William Morse ILC R&D April 19, 2006 1 ILC Detector R&D William Morse Physics Dept., BNL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
Advertisements

March, 11, 2006 LCWS06, Bangalore, India Very Forward Calorimeters readout and machine interface Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy.
TESLA R&D: LCAL/LAT Achim Stahl DESY Zeuthen Cracow Tel Aviv Minsk Prague Colorado Protvino UCL London Dubna.
Yury CHESNOKOV Crystal Collimation workshop, March 7, 2005 CALIBRATION of CMS CALORIMETERS with LHC PROTON BEAM DEFLECTED BY CRYSTAL CALIBRATION of CMS.
P hysics background for luminosity calorimeter at ILC I. Božović-Jelisavčić 1, V. Borka 1, W. Lohmann 2, H. Nowak 2 1 INN VINČA, Belgrade 2 DESY, Hamburg.
SUSY small angle electron tagging requirements Philip Bambade LAL-Orsay MDI workshop - SLAC 6-8 January 2005 With M. Berggren, F. Richard, Z. Zhang + DESY.
Background Studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC ALCPG 2004 Winter Workshop January 8, 2004.
Machine-Detector Interface MDI Panel Report MDI Panel is one of several World-Wide Study (WWS) panels (R&D, Detector costing, MDI, 2 IRs) Interim panel.
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
 k0k0 ++ -- -- p ILC Technical Design Report Physics and Detectors – Detailed Baseline Design Juan A. Fuster Verdú, IFIC-Valencia PAC Meeting, KEK.
August 2005Snowmass Workshop IP Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Measurement of: Luminosity (precise and fast) Energy Polarisation.
1 LumiCal Optimization and Design Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, Boulder, September 18, 2008.
Simulation Calor 2002, March. 27, 2002M. Wielers, TRIUMF1 Performance of Jets and missing ET in ATLAS Monika Wielers TRIUMF, Vancouver on behalf.
Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Cambridge ILC software tools meeting.
W. Morse May 15, Colliding 5nm Beams at the International Linear Collider William Morse Brookhaven National Lab.
Jan MDI WS SLAC Electron Detection in the Very Forward Region V. Drugakov, W. Lohmann Motivation Talk given by Philip Detection of Electrons and.
September, TAU FCAL Worlshop in Tel Aviv W. Lohmann, DESY Why a e + e - Collider Physics essentials The Snowmass Adventure Where we are with FCAL.
Analysis of Beamstrahlung Pairs ECFA Workshop Vienna, November 14-17, 2005 Christian Grah.
Preparing for the SiD LoI SiD Parallel Session TILC08 March 5, 2008 John Jaros.
ILC Meeting Vancouver July What Does Beam-strahlung Tell Us? William Morse - BNL.
LOI Planning The Very Forward Region Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Takashi Maruyama/SLAC Uriel Nauenberg/UCB SiD Collaboration Meeting, Boulder, CO 19 September.
Simulation of physics background for luminosity calorimeter M.Pandurović I. Božović-Jelisavčić “Vinča“ Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, SCG.
2. December 2005Valencia Workshop Very Forward Region Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Basic functions: - Hermeticity to small polar angles - Fast.
1 A.Nomerotski SUSY Benchmarking Analyses with SiD Yiming Li, Tomas Lastovicka, Andrei Nomerotski (University of Oxford) TILC09, Tsukuba, 18 April 2009.
September, 19 FCAL Worlshop in Tel Aviv W. Lohmann, DESY Physics Requirements Input From Theory Lessons from LEP LumiCal Simulations BeamCal.
1Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 ILD and SiD detectors for 1 TeV ILC some recommendations following experience from the CLIC detector study
SiD R&D tasks for the LOI - Subsystem R&D tasks - Summary of SiD R&D - Prioritization of R&D tasks -> Document for DoE/NSF ~Feb 2009 (Mainly based on Marty’s.
Septembre SLAC BeamCal W. Lohmann, DESY BeamCal: ensures hermeticity of the detector to smallest polar angles -important for searches Serves as.
Karsten Büßer Instrumentation of the Forward Region of the TESLA Detector International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics Aachen, July 19th.
ILC-ECFA Workshop Valencia November 2006 Four-fermion processes as a background in the ILC luminosity calorimeter for the FCAL Collaboration I. Božović-Jelisavčić,
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Philip Bambade - LALLCWS04 - MDI 20/4/20041 Crossing-angle-or-not physics implications report from phone-meeting cold half-angle = 10, 4, 1, 0.3,……
P. Bambade, LAL/Orsay TESLA collaboration meeting APDG session 22/1/ Crossing-angle-or-not physics implications report from phone-meeting.
TESLA R&D: Forward Region Achim Stahl DESY Zeuthen Cracow Tel Aviv Minsk Prague Colorado Protvino UC London Dubna.
HEP Tel Aviv University LumiCal (pads design) Simulation Ronen Ingbir FCAL Simulation meeting, Zeuthen Tel Aviv University HEP experimental Group Collaboration.
February, INP PAN FCAL Workshop in Cracow W. Lohmann, DESY The BCD (Baseline Configuration Document) The next calendar dates Where we are with FCAL.
CLIC Machine-Detector Interface Working Group (MDI) Emmanuel Tsesmelis CERN TS/LEA CLIC-ACE of 3 September 2008.
CLIC Energy Stages D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
SiD Collaboration Meeting Highlights Tom Markiewicz/SLAC ILC BDS Meeting 08 May 2007.
W. Morse GamCal1 GamCal: a Beam-strahlung Gamma Detector for Beam Diagnostics William M. Morse Brookhaven National Lab.
Status of Forward Calorimetry R&D: Report from the FCAL Collaboration Bruce A. Schumm Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics University of California,
The Luminosity Calorimeter Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Desy ( On behalf of the FCAL collaboration ) June 11 th 2008.
On the possibility of stop mass determination in photon-photon and e + e - collisions at ILC A.Bartl (Univ. of Vienna) W.Majerotto HEPHY (Vienna) K.Moenig.
Lucia Bortko | Optimisation Studies for the BeamCal Design | | IFJ PAN Krakow | Page 1/16 Optimisation Studies for the BeamCal Design Lucia.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
1/24 SiD FCAL Takashi Maruyama Tom Markiewicz SLAC TILC’09, Tskuba, Japan, April 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K.
Mokka simulation studies on the Very Forward Detector components at CLIC and ILC Eliza TEODORESCU (IFIN-HH) FCAL Collaboration Meeting Tel Aviv, October.
September 2007SLAC IR WS Very Forward Instrumentation of the ILC Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Talks by M. Morse, W. Wierba, myself.
LumiCal background and systematics at CLIC energy I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences.
1 LoI FCAL Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K. Krempetz T. MarkiewiczBNLW.
November, 7, 2006 ECFA06, Valencia, Spain LumiCal & BeamCal readout and DAQ for the Very Forward Region Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish.
Octobre 2007LAL Orsay Very Forward Instrumentation of the ILC Detector Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY.
I nstrumentation of the F orward R egion Collaboration High precision design ECFA - Durham2004 University of Colorado AGH University, Cracow I nstitute.
Very Forward Instrumentation: BeamCal Ch. Grah FCAL Collaboration ILD Workshop, Zeuthen Tuesday 15/01/2008.
Potential and challenges of the physics measurements with very forward detectors at linear colliders Ivanka Bozovic Jelisavcic [on behalf of the FCAL Collaboration]
FCAL Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, 15 – 17 November, 2010, Eugene, Oregon.
Initial proposal for the design of the luminosity calorimeter at a 3TeV CLIC Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University March 6th 2009
FCAL Munich October W.M. Morse 1 U.S. FCAL Efforts William Morse - BNL.
Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
SiD Calorimeter R&D Collaboration
LumCal, BeamCal and GamCal
Maria Person Gulda , Uriel Nauenberg, Gleb Oleinik,
CLIC-ILC BDS & MDI work.
Report about “Forward Instrumentation” Issues
SiD Electronic Concepts
A Silicon-Tungsten ECal for the SiD Concept
Luminometer Integration at IR2
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
Presentation transcript:

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, ILC Detector R&D William Morse Physics Dept., BNL

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, ILC SiD Detector Concept BNL has joined SiD last fall, which is one of four ILC detector concepts. First draft of the SiD Detector Outline Document submitted to LC World Wide Study last month (150p). Forward Detector Section written by BNL (W.M. coordinator). Web site:

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Forward Region Physics Measurement of beam-strahlung pairs for ILC bunch characterization (BeamCal). Measurement of forward Bhabha pairs for precision measurement of luminosity normalization (LumCal) to 2  Maintain detector hermeticity (missing P T ) down to very small polar angles (  5mrad).

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Forward Detector Challenges Radiation Hardness (10MGy/year) Interfacing with the final focus elements High occupancy rates (10 4 pairs/BX) Good efficiency, energy and position resolution in the presence of very high backgrounds Fast readout to guide beams together

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, SiD Forward Detector Coordinators Detector Hermeticity with BeamCal/LumCal – Morse Monitoring the Instantaneous Luminosity with BeamCal and GamCal – Morse LumCal Physics Requirements – Morse Occupancy Issues in the Forward Direction – Morse Radiation Damage Issues in the Forward Direction – Li Space, Support, and Integration Issues – Lissauer Readout Issues – Lanni R&D Plan – Lissauer Physics: Lanni, Lissauer, Morse; Instrumentation: De Geronimo, Li, Mead, Radeka, Rescia; S.C. Magnet Div: Bret Parker; U. Oregon: Dave Strom

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, What is Beam-strahlung? Flat beam with length L, half-width B, half-height A, L >> B >> A,  = Ne/4ABL E v =  y/  0 B h =  y/c  0 F v = e(1-  2 )  y/  0 (space charge force) Two bunches overlap: E = 0 B h = 2  y/c  0 – up to 1 KT for ILC F v = 2e  y/  0 Power radiated in gammas  (  F) 2  0.5 MW at ILC

