The Characteristics of an Experimental Hypothesis The Inductive Model The Deductive Model Combining Induction and Deduction Building on Prior Research.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Psychology
Advertisements

Introduction to Research
Research problem, Purpose, question
Introduction, Acquiring Knowledge, and the Scientific Method
Chapter One: The Science of Psychology
The Study of Adult Development and Aging:
The Need for Scientific Methodology The Characteristics of Modern Science The Objectives of Psychological Science The Tools of Psychological Science Scientific.
The Characteristics of an Experimental Hypothesis
Scientific Method and Experimentation
Formulating the Hypothesis M&H: Chapter 6 Anthropomorphism?
Chapter 2 The Research Enterprise in Psychology. n Basic assumption: events are governed by some lawful order  Goals: Measurement and description Understanding.
Hypothesis A statement of predicted relationship between the independent and dependent variables Example: Cigarette smoking is related to lung cancer.
Research Methods Key Points What is empirical research? What is the scientific method? How do psychologists conduct research? What are some important.
Psychology as a Science In this lecture we will discuss: science - a method for understanding limits of common sense methods of science description correlation.
CHAPTER 3 Research in Psychology: Methods and Design.
The Scientific Method in Psychology.  Descriptive Studies: naturalistic observations; case studies. Individuals observed in their environment.  Correlational.
Research Methods in Psychology Group Activity Friday August 5, 2011.
Constructing Hypothesis Week 7 Department of RS and GISc, Institute of Space Technology.
CHAPTER 4 – RESEARCH METHODS Psychology 110. How Do We Know What We Know? You can know something because a friend told you You can know something because.
The Scientific Method. Objectives Explain how science is different from other forms of human endeavor. Identify the steps that make up scientific methods.
Research Methods Chapter 2.
Steps of The Scientific Method 1.Purpose/Question (Why we are doing the experiment) 2.Background Information (What do we already know that will help us)
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 1 Research: An Overview.
How Psychologists Do Research Chapter 2. How Psychologists Do Research What makes psychological research scientific? Research Methods Descriptive studies.
BHS Methods in Behavioral Sciences I April 7, 2003 Chapter 2 – Introduction to the Methods of Science.
The Scientific Method. Scientifically Solving a Problem Observe Define a Problem Review the Literature Observe some More Develop a Theoretical Framework.
Research in Psychology A Scientific Endeavor. Goals of Psychological Research Description of social behavior Are people who grow up in warm climates different.
THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD Murtaugh 1A Living Environment.
F ORMULATING THE H YPOTHESIS. C HAPTER O BJECTIVES : 1. Learn the difference between nonexperimental and experimental hypotheses 2. Understand the components.
Writing a sound proposal
KARL POPPER ON THE PROBLEM OF A THEORY OF SCIENTIFIC METHOD
Research Methods in Psychology
How science works.
Scientific Method.
How to Research Lynn W Zimmerman, PhD.
By Prof. Dr. Salahuddin Khan
Unit 3 Hypothesis.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
Section 2: Science as a Process
THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD   Regents Biology.
Research & Writing in CJ
Hypothesis-Based Science
Psychology as a science
Research, Methodology, and Ethics
IS Psychology A Science?
Module 02 Research Strategies.
How do we know things? The Scientific Method
The Scientific Method.
© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
2 independent Groups Graziano & Raulin (1997).
Research Methods: Concepts and Connections First Edition
IS Psychology A Science?
What Is Science? Read the lesson title aloud to students.
What Is Science? Read the lesson title aloud to students.
Scientific Methods Science in Practice.
Cross Sectional Designs
The Scientific Method Unit 1.
What Is Science? Read the lesson title aloud to students.
It is actually way more exciting than it sounds!!!!
Generating Testable Ideas
Nature of Science.
Chapter 1: Introduction to Research on Physical Activity
INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
What Is Science? Read the lesson title aloud to students.
Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology
IS Psychology A Science?
Research Methods & Statistics
The Practice of Science
Presentation transcript:

The Characteristics of an Experimental Hypothesis The Inductive Model The Deductive Model Combining Induction and Deduction Building on Prior Research Serendipity and the Windfall Hypothesis Intuition When All Else Fails Searching the Research Literature

What is a hypothesis? The Characteristics of an Experimental Hypothesis A hypothesis is a statement of a predicted relationship between two or more variables. It comes after a lot of thinking about a research idea. It is the thesis or main idea of an experiment. Y will have a different type of hypothesis for an experiment than for a nonexperimental design, but both types of studies have hypotheses.

