Jim Alaimo CPO PRACTICAL O&P OUTCOMES TO VALIDATE THE EFFICACY OF YOUR CLINICAL INTERVENTION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nursing Diagnosis: Definition
Advertisements

A Systems Approach To Training
Dr. Hamda Qotba, M.D,MFPH,FFPH
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
MU Center for SW-PBS College of Education University of Missouri Behavior Intervention Plans: Monitoring Student Progress.
Cross Sectional Designs
Job Analysis-Based Performance Appraisals
Screen 1 of 24 Reporting Food Security Information Understanding the User’s Information Needs At the end of this lesson you will be able to: define the.
W5HH Principle As applied to Software Projects
Chapter 3 Producing Data 1. During most of this semester we go about statistics as if we already have data to work with. This is okay, but a little misleading.
Program Management n KSPE 4250 n Ch 2. Vision Statement n A concise statement that describes the ideal state to which the organization aspires. u Include.
Lecture 11 Information Systems Training (Chapter 11)
Chapter 15 Evaluation.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
a judgment of what constitutes good or bad Audit a systematic and critical examination to examine or verify.
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
Network security policy: best practices
Chapter 3 Needs Assessment
REC 375—Leadership and Management of Parks and Recreation Services Jim Herstine, Ph.D., CPRP Assistant Professor Parks and Recreation Management UNC Wilmington.
© 2007 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. 1 School Health Services: Promoting and Protecting Student Health Chapter 2.
Performance Measurement and Analysis for Health Organizations
WORKING EFFECTIVELY IN AN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENT
Scoring 1. Scoring Categories 1 – 6 (Process Categories) Examiners select a score (0-100) to summarize their observed strengths and opportunities for.
Development and results of an older adult health communication program using the Theory of Planned Behavior Virginia Brown, DrPH; Lisa McCoy, MS The National.
Integrating the Resident into Private Practice Wendy Beattie, CPO.
Entrepreneurship: Ideas in Action 5e © 2011 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Creating Questionnaires. Learning outcomes Upon completion, students will be able to: Identify the difference between quantitative and qualitative data.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Development of Training and Procedural Manuals Section A 1.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
This Outcome Report is based on data from patients who completed a Functional Restoration Programme (FRP) at the RealHealth Treatment Centre in Coventry.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
Clinical Application. The Problem Clinical Systems are extremely complex IT configures and deploys best practices (best guesses) about what users want.
For ABA Importance of Individual Subjects Enables applied behavior analysts to discover and refine effective interventions for socially significant behaviors.
7.
THIS PRESENTATION IS INTENDED AS ONE COMPLETE PRESENTATION. HOWEVER, IT IS DIVIDED INTO 3 PARTS IN ORDER TO FACILITATE EASIER DOWNLOADING AND VIEWING,
1 TenStep Project Management Process ™ PM00.9 PM00.9 Project Management Preparation for Success * Manage Quality *
Evaluating Ongoing Programs: A Chronological Perspective to Include Performance Measurement Summarized from Berk & Rossi’s Thinking About Program Evaluation,
Quantitative research – variables, measurement levels, samples, populations HEM 4112 – Research methods I Martina Vukasovic.
Force Results – August 2012 Sussex Police Employee Survey 2012.
Mike Hindmarsh Improving Chronic Illness Care California Chronic Care Learning Communities Initiative Collaborative February 2, 2004 Oakland, CA Clinical.
Marketing Pharmaceutical Care Dr. Muslim Suardi, MSi., Apt. Faculty of Pharmacy University of Andalas 2010.
Teacher Survey Highlights R&E/LWW May2014.
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS Entry Into Professional Nursing NRS 101.
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Work Areas 2015 Response Count 2014 Response Count.
Health Management Dr. Sireen Alkhaldi, DrPH Community Medicine Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan First Semester 2015 / 2016.
Principles of Assessment and Outcome Measurement for Physical Therapists ksu. edu. sa Dr. taher _ yahoo. com Mohammed TA, Omar,
Quality Assurance. Define Quality (product & service) Exceeds the requirements of the customer. General excellence of standard or level. A product which.
Monday, June 23, 2008Slide 1 KSU Females prospective on Maternity Services in PHC Maternity Services in Primary Health Care Centers : The Females Perception.
Clinical Utility of EQA Dr. Angela Amayo UON27/11/2008.
©2013, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 8 Construction and Administration of Psychomotor Tests.
WEEK 3 Project Planning.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Catering Food Service Development
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
PowerPoint to accompany:
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Total Quality Management and Continuous Improvement
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Susan Gafner and Sarah Olson City of Madison Human Resources
Prosthetic Socket Fit & Comfort Score
Polypharmacy In Adults: Small Test of Change
What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Rounds of Cornell LibQUAL Data
Albania 2021 Population and Housing Census - Plans
Presenter: Kate Bell, MA PIP Reviewer
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
Presentation transcript:

Jim Alaimo CPO PRACTICAL O&P OUTCOMES TO VALIDATE THE EFFICACY OF YOUR CLINICAL INTERVENTION

NEED FOR OUTCOMES IN O&P There is a lack in outcomes in the field of Orthotics and Prosthetics A 2006 research paper* published in the JPO study reported in a review of lower limb outcomes from , revealed only 25 studies on LE amputees. Included both evidence based and patient reported outcomes Majority of studies were based on results of a small number of patient subjects or single patient case studies * Lower Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures: A Review of the Literature 1995 to Elizabeth Condie, Grad Dip Phys, FCSP Helen Scott, Grad Dip Phys, MCSP Shaun Treweek, BSc, PhD.

Copyright There's a "right" way to do outcome evaluation. What if I don't get it right? Outcomes is a complex. I don't have time to learn it. I always know what my clients need - I don't need outcome evaluation to tell me if I'm really meeting the needs of my clients or not. Outcomes require a whole new set of activities – we don't have the resources COMMON MISCONCEPTIONS REGARDING OUTCOME MEASURES Myth 1 Myth 2 Myth 3 Myth 4

STEPS FOR ESTABLISHING OUTCOMES IN YOUR FACILITY As the idea of outcomes becomes important for many O&P facilities, there is a desire to gather as much information as possible. Gathering will not be enough, however. Evaluation of the information will be of critical importance.

A successful outcome management program includes a process to measure outcomes plus the use of that information to help manage and improve services and organizational outcomes STEPS FOR ESTABLISHING OUTCOMES IN YOUR FACILITY

 Are the outcomes relevant? Are they related to the "core” activities of your business  Are the outcomes useful and meaningful? Will they help you understand whether or not your program is successful?  Are your outcomes achievable? Are they realistic and attainable given the intensity and duration of service you deliver?  Are the outcomes likely feasible and practical to measure? Will you be able to collect data related to them? An outcome is not what you do, but what changes you make to improve the life of the your clients

OUTCOME MEASUREMENT CRITERIA Reliability Insure that questions are worded properly and provide consistent results. Cannot be ambiguous or misleading. Validity Be able to measure differences in the performance One facility compared to the entire company Performance of one patient in facility to all the patients in a facility and the company as a whole. Responsiveness Any change would be noted as an improvement or degradation of functional abilities or confidence levels. Patient activity and confidence level collected at 3 different times of their prosthetic care using the same survey; 1.Evaluation 2.2 weeks post delivery days delivery.

PLAN AHEAD

9  Identify outcomes that need attention.  Collect data on more than one outcome indicator so that you have enough information to base proposals for change.  Recent findings can be compared to earlier periods.  Identify client groups that need attention. These can include age, gender, race or disability level  Identify service procedures and policies that need improvement. This information can be used to improve procedures, facilities or staff whose outcomes are not as good as others.  Identify possible improvements in service delivery. At the very least, outcomes data can help support proposals to change particular program practices or policies. GLOBAL OBJECTIVES

INTERNAL OBJECTIVES Measures the patient’s perception on major functions that take place in your independent practice such as Administrative, and Technical areas.

