A Challenge Problem on Uncertainty Quantification & Value of Information 1 Patrick Koch Dassault Systèmes SIMULIA 2013 NAFEMS World Congress Salzburg,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Advertisements

Topics to be discussed Introduction Performance Factors Methodology Test Process Tools Conclusion Abu Bakr Siddiq.
Project Definition of Bulk Electric System & Bulk Electric System Rules of Procedure Development Presenter: Peter Heidrich, FRCC – BES Drafting.
Computing & Software Systems
Relex Reliability Software “the intuitive solution
1 Schedule Risk Assessment (SRA) Overview July 2013 NAVY CEVM.
Prof. Seppo Virtanen TUT Dr. Seppo Virtanen, Professor, Faculty of Engineering Sciences Research and teaching interests: Reliability Engineering, Maintenance.
Full Monte Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis
GoldSim 2006 User Conference Slide 1 Vancouver, B.C. The Submodel Element.
Decision Making: An Introduction 1. 2 Decision Making Decision Making is a process of choosing among two or more alternative courses of action for the.
FIN 685: Risk Management Topic 5: Simulation Larry Schrenk, Instructor.
The Calibration Process
1 D r a f t Life Cycle Assessment A product-oriented method for sustainability analysis UNEP LCA Training Kit Module k – Uncertainty in LCA.
Introduction to ModelingMonte Carlo Simulation Expensive Not always practical Time consuming Impossible for all situations Can be complex Cons Pros Experience.
Opportunity Engineering Harry Larsen The Boeing Company SCEA 2000 Conference.
Lecture 11 Implementation Issues – Part 2. Monte Carlo Simulation An alternative approach to valuing embedded options is simulation Underlying model “simulates”
Microsoft Services Provider License Program
Stephane Larocque – Consulting Practice Leader, Impact Infrastructure A DECISION MAKING FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT 1 ST INTERNATIONAL.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
Confidential Crisis Management Innovations, LLC. CMI CrisisPad TM Product Overview Copyright © 2011, Crisis Management Innovations, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
HOW DO INFORMATION SYSTEM SUPPORT THE MAJOR BUSINESS FUNCTION?
Chapter 7. First and second order transient circuits
Relex Reliability Software “the intuitive solution
The Nor-Par Group The Company that Cares 1 Production Improvement Tool By Stefan Mikulski M.Sc. Chem. E., Vice-president Development, Nor-Par.
AND “Learning to live in a technical world.”. Ted Wilkinson  Interim State TSA Advisor  Department Chair  TBHS TSA Chapter Advisor  MO TSA Board of.
1 Mohammed M. Olama Seddik M. Djouadi ECE Department/University of Tennessee Ioannis G. PapageorgiouCharalambos D. Charalambous Ioannis G. Papageorgiou.
VTT-STUK assessment method for safety evaluation of safety-critical computer based systems - application in BE-SECBS project.
CRESCENDO Full virtuality in design and product development within the extended enterprise Naples, 28 Nov
1 © 2007 Avaya Inc. All rights reserved. Avaya – Proprietary & Confidential. Under NDA Avaya - Proprietary & Confidential. For Internal Use Only. Avaya.
Robust Design Integrated Product and Process Development MeEn 475/476 “Great Product, Solid, and just always works.” - CNET user review of MacBook Pro.
IV&V Facility PI: Katerina Goseva – Popstojanova Students: Sunil Kamavaram & Olaolu Adekunle Lane Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering.
1 Synopsys Saber Simulation Performance Measure(s) Performance Measure(s) Model(s) Nominal Design Nominal Design Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity Analysis.
Probabilistic Mechanism Analysis. Outline Uncertainty in mechanisms Why consider uncertainty Basics of uncertainty Probabilistic mechanism analysis Examples.
Advances in Robust Engineering Design Henry Wynn and Ron Bates Department of Statistics Workshop at Matforsk, Ås, Norway 13 th -14 th May 2004 Design of.
Fourer et al., The NEOS Benchmarking Service INFORMS International, Puerto Rico, July 8-11, INFORMS International Session MC07, July 9, 2007 The.
SmartSuite Software, Web based Time Attendance Software Visit website –
CEE-SECR 2009 October Moscow, Russia Proposal Feasibility Study using Stochastic Risk Model Anton Khritankov.
AMERICA’S ARMY: THE STRENGTH OF THE NATION Mort Anvari 1 Cost Risk and Uncertainty Analysis MORS Special Meeting | September.
Presented by: Meysam rahimi
Center for Radiative Shock Hydrodynamics Fall 2011 Review Assessment of predictive capability Derek Bingham 1.
Objective Read World Uncertainty Analysis CMSC 2003 July Tim Nielsen Scott Sandwith.
1 Software Reliability Analysis Tools Joel Henry, Ph.D. University of Montana.
NPSS Web Site Redesign RICHARD KOUZES July 13, 2013.
Machine Design Under Uncertainty. Outline Uncertainty in mechanical components Why consider uncertainty Basics of uncertainty Uncertainty analysis for.
RLV Reliability Analysis Guidelines Terry Hardy AST-300/Systems Engineering and Training Division October 26, 2004.
© 2014 Minitab, Inc. Justin Callahan Commercial Sales Representative.
To obtain Coefficient A1 and A2
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Manuel Avendaño J. V. Milanović Manuel Avendaño – UK – Session 2 – Paper 0529 METHODOLOGY FOR FLEXIBLE, COST-EFFECTIVE.
Association of Enterprise Architects International Committee on Enterprise Architecture Standards Jan 23, Collaborative Expedition Workshop #57aeajournal.org.
A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.
1 Life Cycle Assessment A product-oriented method for sustainability analysis UNEP LCA Training Kit Module k – Uncertainty in LCA.
Unified Adaptivity Optimization of Clock and Logic Signals Shiyan Hu and Jiang Hu Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering Texas A&M University.
The Role of Simulation in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual ITE Western District Annual Meeting June 28, 2010 Loren Bloomberg/CH2M HILL Santa Ana, CA
Project Management PTM721S
Supplementary Chapter B Optimization Models with Uncertainty
HEC-ResSim 3.3 New Features to Support Complex Studies
OPERATING SYSTEMS CS 3502 Fall 2017
Static Management Program (SMP)
Capital Project / Infrastructure Renewal – Making the Business Case
Welcome!, but before we begin…
Peak Day Pricing Module 2:Eligibility & Default
The Calibration Process
Graduate Development Program Engineering
Presenter: Peter Heidrich, FRCC – BES Drafting Team Chair
Introduction to Requirements Management
Static Management Program (SMP)
M. Kezunovic (P.I.) S. S. Luo D. Ristanovic Texas A&M University
A Glimpse of Representing Stochastic Processes
IEEE RS Standards Status and Descriptions
2019 Boeing Innovation Challenge
Presentation transcript:

A Challenge Problem on Uncertainty Quantification & Value of Information 1 Patrick Koch Dassault Systèmes SIMULIA 2013 NAFEMS World Congress Salzburg, Austria June 9-12 NAFEMS, Stochastic Working Group

Stochastics Working Group  Proactively represent the working group  Provide recommendations to advance the user community  Share breakthrough technology to the dedicated community  Assist with the development of publications Challenge Problem  Topic: Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) Challenge Problem  Promote effective use of engineering simulation methods  Showcase different approaches to UQ through presentations and/or publications  Showcase the use of software tool(s) to automate methodology  Selections will be featured in NAFEMS publications and presented at NAFEMS Americas’ Conference 2 Purpose Robust Design for improved reliability and reduced field issues 99% Customer Target Life Distribution (years) Lifecycle Field Issues

3 Challenge problem  A mathematical model of a typical electronic device as represented by a R-L-C network will be provided along with different levels of uncertainty estimates around the input parameters.  The challenge is to evaluate the reliability of the device using given criteria as well as quantify the value of information in each case.  Methods are not judged and this is not a competition to find the true solution

4 Problem Statement A typical electronic device is represented by R-L-C network in series as shown. Input signal is the step voltage source for a short duration. Output response is the voltage at the capacitor. The output response is sensitive to network parameters R, L and C. Uncertainty estimates regarding the R, L, C values are available. The challenge is to evaluate the reliability of the device using two criteria: a.Voltage at a particular time should be greater than a threshold b.Voltage rise time to be within a specified duration

5 Mathematical Model Uncertainty in RLC such that the voltage response across capacitor, Vc, may fall into: 1. Over damped 2. Critically damped 3. Under damped For each case above, the response Vc is expressed as Typical results A1 and A2 are solved using the initial conditions:

6 Parameter Information Uncertainty estimates of R, L, C parameters are available in different forms Case A: Intervals Case B: Multiple Intervals Case C: Sampled Points Case D: Incomplete Data Source 1: R=[40, 1000]  L = [1, 10]mH C = [1, 10]  F Source 2: R=[600, 1200]  L = [10, 100]mH C = [1, 10]  F Source 3: R=[10, 1500]  L = [4, 8]mH C = [0.5, 4]  F R=[40, 1000]  L = [1, 10]mHC = [1, 10]  F R=[40, R U ]  with nominal value of 650 , R u > 650 L = [1, L U ]mH with nominal value of 6 mH, L u > 6 C = [C L, 10]  F with nominal value of 7  F, C L < 7 R= {861, 87, 430, 798, 219, 152, 64, 361, 224, 614}  L={4.1, 8.8, 4.0, 7.6, 0.7, 3.9, 7.1, 5.9, 8.2, 5.1}mH C={9.0, 5.2, 3.8, 4.9, 2.9, 8.3, 7.7, 5.8, 10.0, 0.7}  F

7 Requirement Information 1. Assess reliability of the device using the two criteria: a.Voltage at a particular time should be greater than a threshold V C (t=10 ms) > 0.9 V b.Voltage rise time to be within a specified duration V C (t= t r ) =0.9 V, where t r < 8 ms c.Underdamped responses should be discarded. 2. Quantify the value of information in each case

Any tool or software may be used for the challenge problem. Saber from Synopsys is a tool used for analog/power electronics, electric power generation/conversion/distribution and mechatronics that may be used for this challenge problem.  Free Demo Version: Limited to 10 Monte Carlo runs and does not include Saber’s design optimization tool  Full Commercial Version (limited to 30 days) : Contact SWG member Jim Patton  Challenge Problem example available in Saber Resources

 Synopsys’ Saber team is sponsoring three giveaways*: JawBone JAMBOX Wireless Bluetooth Speakers  Recipients will be chosen randomly by the SWG from acceptable responses *Acceptance of the prize is an agreement with Synopsys to use your name, company name, and a photo in Saber Robust Design promotional material *Participation in the giveaways is optional 9 Giveaways

Contact Mary Fortier NAFEMS SWG Chair Phone: Timeline Selections will be featured in NAFEMS publications and presented at NAFEMS Americas Conference Spring 2014 Submit solutions for publication and presentations Nov. 29, 2013 Responses due by participants to accept challenge problem July Kick-off at NAFEMS World Congress June 2013