Ministry of Transport and Communications of the Republic of Lithuania

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural and Cohesion Funds – an Important Tool to Support Climate Protection Improving the climate resilience of Cohesion Policy Funding Programmes:
Advertisements

Procedures established to manage transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and other wastes Workshop BCRC, Bratislava Okt
Sustainable Road Transport Upcoming legislative proposals from the EU Antje Fiehn Federation of German Industries.
A: Longer Heavier Vehicles Q: Environmental costs (minimise) –Emissions, Pollution, Waste... Q: Track costs (balance) –Pavement design / axle loads, tyre.
Swedish Road Administration (SRA) Sören Hedberg Society and Traffic Division S – Borlange
Bilateral screening, Chapter 14, Transport policy Land Transport/Road/Intermodality/ General issues affecting all modes Brussels, 8 and 9 June 2011.
June 2010 © MMX H J Burnett FTSI MCQI CPD Nominal Quantities and the status of ℮
Polish Heavy Transport Association. Introduction Short information about lecture About Us 1 Permit and escort 2 3 Our goals.
Katri Kummoinen, Ministry of Justice, Finland SERVICES DIRECTIVE 2006/123/EC - towards more competitive market in the European Union.
Authorities role in the assessment of energy efficiency Marianne Lindström, Conference on Energy Efficiency in IPPC Installations, Vienna
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
1 / LiveLink number Passenger Land Transport in Portugal: Improving Competition by Legislative Reform José Luís Moreira de Silva Ana Pereira de Miranda.
Road charging and vehicle taxation - the EU perspective
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION COMMERCIAL MOTOR VEHICLES.
ROAD TRANSPORT SECTOR IMPLEMENTATION OF SELECTED MEASURES AND INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS Chişinău 2011.
European Commission Enterprise and Industry Market surveillance and automotive type-approval legislation - 28/06/2012 | ‹#› WP.29 Enforcement Working Group.
EP Transport Committee Fourth Railway Package - public hearing Brussels, 7 May 2013 Better governance of the railways – a freight perspective Tony Berkeley.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Transport statistics Demarcation of the domain 1.
UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Economic Commission for Europe Beijing, September 2005 Sub-regional Seminar.
Challenges and the benefits of interoperability for the railway industry and the rail transport Eric Fontanel UNIFE General Manager.
16th annual UCLA Lake Arrowhead Symposium on the Transportation- Land Use-Environment Connection. Axel Friedrich Umweltbundesamt (UBA) Germany WHAT IN.
Introduction to Europe & European Law
Nov/Dec 2003ElectraNet BSP-2 Workshop (khb) 1 EU Telecoms Regulatory Status Governing Legislation Package 2002  Directive 2002/19/EC Access to, and interconnection.
Directorate General for Energy and Transport Johannes ENZMANN European Commission DG Energy and Transport Unit Electricity and Gas GIE Annual Conference.
Employment policy, labour market and free movement of workers European Social Policy Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University in Prague.
Increasing railways‘ competitiveness UNECE workshop Deutsche Bahn AG Maria Sack, LL.M. Head of Unit International Associations Geneva, 25 November 2014.
1 ACCREDITATION – BG situation April 2014, Prague STATE AGENCY STATE AGENCY FOR METROLOGICAL AND TECHNICAL SURVEILLANCE TECHNICAL SURVEILLANCE 1.
Study on the Implementation of the European Regulation (EC) N° 1370/2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road of 23 October 2007.
Finding a PPP Partner Essential EU Law Considerations Bernard Wilson Maribor, 18 January 2005 Bernard Wilson Maribor, 18 January 2005.
ESCWA Expert Group Meeting on transport and trade facilitation in the ESCWA region Beirut 7./ Proposal for a work schedule for ESCWA Work Group.
SUPERVISION AND CONTROL OF SHIPMENTS OF WASTE RUTA BIRUTE DAUKSIENE CUSTOMS DEPARTAMENT LITHUANIA.
Transport ABRPlus in Transport HLG on Administrative Burden 30 January 2014.
European Railway Safety Strategy EIM Safety Group (PhGALLEY and J-Å HALLDEN) 29 september 2009.
Transport The new TEN-T guidelines Results of the legislative procedure Philippe Chantraine (MOVE B1), 24 June 2013.
Control of dangerous goods transportation in Latvia Deputy Head of Road Transport Inspectorate Mr. Renars Derrings June 19, 2006 Riga.
Support to the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine in Strengthening of Safety Standards of Commercial Road Transport UA/14/ENP/TR/43 The 3d Steering.
Jonathan Goldberg - EMTA Draft regulation on public passenger transport services by rail and by road Progress report - October 2006 EMTA General meeting.
AN OVERVIEW OF LAWS AND RULES GOVERNING ROAD FREIGHT TRANSPORT AND THEIR ENFORCEMENT ISSUES IN PAKISTAN Shahbaz Latif Mirza Assistant Chief National Transport.
EMTA General Meeting Prague May 2012 Round table on PSO Regulation 1370/2007 “Two years after enforcement, where are we? How efficient is the regulation?
The New Legislative Framework
B.A BUSINESS STUDIES BUS361 BUSINESS LAW. Ms. Natalie Alkiviadou.
CONSUMER PROTECTION Slovak Customs Administration UNECE „MARS“ Group meeting 24 – 26 September 2006, Bratislava Bc. Viliam Pružinec, Customs Directorate.
C4Freight. Freight Transport Corridors  Objective Demonstrate on key pan-European corridors innovative transport technologies, systems and strategies.
PIANC RIS Guidelines 2011 Edition 3 Smart Rivers Conference 2011 PIANC RIS working group Cas Willems.
Electric safety requirements in European Community vehicle type-approval legislation GRSP ELSA sub-group – 6 th meeting Brussels, Belgium, April.
Virginia Tanase Transport Division, UNECE, Geneva IRU Academy Seminar on Driver Competence 28 January 2010 A Global Perspective on Driver Competence.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 14 – Transport Bilateral screening:
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 14 – Transport Bilateral screening:
© International Road Transport Union (IRU) IRU Academy Seminar, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsPage 1 5 th International IRU Academy Seminar on Driver.
EU policy on charges for heavy goods vehicles Road vehicle taxation and common rules on annual taxes for heavy goods vehicles 16 April 2011.
ROMANIA NATIONAL NATURAL GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY Public Service Obligations in Romanian Gas Sector Ligia Medrea General Manager – Authorizing, Licensing,
Zápatí prezentace Notion and system of European Labour Law.
N° 1 Possible co-operation between rail and buses in the area of Telematics Applications for Passengers Presented by European Railway Agency (ERA) th.
European Union's policy and legislation on technical regulation of energy efficiency and environmental safety for road transport Tomaž Svetina, M. Sc.
competition rules in inland transport
Marek Stavinoha Legal officer DG MOVE A4 European Commission
P.L Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act
European Rail Infrastructure Managers
NAB/RB Training Workshop In Valenciennes, April 2016
Notion and system of European Labour Law
4th Railway Package – Implementation of the Technical Pillar
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Relevant EU legislation and upcoming developments
New Customs Legislation of the Eurasian Economic Union
Modular Vehicle combinations MVC in Paris 27and 28. Januar 2014
High-level Working Group on Statistical Confidentiality
Sustainable Development A priority issue for the IRU
Task Force on the measurement of road traffic volumes in VKm
Presentation transcript:

Ministry of Transport and Communications of the Republic of Lithuania main EU Directives and Regulations on maximum authorized dimensions and weights of road vehicles in national and international traffic PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS 16 April 2012, Baku Gytis Mažeika Ministry of Transport and Communications of the Republic of Lithuania

CONTENTS Purpose of the Directive 96/53; Key norms and standards; Examples of some EU Member States; Discussion on revision of the Directive; Conclusions.

TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY (1957)

TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY (1957)

PURPOSE OF THE DIRECTIVE 96/53 Common standards of weights and dimensions for commercial road transport vehicles; Fair competition between transport operators; Clear and stable operating environment; Seamless circulation of commercial vehicles across borders; 5

DIRECTIVE 96/53 IN THE CONTEXT OF TYPE-APPROVAL LEGISLATION Directive 96/53 sets the circulation standards; Production standards and type-approval procedures are set by other EU legislation (i.e., directive 2007/46/EC); 6

SCOPE OF THE DIRECTIVE 96/53 Dimensions, weights and certain other characteristics of vehicles and trailers under categories: M2 : 8+1, m < 5 t; M3 : 8+1, m > 5 t; N2 : 3,5 < m < 12 t; N3 : 12 t < m; 03 : 3,5 < m < 10 t; 04 : 10 t < m; 7

KEY DIMENSIONS Max height – 4 m; max width – 2,55 m (2,60 m for conditioned vehicles); max length: motor vehicle or a single trailer: 12.00 m articulated vehicle:16.50 m road train, articulated bus, bus + trailer: 18.75 m 8

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DIMENSIONS Vehicle or vehicle combination must be able to turn within a swept circle having an outer radius of 12.50 m and an inner radius of 5.30 m. Maximum distance between the axis of the fifth-wheel king pin and the rear of the semi-trailer is 12.00 m. The distance measured horizontally between the axis of the fifth-wheel king pin and any point at the front of the semi-trailer must not exceed 2.04 m. Maximum distance between the foremost external point of the loading area behind the cabin to the rearmost external point of the trailer of the vehicle combination is 16.40 m. Maximum distance between the foremost external point of the loading area behind the cabin to the rearmost external point of the trailer of the vehicle combination minus the distance between the rear of the drawing vehicle and the front of the trailer is 15.65 m. The distance between the rear axle of a motor vehicle and the front axle of a trailer must not be less than 3.00 m. 9

