Understanding and Predicting Arctic Land-ice Loss and its impacts Fiamma Straneo (WHOI), Ted Scambos (NSIDC) 1 Greenland Ice Sheet (6.5 m SLR) Arctic Ice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future Directions and Initiatives in the Use of Remote Sensing for Water Quality.
Advertisements

2010 update of GCOS IP in support of UNFCCC Paul Mason and Stephan Bojinski GCOS Steering Committee September 2010.
THE USE OF REMOTE SENSING DATA/INFORMATION AS PROXY OF WEATHER AND CLIMATE IN THE GREATER HORN OF AFRICA Gilbert O Ouma IGAD Climate Applications and Prediction.
Briefing to the Caribbean Fisheries Management Council April 23, 2014.
N84 UNCLASSIFIED Rear Admiral Dave Titley, Ph.D. Oceanographer of the Navy / Director Task Force Climate Change October 15, 2009 This Presentation is Unclassified.
NASA ROSES – Interdisciplinary Research in Earth Science (IDS) Linking Greenland ice sheet mass loss to decadal circulation changes in the ocean and atmosphere.
Parameters and instruments A. Proshutinsky, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Science and Education Opportunities for an Arctic Cabled Seafloor Observatory.
Ocean Research Priorities Plan Near-Term Priority Abrupt Climate Change and the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) Anticipated Outcomes.
Gary Lagerloef, PhD Science on Tap, 7 April Apollo 17 December 1972 Climate Science in the Space Age Gary Lagerloef Oceanographer & Climate Scientist.
The National Climate Assessment: Overview Glynis C. Lough, Ph.D. National Climate Assessment US Global Change Research Program National Coordination Office.
Washington, DC - Sunday, 7 February 2010 SAON Board Meeting :: January 2012 :: Tromsø, Norway United States Report to the SAON Board Martin Jeffries.
US CLIVAR Themes. Guided by a set of questions that will be addressed/assessed as a concluding theme action by US CLIVAR Concern a broad topical area.
A Monitoring Program for Ny-Ålesund Christina A. Pedersen Norwegian Polar Institute.
How does it all work? Synthesis of Arctic System Science Discover, clarify, and improve our understanding of linkages, interactions, and feedbacks among.
Martin Sommerkorn WWF International Arctic Programme.
INTERAGENCY ARCTIC RESEARCH POLICY COMMITTEE Brendan P. Kelly Assistant Director for Polar Sciences Office of Science and Technology Policy
Report on Ice Sheet Modelling Activities David Holland Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences New York University, NY USA Jonathan Gregory Walker Institute,
US Climate Change Science Program Incorporating the US Global Change Research Program and the Climate Change Research Initiative U.S. Climate Change Science.
USGS Global Change Science National Climate Change & Wildlife Science Center and SE Regional Hub Sonya Jones USGS Southeast Area NIDIS Planning Meeting.
The U.S. Inter-agency Arctic Research Policy Committee (IARPC) 5-year Research Plan, FY13-FY17 1.Understand sea-ice dynamics, ecosystem processes, ecosystem.
SEARCH AGU Town Hall Meeting: Community Input on Activities & Directions Hajo Eicken Chair, SEARCH Science Steering Committee.
The AIACC Project Assessments of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change in Multiple Regions & Sectors UNFCCC Workshop Bonn 9 June 2003.
Dr. Frank Herr Ocean Battlespace Sensing S&T Department Head Dr. Scott L. Harper Program Officer Team Lead, 322AGP Dr. Martin O. Jeffries Program Officer.
Key Questions to Answer on Storm Simulation Xiangdong Zhang International Arctic Research Center University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA.
U.S. GLOBEC THE VIEW FROM NOAA The Honorable Dr. Larry Robinson Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Conservation & Management National Oceanic & Atmospheric.
Collaborative Research: Toward reanalysis of the Arctic Climate System—sea ice and ocean reconstruction with data assimilation Synthesis of Arctic System.
Post-OO’09 Working Group OceanObs’09 building a common vision for ocean observations.
15-18 October 2002 Greenville, North Carolina Global Terrestrial Observing System GTOS Jeff Tschirley Programme director.
Observational Platforms Vito Vitale, Lars-Otto Reiersen, Jan René Larsen SAON Board Meeting, 29 April 2013, Vancouver, Canada,
Slide: 1 Osamu Ochiai Water SBA Coordinator The GEO Water Strategy Report – The CEOS Contribution Presentation to the 26 th CEOS Plenary at Bengaluru,
Decadal Climate Variability and Predictability Discussion of CLIVAR Research Focus Pan-CLIVAR Meeting, July 16-18, 2014.
