Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 6-7, 2012 Waterfront Hotel - Morgantown, WV Federal Programs Spring Directors Conference Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
Advertisements

In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Education Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility Request: Summary of Key Provisions.
AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Focus Schools Conference Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. September 17-18, 2012.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
BIE Flexibility Request Summary of Key Provisions Bureau of Indian Education U.S. Department of the Interior.
1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS Gayle Pauley Assistant Superintendent Special Programs and Federal Accountability
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
4 Principles of ESEA Flexibility 1 January College-and-Career-Ready Expectations for All Students ( ) 2.State-Developed Differentiated Recognition,
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012.
What is Title I ?  It is federal funding that is attached to NCLB/ESEA legislation  It is intended to help students who are falling behind.
What’s going on in Richmond? Items of Interest to VESIS March 21, 2012 Bethann H. Canada Director of Educational Information Management Virginia Department.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Contractors’ Meeting March 4, 2013 Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D.
ESEA Flexibility: Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 1 of 8.
Building Capacity to Support High Quality Instruction Ryan Saxe, Title I Coordinator Office of Federal Programs.
2012 KanSPRA Conference Brad Neuenswander Deputy Commissioner, KSDE.
Annual Student Performance Report September
No Child Left Behind Waivers: Promising Ideas from Second Round Applications By Jeremy Ayers and Isabel Owen with Glenda Partee and Theodora Chang.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
2012 USA/KASB Regional Education Summits Kansas Education Past/Present/Future Brad Neuenswander, KSDE.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
March 30, 2012 Marriott Hotel- Charleston, WV Committee of Practitioners Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student. Brad Neuenswander, Deputy Commissioner KSDE.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
The Every Student Succeeds Act Highlights of Key Changes for States, Districts, and Schools.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.
What just happened and what’s next? Presenters: Steve Dibb, MDE Debra Landvik, MDE AYP 2011.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Brentwood Rotary Club Wednesday, March 30, 2016 Dr. Candice McQueen, Commissioner of Education.
Emporia State University - Computer and Business Teacher’s Conference February 20, 2013 Diane DeBacker, Commissioner of Education.
New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): Overview and Implications for New Jersey Peter Shulman & Jill Hulnick Deputy Commissioner.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
NORTH CAROLINA ESEA Flexibility Request Globally Competitive Students (GCS 1) 1Wednesday, February 1, 2012.
State of Alaska House Finance Subcommittee Department of Education and Early Development July 25, 2013.
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Welcome to our SCHOOL’S Parents Are Connected (PAC) Meeting
Kansas ESEA Flexibility Waiver Overview
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
Inaugural Meeting - September 14, 2012
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT
Presentation transcript:

Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012

Kansas Association of School Boards 2 What is ESEA and NCLB? Elementary and Secondary Education Act 1965 and Title I

Kansas Association of School Boards 3 What is ESEA and NCLB? No Child Left Behind Reauthorization of ESEA Reduce the achievement gap among various groups: School as a whole Ethnic groups (6 major ethnic groups) Economically disadvantaged Students with disabilities English language learners Improve the quality of education for all students Provide parents with more choices Require increased accountability

Kansas Association of School Boards 4 AYP

Kansas Association of School Boards 5 Results from NCLB? Percent of All Students Proficient & Above Reading From about 60% to now 90% Math From about 55% to now 85% READING - Kansas “at-risk” students with historically lower educational outcomes made larger gains.

Kansas Association of School Boards 6 Results from NCLB? MATH - Kansas “at-risk” students with historically lower educational outcomes on state assessments made larger gains.

Kansas Association of School Boards 7 Results from NCLB? HIGH SCHOOL COMPLETION - Kansas tripled high school completion from 1940 through 2008, and increased 50% since 1970.

Kansas Association of School Boards 8 Results from NCLB? ACT – Kansas ACT scores continuing to outpace U.S. average. The number of Kansas adults with four-year college degrees is six times higher than 1940, tripled since 1970.

Kansas Association of School Boards 9 Results from NCLB? On 11 Key Indicators… Pre-High School Mastery of Basic Reading and Math (2 Measures): Kansas 8 th High School Completion (3 measures): Kansas 12 th Preparation for College (3 measures): Kansas 6 th Adult Educational Attainment (3 measures): Kansas 14 th Overall - Kansas ranks 6 th in the nation when compared to other states.

