PLANNING FOR QUALITATIVE DATA COLLECTION Day 2 - Session 4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rwanda Case Study Additional Slides on Stakeholder Involvement.
Advertisements

Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
GENERATING DEMAND FOR DATA Module 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data-informed decision making  Understand the role of.
Begin with the End in Mind
LINKING DATA TO ACTION Session 6. Session Objectives By the end of this session, you will be able to:  Identify priority decisions and programmatic questions.
Dissemination and Use of Results from OVC Program Evaluations Florence Nyangara, PhD MEASURE Evaluation/Futures Group Dissemination Meeting, September.
DETERMINANTS OF DATA USE Session 2. Session Objectives  Explain the data-use conceptual framework  Highlight the determinants of data use  List potential.
Context of Decision Making
UNDERSTANDING DATA AND INFORMATION FLOW Session 4.
Funding was provided through a Community Engagement Supplement to the Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute at Oregon Health & Science University.
Chapter 12: Survey Designs
Business as Unusual: Changing the Approach to Monitoring OVC Programs Karen G. Fleischman Foreit, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.
Case management versus M&E in the context of OVC programs: What have we learned? Jenifer Chapman, PhD Futures Group/MEASURE Evaluation.
PLACE Method Priorities for Local AIDS Control Efforts 1 1 MEASURE Evaluation, A Manual for implementing the PLACE Method.
© (2015, 2012, 2008) by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Chapter 7: Collecting Qualitative Data Educational Research: Planning, Conducting,
Linking Data with Action Part 1: Seven Steps of Using Information for Decision Making.
Day 6: Supervisors’ Training This presentation has been supported by the U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Agency.
WHY IS THIS HAPPENING IN THE PROGRAM? Session 5 Options for Further Investigation & Information Flow.
Day 4: Field Practicum This presentation has been supported by the U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Agency for.
STUDY IMPLEMENTATION Day 2 - Session 5 Interview guides and tips for effective strategies.
Day 2: Research Ethics and Interviewing This presentation has been supported by the U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
MEASURE EVALUATION Session: 7 Developing Action Plans Based on Results Data Quality Assurance Workshop.
MER Essential Survey Indicators Jenifer Chapman, PhD & Lisa Parker, PhD February 2, 2015.
Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Welcome and Introductions.
Day 1: Well-being and Interviewing This presentation has been supported by the U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S.
Data Demand & Use: Information Use Map Webinar Series #2 Tuesday, January 24, 2012 Presenters: Eric Geers and Tara Nutley.
Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.
Integration of Community Based Services It seems like a good idea, but how to make it work? Molly Cannon Palladium/MEASURE Evaluation September 28, 2015.
Management of RHIS Resources
Module 2 Household Vulnerability Prioritization Tool Database.
Ensuring Data Quality for Monitoring and Evaluation
Data Quality Assurance Workshop
Introduction MODULE 2: Indicators and Data Collection and Reporting
Collecting Qualitative Data
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 5:
RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 10:
Data Quality Assurance
Session: 5 Using the RDQA tool for System Assessment
Session: 8 Disseminating Results
Right-sized Evaluation
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
Training of Trainers on the OVC Household Vulnerability Prioritization Tool.
ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Measuring Success Toolkit
Presenting an Information Needs Framework for PEPFAR OVC Programs
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 4:
Overview of the RHIS Rapid Assessment Tool
Session: 4 Using the RDQA tool for Data Verification
Complementing Routine Data with Qualitative Data for Decision Making: Understanding the "Why" Behind Program Data Day 1 - Session 1 Note to Facilitator:
Assessment Training Session 9: Assessment Analysis
Training Content and Orientation
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 3:
Introduction RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Introduction to Health Informatics:
Introduction to the PRISM Framework
Information Systems for Health:
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
Information Systems for Health:
Introduction to Health Informatics:
Session: 6 Understanding & Using the RDQA Tool Output
Introduction MODULE 7: RHIS Governance and Management of Resources
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
Data and Interoperability:
Use of Information for Decision Making
Measuring Data Quality
Introduction to Health Informatics
Session: 9 On-going Monitoring & Follow Up
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

