Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Dana Arenius Rao Ganni Jefferson Laboratory Sept 13, 2013 CRYOGENIC SYSTEMS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1.
Advertisements

ESS Cryogenic System Design
Cryogenics Applied Technology Development Dana Arenius, Rao Ganni Engineering Division Cryogenic Systems Department Technology Town Meeting Feb 9, 2012.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy Commissioning and Operation of the Horizontal Test Apparatus at SNS Presented at: CEC/ICMC.
ESS Cryogenic System Process Design Philipp Arnold Section Leader Cryogenics CEC – ICMC 2015 June 29, 2015.
12 GeV Upgrade of Cryogenics at Jefferson Laboratory (Jlab) Dana Arenius Engineering Division Cryogenic Systems ILC08 Nov This work is supported.
Perfect solution for large building
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz September 10, 2007.
CRYOGENICS AND POWERING
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1.
Conceptual Design Study - Cryogenic Requirements How to decide the layout of ILC cryogenic system Conceptual design of cryogenic system Layout of cryogenic.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1.
Accelerators for ADS March 2014 CERN Approach for a reliable cryogenic system T. Junquera (ACS) *Work supported by the EU, FP7 MAX contract number.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy 2-K Pump Down Studies at SNS Presented at the CEC/ICMC 2015 – C3OrA Matthew Howell SCL Systems.
October, 2009 Cryogenics System Roberto Than October, 2009 Internal Review.
Cryogenic update before Fermilab meeting (and after the helium tank review) Coordination meeting 6 th May 2015 K. Brodzinski HiLumi-LHC-CC-Cryo-PPT-18_v1.
January 4, 2007 Project Overview RHIC II Project Internal Cost Review Roberto Than Cryogenics Systems January 4, 2007.
Superconducting Electronics and Detectors Workshop “Jefferson Lab Cryogenic Operation” Mathew C. Wright December 1,
S. Claudet - 31st May 2007Power refrigeration for LHC Power refrigeration at 4.5K & 1.8K for the LHC S. Claudet, CERN AT-ACR.
Project X RD&D Plan Cryogenics Arkadiy Klebaner AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Cryogenics Systems WBS-62 Steve Raftopoulos NCSX Cryogenic Systems WBS(62) Manager.
1 Small Coolers for MICE Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL.
SM18 cryogenics infrastructure upgrade L. Serio TE-CRG.
J. G. Weisend II for the ESS Team Energy Efficiency & Recovery at ESS.
ITER Liquid Helium Plants Status and Test Protocol ICEC June 29th, 2015 / Grenoble / FranceY. FABRE.
PIP-II Cryogenics Arkadiy Klebaner and Jay Theilacker PIP-II Collaboration Meeting 9 November 2015.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Mathew Wright Cryogenic Systems Operations Engineer
NML Cryogenic System Arkadiy Klebaner Cryomodule One Commissioning June 3, 2011.
PXIE Cryogenics Concept Arkadiy Klebaner Session 5 / WG1 (CW Linac and PXIE) October 26 th, 2011.
LCLS-II Cryoplant Overview
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 Dana Arenius Cryogenics Control Account Manager 12 GeV Upgrade Project X Collaboration September.
CMTF Cryogenics Arkadiy Klebaner May 6, Outline CMTF cryogenic system scope Goals Key functional requirements Conceptual layout Cryoplant Current.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Jonathan Creel Electrical / Cryogenics Engineer Cryogenics.
Project X Workshop - Cryogenics1 Project X CRYOGENICS Arkadiy Klebaner.
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz August 16, 2007.
Energy efficiency considerations in cryogenics Philipp Arnold Section Leader Cryogenics Proton Driver Efficiency Workshop.
ESS Cryomodule Status Meeting – Introduction | | Christine Darve Introduction to Cryomodules for the ESS 2013 January, 9 th Christine Darve.
Hongyu Bai LCLS-II 2 K Cold Box PDR September 27, 2016
Vishy Ravindranath LCLS-II 2 K Cold Box FDR March 9, 2017
Cryoplant Installation Cost and Schedule Installation PDR
Cryoplant Controls Installation
Dana Arenius LCLS-II 4.5K Cold Box Director’s Review November 16, 2016
2 K Coldbox Safety and ESH
2K Cold Box FDR Introduction
Cryomodule test stand at ESS site
Process Simulation for the LCLS-II Cryogenic Systems
2K Cold Box PDR Introduction
FRIB Cryogenic Support
Innovative He cycle Francois Millet.
Cryoplant Installation Scope
N. Hasan1, P. Knudsen2 and V. Ganni2
Dana M. Arenius Jefferson Laboratory Cryogenics Dept Head
SPS cryogenic proximity equipment and SM18 validation
Hongyu Bai LCLS-II 2 K Cold Box FDR March 9, 2017
ESS RF Development at Uppsala University
BriXS – MariX WG 8,9 LASA December 13, 2017.
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
Mathew C. Wright January 26, 2009
ILC Experimental Hall Cryogenics An Overview
ESR 2 Presented to Joint Hall A/C Summer Meeting
Scope, Requirements Deliverables & Schedule
Overarching Commissioning Plan
Operator Training Requirements
SNS Cryoplant Commissioning Past Experiences
CryoPlant Commissioning
CTF Users’ Perspective
ESR2 Process Cycle Design
Conceptual design of the Cryogenic System of Comprehensive Research Facility for Key Fusion Reactor Core Systems Liangbing Hu Sep.4.
Overview of the TARGET Monolith Rough Vacuum
ESR2 Process Cycle Design
Presentation transcript:

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Dana Arenius Rao Ganni Jefferson Laboratory Sept 13, 2013 CRYOGENIC SYSTEMS

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Outline Typical Cryogenic Plant Overview What Are the Subsystems Subsystem Specification Development Sequence of Cryogenic Plant Subsystems Integrative Design Coordination (SRF/Civil) Plant Requirements Determination Requirements for Civil Construction Estimation Summary Page 2

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 JLab 12GeV Plant Overview Two Refrigerator Systems, each on a linac Each can provide g/s 4K liquefaction, 100 micro bar pressure regulation Newer refrigerator system uses far less electrical power, cooling water, etc….3.8 vs. 6.5MW electric power… JLab’s Ganni Thermodynamic Cycle (licensed to industry) Subsystem designs have been “standardized” by JLab to reduce cost and improve performance, “build to print” Warm helium compressors, gas management, oil removal, gas purification, controls, guard vacuum, installation Saving rolls up into civil construction costs Currently working with FRIB with cryomodule subcooler R&D to improve cryogenic plant efficiency by another 7% Page 3

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Typical Sub Atmospheric Cryogenic Plant Multi Stage Warm He Compressors Warm He Gas Storage Tanks Subatmospheric Multi-Stage Cold Compressor Cold Box He Gas Purifier & Recovery Compressors LN2 4.5K Refrigerator Cold Box w/ Turbines

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Plant Subsystems Cryogenic Subsystems Warm Helium Gas Compressors Motor Control (MCC) Oil Removal System 4.5K Helium Refrigerator 1.8K or 2K Cold Compressors Cryogen Distribution System Warm Helium Gas Storage LN2 Storage LHe Storage Helium Gas Purification –Recovery Compressors –Purifier –Purity Monitors Gas Management, Vaporizer Process Control Guard Vacuum Safety Systems (ODH, etc.) Civil Supportive Systems Cooling Water Electric Power –Medium Voltage –480V –120/208V –Emergency Cranes Lighting Instrument Air Indoor Ventilation (incl. Heating and Cooling) Indoor Building Space Outdoor Equipment Layout Areas Cryogenic Equipment Installation Access Safety Systems Plant Subsystems are generally WBS structure for cryogenic plants

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Typical Warm Helium Compressor

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Warm Helium Gas Compressors Compressor Room Compressor Room Page 7

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, K Refrigerator Cold Box 18 4K Equivalent Shown Upper Outside Box (vertical) Lower Inside Box (horizontal) Joined by transfer line Page 8

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Upper 12 GeV 4.5K Cold Box Installation

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, GeV Lower 4.5K Cold Box Installation 12GeV Lower 4.5K Cold Box Installation Installed through the roll up door With creepers

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, K Cold Box, Lower Section Top Head Valves and Control RackInternal Piping

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Sub Atmosheric Cold Box Multi Stage Centrifugal Compressors Variable Speed Motor Drives Magnetic Bearing Technology Mixed or Full Compression Ratio Designs

