. E. Bush 2, R. Kaita 3, H. W. Kugel 3, B.
1 Results and analysis of Gas Puff Imaging experiments in NSTX: turbulence, L-H transitions, ELMs and other phenomena R.J. Maqueda Nova Photonics S.J.
High  p experiments in JET and access to Type II/grassy ELMs G Saibene and JET TF S1 and TF S2 contributors Special thanks to to Drs Y Kamada and N Oyama.
N. Fedorczak O-26 PSI 2010 San Diego 1 Nicolas Fedorczak Poloidal mapping of turbulent transport in SOL plasmas. G. Bonhomme,
1 Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik 10th ITPA meeting on SOL/Divertor Physics, 8/1/08, Avila ELM resolved measurements of W sputtering MPI für Plasmaphysik.
Advances In High Harmonic Fast Wave Heating of NSTX H-mode Plasmas P. M. Ryan, J-W Ahn, G. Chen, D. L. Green, E. F. Jaeger, R. Maingi, J. B. Wilgen - Oak.
Supported by Imaging the Pedestal Island Structure during the Application of 3D Magnetic Perturbations Office of Science D.J. Battaglia 1*, M.W. Shafer.
MHD Suppression with Modulated LHW on HT-7 Superconducting Tokamak* Support by National Natural Science Fund of China No J.S.Mao, J.R.Luo, B.Shen,
R. A. Pitts et al. 1 (12) IAEA, Chengdu Oct ELM transport in the JET scrape-off layer R. A. Pitts, P. Andrew, G. Arnoux, T.Eich, W. Fundamenski,
Transport in three-dimensional magnetic field: examples from JT-60U and LHD Katsumi Ida and LHD experiment group and JT-60 group 14th IEA-RFP Workshop.
1 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Influence of Equilibrium Shear Flow on Peeling-Ballooning Instability and ELM Crash Pengwei Xi 1,2, Xueqiao Xu.
ASIPP HT-7 The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by impurity injection The effect of alleviating the heat load of the first wall by.
Kansas Annual NSF EPSCoR Statewide Conference Wichita, KSJanuary 12-13, 2012 Simulation of pellet ablation in DIII-D Tianshi Lu Patrick Rinker Department.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Task Force S1 J.Ongena 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon Towards the realization on JET of an.
STUDIES OF NONLINEAR RESISTIVE AND EXTENDED MHD IN ADVANCED TOKAMAKS USING THE NIMROD CODE D. D. Schnack*, T. A. Gianakon**, S. E. Kruger*, and A. Tarditi*
R. Wenninger 1 (35) Sat. Workshop to EPS on Fuelling 16 th June 2008 Status of ELM trigger investigations on JET and AUG R. Wenninger IPP Garching, EFDA.
5.5 inch 8 inch 6 inch V = m/s Freq = Hz Independent Control:
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
Gas Jet Disruption Mitigation Studies on Alcator C-Mod and DIII-D R.S. Granetz 1, E.M. Hollmann 2, D.G. Whyte 1, V.A. Izzo 1, G.Y. Antar 2, A. Bader 1,
Improved performance in long-pulse ELMy H-mode plasmas with internal transport barrier in JT-60U N. Oyama, A. Isayama, T. Suzuki, Y. Koide, H. Takenaga,
ELM propagation in Low- and High-field-side SOLs on JT-60U Nobuyuki Asakura 1) N.Ohno 2), H.Kawashima 1), H.Miyoshi 3), G.Matsunaga 1), N.Oyama 1), S.Takamura.
Integrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss Determined by Pedestal MHD and SOL Transport N. Hayashi, T. Takizuka, T. Ozeki, N. Aiba, N. Oyama JAEA Naka TH/4-2.
Dependence of Pedestal Structure on Ip and Bt A. Diallo, R. Maingi, S. Zweben, B.P. LeBlanc, B. Stratton, J. Menard, S. Gerhardt, J. Canick, A. McClean,
Enhancement of edge stability with lithium wall coatings in NSTX Rajesh Maingi, Oak Ridge National Lab R.E. Bell, B.P. LeBlanc, R. Kaita, H.W. Kugel, J.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
LI et al. 1 G.Q. Li 1, X.Z. Gong 1, A.M. Garofalo 2, L.L. Lao 2, O. Meneghini 2, P.B. Snyder 2, Q.L. Ren 1, S.Y. Ding 1, W.F. Guo 1, J.P. Qian 1, B.N.
ELM propagation and fluctuations characteristics in H- and L-mode SOL plasmas on JT-60U Nobuyuki Asakura 1) N.Ohno 2), H.Kawashima 1), H.Miyoshi 3), G.Matsunaga.
Fast response of the divertor plasma and PWI at ELMs in JT-60U 1. Temporal evolutions of electron temperature, density and carbon flux at ELMs (outer divertor)
Page 1 Alberto Loarte- NSTX Research Forum st - 3 rd December 2009  ELM control by RMP is foreseen in ITER to suppress or reduce size of ELM energy.
Helically Symmetry Configuration Evidence for Alfvénic Fluctuations in Quasi-Helically Symmetric HSX Plasmas C. Deng and D.L. Brower, University of California,
Scaling experiments of perturbative impurity transport in NSTX D. Stutman, M. Finkenthal Johns Hopkins University J. Menard, E. Synakowski, B. Leblanc,R.
1 ASIPP Sawtooth Stabilization by Barely Trapped Energetic Electrons Produced by ECRH Zhou Deng, Wang Shaojie, Zhang Cheng Institute of Plasma Physics,
Pedestal Characterization and Stability of Small-ELM Regimes in NSTX* A. Sontag 1, J. Canik 1, R. Maingi 1, J. Manickam 2, P. Snyder 3, R. Bell 2, S. Gerhardt.
1 Estimating the upper wall loading in ITER Peter Stangeby with help from J Boedo 1, D Rudikov 1, A Leonard 1 and W Fundamenski 2 DIII-D 1 JET 2 10 th.
G. Matsunaga 1), M. Okabayashi 2), N. Aiba 1), J. A. Boedo 3), J. R. Ferron 4), J. M. Hanson 5), G. Z. Hao 6), W. W. Heidbrink 7), C. T. Holcomb 8), Y.
1 V.A. Soukhanovskii/IAEA-FEC/Oct Developing Physics Basis for the Radiative Snowflake Divertor at DIII-D by V.A. Soukhanovskii 1, with S.L. Allen.
L.R. Baylor1, T.C. Jernigan1, N. Commaux1, S. K. Combs1,
Features of Divertor Plasmas in W7-AS
Non-linear MHD simulations for ITER
24th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference – IAEA CN-197
Andrew Kirk on behalf of
Pellet injection in ITER Model description Model validation
Reduction of ELM energy loss by pellet injection for ELM pacing
L-H power threshold and ELM control techniques: experiments on MAST and JET Carlos Hidalgo EURATOM-CIEMAT Acknowledgments to: A. Kirk (MAST) European.
Progress on the application of ELM control schemes to ITER scenarios from the non-active phase to DT operation Alberto Loarte G. Huijsmans, S. Futatani,
Max-Planck Institut für Plasmaphysik Garching
New Results for Plasma and Coil Configuration Studies
No ELM, Small ELM and Large ELM Strawman Scenarios
Presentation transcript:

L.R. Baylor 1, N. Commaux 1, T.C. Jernigan 1, S.J. Meitner 1, N. H. Brooks 2, S. K. Combs 1, T.E. Evans 2, M. E. Fenstermacher 3, R. C. Isler 1, C. J. Lasnier 3, R.A. Moyer 4, T. H. Osborne 2, P.B. Parks 2, P.B. Snyder 2, E.J. Strait 2, E.A. Unterberg 1, A. Loarte 5 1 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA 2 General Atomics, San Diego, CA, USA 3 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA 4 University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA 5 ITER Organization, Cadarache, France Demonstration of ELM Pacing by Pellet Injection on DIII-D and Implications for ITER Presented at the 24 th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference San Diego, CA 11-Oct-2012 LB/IAEA/Oct12 1

D 2 pellets injected in ITER configuration 12x increase in f ELM with 12x reduction in ELM  W H factor maintained Impurities greatly reduced DIII-D has Demonstrated Viability of Pellet ELM Pacing Mitigation for ITER Talk to cover motivation, pellet technology, and physics results. Pellets 0 2 LB/IAEA/Oct12

ITER ELM size needs to be < 0.7 MJ for low erosion Implying ELM triggering is needed > 30Hz if f ELM *  W = Const (>30x increase in natural ELM frequency) ELM Erosion of the Divertor is an Important Issue for ITER [A. Loarte, et al., IAEA 2010 and ITR/1-2 this conference ] No Erosion Some Erosion Significant Erosion 50 Shots Significant Erosion 10 Shots  Can pellets be used to trigger frequent ELMs on-demand to reduce  W? [Zhitlukhin et al., JNM, 2007] LB/IAEA/Oct12

New ITER like LFS X-point injection line installed on DIII-D. All 1.3mm pellets from X- point and Midplane reliably trigger ELMs – no fueling. HFS 1.3mm pellets trigger ELMs, but provide fueling. DIII-D Pellet ELM Pacing Experiment Performed with D 2 Pellets Injected from Low Field Side Midplane and X-point D3DPI 1.3mm pellets ~ m/s (2 mbar-L, 1x10 20 atoms per pellet) ORNL 3 barrel injector 20 Hz per gun X-pt HFS Mid 4 New ITER like X-point Injection line added in 2011 LFS Pellet Guide Tube x3 ITER [S. Maruyama, ITR/P5-24] LB/IAEA/Oct12

ELMs Triggered On-demand by 60 Hz Pellets at 12x the Natural ELM Frequency LB/IAEA/Oct12 ITER shape,  N ~1.8, q 95 =3.4

ELMs Triggered On-demand by 60 Hz Pellets at 12x the Natural ELM Frequency Pellets ITER shape,  N ~1.8, q 95 =3.4 ELM Pacing demonstrated 12x the natural ELM rate. 60 Hz 1.3mm pellets injected from LFS mid (20 Hz), X-pt (40Hz) at m/s. Much lower energy loss ELMs observed with the pellets. Negligible fueling and reduction in H-factor observed. Reduced Ni in the plasma core with high rep rate pellets, f ELM *  E > 15. LB/IAEA/Oct12

X-pt Ave Mid Ave Divertor Heat Load from Pellet Triggered ELMs is Significantly Smaller than Natural ELMs 12x Increase in ELM Frequency Results in >12x Decrease in Energy Deposited in the Divertor x12 Natural Ave 7 The energy deposited (log scale) in the divertor from the IR camera data is significantly lower than the 5 Hz natural ELM case. LB/IAEA/Oct12

Mid 20Hz X-pt 20Hz The energy deposited (log scale) in the divertor from the IR camera data is significantly lower than the 5 Hz natural ELM case. The energy distribution spread is somewhat larger for the X-pt pellets.  Wtot_IR (kJ)  of ELMs X-pt Ave Mid Ave x12 Natural Ave 8 Divertor Heat Load from Pellet Triggered ELMs is Significantly Smaller than Natural ELMs LB/IAEA/Oct12

 W_IR (kJ) Pellet Frequency (Hz) Natural Pellet Divertor Heat Deposition per ELM Decreases as the Pellet Frequency Increases 9 f ELM *  W= Const The average energy deposited in the divertor per ELM decreases with increased pellet frequency. LB/IAEA/Oct12

 W_IR (kJ) Pellet Frequency (Hz) Natural Pellet Outer Inner Peak_IR (W/cm 2 ) Pellet Natural Pellet Frequency (Hz) f ELM *  W= Const The average energy deposited in the divertor per ELM decreases with increased pellet frequency. The peak heat flux in the outer divertor is greater than the inner divertor. − The IR camera data is integrated assuming axisymmetric deposition Divertor Heat Deposition per ELM Decreases as the Pellet Frequency Increases f ELM * q peak = Const 10 LB/IAEA/Oct12

Reduction of Impurities Observed with Pellet ELM Pacing – A Function of the Pellet Frequency Reduced high-Z and lower Z impurities during pellet ELM pacing. STRAHL calculations indicate a reduced Ni density explains reduced emission. Higher frequency pellets reduce impurity levels. Impurities and natural ELMs return within  E. Ni 26 Intensity Plasma Center O VIII Intensity Plasma Edge Divertor D  Inner Strike Point No Pellets 60 Hz Pellets 20 Hz Pellets 40 Hz Pellets Time (s) LB/IAEA/Oct12