Measure the results of your independent patient care compared to nationally recognized outcomes studies. Measure the patient’s perception on major functions that take place in our independent practice such as Administrative, and Technical areas INTERNAL OBJECTIVES

Measure the results of your independent patient care compared to nationally recognized outcomes studies. Measures the patient’s perception on major functions that take place in your independent practice such as Administrative, and Technical areas Design an electronic outcome measurement system that can be sustained and measure intermediate and long term outcomes INTERNAL OBJECTIVES

Measure the results of your independent patient care compared to nationally recognized outcomes studies. Measure the patient’s perception on major functions that take place in your independent practice such as Administrative, and Technical areas Design an electronic outcome measurement system that can be sustained and measure intermediate and long term outcomes Establish an automated system that minimizes the burden on the health care provider, patient care facility and end user. INTERNAL OBJECTIVES

Obtain demographic information on your patient base. INTERNAL OBJECTIVES

Obtain demographic information on our patient base Compare results between facilities INTERNAL OBJECTIVES

Obtain demographic information on our patient base Evaluate changes in function during the temporary and definitive timeframe Compare results between facilities

INTERNAL OBJECTIVES Obtain demographic information on our patient base Compare results between facilities Respond to 3 rd party payor requests for proof on the efficacy of your prosthetic intervention. Evaluate changes in function during the temporary and definitive timeframe.

Copyright What is the alternative to the intervention (e.g. placebo, different component, technique)? What are the characteristics of the patient or population? What is the condition or disease you are interested in? What do you want to do with this patient (e.g. treat, diagnose, observe)? What are the relevant outcomes (e.g. improved functional abilities, improved standards, new policies or procedures)? Patient, Population or Problem Intervention or exposure Comparison Outcome CONSTRUCT WELL BUILT CLINICAL QUESTIONS USING P. I.C.O Intervention or exposure

Age Race Sex Education Marital Status Current User Where They Learned How to Use Their Prosthesis Level of Amputation Assistive Devices Used First Prosthesis Patient demographics can improve the services you provide by allowing you to focus on the type of patient base you currently serve. They also allow you to plan more effectively in the areas you would like your business to grow Copyright DEMOGRAPHIC QUESTIONS PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS

“Evidenced Based” outcomes tests include fairly simple performance measures such as;  Ten-meter walk test (10mWT)  Six-minute walk test (6MWT)  L-Test “Patient Reported” outcomes test include;  Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale…0-100% Scale where patients are asked to imagine performing 16 ADL tasks and rate their confidence level in accomplishing those tasks  Socket Comfort Score (SCS) 20Copyright 2010 OUTCOME MEASURES CURRENTLY USED IN O&P

MEASUREMENT TESTS “ EVIDENCED BASED” L Test 20 meters, timed event, 2 transfers, 3 turns in both directions

MEASUREMENT TESTS “ PATIENT REPORTED” Hanspal Socket Comfort Score (SCS) Patient rate their comfort level within their socket at the present moment 0-10 Scale 0………………...…….………………..10 Least comfort Most comfort Socket Comfort

SELECTION OF QUESTIONS Subsets Demographic Health Related Administrative Service Patient Satisfaction Technical Skills Prosthetic Fit Functional Ability

HEALTH RELATED QUESTIONS My current physical condition allows me accomplish everyday tasks My current emotional condition allows me accomplish everyday tasks I have a positive image of myself During the past week I have been satisfied with my overall physical health I am able to maintain as active lifestyle as I wish I do not let being an amputee hinder my social life I Can Walk 100’ Farther

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE RELATED QUESTIONS  I received an appointment with the prosthetist in a reasonable time  I was informed of my financial obligations for my prosthesis  Overall I am satisfied with the services I received from my prosthetic facility and would recommend this company to others Knowing if your front office personnel are doing a proficient job is paramount in providing excellent customer service.

