Warm Front End Concept A. Shemyakin PIP-II Machine Advisory Committee 9-11 March 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Imperial College 1 Progress at the RAL Front End Test Stand J. Pozimski Talk outline : Overview Ion source development LEBT RFQ Beam Chopper MEBT.
Advertisements

MEBT Design Considerations The beam energy in the MEBT is sufficiently low for the space charge forces to have a considerable impact on the beam dynamics.
Final Design of a CW Radio-Frequency Quadrupole (RFQ) for the Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE)* Abstract: The Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE)
R. Miyamoto, Beam Physics Design of MEBT, ESS AD Retreat 1 Beam Physics Design of MEBT Ryoichi Miyamoto (ESS) November 29th, 2012 ESS AD Retreat On behalf.
Novel Beam Diagnostics on PXIE Vic Scarpine, FNAL 2nd Annual PASI Meeting April 3-5, 2013.
Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE) Steve Holmes Fermilab Proton Accelerators for Science and Innovation: Second Annual Meeting Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Experience with Bunch Shape Monitors at SNS A. Aleksandrov Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge, USA.
Masahito TOMIZAWA and Satoshi MIHARA Accelerator and proton beam.
 An h=4 (30 MHz) RF system will be used for electron operation. For protons, this would correspond to h=56, and the 1 kV maximum gap voltage would only.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SNS MEBT : Beam Dynamics, Diagnostics, Performance. Alexander Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
ESS DTL beam commissioning
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Simultaneous Delivery of Parallel Proton Beams with the EURISOL Driver
REFERENCES [1] C.Y. Tan, FNAL Beams-doc-3646-v16, 2011 [2] V.N. Aseev, TRACK, the beam dynamics code, PAC05 [3] S. Kurennoy, LA-UR TRANSMISSION.
January 5, 2004S. A. Pande - CAT-KEK School on SNS MeV Injector Linac for Indian Spallation Neutron Source S. A. PANDE.
Project X Overview L. Prost (for the Project X team) FNAL Accelerator Physics forum CERN June 17, 2013 Many slides taken from V. Lebedev, S. Nagaitsev,
Alexander Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE) Sergei Nagaitsev Dec 19, 2011.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
ICFA-HB 2004 Commissioning Experience for the SNS Linac A. Aleksandrov, S. Assadi, I. Campisi, P. Chu, S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, G. Dodson, J. Galambos,
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
Y. Roblin, D. Douglas, F. Hannon, A. Hofler, G. Krafft, C. Tennant EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF OPTICS SCHEMES AT CEBAF FOR SUPPRESSION OF COHERENT SYNCHROTRON.
Developments of the FETS Ion Source Scott Lawrie.
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
Comparison of Fermilab Proton Driver to Suggested Energy Amplifier Linac Bob Webber April 13, 2007.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
PXIE Beam Instrumentation Status Update – Preparing for MEBT 1.1 Beam Vic Scarpine Feb. 9, 2016.
ESS wire scanner Benjamin Cheymol
PS-ESS and LEBT State of the art Lorenzo Neri Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Laboratori Nazionali del Sud.
MEBT status A. Shemyakin for the PXIE warm front end group PIP-II technical meeting January 20, 2015.
PXIE LEBT Status Update Lionel Prost PIP-II “Friday” Meeting January 16 th, 2015.
PIP-II R&D Program PXIE Ion source and LEBT Lionel Prost PIP-II Machine Advisory Committee Meeting March 2016.
Machine Protection Systems (MPS) Arden Warner, and Jim Steimel Project X Machine Advisory Committee March 18-19, 2013.
PXIE warm front end status A. Shemyakin PIP-II technical meeting 3 May 2016.
Introduction to the effort on C-ADS accelerator physics and review charges Jingyu Tang For the Joint IHEP-IMP group on the C-ADS Accelerator Physics International.
CW Linac Lattice August, 29 N.Solyak, B.Shteynas.
M. Munoz April 2, 2014 Beam Commissioning at ESS.
PXIE Medium Energy Beam Transport status What has happened since the April’12 collaboration meeting A. Shemyakin Project X collaboration meeting November.
A. FaccoEURISOL DS Task 7GANIL, 30 Nov 2005 EURISOL DS 2° Meeting Task 7 - Primary Accelerator GANIL, November 30, 2005 Summary of the Task 7 status New.
PIP-II Beam Instrumentation Vic Scarpine PIP-II Machine Advisory Committee Meeting March 2016.
D. Li, Project X Collaboration Meeting, Fermilab (October 25-27, 2011) Overview of Project X Frond-End R&D at LBNL Derun Li Project X Collaboration Meeting.
F Sergei Nagaitsev (FNAL) Webex meeting Oct ICD-2 chopper requirements and proposal #1.
NICA injection complex status
BEAM DYNAMICS STUDIES for IFMIF-EVEDA ACCELERATORS
General Design of C-ADS Accelerator Physics
A. Martynov on behalf of accelerator division.
Linac4 Beam Characteristics
Progress in the Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Challenges and Perspectives of Accelerator Driven Systems (ADS)
Beam dynamics of RAON accelerator system
1- Short pulse neutron source
Electron Source Configuration
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Part2: Cavities and Structures
commissioning and measurements
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
(Beam) Commissioning Plan
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Status of the JLEIC Injector Linac Design
DTL for MEIC Ion Injection
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
RF system for MEIC Ion Linac: SRF and Warm Options
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
Presentation transcript:

Warm Front End Concept A. Shemyakin PIP-II Machine Advisory Committee 9-11 March 2015

Outline Warm front end performance requirements Design concept Required R&D Note –Since last MAC many elements of the front end moved from ideas to technical designs or hardware No significant changes in scheme or specifications –Therefore, this talk is to remind about main concepts as an introduction to reports by L. Prost and J. Steimel Where technical details will be presented 3/9/2015A. Shemyakin | P2MAC_20152

Warm front end performance requirements PIP-II: 800 MeV SRF linac constructed of CW-capable accelerating structures and operated initially at 1% duty factor The warm front end prepares H- beam optimized for Booster injection and provides capabilities for future CW operation –Output energy 2.1 MeV Below neutron production and high enough to mitigate space charge effects up to 10mA –Peak beam current up to 10 mA (from µs to CW) 5 mA nominal; 4 mA in macropulse for Booster injection –Bunch-by-bunch selection capability For into-bucket injection to Booster and for future CW multi-user operation –Output rms emittances:   <0.23 µm,  L <0.31 µm –Proper vacuum, tails, and bunch extinction management 3/9/2015A. Shemyakin | P2MAC_20153

Design concept Ion source(s), LEBT, RFQ, MEBT –SRF (HWR cryomodule) directly follows MEBT –Long MEBT to accommodate the chopping scheme Attention to factors that may determine reliability and uptime –Two ion sources –Low gas flow to RFQ with a long LEBT –Proven-design RFQ –Low particle loss in RFQ –System of scrapers in LEBT and MEBT Passive and active parts of MPS –Very low gas flow to SRF with a differential pumping section 3/9/2015A. Shemyakin | P2MAC_20154 Ion source LEBT RFQ MEBT

Ion source DC H- source –30 keV, ≥10 mA –Emittance ≤0.14 µm rms norm. (preferably ~0.1) PXIE: ion source from D-Pace, Inc –Satisfies all PIP-II requirements Current can be modulated with extraction electrode voltage –Filament-driven, volume, no Cs –Life time ~300 hrs Alternative schemes are being developed by various groups –May provide a longer life time with the same other parameters –Using the LEBT scheme with two sources might be rational at longer life time as well Capability to service the ion source with accelerator operating would be highly beneficial 3/9/2015A. Shemyakin | P2MAC_20155

Low Energy Beam Transport (LEBT) requirements Purposes: –Beam matching, differential pumping, fast beam turn-off for machine protection, beam chopping, transverse tails scraping Requirements –Output emittance <0.18 µm rms norm. (30 keV, 5 mA) –Gas load to RFQ ≤10 -4 Torr· l/s –DC or pulse operation Up to 60 Hz for commissioning purposes; from 1µs to DC Preferably, Twiss parameters changes during the pulse are small –Tools to control the beam current and position at the RFQ entrance Switching dipole magnet upstream of 2 nd solenoid –Two ion sources, removal of neutrals and protons, personnel protection 3/9/2015A. Shemyakin | P2MAC_20156

