Can investing in teachers raise outcomes in disadvantaged schools? 2016-05-24 Anahita Assadi, Caroline Hall, Martin Lundin och Kristina Sibbmark IFAU.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leading Learning in the Social Sciences MARGARET LEAMY National Coordinator Social Sciences Te Tapuae o Rehua Consortium
Advertisements

Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
LINDSAY CLARE MATSUMURA HELEN GARNIER BRIAN JUNKER LAUREN RESNICK DONNA DIPRIMA BICKEL June 30, 2010 Institute of Educational Sciences Conference Evidence.
Bridging Research, Information and Culture An Initiative of the Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges Your Name Your Institution.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Sharon Lapkin OISE/University of Toronto The Lambert research blueprint.
Classroom Assessment Policy and Practice in Georgia Black Sea Third International Conference September 12-13, 2014 Natia Andguladze and Nino Revishvili.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Maths Counts Insights into Lesson Study
THE FINNISH NATIONAL BOARD OF EDUCATION Councellor of Education
Assessment of Behavior
King Saud University College of nursing Master program.
IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Data Collection Information 1.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Kristina Kaihari-Salminen Senior adviser
1 Classroom-Based Research: How to Be a Researcher in Your Classroom Basic Skills Initiative Teaching and Learning Workshop October 2009 Darla M. Cooper.
Title 1 at J. Evans Middle School. Title 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 was created to ensure that all children have a fair,
Digital Media and Writing in Upper Elementary Schools: A Mixed Methods Study Mark Warschauer Binbin Zheng.
What are the Impacts of School Gardens on Academic Success? Slow Food USA.
School Leaders Professional Learning for School Leaders: The Principal’s Role in School Transformation Cynthia Mruczek Rich Barbacane April 19, 2011.
CRIOP Professional Development: Program Evaluation Evaluatio Susan Chambers Cantrell, Ed.D. Pamela Correll, M.A. Victor Malo-Juvera, Ed.D.
Dr Elena Luchinskaya, Lancaster University/ Leeds Metropolitan University, UK.
Raising Academic Standards for all School Development Planning Initiative.
Evaluating a Literacy Curriculum for Adolescents: Results from Three Sites of the First Year of Striving Readers Eastern Evaluation Research Society Conference.
Striving to Link Teacher and Student Outcomes: Results from an Analysis of Whole-school Interventions Kelly Feighan, Elena Kirtcheva, and Eric Kucharik.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
What Was Learned from a Second Year of Implementation IES Research Conference Washington, DC June 8, 2009 William Corrin, Senior Research Associate MDRC.
Robert Barnoski (Barney) Washington State Institute for Public Policy Phone: (360) Institute Publications:
GETTING HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT’S BUY-IN: Target Language Only Mandarin Chinese Classes.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
Professional development is “a focus on and responsibility for student learning and the formation of professional community inside and outside the school.”
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Does Reading First Work? Feng-Yi Hung, Ph.D. Director of Assessment and Program Evaluation Clover Park School District.
CMP3 – Services Tiered Packages* PD Essentials PackagePD Fidelity PackagePD Growth Package Product Implementation Essentials Plus Product Implementation.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Access to HE Diploma Changes for What has changed with the new Access specification? 45 graded level 3 credits which must all come from units.
PHYSICAL EDUCATION Objective P1. Ensure that students are moderately to vigorously active at least 50 percent of the time in all physical education classes.
LAUSD Student Data ELD Implementation Report 2006.
Second Language Classroom Research (Nunan, D. 1990) Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sehnaz Sahinkarakas.
Primary.  There was a greater level of improvement in Literacy than Numeracy for both FSME and Non-FSME pupils.  Boys showed a greater level of.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Project Design Jennifer Coffey OSEP May 4,
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
January 15, Utilization of the Personal Curriculum.
Group writing tutorials: Do they improve student writing? Roger Graves University of Alberta, CAN
2 nd Year Principals Programme Day 1 TEC Omagh Tuesday 2 nd December 2008 Leading in time of changes.
Family Homework Night Establishing Routines to Support Parent Involvement Kaitlyn Nykwest Homeless Children’s Education Fund 1.
11 TWSSP Summer Academy Whole School Day Friday, June 27, 2014 Sit in building, mixed content groups.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
January  Government introduced a New Curriculum in September  Government also decided that levels should go after the academic year 2014.
Raising the Bar for Oregon. Why Now?  New Mathematics Content Standards were adopted for grades K-8 in 2007 and high school in Oregon Statewide.
Introduction and Welcome. Looking to the future... PPLI currently developing a short course in Russian which will be available to schools for delivery.
Talk Boost A targeted intervention for 4-7 year olds with language delay Wendy Lee Professional Director, The Communication Trust Mary Hartshorne Head.
Civic Engagement in Action : Math and Soccer with S.C.O.R.E. James H. Eschenbrenner Introduction This semester for my Service Learning requirement for.
Pathway to Excellence. School’s Out Washington provides services and guidance for organizations to ensure all young people have safe places to learn and.
Summer ChAMP Carroll County Schools. Summer can set kids on the Right- or Wrong- Course Study links a lack of academic achievement, high drop out rates,
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices. Five Guidelines For Developmentally Appropriate Practices.
Information for Students and Parent(s)/Guardian(s)
Ongoing education policy evaluations
Future Directions Conference September 3rd, 2010
AVID College Completion Project
January 2019 Designing Upper Economics Electives with a significant writing component Helen Schneider The University of Texas at Austin.
Presentation transcript:

Can investing in teachers raise outcomes in disadvantaged schools? Anahita Assadi, Caroline Hall, Martin Lundin och Kristina Sibbmark IFAU

3-year project in 10 schools in low-income areas The previous government gave the National Agency for Education the task of designing and implementing a project to support a selection of schools with poor academic results Project in ten schools (grades 6–9) located in so-called ”urban development areas” The project lasted 2012–2014 (60 million SEK ~ 6,4 million EUR) Focused mainly on supervision and further training of the teachers Main aim: Support the students learning and raise their academic achievement 2

The content of the project Supervision of teachers – group supervision (mandatory) and voluntary individual coaching Develop support for newly immigrated children in their mother tongue Improve contact with guardians Develop activities outside regular school hours (e.g. help with homework) Further training of teachers – courses in teaching strategies to support language development (”mandatory”), formative assessment etc. A package of measures, with ”strenthening the teachers” as the main focus 3

The selection of schools To ensure the possibility for evaluation, the National Agency for Education had to consult with IFAU regarding the selection of schools National Agency for Education: ”How can we make the project as successful as possible?” Each school must be able to influence the content of the project, and all schools must have the opportunity to take part in all measures Everyone at the school must be involved simultaneoulsy The schools must have influence in the selection process IFAU: ”How can we ensure that we can learn as much as possible from the project?” If everyone takes part in several measures at the same time, we will not be able to tell which of the measures were effective Important to avoid self-selection of schools to the project 4

The selection of schools (cont.) Around 25 schools were eligible for the project in 2012 We tried to create pairs of similar schools (similar in terms of trends in GPA and percent eligible for upper secondary school) Only one school in each pair would then be offered to take part in the project. This way we tried to ensure that it would be possible to find a comparable control group for the participating schools 5

Our study 1.Interviews with teachers and principals What has happened at the schools during the project? How have teachers and principals experienced the project? 2. Surveys of students in intervention and comparison schools What impact has the project had on students’ perceptions of the school situation? 3. Register data on students’ grades and results on national achievement tests Effects on students’ school performance? 6

Some results from the interviews Supervision and further training of teachers represented the largest part of the project -Very mixed views regarding the group supervision -Teachers that received individual coaching were positive to this measure -Course in teaching strategies to support language development – very instructive and useful The project seems to have had little or no impact on: -The support for newly immigrated children in their mother tongue -Contacts with guardians -Activites outside regular school hours 7

Effects on school performace? Available data on school outcomes: Final grades from compusory school (grade 9) Eligibility to upper secondary school Grades on national achievement tests in grade 9 (Maths, English, Swedish) The project started in the fall 2012 and we can observe student outcomes until the spring 2014 We examine how school results developed for intervention schools compared to similar schools (also in ”urban development areas”) that did not take part of the project 8

9

10

11

12

Higher grades in language courses Results from regression analyses: No effects on grades in 2013 In 2014, statistically significant effects on grades in English: 20% improvement grades in Swedish as 2nd language: 13% improvement For students who have lived in Sweden four years or longer, also statistically significant effect on the GPA: 16% improvement 13

14

Improved results on the national test in English, but not in Swedish No effects on the 2013 national achivement test results In 2014, statistically significant effect on English test: 17% improvement But no statistically significant effect on Swedish or Maths results 15

Conclusions Positive effects on students’ grades (Large) positive effects on students’ grades in English and Swedish as 2nd language, as well as on the national test in English For students who have lived in Sweden four years or longer, also positive effects on the GPA The project consisted of several measures and we cannot say anything about the effects of the different measures The effects are probably linked to an enhancement in teacher skills: Group supervision, individual coaching and the course in teaching strategies to support language development constituted the largest parts of the project 16