PROSTHETIC FIT RELATED QUESTIONS I have overall comfort in my prosthesis  Less than 25% of the time  25-50% of the time  50-75% of the time  More than 75% of the time

FUNCTIONAL ABILITY RELATED QUESTIONS I feel balanced while standing with my prosthesis I can walk on uneven ground while using my prosthesis I can easily take off and put on my prosthesis

COMPONENTS OF AN OUTCOME SYSTEM Software Requirements Hardware Requirements Data Transfer Evaluation of Data

SOFTWARE DIGIVEY Outcomes Software  Ability to compose appropriate questions, scoring, a pleasant look and feel  Ability to have several surveys on one laptop  Ability to analyze data, by individual patient, by all patients in one facility and by all patients in all facilities. Survey Monkey  Web-based survey company which allows you to compose, survey and analyze results  Simple cost effective and quick and easy to use.

HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS SIMPLE TO USE  Touch Screen Laptops  Uses a Stylus  Tablet Style  Large Enough Screen for Patients with Poor Eyesight

PATIENT SELECTION Lower extremity All patients receiving preparatory prosthesis, new complete prosthesis, or socket change Voluntary participation Ability to complete the survey independently or with assistance

PATIENT PREPARATION Make sure everyone in facility understands purpose and instructions Collect data same way every time Lower Limb Amputees Patient Release Form Administrator or family member assisted if necessary in operation of the computer

DATA SECURITY  No patient names, use patient identity numbers  Designate an outcomes administrator, employees should not able to view or retrieve data  Data is centrally housed in a separate server  Data uploaded on a consistent basis

DATA COLLECTION Three surveys on each patient are collected. All surveys are exactly the same  evaluation or casting  2 week post-delivery or post initiation of PT gait training for new amputees  90 day post delivery within 2 weeks

COMPARE DATA WITH ESTABLISHED STUDIES

SINGLE PATIENT RESULTS Increase in functional abilities, safety, donning prosthesis and walking

WEARING TIMES This graph shows that your patients wear their prosthesis more hours per day once fit by your prosthetist. This allows them to lead a more active lifestyle

USE OF ASSISTIVE DEVICE This graph shows there is a significant downward trend of amputees needing an assistive device, 90 or more days past delivery of their prosthesis. Patients that are able to dispense the use of their assistive aide are more functional and active amputees.

FUNCTIONAL ABILITY IMPROVEMENT This graph shows an improvement in certain functional tasks from the time they are initially seen to 90 or more days after they received their prosthesis. These tasks are very important for amputees in order to become part of the able bodied population.

ESTABLISH BENCHMARKS FacilityABC Score Hours Per Day Usage Walk On Uneven GroundDonning Variable CadenceFalling Accomplish Everyday Tasks Facility % Facility % Facility % Facility % Facility % Facility % Facility % Facility % Facility % Facility % Company Average69%

MARKETING

Customer TypeWhat Outcomes Data Points Will Interest Them Referring Doctors Number of hours wearing prosthesis; Prosthetic function Non-Referring Doctors Number of hours wearing prosthesis; Prosthetic function; Comparison of patient confidence levels (Miller Study) Insurance Companies Prosthetic function; Use of assistive device; Admin and customer service Case Managers Prosthetic function; Comparison of patient confidence levels (Miller study) Patients Prosthetic function; Comparison of patient confidence levels (Miller); Demographic data for targeting purposes Potential Employees/Acquisitions/AcademiaAny/all data points; VA/Hospital/Other Referral Sources Number of hours wearing prosthesis; Prosthetic function; Use of assistive device; Comparison of patient confidence levels (Miller

WHAT YOU CAN ACHIEVE THROUGH OUTCOMES DATA COLLECTION  Actual demographic information  High-quality information on the services you provide patients  A reliable, easy to use data collection model  A tool to improve your individual, facility and company performance

QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? Jim Alaimo We all know in our heart that we provide good patient care. It important that we statistically prove that we do.