All Impurities are Reduced with Pellet ELM Pacing as a Function of the Pellet Frequency SPRED and CX show a reduced impurities with pellet ELM pacing. (Data shown from 0.8s after the start of pellets) Consistent with earlier gas puffing results where impurities were entrained in the divertor with enhanced SOL flow. [Wade, et al., JNM 1999] Atomic No. Z Intensity (a.u.) B5 C6 08 Fe23 Ni26 f ELM 12 LB/IAEA/Oct12

Pellet ELM Pacing Produces a Narrower Pedestal Width Total pressure profile from the pellet ELM pacing has a narrower pedestal width and lower height. Note: Pellet case averaged over 200ms. − Lower Z eff and higher rotation shear help to compensate for lower pedestal pressure.  P tot (kPa) No-pellet before ELM Pellet Paced (average over ELMs) No-pellet after ELM  T e (keV) n e (10 20 m -3 ) No-pellet after ELM No-pellet before ELM Pellet Paced No-pellet before ELM No-pellet after ELM 13 LB/IAEA/Oct12

Natural ELMs Occur When Pedestal Width Becomes Unstable to Peeling Ballooning Modes Natural ELMing Case Pre-ELM Post-ELM Unstable Stable 14 The boundary for peeling and ballooning stability in this plasma configuration is calculated by ELITE (P. Snyder, NF 2007). LB/IAEA/Oct12

Pellet ELM Pacing Produces a Narrower Pedestal Width - Stable to Peeling Ballooning Modes The boundary for peeling and ballooning stability in this plasma configuration is calculated by ELITE (P. Snyder, NF 2007). Pellet case is far in stable region, ELMs likely triggered by local effect. Natural ELMing Case Pellet ELMing Case Pre-ELM Post-ELM Unstable Stable Pellet 15 LB/IAEA/Oct12

Fast Camera Images of Pellets Triggering ELMs Show Individual Filaments Being Perturbed X-point pellet exciting a filament as it enters the plasma. ELM is subsequently triggered. Midplane pellet triggers ELM while X-point pellet fragment enters plasma D  Filter Images consistent with hypothesis of a local ballooning mode triggered by pressure gradient in pellet cloud. Mid X-pt 16 LB/IAEA/Oct12

Minimum Pellet Size Needed for ELM Triggering is Under Investigation What are the minimum pellet size and speed requirements to reliably trigger ELMs ? Small fragments and 1mm slow pellets do not trigger ELMs. ≥ 1.3mm do trigger ELMs. New smaller 0.9x1.3mm pellets (~60% of 1.3mm size) also trigger ELMs. Non-linear MHD modeling is consistent with observations of local ballooning instability and minimum pellet size. [Futatani ITR/P1-22] ELM triggered No ELM triggered ? ELM triggered No ELM triggered 1.3, LB/IAEA/Oct12

NN 1.8  * ped B  (T) 5.3 n e _ped (10 19 m -3 ) 8.0 LL x f ELM q 95 * ped  ped (cm) n e/ n GW ITER parameters P/P H % 0.48% 0.05% DIII-D Pellet ELM Pacing Operating Space Compared to ITER Except for magnetic field and  * the operating space on DIII-D is comparable to that expected for ITER. DIII-D parameters 18 LB/IAEA/Oct12

Summary – DIII-D has Tested Key Principles of Pellet ELM Pacing for ITER Pellets trigger ELMs on demand with lower X-point injection. ELM frequency increase of 12x achieved with > 12x reduction in divertor ELM energy deposition. No confinement degradation Impurities screened out ELMs triggered locally before pellet reaches pedestal top – enables smaller pellets and lower fueling Future optimization and extension to higher frequencies with smaller pellets is planned. 19 LB/IAEA/Oct12

Backup Slides 20 LB/IAEA/Oct12

Pellet Ablation of X-pt Pellets Indicates ELMs are Triggered Within 1cm of Entering the Plasma ELM is observed by magnet loops ~50  sec after pellet starts to ablate – implies ELM starts at 1cm penetration.  =0.95 R-2 LFS Trajectory Distance to  =.95 location is 4cm along R-2 trajectory. DIII-D Time (ms) Pellet Ablation (a.u.) dB/dt (a.u.) n e L (10 14 ) x1.3mm D 2 Pellet LB/IAEA/Oct12