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Beam-strahlung and Pairs Bethe-Heitler pair created when  meets incoming e and converts to pair B.H. cross-section about  6  cm 2 Pairs  N  N e /AB Energy in pairs over energy in gammas is proportional to N e /AB, ie. almost luminosity! Submitted as a LC Tech Note

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Collaborating with W. Lohman and M. Ohlerich (DESY)

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, BeamCal and LumCal Silicon Tungsten Calorimeters BeamCalLumCal Polar angle mrad20 – 140 mrad L3.2m1.7m /BX20 TeV10 GeV

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, BeamCal – 14mrad crossing angle

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Maximum missing P T for smu → mu LSP vs LSP mass for different smu masses

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Hermeticity Requirements Hep-ph/ (2004) P. Bambade et al. Experimental Implications for a LC of the SUSY Dark Matter Scenario M(LSP) = 212GeV, M(stau) = 217 GeV Need to veto ee→ee  and ee→ee  backgrounds at level – being studied by Tel Aviv as part of FCAL effort. BNL will study Bhabha pileup

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Luminosity Normalization Goal is precision measurement to 2  Bhabha cross-section in forward direction

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Possible Readout Architecture F. Lanni

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Forward Detector R&D Synergy with LHC Effort Simulation studies (p.20) Integration studies (p.21) Mechanical design (p.22) Readout (p.23) Detail detector design (p.24) Material studies (p.25) Hadronic calorimeter (p.26) SiD web site:

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Conclusions Part of SiD Study since Fall 2005 (mostly U.S. based) Part of FCAL Study since March 2006 (mostly Europe based) Synergy with BNL S.C. Magnet Div. Synergy with BNL Instrumentation Div. Synergy with LHC Effort

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Extra Slides

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Where Do The Pairs Go? Analytic Calculation

William Morse ILC R&D April 19,

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Simulation Studies Optimization of the design taking in to account space, cost and technology. This includes segmentation, both longitudinal and transverse and the dynamic range needed. We expect that the simulation studies will need a few iterations to help in optimizing the system integration aspects as well as cost. Preliminary decisions Dec. 06, Baseline Detector Layout: Mid ’07. The baseline should define in details the specifications and the parameters for the Beam Cal and the Luminosity Cal. Studies to be done by Physicists – assume baseline support.

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Integration Studies The forward region is very crowded and the space needs to be shared with the magnets of the final focus, beam pipes, forward calorimeters and their services. Detailed engineering studies to integrate and coordinate these requirements needs to be done at an early stage. Conceptual design for space allocation, services, access and installation by fall of ’06 and a baseline design by mid ’07. Design effort: ¼ Designer time. Baseline should be ready in one year to allow for space allocation between the different detector and first layout of services routing.

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Mechanical Design The forward calorimeters have special requirements. For example, we expect that the beam pipes will need to be integrated with the Beam Cal to achieve maximal coverage. Detailed mechanical design that takes into account the constraint imposed by the space limitation needs to take place. This should include the support of the calorimeters off the forward tube. Conceptual design end of ’06. Baseline design fall of ’07. Mechanical Engineer/Designer: ½ FTE. Technician: Prototype work on assembly concepts.

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Readout Define readout architecture, develop readout solutions and test some of the ideas in the Lab and/ or test beams. The readout work should include calculations of the Beam Cal feedback needed for the machine as well as for physics events. Conceptual design and detail specifications by end of ’06, Baseline readout architecture 18 month from now. Electronic Eng: 1/3 of an electronic Eng.

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Detail Detector Design Once the readout and the mechanical layout are established a detail integration of the readout and the mechanical set up is needed. This will include the layout of the Si sensors, routing of the signals to the readout and cabling of the detector.

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Material Studies The radiation level in the forward direction implies that one will need to probably specify specialized Si material. One needs to select the materials and expose them to radiation levels equivalent to what will be seen at the ILC forward region over period of 5 years. BNL Instrumentation Division has a facility that will allow us to do this. Selection of material and radiation tests – end of ’06 early ’07. Selection of Sensor material mid ’08. ¼ designer for preparation of Si wafers for tests, plus material costs.

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Hadronic Calorimeter Depending on the technology choice for the Hadronic calorimeter for SiD, the Forward section of the Hadronic calorimeter might need to have a different technology. The R&D part will include choice of technology for the forward hadronic calorimeter and a detail design. Designer 1/3 time, Technician ½ time, ME 1/3 time. For the above we would like to test some of the ideas and build a mechanical prototype and, given the financial resources, to test it in a beam. This effort should be coordinated with other prototypes in SiD.

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Total of Above Forward Region Manpower One man-year each: tech, designer, ME, EE 3 physicists  2 years 1 Simulation 1 Readout R&D coordination 1 Integration of the Forward region Present level of effort is 1.3 physicists and 0.2 tech, designer, ME, EE; so it will take 5 years, not 2 years.

William Morse ILC R&D April 19, Particle Flow ILC is a precision measurement machine. The hope is particle flow will give 30%/E 0.5 jet resolution which is needed to do precision measurements. Situation in Europe is about three dozen very smart people working  20% of their time on PFA. The U.S. is effort is not as large. US effort needs better coordination – BNL can make a difference.