What is an nonexperimental hypothesis? The Characteristics of an Experimental Hypothesis A nonexperimental hypothesis predicts how variables (events, traits, or behaviors) might be correlated, but not causally related. For example, the amount of TV viewing will be directly related to vocabulary size, or incandescent lighting in Company A will produce better performance than fluorescent lighting in Company B. Sometimes a nonexperimental design, such as a case study or a naturalistic observation, will not have a hypothesis because it was meant to explore and describe behaviors as they occur naturally. Other nonexperimental designs like correlational studies and quasi experimental studies, include a hypothesis about the predicted relationship between variables.

What is an experimental hypothesis? The Characteristics of an Experimental Hypothesis An experimental hypothesis is a tentative explanation of an event or a behavior. It is a statement that predicts the effect of an independent variable or antecedent, on a dependent variable or measured behavior. For example, cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) produces less relapse than antidepressants.

Experimental hypothesis Every experiment has at least one hyothesis. To formulate a hypothesis, the researcher must think about all of the possible factors affecting the variable they wish to study and decide which are important. Hypothesis must meet the criteria of being synthetic statements, that are testable, falsifiable, parsimonious and fruitful.

Why must a hypothesis be a synthetic statement? The Characteristics of an Experimental Hypothesis When we state a hypothesis, we then gather data that either support or contradict it. For this reason, a hypothesis must be capable of being true or false, which is a property of synthetic statements. The statements, “the weight of dieters will fluctuate” is always true, therefore it is not a synthetic statement. This statement is an analytic statement, one that is always true. Also must avoid contradictory statements; these are always false.

Synthetic statements A hypothesis meets the definition of a synthetic statement when it can be stated in “if…..then” form. If the subject eats candy, then his mood will brighten. This form expresses the relationship between the antecedent conditions of eating candy and the measured behavior of mood. This statement can also be true or false.

What is testability and why is it important? The Characteristics of an Experimental Hypothesis An experimental hypothesis is testable when it can be assessed by manipulating an IV and measuring the results on the DV. Without testability, we cannot evaluate the validity of a hypothesis. If a dog’s eyes move behind his lids during sleep, then he must be dreaming. Can we really test this hypothesis?

Falsifiable statements Statements of research hypotheses must be falsifiable (disprovable) by the research findings. Hypotheses must be worded in a way that failure to find the predicted effect must be considered evidence that the hypothesis is false. If an hypothesis is worded incorrectly, then it may not be falsifiable because any failures to produce the predicted effect can just be explained away by the researcher. “Chocolate is better than vanilla” and “God is real,” are both non- falsifiable statements. In science, you don’t prove hypotheses true, you either support them or prove them false.

Why should hypotheses be parsimonious? The Characteristics of an Experimental Hypothesis Parsimony means that we prefer a simple hypothesis over one requiring many supporting assumptions. A simple hypothesis allows us to focus our attention on the main factors that influence our dependent variable. If you look at an appealing photograph, your pupils will dilate, or, If you look at an appealing photograph in June and it is warm and sunny out, then your pupils will dilate.

Fruitful A hypothesis should be fruitful, it should lead to other studies. Little Albert example

Explain the inductive model of formulating a hypothesis. The Inductive Model Induction is reasoning from specific cases to general principles to form a hypothesis. The inductive method is often used to create hypotheses. You notice something specific about some people, for instance, that all of your male friends who are hairy have higher sex drives than other men who are less hairy. You make a conclusion that hairiness must be related to sex drive. This is a theory that you have formed that can now be tested through an experiment. Researchers use inductive reasoning to construct theories by creating explanations that account for empirical data (observations). Induction is the basic tool of theory building.