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Typical Compressor Oil Removal Vessels Page 13

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Other Needed Subsystems 14 Gas Storage Guard Vacuum System Liquid Storage Purifier

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Choice of Technology Page 15 Full Pressure Ratio vs. Mixed Mode Cold Compressors Full Pressure Ratio has demonstrated higher linac pressure stability ~ 0.1mbar pressure stability Very important operational consideration for CM technology vs. magnets Faster turn around after a system trip (higher beam time availability) Lower cryogenic capital equipment cost Some what lower equipment foot print for Civil ~ Same Carnot Efficiency or slightly better JLab Ganni Cycle Floating Pressure technology is applicable to both process options Full cold compressors turn down limited to~70% of full capacity vs partial CC’s can turn down to ~35% of full capacity Full pressure ratio CC system has no warm sub atmopspheric connections Lower Contamination Issues Higher reliability

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Ganni Process Cycle Technology Use So Far (Industry may already have more worldwide) Existing Plant Conversions ( Partial Ganni Cycle,Floating Pressure ) Jefferson Lab...all six refrigerators, 2K/4K, 200 to 4.6 kW Capacities Brookhaven RHIC ….Central Helium Liquefier Spallation Neutron Source (SNS)…Central Helium Liquefier, K Michigan State University….Cyclotron Test Facility NASA Johnson Space Center, Environmental Test Chamber A, twin 3.5 kW 20K refrigerators New Facilities Under Construction (Full Implementation of Cycle) New Facilities Under Construction (Full Implementation of Cycle) Jefferson Lab 12 GeV Upgrade, K (completed) Jefferson Lab’s 4kW End Station Refrigerator (ESR-2) NASA JSC Houston, James Webb Telescope Test Facility, K (completed) MSU FRIB, 3.2 g/s 4K liquefaction

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Performance Essentially constant efficiency down to ~1/3 of max. 20K load! Commissioning of NASA CBX-3 Note (1) Note (2) Note(1) – Offset due to actual expander efficiency higher than minimum required by refrigerator specification (so as not to restrict competition). Note(2) – Increased offset due to using the slide valve at low loads during commissioning (which is more efficient) than adding heat.

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Full Pressure Ratio Pump Down Time and Stability Page 18

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Linac Pressure Stability Page 19

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Operating Temperature Choice Page K vs 2.05K Temperature Choice from Cryogenic Point of view Carnot power is 14% higher (Just for the temperature effect) Higher pressure ratio leads to lower Carnot Efficiency Net effect ~ 20% higher wall plug power per unit cryo load (W/W) The first cost ~20-30% (W/W) No operating complete cold compressor option exists today (for a pressure ratio of 80); May need 6 stage cold compression process. Some developmental time will be required Need more building/ civil space for a given capacity

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Subsystem Suppliers Subsystems come from a wide variety of suppliers based on purchase specifications or designs provided by an integration engineering team The integration design and procurement may be provided by one of the major subsystem providers (turn key) but recent projects indicate that equipment pass through and risk costs appear to be very large in N. America….lack of subsystem partnership infrastructure, JLab integration engineering reduced FRIB from $74M (mixed mode CCs) to $32M for refrigerator system (Full CC pressure ratio) The integration design and procurement may be provided by one of the major subsystem providers (turn key) but recent projects indicate that equipment pass through and risk costs appear to be very large in N. America….lack of subsystem partnership infrastructure, JLab integration engineering reduced FRIB from $74M (mixed mode CCs) to $32M for refrigerator system (Full CC pressure ratio) Some subsystems do not have multiple or no vendor sources /designs (Helium gas purifiers, guard vacuum systems, etc.) Viewed as high risk and/or new designs by industry, pass through costs appear to be 100%+ additive Some subsystems do not have multiple or no vendor sources /designs (Helium gas purifiers, guard vacuum systems, etc.) Viewed as high risk and/or new designs by industry, pass through costs appear to be 100%+ additive Many of the technologies used in the plant may not be included in the core technology of a single supplier

