The University of Texas – Pan American HEAF Background, Model, Issues and Possible Strategies to Consider.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Closing the Gaps: Facilities Development and Planning Systems Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board February 26, 2004.
Advertisements

Operating Budget Overview Presented to the Tuition and Fee Committee November 13, 2009 Presented to the Tuition and Fee Committee November 13, 2009.
Summary of $475 million Bond Issue and Capital Financing Options Practiced By the State System of Higher Education in Oklahoma Practiced By the State System.
Adopted Budget Presented By: Budget Advisory Committee September 5, 2006.
TUITION & FEE PROPOSAL (Revised) Recommendation to The University of Texas Board of Regents (Revised) Recommendation to The University of Texas.
STATUS UPDATE 3/12/2010 Proposed Changes to RCM. Goals Align RCM incentives with institutional goals Identify source of central strategic funds Simplify.
1 MFP 101 Understanding the Minimum Foundation Program Formula FY
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
Capital Planning Task Force Update Interim Report November 18, 2003 THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM.
Walworth County 2011 Preliminary Budget Planning for the future.
October 29, 2013 UNC’s R&R Formula Repairs and Renovations.
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-first Legislature First Regular Session IN THE SENATE SENATE BILL NO BY FINANCE COMMITTEE.
Peralta Community College Budget Allocation Model BAM November 17, 2014.
The Vote Formula Imperial College’s Resource Allocation Methodology Carole Hobden Planning April 2010.
SCHOOL FINANCE EA756. Finance The budget is one of the most important legal documents of a school district. It is not a static document, but rather a.
THECB 11/2001 Organization,Governance and the Higher Education Plan Regent’s Seminar November 27, 2001.
Budget Office Division of Business and Finance DEVELOPING A UNIVERSITY-WIDE BUDGET An Overview of the External Budget Development Process.
HIGHER EDUCATION FUND (HEF) HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD.
Higher Education Incentive Funding University of Texas at San Antonio.
Presenter: Date: Arizona & Higher Education 2014 and Beyond Dan Anderson Director of Institutional Research October 22, 2014.
Illinois Higher Education FY15 Performance Funding Recommendations IBHE Board Presentation February 4, 2014 Dr. Alan Phillips.
HAMMONDSPORT CENTRAL SCHOOL Budget Information.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
Annual Financial Report Division of Business Affairs.
UTSA Presentation to the Legislative Budget Board September 28, 2010 UTSA Presentation to the Legislative Budget Board September 28, 2010 Legislative Appropriations.
Faculty Senate Updated: May 7, 2008 American University Vice President of Finance and Treasurer.
BUDGETING – CRADLE TO BOARD AT THE UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA CAUBO – Pre-conference June 23, 2007.
Facilities Condition Audit Summary of Findings Entech is a full-service Architectural/Engineering firm providing design, construction management, facilities.
WASHINGTON HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD 1 Washington State & Regional Needs Assessment Pacific Northwest Association for Institutional Research.
2 UTSA has developed a process to systematically review all fees to: 1. 1.Analyze expenditures and transfers to ensure appropriate use consistent with.
Financial Skills. Objectives 1.Business strategy 2.Budget strategy 3.Calculations 4.Practice.
Budget Approved: June 25, Board of Trustees’ Planning Goals Maximize Student Access Guarantee Quality Education Guide Towards Educational.
1 Superintendent’s Proposed Budget Fiscal Year 2009 February 11, 2008.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
Charter School Facilities Funding 2010 Florida Charter School Conference November 9, 2010 William E. Fontaine Office of Educational Facilities.
EDAD 537, Seminar in Public School Finance (4 cr.) Summer 2013.
TUITION & FEE PROCESS GUIDELINE Draft Policy Review Draft Policy Review Financial Area Representatives April 21, 2008 Draft Policy Review Draft Policy.
The University of Texas at San Antonio FY 09 Annual Financial Report Highlights January, 2010.
Utility Financial Management AWWA Intermountain Section Leadership Forum Session Two November 10, 2015.
City of Biddeford, Maine Capital Improvement Plan for FY2017.
STRATEGIC BUDGET COMMITTEE CHARGE Develop model for a 5 year sustainable budget. The model budget should include strategies for cost reductions, recommendations.
Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,
Spending/ Fiscal Allowable Expenses Equitable Services Needs Assessment Potluck
{ North East ISD Technology Plan North East ISD Technology Plan By Dilene Witt-Nelson EDLD 5362 ET 8040.
1 The Budget Process at UTPA An Overview. 2 Agenda Sharing Knowledge & Engaging in the conversation of Resource Allocation  What is a Budget?  Biennial.
March 2014 Regents, Trustees, Coordinating Board Institutions Instructions, $ $ $ $ Suggestions, recommendations Texas Legislature.
The University of Texas Pan American Designated Tuition Increase Proposal Fiscal Year 2006 Starting September 1, 2005.
Higher Ed Finance and UTPA. Two Big Questions  Where Does the Money Come From? –For Texas –For Higher Ed –For UTPA  Where Does the Money go? –For Texas.
1 Financial Topics Cost of Education Committee 9/04/2009.
FY2007 Budget Presentation Annual Town Meeting April 24, 2006.
Enrollment Formula Funding and Outcomes Funding
Performance Incentive Funding
HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCE AND BUDGETING May 2017
Presenter: Dave Torres, Senior Product Manager, Forecast 5 Analytics
TOWN OF HUBBARDSTON FINANCIAL FORECAST
Evaluation of the Space Projection Models
City of Biddeford, Maine Capital Improvement Plan
Water/Wastewater Infrastructure and GASB 34
Bond and Override Report
Rebalancing State Appropriations
Regional Transit Formula Fund Policies Section 5307/5340 – Urbanized Formula Fund Section 5337 – State of Good Repair Section 5339 – Bus and Bus Facilities.
Property Management Economics and Planning
FY19 Budget Update Berlin-Boylston Regional School District
Adoption of the Fiscal Year 2019 Recommended Operating Budget
EXPLANATION The following slides describe the changes between the first draft of the general fund budget presented to the Board on March 28, 2017 and the.
Town Hall on Budget & Taxes
COMMUNITY FORUM ROLL- OVER BUDGET JANUARY 16, 2019
budgets Changed date to 4th Monday in June
Frontier Central School District Public Budget Hearing May 3, 2016
Presentation transcript:

The University of Texas – Pan American HEAF Background, Model, Issues and Possible Strategies to Consider

Items Covered  Background Info/History  Model explained  HEAF Committee Charge, etc.  Comparison & contrast between UTPA and other HEAF institutions  Questions & Strategies

Background  Established in 1984 via a constitutional amendment after the repeal of the ad-valorem tax.  Allocations began in FY  Originally earmarked $100M; Currently $175M is allocated.  Purpose: –Acquire land –Construct, repair & rehabilitate buildings –Purchase equipment –Purchase Library materials –Retire debt not to exceed 50% of the appropriation.  About to begin the third 10-year cycle  Formulas re-visited/re-run with updated data every five years. .

Background, Cont’d  Actual space data is compared to predicted data to determine deficit amounts  Documented reluctance, in the past, to use projections or other “non-factual” data

The Space Projection Model

Model Four Parts: 1.Space Deficit:  Provide funding for predicted space needs  uses the space projection model 2.Condition of Facilities:  Provide funding for renovation & maintenance of facilities  Replacement value of E&G buildings x 2% (accepted industry standard) 3.Complexity:  Provide funding for carrying out the range & level of an institution’s programs  Appropriations 4.Set Asides:  6.5% to Health Institutions  2.2% for TSTC (max allowed by constitution)  $1M for TSU per Texas Educational Opportunity Plan (1983)

Condition of Facilities  Is simply calculated by multiplying the replacement value of each institution’s E&G space times 2% (“industry standard”).  2003 UTPA replacement value = $242,331,008  Condition of facilities + Space deficit = 50% of the funds

Institutional Complexity  Formula appropriations are used as a surrogate  50% of the funds are allocated to this element

Space Deficit  Uses the Space Projection Model (SPM) used for the infrastructure formula.  Stated purpose of the SPM is “...to assess the need for new construction and to determine whether an institution’s new construction will qualify for maintenance & operations funding provided by General Revenue.”

Space Projection Model  Funding provided only for space deficits  Predicts Net assignable area in five categories: –Teaching –Library –Research –Office –Support

Teaching Space Four program areas:  Area 1: Most space intensive programs; agriculture and visual & performing arts.  Area 2: Architecture, engineering, trade & industrial arts.  Area 3: Computing, health sciences, psychology, physical sciences, languages, etc.  Area 4: All other programs such as english, history, math and political science.

HEAF Committee Charge  Deadline: October 2004 Coordinating Board meeting  Allow those not represented with an opportunity for input  Review the relevant sections of the constitution & education code  Review the assumptions and the data used & recommend changes “especially any that would help achieve the goal of Closing the Gaps by 2015.”  Avoid radical reallocation  Changes must be persuasive to the committee, the board and the legislature

Problems, Strategies & Questions  Persuade the committee to recommend an increase in funding beyond the $175M currently provided.  Persuade the committee to incorporate Closing the Gaps projections.  Get Bigger! Increase SCHs, Faculty FTEs, FTSEs, research expenditures, etc.  Suggest a change in weights  Suggest a set-aside for Closing the Gaps?

Problems, Strategies & Questions, cont’d  Existing formula rewards past success/growth.  Future trends are important and at least a portion of the allocation should be based on that—we need to prepare for the future now.

Problems, Strategies & Questions, cont’d  Identify additional elements? –% Hispanic? (vs. # of Hispanic) –Per capita income of the region? –Unemployment rates? –% of population without university education? –Growth rates of institution? –Growth rates of region’s population?  Suggest splitting of UT- Brownsville from us (technical, not substantive change)

Thank you… Questions? Additional Info Needed? Thoughts?