THE NEXT LINEAR COLLIDER DAMPING RING COMPLEX J.N. Corlett, S. Marks, R. Rimmer, R. Schlueter Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Advertisements

Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
CEPC BoosterDesign CEPC Booster Design FCC Week 2015, March, 2015 Marriot Georgetown Hotel Huiping Geng Presented for Chuang Zhang.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Compact Linear Collider. Overview The aim of the CLIC study is to investigate the feasibility of a high luminosity linear e-/e+ collider with a centre.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
CESR-c Status CESR Layout - Pretzel, Wigglers, solenoid compensation Performance to date Design parameters Our understanding of shortfall Plans for remediation.
Damping Rings Baseline Lattice Choice ILC DR Technical Baseline Review Frascati, July 7, 2011 Mark Palmer Cornell University.
November 2005M. Woodley1 ILC Beam Delivery System layout with end-of-linac undulator.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Sergey Antipov, University of Chicago Fermilab Mentor: Sergei Nagaitsev Injection to IOTA ring.
2011 Damping Rings Lattice Evaluation Mark Palmer Cornell University March 8, 2011.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
ALCW at SLAC, January 7, 2004J. Rogers, A Damping Ring Primer1 A Damping Ring Primer J. Rogers Cornell University Linear collider emittance requirements.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Analytical considerations for Theoretical Minimum Emittance Cell Optics 17 April 2008 F. Antoniou, E. Gazis (NTUA, CERN) and Y. Papaphilippou (CERN)
Lattice design for IBS dominated beams August th, 2007 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU IBS ’07 – Intra Beam Scattering mini workshop, The Cockcroft Institute,
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
DR 3.2 km Lattice Requirements Webex meeting 10 January 2011.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
1 BINP Tau-Charm Project 3 February 2010, KEK, Tsukuba E.Levichev For the BINP C-Tau team.
Automatic Machine Review Dec 2015 MAX IV Storage Rings Automation Pedro F. Tavares.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
ATF status M. Ross October 15, 2004 The ATF is the largest test facility built exclusively for linear collider RD –Utility not reduced by the selection.
Design of a one-stage bunch compressor for ILC PAL June Eun-San Kim.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
CEPC Booster Zhang Chuang, Cui Xiaohao September 11,2015.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
ILC Damping Rings: Configuration Status and R&D Plans Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory January 19, 2006.
Damping Ring Specifications S. Guiducci ALCPG11, 20 March 2011.
Accumulator & Compressor Rings with Flexible Momentum Compaction arccells MAP 2014 Spring Meeting, Fermilab, May 27-31, 2014 Y. Alexahin (FNAL APC)
Main Technical Issues of theSuper B Injector Main Technical Issues of the Super B Injector SuperB Meeting, Isola d’Elba, May 31st – June 3rd, 2008 D. Alesini,
Injection System Update S. Guiducci (LNF) XVII SuperB Workshop La Biodola, Isola d'Elba, May 29 th 5/29/111.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Acceleration.
ALCW at SLAC, January 7, 2004J. Rogers, Novel Schemes for Damping Rings1 Novel Schemes for Damping Rings J. Rogers Cornell University Improving dynamic.
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
Third ILC Damping Rings R&D Mini-Workshop KEK, Tsukuba, Japan December 2007 Choosing the Baseline Lattice for the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski.
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
Test of Optical Stochastic Cooling in CESR
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
Cui Xiaohao, Zhang Chuang,Bian Tianjian January 12,2016
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Electron Source Configuration
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Design Study of the CEPC Booster
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Injection design of CEPC
CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

