 The professional growth and development of teachers is the fundamental purpose of teacher assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Collaborating to Provide Feedback for Learning Lisa Youell and Michelle Samples.
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
A Guide to Implementation
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Competencies for beginning teachers
PORTFOLIO.
Continuum of Teacher Development and Shared Accountability Leading to Increased Student Performance Teaching Quality Policy Center Education Commission.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
What it means for New Teachers
The National Policy Landscape Elizabeth B. Kozleski, Professor Arizona State University.
MAKE YOUR MARK HEAVY AND DARK. /snapshot.cfm?schl=2643 /snapshot.cfm?schl=2643.
Queen Anne’s County: New Teacher Portfolio Prepared by: Hired: August, 2006.
Consistency of Assessment
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
Good teaching, good teachers and comparative analysis Fernando Reimers.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Weber State University Teacher Preparation Program Levels, Field Experiences, and Assessments.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Coaching Framework Improving Teaching and Learning Literacy District More than Literacy.
Katherine Kingston EDLD May 15, 2011 This presentation will see just how well Galena Park ISD’s technology plan compares with the National.
Teacher Certification Next Steps……. How certification works within your current practice Student Growth Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Teacher Quality In New Mexico Information Session on New Mexico’s 3-Tiered Teacher Licensure System James Ball, SDE Larry Martinez, SDE Kersti Tyson, SDE.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Timberlane Regional School District
Assess the effectiveness of strategies Analyze that evidence/data Identify the most powerful teaching strategies Identify and gather evidence/data of student.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
MAR*TEC Supported Assessing Teacher Candidate Effective Integration of Technology in Clinical Practice SRATE 2003 Susan Arisman Marcia Cushall Frostburg.
Choosing Excellence: National Board Certification You’re at the head of your class. Now go to the top of your profession.
CULTURES OF COACHING AND MENTORING Principal’s role in Coaching and Mentoring teachers.
Darla Stynen. The subject matter I am teaching in my classroom, as prescribed by the school district.
Critical Thinking By: Nakendra Jones Tyrone Salmon-Jarrett Nikia Johnson Peta-ann Rowe Tiffany Brown.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Problem-Solving Approach of Allied Health Learning Community.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
Olympia High School.  “The question confronting most schools and districts is not, ‘What do we need to know in order to improve?’ but rather, ‘Will we.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
Choosing Excellence: National Board Certification You’re at the head of your class. Now go to the top of your profession.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Content Pedagogy Design Group: Jeanne Bennett, Corrine Chalifour, Warren Dobbins, Julie Jones, Liz Linear, Lindi McCurry, Jigna Patel, Sue Varga-Ward,
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Presenters: Drs. Thomas Koballa, Jr. & Tracy Linderholm
What it means for New Teachers
Orientation Classroom Teaching and Learning Theory Course Introduction and Overview.
Competency Based Learning and Project Based Learning
Dissemination Training
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Chapter 14: Evaluation of Instruction
Competency Assessment
Prepared by: Toni Joy Thurs Atayoc, RMT
NJCU College of Education
Developing as a Professional
Start with the Science & Technology Standards (2002, 2008?)
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
INTASC STANDARDS Sharae Frazier.
Orientation Classroom Teaching and Learning Theory Course Introduction and Overview.
The Meriden Public Schools
Presentation transcript:

 The professional growth and development of teachers is the fundamental purpose of teacher assessment.

 The goal is to enable teachers to receive appropriate feedback in order to improve their teaching and their students’ learning.  Accountability? / Teacher Development?

 Talk to your clinical teacher about how he/she is assessed.  Why are teachers assessed?  What can you do to prepare for assessment?

 No Child Left Behind Act: standards of teacher quality.  1. Full state certification.  2. Passed state teacher licensing examination.  3. Minimum: Bachelor’s Degree  4. Demonstrate subject  matter competency.

 National Board Certification:  Bachelor’s Degree  + 3 years classroom experience.  Certification valid for 10 years.  Certification fee: $2,300 –  sometimes district subsidized.  Salary increases.  State to state reciprocity for hiring.  Accepted as ‘elective’ credit at USU.

 Tied to teacher retention.  Period of teacher probation.  District specific.  Frequent observation during early years.

 Formal feedback.  May include portfolio.  Performance  standards outlined  in evaluation  instrument.

 Administrator ‘drop-ins’  Peer Coaching  Mentoring  Teacher initiated  observations

 Focused skill observations  Observing of peers  Student  Feedback  Teacher  Reflection  Peer Learning  Groups

 SCED 4210:  Utah Effective Teaching Standards:  1. Learner Development  2. Learning Differences  3. Learning Environments  4. Content Knowledge  5. Assessment  6. Instructional Planning  7. Instructional Strategies

 Utah Effective Teaching Standards (cont.)  8. Reflection and Continuous Growth  9. Leadership and Collaboration  10. Professional and Ethical Behavior

 Instructor Goals and Expectations:  Factual Knowledge: (#1)  Learning terminology, classifications, methods, and trends related to curriculum design and assessment.

 Instructor Goals and Expectations:  Application Knowledge: (#3)  Learning to apply course materials to improve rational thinking, solve problems, and make teaching decisions.

 Instructor Goals and Expectations:  Professional Knowledge (#4)  Developing skills, competencies and points of view related to assessment and curriculum design needed by classroom teachers in their specific contexts.

 Instructor Goals and Expectations:  Team Development Skills (#5)  Acquiring skills in working with others as a member of a team.

 In small groups: (5)  Review the teacher evaluation instruments you have been given.  On the team form, write down the strengths and weaknesses of the model.  What questions do you have about the model?

 Which one of the instruments would you prefer being evaluated by?  Why?

 How Can You Use Learning Communities in Your Classroom?  Team-Building Activities  Curriculum-Focused Tasks  Group Projects/ Products  Differentiated Learning  Critical Thinking/  Inquiry Activities  Performance?  Other?

 How can you help students be successful as they work in Classroom Learning Communities?  Teach Group Skills  Assign Roles  Honest Feedback to Non-contributing Members  Teacher/ Other Serves as Mediator

 Five Critical Questions:  1) What is it we want all students to learn – by grade level, by course, and by unit of instruction?

 2) How will we know when each student has learned – that is, has acquired the knowledge, skills, and dispositions deemed essential?

 3) What are the best ways to teach what all students need to know and be able to do?

 4) How will we respond when students experience initial difficulty in their learning?

 5) How will we enrich and extend the learning for students who are already proficient?