PLANNING FOR QUALITATIVE DATA COLLECTION Day 2 - Session 4

Session Objectives  List the important elements to consider when planning for qualitative data collection  Review procedures for collecting data (logistics, roles, and responsibilities)

Stages of a Study 1.Concept Note 2.Planning 3.Implementation 4.Data Management and Analysis 5.Planning and Assessing Data Use

Planning Considerations  Roles and Responsibilities  Staffing  Timeline  Logistics  Pre-testing  Training  Budget

Roles and Responsibilities  Establish clear roles and responsibilities for:  Communicating with stakeholders  Collecting data  Institutional Review Board application  Processing data (storing, translating, transcribing)  Analyzing data  Arranging logistics  Report writing/presentation

Staffing  Who do you need?  Qualitative data collector  Note-taker  Translator  Transcriber  Analyst  Administrator  Program officer/M&E officer

Timeline  Be sure to set up a realistic timeline given the context of your situation  Factors that influence your timeline:  Institutional Review Board approval  # of interviews/FGDs per day  Availability of beneficiaries - Holidays/market day  Travel time and availability of staff  Time for analysis and report writing

Logistics  Logistics can make or break the whole process  Communicating with necessary authorities/stakeholders  Arranging transportation  Printing enough copies of interview guides  Arranging a convenient, confidential location  Ensuring recording equipment works correctly  Ensuring you protect confidentiality

Pre-testing Instruments  Cognitive interviewing  Conducting interview with sample of target population Allows for making revisions and ensuring your instrument is collecting the information you need to answer your study questions.

Training  Ensure training in data collection and analysis is conducted (separately).  This is particularly important if you have more than one data collector/analyst  Length of training depends on questions/study  Ensure data collectors stick to the protocol

Training – Data Collectors Clarify roles and responsibilities Review research rationale, goals, methods, and questions Review data collection logistics, including entrée into community, location, and selection of participants (if not pre-determined) Review data collection instruments, including intent of questions Practice obtaining consent and asking the questions Review confidentiality and data storage issues Tips for qualitative data collection – probing, etc. and practice with data collection – can pilot with sample of target audience Expectations and deliverables – detailed notes, summaries, recordings

Training – Data Analysts Clarify roles and responsibilities Review research rationale, goals, methods, and questions Practice interview transcription: redact personal identifiers, indicate inaudible sections, and include field notes Review codebook Review procedure for coding (software, word, pen and paper) How to identify new codes/useful quotes Review confidentiality and data storage issues Practice coding select transcript, discuss findings and coding procedures Expectations and deliverables – detailed notes, summaries, recordings

Budget  When planning for a budget, consider:  Length of interviews, # of interviews  Staffing - $$$  Translation and/or transcription  Training costs  Travel costs – accommodation/M&IE  Equipment, printing costs  Institutional Review Board costs

Planning – Transcript Analysis  1 st round – critically read and review transcripts  2 nd round – apply codes to transcripts (with quality checks)  3 rd round – apply second set of interpretative codes  4 th + round – explore thematic areas and organize data

Planning – 50 Interviews Time  1-2 wks.: pilot test, edit guide, & training  1 wk.: interviews  2 wks.: transcripts  1 wk.: train & test coders  10 wks.: analysis Staff  3 researchers  2 interviewers  4 transcript writers  2 coders MONTHS FOR DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS

Planning – 10 Interviews Time  1 week.: pilot test, edit interview guide, train  2.5 days: interviews  2 wks.: analysis (for 20 pages *20 = 200 pages)  3 days: write up/data communication strategy Staff  1 study lead  1 interviewer  1 note taker  2 coders ONE MONTH FOR DATA COLLECTION & ANALYSIS

QUESTIONS???

MEASURE Evaluation is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). Views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily represent the views of USAID, PEPFAR or the U.S. government. MEASURE Evaluation is implemented by the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partnership with Futures Group, ICF International, John Snow, Inc., Management Sciences for Health, and Tulane University.