1) Global Coefficients: Derived from all available cloud-free ASTER scenes for a given network SURFRAD: 246 scenesUSCRN: 371 scenes 2) Day/Night-Specific.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collection 6 Aerosol Products Becoming Available
Advertisements

Land Surface Evaporation 1. Key research issues 2. What we learnt from OASIS 3. Land surface evaporation using remote sensing 4. Data requirements Helen.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Changes in U.S. Regional-Scale Air.
Scaling Biomass Measurements for Examining MODIS Derived Vegetation Products Matthew C. Reeves and Maosheng Zhao Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group.
VIIRS LST Uncertainty Estimation And Quality Assessment of Suomi NPP VIIRS Land Surface Temperature Product 1 CICS, University of Maryland, College Park;
New Product to Help Forecast Convective Initiation in the 1-6 Hour Time Frame Meeting September 12, 2007.
Climate Change Impacts on the Water Cycle Emmanouil Anagnostou Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Environmental Engineering Program UCONN.
Characteristics, uses, and sources Introduction to DEMs.
Remote Sensing – Fire Weather Product Presentation
Large-scale atmospheric circulation characteristics and their relations to local daily precipitation extremes in Hesse, central Germany Anahita Amiri Department.
Princeton University Global Evaluation of a MODIS based Evapotranspiration Product Eric Wood Hongbo Su Matthew McCabe.
Globally distributed evapotranspiration using remote sensing and CEOP data Eric Wood, Matthew McCabe and Hongbo Su Princeton University.
Xin Kong, Lizzie Noyes, Gary Corlett, John Remedios, Simon Good and David Llewellyn-Jones Earth Observation Science, Space Research Centre, University.
A Sensitivity Analysis on Remote Sensing ET Algorithm— Remote Evapotranspiration Calculation (RET) Junming Wang, Ted. Sammis, Luke Simmons, David Miller,
CSIRO LAND and WATER Estimation of Spatial Actual Evapotranspiration to Close Water Balance in Irrigation Systems 1- Key Research Issues 2- Evapotranspiration.
Dr. Sarawut NINSAWAT GEO Grid Research Group/ITRI/AIST GEO Grid Research Group/ITRI/AIST Development of OGC Framework for Estimating Near Real-time Air.
LST Validation and Analysis Simon J. Hook et al.
Motivation Many GOES products are not directly used in NWP but may help in diagnosing problems in forecasted fields. One example is the GOES cloud classification.
Introduction Land surface temperature (LST) measurement is important for understanding climate change, modeling the hydrological and biogeochemical cycles,
CRN Workshop, March 3-5, An Attempt to Evaluate Satellite LST Using SURFRAD Data Yunyue Yu a, Jeffrey L. Privette b, Mitch Goldberg a a NOAA/NESDIS/StAR.
Slide 1/32NOAA Soil Moisture/Soil Temperature Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, 3-5 March, 2009 Value of Ground Network Observations in Development of Satellite.
Retrieval of snow physical parameters with consideration of underlying vegetation Teruo Aoki (Meteorological Research Institute), Masahiro Hori (JAXA/EORC)
Slide #1 Emerging Remote Sensing Data, Systems, and Tools to Support PEM Applications for Resource Management Olaf Niemann Department of Geography University.
High Spectral Resolution Infrared Land Surface Modeling & Retrieval for MURI 28 April 2004 MURI Workshop Madison, WI Bob Knuteson UW-Madison CIMSS.
The University of Mississippi Geoinformatics Center NASA MRC RPC – 11 July 2007 Greg Easson, Ph.D. Robert Holt, Ph.D. A. K. M. Azad Hossain University.
Development and evaluation of Passive Microwave SWE retrieval equations for mountainous area Naoki Mizukami.
Satellite-derived Sea Surface Temperatures Corey Farley Remote Sensing May 8, 2002.
Using satellite observations to measure the direct climate impacts of oil palm expansion in Indonesia Natalie Schultz Heat budget group meeting June 13,
Clear sky Net Surface Radiative Fluxes over Rugged Terrain from Satellite Measurements Tianxing Wang Guangjian Yan
1. GOES-R AWG Land Team The advanced baseline imager (ABI), which will be on board the GOES-R satellites with the first launch being approximately in 2014,
Variation of Surface Soil Moisture and its Implications Under Changing Climate Conditions 1.
Remote Sensing of Evapotranspiration with MODIS
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Developing GOES and POES Land Surface Temperature Products Yunyue Yu 1.