MAXIMUM AUTHORIZED WEIGHT Maximum driving axle weight – 11,5 t (10 t for non-driving axles) 24 t for three axle trailers; 26 t for three axle vehicles; 32 t for four axle vehicles 44 t for 40-foot ISO container; 36 t or 38 t in case of four axles 36 t in case of four axles 40 t 18 t* * 18 t limit is applied for two-axle trailers and vehicles 10

FREE CIRCULATION OF VEHICLES Vehicles registered in the EU; Compliance with weights and dimensions standards in case of international operations; Compliance with dimensions standards in case of national operations. 11

PROHIBITION OF CIRCULATION OF VEHICLES WHICH DO NOT CONFORM TO: Maximum length; Maximum width; Intermodal cargo dimensions Turning radius; Maximum length of semi-trailer; Other dimensions; Special requirements for buses. 12

MS MAY AUTHORISE CIRCULATION OF VEHICLES EVEN IF THEY DO NOT CONFORM WITH THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS: Maximum height; Maximum authorized vehicle weight; Maximum authorized axle weight; 25 % load on the driving axle; Special limitation for laden weight of a four-axle vehicle in relation to its length. 13

EXAMPLES OF MAX WEIGHT 10 11.5 18 26 38 48/60 13 19 40 12 44 11,5 36 Country Weight per non-drive axle Weight per drive Lorry 2 axles 3 axles Road Train 4 axles 5 axles and + Articulated Vehicle 5 axles and + SWEDEN 10 11.5 18 26 38 48/60 FRANCE 13 19 40 ITALY 12 44 FINLAND 11,5 36 44/60 42/48 NETHER- LANDS 21,5 33 50 Source: International Transport Forum, 12 Oct 2011 14

MAX. AXLE LOAD REGULATION IN SWEDEN Source: Legal loading. Weight and dimension regulations for heavy vehicles 2010, Transport Styrelsen, Sweden. 15

EXAMPLES OF MAX DIMENSIONS Country Height Width Length Lorry or Trailer Road Train Articulated vehicle SWEDEN Not defined 2,55 24 25,25 FRANCE 12 18,75 16,5 IRELAND 4,65 FINLAND 4,2 2,6 UK Source: International Transport Forum, 12 Oct 2011 16

EXCEPTIONS FOR CIRCULATION OF OVERSIZED VEHICLES Indivisible loads: non-discriminatory, on the basis of special permits or case-by-case agreements; Or No significant effect on international competition in the transport sector (logging, forestry and modular concept). 17

Conventional regulation MODULAR CONCEPT: SWEDEN, FINLAND AND NETHERLANDS Conventional regulation Modular concept: max. 60 t, 25.25 m 18

POTENTIAL COMPONENTS OF THE MODULAR SYSTEM Source: Legal loading. Weight and dimension regulations for heavy vehicles 2010, Transport Styrelsen, Sweden. 19

POTENTIAL COMBINATIONS OF THE MODULAR SYSTEM Source: Legal loading. Weight and dimension regulations for heavy vehicles 2010, Transport Styrelsen, Sweden. 20

PRINCIPLES OF ENFORCEMENT All vehicles must bear signs of proof of compliance (forms established by the Directive 76/114/EEC); Local restrictions on certain roads or other infrastructure; Random checks allowed for weight control; Dimension control on the basis of suspicion only. 21

DIRECTIVE 96/53 establishes Maximum dimensions; Maximum weight (max laden mass, axle load etc.); Prohibition on MS to discriminate the use of vehicles in case of conformity; Exceptions for max. dimensions (special permits and effect on international competition); Methods of proof and principles for checks. 22

DIRECTIVE 96/53 ALLOWS MS TO: Authorize heavier and bigger vehicles for national transport of goods and passengers; Specify procedures on how to deal with oversized/overweight vehicles (non-discrimination); Put limitations for vehicles on part of their road network; Prescribe institutions responsible for implementation and supervision (competent authority); Levy taxes, tariffs and fines; 23

DISCUSSION ON INCREASING THE MAX WEIGHTS AND DIMENSIONS OF THE DIRECTIVE Potential reduction of flows rail and inland waterways, by 3,8% and 2,9% respectively; Safety expected to stay at the same level; Investments needed to prepare infrastructure for heavier vehicles; Energy consumption and emissions expected to go down. Source: Effects of adapting the rules on weights and dimensions of heavy commercial vehicles as established within Directive 96/53/EC. European Commission. 24

THANK YOU 25