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Integrative Engineering Design Standards Importance of very early Civil/Cryogenics to control costs Engineering design standards and units Ex: ASME, 10CFR851, NEMA, ISA, etc. through out the project Ex: ASME, 10CFR851, NEMA, ISA, etc. through out the project System documentation….design symbols, device tag identification standards and assignment allocation..ISA, etc. Engineering and Change Control Documentation Ex: DRD /DSD/ICD (design requirements/solution documents) Ex: DRD /DSD/ICD (design requirements/solution documents) Control hardware and software that is compatible with existing support organizations

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Sequence of Engineering Design/Procurement SRF Coordination of Loads, Operational Modes, Distribution Budgetary Civil Determination and Coordination Process Engineering Cycle Design 4.5K Cold Box (longest delivery, milestone progress) Civil Design Verification Warm Helium Compressors (2 nd longest delivery) 2K or 1.8K Cold Box w/ cold compressors Purification Oil Removal Gas Storage LN2 /LHe Storage Dewars MCC, Medium and Low Voltage Instrument Air, Guard Vacuum Installation Construction Package Vendor technical reviews and calculation verification are conducted throughout the procurement process and system testing

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Civil and Cryomodule Coordination Very early accurate civil budgeting eliminates costly change orders and schedule delays Need to accurately budget civil utilities, equipment space, etc. usually far in advance of equipment procurement Civil construction and cryogenic engineering by sub suppliers are often conducted at the same time during CD-3 Cryogenic equipment delivery to be coordinated with building RFE to minimize double rigging Compressor in-slab electrical conduits

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Civil requirements Preplanning the requirements….. Establish equipment heat loads and distribution system estimates and locations* Apply overall margins for each temperature level For budgetary electrical power and cooling water….  Transpose the heat loads of the cryomodules to established known industrial “equivalent baseline” temperature standards (20K, 4K) applying known efficiency corrections in terms of Input Electrical Power/Watt Refrigeration for the specific temperatures.  Recognizing most all of the electrical power goes into the cooling water, the amount of cooling water is determined for 10F delta T  From this procedure fairly accurate budgetary estimates can be derived for use in determining civil utility requirements Page 25 * Deep accelerator tunnels generally require the sub atmospheric cold box to be located near that elevation due to process static head pressure losses

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Summary Coordination of cryomodule heat loads, operating modes, locations and maintenance requirements ensure proper cryogenic plant sizing and operational design capability Budgetary civil requirements are important in coordinating and controlling project costs, change orders and schedule prior to detailed cryogenic engineering. Deep tunnel installations will require local cold compressors. Establishing project engineering standards, device nomenclature, documentation hierarchy, etc. are coordinated with all sub system providers and other project technical areas A subsystem engineering sequence was presented which is representative of delivery durations, and installation/testing scheduling Major required cryogenic subsystems are attached along with general civil requirements based on a normalized 18 4K equivalent plant

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Thank you for your kind attention……. May we answer your questions at this time?

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Page 28

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Page 29 Backup Slides Civil Examples for Typical 4K Equivalent Refrigerator

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 MAIN SUB Main Feed #1 Main Feed #2 M LOOP POWER FEED 4160V SUB V SUB2 CB 4160V MCC MAIN COMPRESSORS LOOP POWER FEED 480V AUX1 480V AUX2 MTR CTRL CTR MASTER SUBSTATION AND FEEDER SWITCH A B C M M M M M M M M M SWITCH BOARD MAIN SUB T PNL BRD LP PNL Lights, AC, etc. 4w 3w Outlets, etc. M M M M M For Electrical Power Redundancy and Maintenance Loop Feeds for Medium and Low Voltage Feeds Transformation from 480V 3w to 4W for small 277V loads D Primary Plant Electrical Power Example

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Civil requirements Electric Power (continued) Helium Compressor Medium Motor Protection Requirements  Under voltage, voltage imbalance, run up motor ampere/time over current (motor characteristic curves for compressor application), running current, number of starts per hour, motor winding over temperature, bearing temperature monitors…NEMA MG-1 standards  Because of the above compressor/motor protection coordination, the compressor drive MCC is normally provided by the equipment supplier and serves as the civil interface boundary for electrical. Normally specified as double ended primary feed MCCs for civil capability of redundancy/maintenance/repair of the primary power system  Because of the voltage rating/safety/cost of installation, it is important to include an “in slab” compressor skid conduit design between the MCC location and compressors as part of the early civil plan/estimate Page 31