Land Surface Temperature Development and Validation for GOES-R Mission Land Surface Temperature Development and Validation for GOES-R Mission Yunyue Yu.
Remote sensing for surface water hydrology RS applications for assessment of hydrometeorological states and fluxes –Soil moisture, snow cover, snow water.
1 Directional Difference of Satellite Land Surface Temperature Yunyue Yu NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Federal Departement of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Revisiting Swiss temperature trends * Paulo.
2005 ARM Science Team Meeting, March 14-18, Daytona Beach, Florida Canada Centre for Remote Sensing - Centre canadien de télédétection Geomatics Canada.
Evaluation of the Suomi NPP VIIRS Land Surface Temperature Product 1 CICS, University of Maryland, College Park; 2 STAR/NESDIS/NOAA Yuling Liu 1, Yunyue.
14 ARM Science Team Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, March 21-26, 2004 Canada Centre for Remote Sensing - Centre canadien de télédétection Geomatics Canada Natural.
Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:
A system for satellite LST product monitoring and retrieval algorithm evaluation Peng Yu 12, Yunyue Yu 2, Zhuo Wang 12, and Yuling Liu 12 1 ESSIC/CICS,
IGARSS 2011, Jul. 27, Vancouver 1 Monitoring Vegetation Water Content by Using Optical Vegetation Index and Microwave Vegetation Index: Field Experiment.
P1.56 Seasonal, Diurnal, and Weather Related Variations of Clear Sky Land Surface Temperature: A Statistical Assessment K. Y. Vinnikov (University of Maryland,
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
MODIS Science Team Meeting, Land Discipline (Jan. 27, 2010) Land Surface Radiation Budgets from Model Simulations and Remote Sensing Shunlin Liang, Ph.D.
A Remote Sensing Approach for Estimating Regional Scale Surface Moisture Luke J. Marzen Associate Professor of Geography Auburn University Co-Director.
RADIANT SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF A DECIDUOUS FOREST – THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SATELLITE MEASUREMENT AND TOWER-BASED VALIDATION.
Is the lady dead, was she killed and by whom? Artwork: Michael Schrenk © von Storch, HZG.
INTEGRATING SATELLITE AND MONITORING DATA TO RETROSPECTIVELY ESTIMATE MONTHLY PM 2.5 CONCENTRATIONS IN THE EASTERN U.S. Christopher J. Paciorek 1 and Yang.
Preliminary results from the new AVHRR Pathfinder Atmospheres Extended (PATMOS-x) Data Set Andrew Heidinger a, Michael Pavolonis b and Mitch Goldberg a.
TS 15 The Great Salt Lake System ASLO 2005 Aquatic Sciences Meeting Climatology and Variability of Satellite-derived Temperature of the Great Salt Lake.
Variability of Arctic Cloudiness from Satellite and Surface Data Sets University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory Polar Science Center Axel J.
Consistency of recent climate change and expectation as depicted by scenarios over the Baltic Sea Catchment and the Mediterranean region Hans von Storch,
LAND TEAM. GOES-R AWG Annual Meeting. June 14-16, 2011
Remote Sensing ET Algorithm— Remote Evapotranspiration Calculation (RET) Junming Wang,
Can recently observed precipitation trends over the Mediterranean area be explained by climate change projections? Armineh Barkhordarian1, Hans von Storch1,2.
Jeremy Fisher & John Mustard Geological Sciences - Brown University
Validation of Satellite-derived Lake Surface Temperatures
Yunyue Yu, Mitchell Goldberg, Ivan Csiszar NOAA/NESDIS
Estimating PM2.5 using MODIS and GOES aerosol optical depth retrievals in IDEA Hai Zhang , Raymond M. Hoff1 , Shobha Kondragunta2.
Satellite Sensors – Historical Perspectives
LAND TEAM. GOES-R AWG Annual Meeting. June 14-16, 2011
LAND TEAM. GOES-R AWG Annual Meeting. June 14-16, 2011
Sources of Variability in Canopy Spectra and the Convergent Properties of Plants Funding From: S.V. Ollinger, L. Lepine, H. Wicklein, F. Sullivan, M. Day.
Igor Appel Alexander Kokhanovsky
LAND SURFACE AND AIR TEMPERATURE AT CLEAR AND OVERCAST SKIES
CAN WE USE CRN OBSERVED LST AS GROUND TRUTH FOR GOES-R VALIDATION?