Movable scraper Bending magnet Solenoid Ion source Emittance scanner port DCCT Valve Toroid Chopper LEBT concept 3/9/2015A. Shemyakin | P2MAC_20157 Two identical legs –Ion source –differential pumping chamber with a port for emittance scanner –Solenoid –DCCT –Valve Partially neutralized transport –Un-neutralized transport downstream of Solenoid #2 may be a better solution for pulsed operation. Vacuum at the ion source and RFQ differ by ~10 3. Hence, neutralization time changes from µs to ms. Allows chopper between solenoids –See L. Prost’s report for details R.Andrews, D.Snee, T. Hamerla, M.Alvarez, A. Chen

RFQ concept 2.1 MeV, MHz CW RFQ –Expect to use the LBNL design Detailed RF and beam simulations have been performed –output emittances   <0.2 µm,  L <0.28 µm The concept has been successfully implemented at IMP (Lanzhou, China) with protons –10 mA CW delivered to (and through) cryomodules –95% transmission reported –PXIE RFQ based on this concept is in production See J. Steimel’s report for details Expect good vacuum and low beam loss (<5%) –Should be beneficial for reliability 3/9/2015A. Shemyakin | P2MAC_20158 Images courtesy of LBNL

Medium Energy Beam Transport (MEBT) requirements Purposes: –Beam matching, differential pumping, transverse tails scraping –Bunch-by-bunch selection Requirements –2.1 MeV, up to 10mA CW (5 mA nominal), <0.23 µm rms norm. –Compatibility with SRF –Bunch-by-bunch selection Arbitrary bunch structure Loss of pass-through bunches < 5% Bunch extinction to ≤ –Diagnostics to characterize the beam out of RFQ and to HWR 3/9/2015A. Shemyakin| P2MAC_20159

MEBT concept 3/9/2015A. Shemyakin| P2MAC_ RFQ Bunching cavity Kickers HWR Quadrupoles Absorber Scrapers Differential pumping Space for diagnostics Chopping system (next slide) Transverse focusing with 2 doublets and 7 triplets –First short section for beam matching; 1.14 m period after Determined by space required for kickers and absorber Longitudinal focusing with 3 bunching cavities Last ~2 m are dust-free, UHV –H 2 pressure at MEBT – HWR interface < 2· Torr Scrapers C.Baffes, S.Oplt

Chopping system Two kickers in sync + absorber –Two broadband travelling-wave kickers separate bunches by 6σ 0.5 m plate length, 16 mm gap Each plate potential changes by 500V between passing and removing states –Voltage variation <±25V during “flat top” 1.3 ns –6.15ns between bunches 3/9/2015A. Shemyakin| P2MAC_ –Absorber is rated for 21 kW 0.5 m length plate Beam comes at 29 mrad –To decrease the power density to 17 W/mm 2 –Will be tested at PXIE 3σ Y beam envelopes for removed (top) and passing (bottom) bunches. A. Saini Absorber Two kickers Differential pumping

Scrapers 4 sets of scrapers, 4 jaws each –Independently movable, electrically isolated –Scraping, machine protection, beam size estimation With proper phase advance in pairs, all high transverse action particles can be removed 3/9/2015A. Shemyakin| P2MAC_ –First pair makes the main scrape (~1%) and protects kickers –Downstream pair removes tails created by chopping and protects SRF Phase advance along MEBT at 5mA and position of scrapers. A. Saini

Modes of the front end Beam for tuning: safe pulses –start with 5 µs single pulses; increase the pulse frequency to 60 Hz and pulse length to CW 5 µs is enough for diagnostics and relatively safe for SRF Ion source produces long enough pulses to reach neutralization in the upstream LEBT; LEBT chopper cuts the needed length; MEBT chopper trims the front of the pulse train if needed –Optimum for vacuum management Booster injection: 0.6 ms, 20 Hz pulses –The same combination of modulating and chopping –MEBT choppers creates a bunch sequence optimal for longitudinal painting of the Booster buckets –Not harmonically related RF systems for SC Linac and Booster Lock of bunch chopper to Booster RF with LLRF CW: future multiple-user operation –MEBT choppers creates the required bunch sequence 3/9/2015A. Shemyakin| P2MAC_201513

R&D topics To be addressed by PXIE –LEBT with low emittance growth compatible with chopping –Reliable CW RFQ –Bunch-by-bunch selection in MEBT –Compatibility of high-power deposition in MEBT absorber with SRF several meters downstream Making the entire line reliable, predictable, tunable 3/9/2015A. Shemyakin| P2MAC_201514