Workshop on Planning Coordinated Research on Ecosystems, Climate, and Policy in the Northeast.
Downscaling Future Climate Scenarios for the North Sea 2006 ROMS/TOMS Workshop, Alcalá de Henares, 6-8 November Bjørn Ådlandsvik Institute of Marine Research.
Using Global Ocean Models to Project Sea Level Rise Robert Hallberg NOAA / GFDL.
Automated Weather Observations from Ships and Buoys: A Future Resource for Climatologists Shawn R. Smith Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies.
Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.
2008 US CLIVAR Summit Phenomena Observations and Synthesis.
Ocean.US and Coastal Ocean Applications and Science Team (COAST) Larry Atkinson September 2004 Corvallis.
Components of the Global Climate Change Process IPCC AR4.
Climate and Cryosphere (CliC): Legacy for 2013 and Beyond Jeff Key NOAA/NESDIS Chair, CliC Observation and Products Panel (Agenda item )
The Physical Observing System: From Monitoring and Predicting Hazards to Long Term Changes Doug Wilson Co-Chairman, IOCARIBE-GOOS U.S. NOAA GEO CZCP Workshop.
Status of SEARCH Study of Environmental Arctic Change A system-scale, cross-disciplinary, long-term arctic research program Peter Schlosser SEARCH SSC.
Science Advisory Board Public Session 1 1 Peter Schultz, Ph.D. Associate Director for Science Integration Climate Change Science Program Office CCSP Update.
The AIACC Project Assessments of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change in Multiple Regions & Sectors AIACC Latin America/Caribbean Region Meeting San.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 The Influences of Changes.
NOAA Council on Long-Term Climate Monitoring (CLTCM) Eighth Meeting in Chicago, Illinois, March The Council identified three strategic issues.
How do ocean ecosystems work? Use remote sensing to address fundamental questions Lack of field data on BGC processes, impeding calibration and validation.
Systematic Terrestrial Observations: a Case for Carbon René Gommes with C. He, J. Hielkema, P. Reichert and J. Tschirley FAO/SDRN.
Arctic Research Office May, 2002 Update on SEARCH from the Agency Perspective.
The Global Cryosphere Watch 1 CRYONET ASIA FIRST WORKSHOP (Beijing, China, 2-5 December 2013) Barry Goodison, Vice-Chair, GCW Steering Group.
Outcomes of CLIMAR-IV DAVID I. BERRY ETMC-V, 22 – 25 JUNE 2015.
Jamie Morison Polar Science Center University of Washington Seattle, Washington USA SEARCH Update ARCSS AHW Feb. 20, 2002.
IPY International Polar Year Progress report to STG 2.
AOMIP status Experiments 1. Season Cycle 2. Coordinated - Spinup Coordinated - Analysis Coordinated 100-Year Run.
Ice-Based Observatories network in the Arctic Ocean Andrey Proshutinsky, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution NOAA Arctic Science Priorities Workshop,
Ocean Response to Global Warming/Global Change William Curry Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Environmental Defense May 12, 2005 Possible changes in.
Understanding and Predicting Arctic Land-ice Loss and its impacts Fiamma Straneo (WHOI), Ted Scambos (NSIDC) 1 Greenland Ice Sheet (6.5 m SLR) Arctic Ice.
NSIDC—Enhancing NASA’s Contribution to Polar Science A response to the NRC Polar Research Board’s review of NASA’s polar geophysical data sets Mark Parsons.
Interagency Ocean Observation Committee The Integrated Coastal & Ocean Observing System Act of 2009  Interagency Ocean Observing Committee  Lead Federal.
Future needs and plans for ocean observing in the Arctic AOOS Arctic Town Hall Futur Zdenka Willis Integrated Ocean Observing System National Program Office.
What science is needed for adaptation? “effective adaptation requires a sound physically- based understanding of climate change, often at levels of detail.
Nancy N. Soreide, NOAA/PMEL, Seattle, WA; and J. E. Overland, J. A. Richter-Menge, H. Eicken, H. Wiggins, and J. Calder 1.
Ocean Carbon and Biogeochemistry Scoping Workshop on Terrestrial and Coastal Carbon Fluxes and Exchanges in the Gulf of Mexico May 6-8, 2008 St. Petersburg,
Seasonal-to-Decadal Predictions of Arctic Sea Ice: Challenges and Strategies Sponsors: NASA, ONR, Intelligence Community Report available: October 30,
Ice sheets and their relation to sea level
Demonstrate the performance of the IAOS towards stakeholders
AOMIP and FAMOS are supported by the National Science Foundation
Developing an Integrated
GODAE Final Symposium, 12 – 15 November 2008, Nice, France
Presentation transcript:

Understanding and Predicting Arctic Land-ice Loss and its impacts Fiamma Straneo (WHOI), Ted Scambos (NSIDC) 1 Greenland Ice Sheet (6.5 m SLR) Arctic Ice Caps/Glaciers (0.35 m SLR) Current discharge 1200 Gt/yr (+30% ) Current discharge 226 Gt/yr (+50% ) Bamber et al 2012; Enderlin et al 2014; Dyurgerov et al 2010; Gardner et al 2013

Consequences: #1 Sea Level Rise Greenland ~1/4 SLR Shepherd et al. 2012; IPCC 2013; Scientific American, 2013

3 Freshwater discharge into the North Atlantic Bamber et al. 2012; Juul-Pedersen, 2015; Bhatia et al. 2013; Hood et al Consequences #2 Increased discharge Material properties – iron, organic carbon … Impact on dense water formation, AMOC, sea-ice Ecosystems – stratification, nutrients

How do we predict future ice sheet changes and their impact on the ocean ? Wire ice sheet and ocean models The challenges: Limited understanding of glacier/ocean interaction No data to inform understanding and models Complex, multidisciplinary problem (oceanography, glaciology, climatology, paleo, atmospheric science, observationalists and modelers).

Primary SEARCH Land Ice Action Team Activity years 1,2 Greenland Ice/Ocean Observing System (GrIOOS) Long-term glaciological, oceanographic, and atmospheric measurements at key sites around Greenland. i)Understand time-evolving relationships between the ocean/glacier/atmosphere ii)Provide data to validate and force models.

Why SEARCH ? Improved predictions required a coordinated effort that is beyond what a single individual, group, nation can achieve. GrIOOS requires an effort that spans across i)International boundaries ii)Disciplines iii)Methodology (from field to climate models)

Workshop: Greenland Ice Sheet-Ocean Observing System (GrIOOS) December 13-14, Fort Mason, San Francisco

Heimbach et al GrIOOS: a priority for Greenland Ice Sheet-Ocean Interactions One of four top priorities: Establishment of long-term glaciological, oceanic and atmospheric measurements to improve our understanding of, and ability to predict, Greenland Ice Sheet changes and their relation to the ocean, including the marine ecosystem, and the atmosphere. International Workshop on Greenland Ice/Ocean 2013

Workshop Statistics: ~50 attendees from 7 countries selected by steering committee based on expressions of interests (oceanographers, glaciologists, climate modelers, ice sheet modelers, marine biologists, 1/3 early career) NASA and NSF Program Managers Greenlandic scientists and government representative Joint Session and co-located with the Ice Sheet Modeling Intercomparison Project 6 GrIOOS Workshop: Discuss the design and implementation of a Greenland Ice Sheet Ocean Observing System (GrIOOS) Long-term time series of critical in situ glaciological, oceanographic and atmospheric parameters at several key locations around Greenland.

Outcome of Workshop List of essential variables to be measured Prioritized list of sites to cover a variety of glacier/fjord parameters, ocean and atmospheric sectors Integration with existing networks Cost assesment Identified international partnerships with shared data policies, uniform quality control protocols, minimum set of measurements.

Workshop Format Background 1)Why an observing system ? (ocean forcing glacier, glaciers forcing ocean, impact on ecosystems, ice and ocean modeling needs) 2)What have we learned ? (Review of 12 glacier/fjord projects) 3)What measurements are already in place ? (in situ, remote sensing, mixed) 4)Measurement Techniques (Review of ocean, ice, atmospheric instrumentation, costs and feasibility)

Existing networks

Workshop Format Discussion Brainstorming within three groups addressing: What are the essential measurements (frequency, resolution) What is already in place and can be synthesized easily? Which sites and how many ? Instrumentation and costs Strategy for coordination, data policies and quality control Final Group Discussion for synthesis

Preliminary Workshop Results Essential measurements Ocean: Temperature, salinity, pressure in the fjord and nearby shelf. Bathymetry is also a needed input. Ice: Discharge runoff, ice velocity, ice elevation, surface mass balance, mélange, calving and terminus position. Atmosphere: local winds and air temperature in the fjord, regional atmospheric forcing of the ocean and ice. What is already in place and can be synthesized easily? Many of the essential measurements can be derived from remote sensing products, existing atmospheric stations. Notable exceptions are the fjord/shelf ocean measurements, fjord atmospheric conditions and high-resolution glaciological frontal parameters. Which sites and how many ? Instrumentation and costs Strategy for coordination, data policies and quality control Final Group Discussion for synthesis

Site selection – many sites are already being effectively monitored (some by international partners) Ranking by Vote: 1.Helheim/Sermilik 2.NEGIS (79 North) 3.Jakobshavn 4.Petermann 5.Godthabsfjord 6.Rink 7.Upernavik 8.Kangerdlugssuaq 9.Qanaaq (Bowdoin)

Instrumentation Ocean: Moorings ($ k); Pressure-inverted echosounders (PIES, $35 k); Tagged Seals (for some sites) Ice: cameras (15 min repeat interval) with infrared capability ($2-10k), seismic (1-3) for calving and subglacial discharge ($40k), GPS ($5k), Phase-sensitive radio echo sounding (pRES) ($10k). Atmosphere: Automated Weather Station (AWS, $20k) – 3 potentially one the ice (~1000m), at the terminus and at the fjord mouth.

What’s Next: Final Report (coming soon) Preliminary report submitted as white paper for Arctic Observing Summit Implementation Discussions 1.How to turn existing projects at sites into GriOOS nodes 2.How to establish new nodes 3.Centralized Data repository (facilitated by GRISO RCN)

Planned Activities Year 2 1.Workshop and Workshop Report Drafted in early winter, circulated for community feedback and publication ~ Spring Follow up on report -National/International Funding Agencies -Coordination with existing networks 3. Arctic Stakeholders -Greenlandic fisheries -Arctic Encounters meeting, January Working with Modelers - Working with leads of ISMIP6 towards a workshop that brings together ice sheet modelers and Greenland ice/ocean experts in spring of 2017 in preparation for the ISMIP6 model runs.

23