THE NEXT LINEAR COLLIDER DAMPING RING COMPLEX J.N. Corlett, S. Marks, R. Rimmer, R. Schlueter Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, P. Bellomo, V. Bharadwaj, R. Cassel, P. Corredoura, P. Emma, R.K. Jobe, P. Krejcik, S. Mao, B. McKee, K. Millage, M. Munro, C. Pappas, T.O. Raubenheimer, S. Rokni, M.C. Ross, H. Schwarz, J. Sheppard, C.M. Spencer, R.C. Tighe, M. Woodley Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford, CA, Abstract We report progress on the design of the Next Linear Collider (NLC) Damping Rings complex (DRC) [1]. The purpose of the DRC is to provide 120 Hz, low emittance electron and positron bunch trains to the NLC linacs [2]. It consists of two 1.98 GeV main damping rings, one positron pre-damping ring, two pairs of bunch length and energy compressor systems and interconnecting transport lines. The 2 main damping rings store up to 0.8 amp in 3 trains of 95 bunches each and have normalized extracted beam emittances  x = 3  m-rad and  y = 0.03  m-rad. The preliminary optical design, performance specifications and tolerances are given in [1]. Key subsystems include 1) the 714 MHz RF system [3], 2) the 60 ns risetime injection / extraction pulsed kicker magnets [4], 3) the 40 m wiggler magnet system, 4) the arc and wiggler vacuum system, 5) the radiation management system, 6) the beam diagnostic instrumentation, 7) special systems used for downstream machine protection and 8) feedback-based stabilization systems. Experience at the SLAC Linear Collider has shown that the NLC damping rings will have a pivotal role in the operation of the high power linacs. The ring dynamics and instabilities will in part determine the design choices made for the NLC machine protection system. This paper includes a summary overview of the main ring design and key subsystem components. [1] T.O. Raubenheimer, et.al., Updated parameters can be found on the NLC Accelerator Physics Web pages found at [2] V. Bharadwaj, et.al., The NLC Injector System, PAC99, FRA27. [3] R.A.Rimmer,et.al., The Next Linear Collider Damping Ring RF System, PAC 99, (MOP60). [3] C. Pappas and R. Cassel, Damping Ring Kickers for the Next Linear Collider, presented at PAC 99, (TUP11). Abstract We report progress on the design of the Next Linear Collider (NLC) Damping Rings complex (DRC) [1]. The purpose of the DRC is to provide 120 Hz, low emittance electron and positron bunch trains to the NLC linacs [2]. It consists of two 1.98 GeV main damping rings, one positron pre-damping ring, two pairs of bunch length and energy compressor systems and interconnecting transport lines. The 2 main damping rings store up to 0.8 amp in 3 trains of 95 bunches each and have normalized extracted beam emittances  x = 3  m-rad and  y = 0.03  m-rad. The preliminary optical design, performance specifications and tolerances are given in [1]. Key subsystems include 1) the 714 MHz RF system [3], 2) the 60 ns risetime injection / extraction pulsed kicker magnets [4], 3) the 40 m wiggler magnet system, 4) the arc and wiggler vacuum system, 5) the radiation management system, 6) the beam diagnostic instrumentation, 7) special systems used for downstream machine protection and 8) feedback-based stabilization systems. Experience at the SLAC Linear Collider has shown that the NLC damping rings will have a pivotal role in the operation of the high power linacs. The ring dynamics and instabilities will in part determine the design choices made for the NLC machine protection system. This paper includes a summary overview of the main ring design and key subsystem components. [1] T.O. Raubenheimer, et.al., Updated parameters can be found on the NLC Accelerator Physics Web pages found at [2] V. Bharadwaj, et.al., The NLC Injector System, PAC99, FRA27. [3] R.A.Rimmer,et.al., The Next Linear Collider Damping Ring RF System, PAC 99, (MOP60). [3] C. Pappas and R. Cassel, Damping Ring Kickers for the Next Linear Collider, presented at PAC 99, (TUP11). Circumference and Store Time Require at least 3 trains (N t  3 ) for reasonable cell packing. Circumference is then, C = cT 0... Extracted vertical emittance... Keep equilibrium y-emittance large (sets y-tolerances) Initial y-emittance,  y 0  150  m, sets the number of damping times required per train, N ... Equilibrium y-emittance and y-tolerances Vertical alignment tolerances scale as ~r 1/2, so push r  1 yet with reasonably small damping, N . NLC MDR…  y 0 /  y = 5000, r = 2/3,  ye = 0.02  m, N  = 4.8  y 0 /  y = 5000,  y 0 /  y = 3333,  y 0 /  y = 1667 Layout of Rings and Transport Lines Parameter table: Vertical damping time-constant,  y, is set by repetition rate, f, trains stored, N t, and the store time per train, N   y, as... Damping Time-Constant of Ring B GeV (RF costs ,  z  ), therefore, at 1.98 GeV (a  = n+1/2), we need a long wiggler. Wiggler at 1.98 GeV For increased momentum compaction (see next slides) we choose F w = 2.3, which sets L w = 46.2 m and B 0 = 11.2 kG. 2.2 m 20 wiggler sections~8 periods/section 51-m full wiggler physical length 27-cm period... 2-cm gap... Effects of more wiggler damping... wiggler length asymptotes wiggler’s emittance asymptotes momentum compaction increases arc bend field decreases As F w increases... For simplicity, use bend with no gradient (J x 0  1) Use B w = 21.5 kG (probably too high) Keep  x  and w reasonably small (  x   4.5 m, w = 27 cm) Choose F w for ‘large’  p (F w = 2.3,  p = 6.6  10 –4 ) Solve  for  x = 3  m (  = 12°) Calculate arc bend field for  y = 5.2 msec (B 0 = 11.2 kG) Find total number of cells ( N c = 2  /  = 30) Get length of arc bends ( L B =  (B  )/B 0 = 1.23 m) Set TME-cell length (L c = (C – 2L w –  L match )/N c = 6 m) Build the arc TME-cell... For simplicity, use bend with no gradient (J x 0  1) Use B w = 21.5 kG (probably too high) Keep  x  and w reasonably small (  x   4.5 m, w = 27 cm) Choose F w for ‘large’  p (F w = 2.3,  p = 6.6  10 –4 ) Solve  for  x = 3  m (  = 12°) Calculate arc bend field for  y = 5.2 msec (B 0 = 11.2 kG) Find total number of cells ( N c = 2  /  = 30) Get length of arc bends ( L B =  (B  )/B 0 = 1.23 m) Set TME-cell length (L c = (C – 2L w –  L match )/N c = 6 m) Build the arc TME-cell...

THE NEXT LINEAR COLLIDER DAMPING RING COMPLEX Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Technology RF Cavity Wiggler Injection/Extraction Kicker BEND QD QF QD  x,  y /m  x /m  x = 108°,  y = 45° 30 cells (28 full) 6-m cell length 25-cm quad length 4-cm quad bore 7-kG max. field 4 sextupoles/cell The arc TME-cell... Circumference adjustment... +C+C –C–C Wiggler switched on extends circumference by... (  1.7 mm)  Need at least  C w -correction for ‘wiggler-off’ and also for unexpected errors. Emittance increase  C = +2 mm for chicane length of L T = 3.6 m (±2 mm  C range). LTLT bends of length L T /6, drifts of length L T /6 Other parameters,  p,  y,  z,...etc., are changed insignificantly. Work remaining... Dynamic aperture (studied in ZDR but not for new ring) Abort kickers (not added yet) Skew quads (for correction * and/or fast MPS  y -blowup) Wiggler radiation deposition problem Termite inspection Lots more... * Full skew correction is available immediately after extraction in 1st bunch compressor See paper FRA23 See paper MOP60 See paper TUP11 Vacuum System