How can we build a theory using induction? The Inductive Model A theory is a set of general principles that can be used to explain or predict behavior. Astrology is an example of a theory. Scientists can use the results of extensive experiments designed to test hypotheses to construct a theory that unifies their findings. For instance, by looking at lots of research on exposure, a theory was formed that the more we are exposed to something, the more we like it.

Explain the deductive model of formulating a hypothesis. The Deductive Model Deduction is reasoning from general principles to specific predictions. It is the opposite of induction. ith deduction, you take a general idea, like a theory, and make prediction about individual specific behavior from this general principle. This approach is used to test the assumptions of an established theory, especially when applied in a new situation.. Example, Baumrind’s Parenting Styles theory – can see if her theory about the effects of authoritarian parenting holds in recent immigrant children.

How can researchers combine induction and deduction? Combining Induction and Deduction Develop propositions using induction by examining specific cases. Induction makes theories. Then, make predictions using deduction. Deduction tests theories. Walster et al. formulated equity theory based on specific observations (induction) and then tested predictions from this theory (deduction). Equity theory says when we feel over benefited or under benefited in a relationship, we do something to restore a sense of fairness.

What is the most useful way to develop a hypothesis? Building on Prior Research Review research that has already been published. Both experimental and nonexperimental studies can prove helpful. Ex post facto studies suggested that cigarette smoking was associated with cancer since larger amounts of smokers got cancer than non smokers. This led to a hypothesis of, If a person smokes, then he will bet cancer, and experimental studies being done in rats.Some rats, smoked, some didn’t (manipulation of antecedents) then all rate were tested for cancer.

How does a review of prior experiments help us develop a hypothesis? Building on Prior Research A review of prior experiments helps in five ways:  Identifies questions that have not been conclusively answered or addressed at all, research might say that this theory was never tested among black females; only white subjects were used.  Suggests new hypotheses  Identifies additional variables that could mediate an effect, perhaps authoritarian parenting is mediated by number of extended family members living in home.

How does a review of prior experiments help us develop a hypothesis? Building on Prior Research  Identifies problems other researchers have experienced  Helps avoid duplication of prior research when replication is not intended

How does serendipity help develop fruitful hypotheses? Serendipity and the Windfall Hypothesis A scientist who is open to unexpected results and who is sufficiently informed can understand the significance of unexpected findings. Serendipity is finding something that was not being looked for. However, a dogmatic scientist would be less likely to “see” or appreciate the significance of serendipitous events. Example Ivan Pavlov. He was studying digestion in dogs, not classical conditioning. He wasn’t even a psychologist.

What is intuition? Intuition Intuition is knowing without reasoning, or unconscious problem-solving. Intuition guides what we choose to study in an experiment. Intuition must be directed by our literature review. Good hunches can be an unconscious result of our own expertise in an area. The more we know about a topic, the better our intuitive hypotheses are likely to be.

What are helpful strategies for developing experimental hypotheses? When All Else Fails Three promising strategies are: (1) Read an issue of a psychology journal, try to stick to one or two topic areas. (2) Observe how people behave in public places (3) Choose a real-world problem and try to identify its cause. Byron (1996) wanted to increase female undergraduate condom use. She tested to see what type of attitudes were associated with women not using condoms (feelings of no control) and designed an intervention to reduce this feeling.

What is the purpose of the Introduction section of an APA-format paper? Searching the Research Literature The Introduction section provides a selective review of research findings related to the research hypothesis. This section identifies which questions have not been definitively answered by previous studies and helps show how your experiment advances knowledge in this area.

Explain the value of a meta-analysis? Searching the Research Literature A meta-analysis can provide helpful information about your topic. A meta-analysis is not an experiment, but rather a statistical analysis of many similar studies.

Explain the value of a meta-analysis? Searching the Research Literature A meta-analysis measures the average effect size of an independent variable across studies that share similar methodologies. This statistical procedure helps establish the strength and external validity of a causal relationship.