Kansas Association of School Boards 10 Why change? U.S. Dept. of Education developed waiver process to opt out of NCLB requirements IN EXCHANGE for a different set of rules.

Kansas Association of School Boards 11 Major Concerns with NCLB Lack of emphasis on higher level skills for college and career readiness. Kansas economy needs more students to complete postsecondary programs.

Kansas Association of School Boards 12 Major Concerns with NCLB Current law only considers percentage of students at minimum level of proficiency – most Kansas students are now at that level or higher. Challenge of moving to 100% Schools get no credit for moving students to higher achievement levels. Federal gridlock impeding reauthorization.

Kansas Association of School Boards 13 Three main parts of the waiver What it says… Principle 1 – College and Career-Ready Expectations for All Students Principle 2 – State- Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability and Support Principal 3 - Supporting Effective Instruction and Leadership What it means… Implement common core standards and new assessments Establish new performance targets Teacher and principal evaluation and support

Kansas Association of School Boards 14 #1: Common Core & New Assessments Implement Kansas common core standards in reading/language arts and math by Implement new assessments in

Kansas Association of School Boards 15 #2: New Performance Targets: AMOs Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) Performance Levels Student growth Decrease achievement gap Decrease by 50% number of students below proficient in six years

Kansas Association of School Boards 16 Performance Levels Assessment Performance Index (API) Exemplary Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Approaches Standard Academic Warning

Kansas Association of School Boards 17 Student Growth Target based on average gain of all students in the state.

Kansas Association of School Boards 18 Decrease Achievement Gap Compare lowest 30% within building to highest 30% in the state. Reduce the gap by half (in annual increments) over six years.

Kansas Association of School Boards 19 Reduce non-proficient percentages Cut the percentage of students scoring below proficient in half (in annual increments) over six years.

Kansas Association of School Boards 20 Other AMOs Participation rate Graduation rate

Kansas Association of School Boards 21 Additional Requirements of Principle #2 - Accountability New school report card Local progress compared to state. Progress of lowest-performing compared to top-performers in the state. Progress in reducing number of students below basic proficiency levels.

Kansas Association of School Boards 22 What happens if targets are missed? Title I Schools – reward, priority and focus schools. Non-Title Schools – not specifically addressed in waiver. Local communities must develop plans for improvement.

Kansas Association of School Boards 23 Principle #3 – Effective Instruction and Leadership Teacher and Principal Evaluation Focus on impact on student growth Use the evaluation for personnel decisions.

Kansas Association of School Boards 24 Teacher Evaluation KEEP McREL Locally-developed Planning and the decision made this year for full implementation in Negotiations impact

Kansas Association of School Boards 25 Timeline for June 2012 Teaching in Kansas Commission II (TIKC II) formed. August % Title I Schools identified as Reward (66), Priority (33) or Focus (66) schools Report Cards issued based on 2011 AYP targets (Last year of the static AYP chart) Spring 2012 assessment data used. December 2012 Preliminary TIKC II report at KSBE Spring 2013 Test window opens, same assessment with inclusion of more Common Core Standards items. April 2013 Notify KSDE of district decision to adopt KEEP or alternative teacher evaluation system; alternative has to be submitted to KSDE for approval. May 2013 TIKC II recommendations announced.

Kansas Association of School Boards 26 5 Key Areas of Impact for Boards 1. Set non-negotiable goals for improvement. Review board’s mission and vision Develop a strategic plan or revise the current plan Develop shared expectations with staff and community

Kansas Association of School Boards 27 5 Key Areas of Impact for Boards 2. Evaluation. Review and revise evaluation of superintendent Establish the evaluation system for all other employees

Kansas Association of School Boards 28 5 Key Areas of Impact for Boards 3. Develop an understanding of the new standards and provide staff time to do the same.

Kansas Association of School Boards 29 5 Key Areas of Impact for Boards 4. Provide for resources and support. 5. Engage the entire community.

Kansas Association of School Boards 30 KASB - Serving Educational Leaders, Inspiring Student Success We are INVOLVED. We support YOU. We are LEADING. First in Education, the Kansas Way –Raising standards. –Suitable finance. –Local leadership.