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Civil requirements 480 Volt Cryogenic Equipment “House Power” Avoid 480V/3ph/4w in lieu of 3w for major 3 phase industrial loads which is the majority of the house power requirement. Use separate 480v 3ph 3w to 4w transformer for 277V loads such as lighting etc., (i.e. avoidance of minor ground faults bring down the power on the whole facility) Typical cryogenic plant equipment loads (compressor room)  480V, 3ph, 3w 400A feed for compressor MCC or switchboard (oil pumps, instrument air, motor space heaters)  480V, 3ph, 3w, 5 ton overhead crane feed  480V, 225A, 3ph, 4W, 42 circuit power distribution panel  225A 120/208V 3ph, 4W 42 circuit power distribution panel  (2) 480V, 225A, 3 ph 3w power feeds for recovery compressors  (2) 480V, 100A, 3ph, 3w welding outlets  (2) 208V, 30A, 3ph, 4W utility equipment outlets (vacuum pumps)  (6) 120V, 20A, 1ph outlets Page 32 Typical for most all large cryogenic systems

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Civil requirements Typical Cold Box Room Cryogenic Electrical Loads  480V, 225A, 3ph, 4w, 42 circuit power distribution panel  480V, 400A, 3ph, 3w feeder to cold compressor switchboard  225A 120/208V 3ph, 4W circuit power distribution panel  (2) 480V, 225A, 3 ph 3w, 42 circuit power distribution panel  (2) 480V, 100A, 3ph, 3w welding outlets  (2) 208V, 30A, 3ph, 4W utility equipment outlets (vacuum pumps)  (6) 120V, 1 ph, 20A ground fault outlets Local Cryogenics Control Room  120/208V, 225A, 3ph, 4W, power distribution panel  120V/208V, 8-10 KVA UPS/panel/transfer switch for ½ hour  8-10 KVA emergency generator, backing UPS, natural gas  (6) 120V, 20A utility outlets Page 33 Typical for most all large cryogenic systems

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Civil requirements Compressor Cooling Water For 18 4K equivalent refrigerator system For 18 4K equivalent refrigerator system – 3300 gpm treated cooling tower water – 90F with 10F delta temperature – 33 gpm is evaporative makeup – 10 gpm is added for chemistry control – Additional cell for maintenance while running Page 34

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Civil requirements Compressor Building Typical for 18 4K equivalent plant 76” x 71’x inside, 31’ H 76” x 71’x inside, 31’ H Overhead 5 ton crane Overhead 5 ton crane 3500 psi concrete floor, 2’ D 3500 psi concrete floor, 2’ D (4) 20,000 cfm roof fans (4) 20,000 cfm roof fans Freeze protection heat only Freeze protection heat only Piping Trench, 8’W x 5.5”D Piping Trench, 8’W x 5.5”D 75’ x 75’ outside equipment area 75’ x 75’ outside equipment area 14’ x 17’ roll up door 14’ x 17’ roll up door Metal Wall Panel Metal Wall Panel Batten Wall Insulation Batten Wall Insulation Will need to characterize micro phonics Will need to characterize micro phonics Page 35

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, GeV Oil Removal and Cold Box Layout Building size that of the compressor room, 76’x71’x31’ Building size that of the compressor room, 76’x71’x31’ 18 4K equivalent size Roll Up Door 14’Wx17’H Roll Up Door 14’Wx17’H 100,000 lb + cold box floor loading Indoor horizontal cold box Indoor horizontal cold box Outdoor equipment area requirements ~2x indoor space Vaporizer, Oil Removal

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Other Backup Slides

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Compressor Characteristics FIGURE 1.3 BRV=2.2 1 st StageFIGURE 1.4 BRV=2.6 2nd Stage

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Standard Cycle

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Ganni Cycle

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Brookhaven RHIC Conversion Results Brookhaven RHIC Cryogenic Staff Brookhaven Reports Its Very Successful Energy Conservation Improvement Program Results After One Year of Operation Brookhaven TODAY, Feb 11, “Jefferson Lab technology saving BNL $1.5M in electricity alone for typical 30 week experiment” “ Seen increased reliability, stability, and efficiency”

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility LCLS September 13, 2013 Performance Unprecedented load range: 11.2 kW at 15K…to…118 kW at 100K Note: x-axis (refrigeration load) is a log scale Commissioning of NASA JSC