Igor Appel TAG LLC, Washington, USA
VALIDATION OF FINE RESOLUTION LAND-SURFACE ENERGY FLUXES DERIVED WITH COMBINED SENTINEL-2 AND SENTINEL-3 OBSERVATIONS IGARSS 2018 – Radoslaw.
Presentation transcript:

1) Global Coefficients: Derived from all available cloud-free ASTER scenes for a given network SURFRAD: 246 scenesUSCRN: 371 scenes 2) Day/Night-Specific Coefficients: ASTER scenes grouped by network and daytime or nighttime overpass Upscaling of in situ Land Surface Temperature for Satellite Validation Robert Hale (CIRA/Colorado St. Univ.), Yunyue Yu (NOAA/NESDIS STAR), and Dan Tarpley (Short & Assoc.) Conclusions and Future Activities  At USCRN sites, regression-based upscaling of in situ LSTs can reduce scale-induced errors, thereby rendering in situ LSTs more appropriate for use in validating coarse-resolution satellite LSTs  While statistically significant reduction of error is observed in many USCRN cases, the absolute reduction is typically fairly small (~0.2 K), and SURFRAD sites generally realize little benefit from upscaling  Scale-induced error reduction is highly variable between models and coefficient groups, as well as between individual sites (not shown)  Better performance from more generalized coefficients versus site- specific coefficients suggests lack of ASTER scenes for coefficient determination may be limiting model performance  To address the above, Landsat data are being acquired and utilized for improved model development 2 km x 2 km average LST avg = K Central pixel LST pixel = K LST in situ = K Validation of satellite-derived Land Surface Temperature (LST) poses challenges due both to the paucity of in situ measures against which the satellite-derived LSTs may be compared and because of the mismatch in spatial scale between the two. In an effort to address these issues, multiple linear regression models were derived using high-resolution LSTs from the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) to characterize the relationship between “point” measurements at ground validation sites and the average LST over a larger area representing a coarse-resolution satellite pixel. The derived models were then used to upscale in situ LSTs from Surface Radiation (SURFRAD) and U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) sites. Unscaled and scaled LSTs were subsequently compared with LSTs from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). + USCRN (Newton 11SW, GA) Field of View of IRT: 1.3 m SURFRAD (Bondville, IL) FOV of Radiometer: ~30 m 1 km ASTER LST (Stillwater 5WNW, OK; 7/23/2005) Resolution: 90 m MODIS LST (Stillwater 5WNW, OK; 7/23/2005) Resolution: 1000 m Upscaling Model Coefficients GroupSURFRADUSCRN Daytime Scenes Nighttime Scenes ) Season-Specific Coefficients: ASTER scenes grouped by network and climatological season 4) Site-Specific Coefficients: ASTER scenes grouped by individual site SURFRAD: scenes, depending on site USCRN: 4-68 scenes, depending on site GroupSURFRADUSCRN Spring (MAM)5396 Summer (JJA)7296 Fall (SON)80115 Winter (DJF)4164 One-Predictor Regression Model Single ASTER pixel encompassing the ground station used as predictor of large-area average LST Once the  and  coefficients are determined using ASTER scenes, the formula is applied to in situ LSTs to determine scaled values Scaled values then are compared with MODIS coarse-resolution LSTs to determine efficacy of model – reduced standard deviation of differences for scaled vs. unscaled LSTs used as indicator of model performance Standard deviation of differences of MODIS – unscaled or scaled in situ LSTs (K) USCRN Sites (22 sites) Significantly different from unscaled at:  = 0.05  = 0.01 No significant difference for any coefficient type SURFRAD Sites (7 sites) Two-Predictor Regression Model Asheville 13S (NC) Mean NDVI Multi-year average of MODIS NDVI used as additional predictor to better capture seasonal changes in vegetation amount that strongly influence LST Two-Predictor Regression Model (Continued) Significantly different from unscaled at:  = 0.05  = 0.01 USCRN Sites (22 sites) Results at SURFRAD sites similar to those for 1-predictor model – No significant reduction in scale-induced error with any of the coefficient types Air Temperature-Based Regression Model Newton 8W, GA Air temperature used as a proxy for canopy temperature ASTER single-pixel or in situ LST used as indicator of soil surface temperature NDVI used to weight the two temperatures USCRN Sites (22 sites) Significantly different from unscaled at:  = 0.05  = 0.01