2012 COMPENSATION STUDY RESULTS July 18, 2012 Board of Aldermen Worksession.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Market Pricing Organizations seek to offer market based pay rates in order to attract and retain competent employees There are two basic methods to recognize.
Advertisements

FY Budget Presentation to Board of Finance April 24, 2014 Human Resources Clemon Williams, Acting Director 1.
HR Contacts Meeting May 23, 2013 Human Resource Mgmt Services Office of Management & Budget.
Your Hidden Paycheck An Employee Communication Presentation
P.O.C.C. Presentation P.O.C.C. Compensation Overview Maggie Wollaston, SPHR Laurie Grenya DAS HRSD Classification and Compensation Unit.
Impact of GASB 45 on Chesterfield County Employees
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Pay For Performance: Managing Pay Systems Across Organizations
Employee Compensation and Benefits Mike Otis SPHR, CEBS Associate Director Human Resource Services Employee Benefits 3770 Beardshear Hall Human Resource.
Compensation and Benefits OBHR E-100 November 6, 2007.
1 Compensation Update Lori Dougherty Director of Compensation December 8, 2009 Brandeis University pays competitive base market salaries as part of a total.
Key Employee Benefit Decisions 1. The single most important decision. RFP for broker, not product. Products are a commodity. The Selection of an Employee.
District Salary Committee Update March 2005.
1 Consumer Driven Health Plans. Health Plans Premiums Experiencing Double Digit Increases! Increasing Premiums Decreasing Benefits AND.
Welcome to the City of Lodi
Human Resources Midwestern State University HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Budget Hearing Presentation FY 2014.
We Share Ideas Health Care Reform – The Business Owner’s Best Friend? Terry Weaver CEO Chief Executive Boards International.
Competitive Market Compensation Review July 2009 Project Overview.
About Us. MISSION STATEMENT Our mission is to provide products to our targeted customers with the highest level of satisfaction and integrity. We will.
Minnesota’s Small Group Market Select Statistics Health Care Access Commission Small Group Insurance Market Work Group September 23, 2010 Stefan Gildemeister.
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
2014 Insurance and Wellness Benefits Committee. Purpose of the Committee 2  Review Current Insurance and Wellness Benefits  Provide Recommendations.
1 Public Employees Benefits Board 2006 Medical Procurement July 12, 2005 Richard Onizuka, Health Care Policy Washington State Health Care Authority.
Compensation management “Attracting, retaining and motivating magic people”
Pay, Compensation and Benefits
Staff Meeting Compensation Plan Adopted during the November 11, 2010 Board of Supervisor’s Meeting.
EVALUATING JOB OFFERS Rosemarie Sena Center Career Development Services.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
BA 101 Introduction to Business 11. Managing Human Resources.
2005 Supervisory and Professional Salary Survey Final Report September 14, 2005.
1 ACC FY07 Classification and Compensation Study.
COMPREHENSIVE REFORM TRANSPARENCY, FAIRNESS AND OBJECTIVITY RESPONSIVENESS AND AGILITY BASIC PRINCIPLES.
Job Analysis. I. Nature of Job Analysis Work activities and behaviors Interactions with others Performance standards Machines and equipment used Working.
Compensation “What’s in it for me?” Ron Kamahele, Director UAA Human Resource Services.
Classification & Compensation Study Outside firm (BCC) was hired to perform: Classification Study Internal Equity Pay equity compliance Study.
Hospitality Operations Objective 4.02 – Human Resources.
Compensation Project Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Finance Committee Meeting Project Overview
Medical Assisting Vs. Nursing Which Career is better?
> > > > Human Resources Quarterly Report April, May & June 2015.
2014 Insurance & Wellness Benefits Committee October 30, 2014.
1 Fall Managing TXSTATE For Supervisors Office of Human Resources 601 University Drive Suite340 J. C. Kellam Bldg San Marcos, Texas Classification.
JOB EVALUATION & SALARY STRUCTURE DESIGN
Bowling Green State University Ohio Staff Council of Higher Education 24th Annual Summer Conference (June 19-20, Ohio State University, Ohio)
Goals List and describe the steps in the hiring process. Describe compensation packages for employees. Identify laws protecting employee rights. Slide.
Chapter 5 Compensation & Benefits
MAG Management Advisory Group, Inc.
Deputy Fire Chief JEFF JACKSON. What is a Deputy Fire Chief?  Commanding officer in a fire department (either elected or appointed) who is responsible.
BA 2204 and BAS 324 Human Resource Management Benefits Instructor: Ça ğ rı Topal 1.
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Overview Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services October 26, 2015.
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PACKAGE. HOW DO YOU DECIDE When you are presented with more than one job offer, how do you make your final decision? Consider this information.
Chapter 24 Human Resource Planning
Agenda Study Process Outreach Summary Salary Quartile Analysis
Prentice Hall, Inc. © A Human Resource Management Approach STRATEGIC COMPENSATION Prepared by David Oakes Chapter 1 Strategic Compensation: A.
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services January 11, 2016.
PORT OF ANACORTES SALARIES & BENEFITS January 2016.
Personnel & Compensation. What is effective Human Resource Management ? The right people, doing the right work, fairly compensated and managed to meet.
Please note that we are providing descriptive summaries of our Company’s benefits which are in effect at the current time. As with most employers, our.
Compensation: A Component of Human Resource Systems
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
1 Human Resource Audits. 2 Human Resource Audit? A human resource audit evaluates the personnel activities used in an organization. The audit may include.
City of Galveston Classification & Compensation Study Discussion Preliminary Findings and Recommendations.
New Mexico Highlands University
October 19, /1Jan – June 2011 Revenue/Expense Reports to Departments 7/11Budget Committee to Complete 2011 and 2012 Revenue Projections 7/18-22Midyear.
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PACKAGE. HOW DO YOU DECIDE When you are presented with more than one job offer, how do you make your final decision? Consider this information.
Associate Changes Policy: Manager Training
Job Evaluation Salary Administration Program
We are Happy to Serve With You!
Employee Benefit Package
We are Happy to Serve With You!
Presentation transcript:

2012 COMPENSATION STUDY RESULTS July 18, 2012 Board of Aldermen Worksession

2012 Compensation Study Results  Summary of Results  Overview of the Process  Benefit Results  Salary Results

RESULTS Summary  Below Market  Salaries  Retirement Plan Design L7  Above Market  Employee Contributions – Insurance  Insurance Plan Design – Deductibles/Copays  Holidays  Leave Maximum Accruals & Pay-Out  Sick Leave Buy-Back Program  Equal Market  Retirement – Defined Benefit Plan  Tuition  Leave Annual Accruals

Compensation Study Overview  Determine Comparators  Job Description Review  External Equity  Internal Equity

MunicipalGeneral Industry & Other Determine Comparators  Arnold (pop 20,808)  Ballwin (pop 30,404)  Chesterfield (pop 47,484)  Creve Coeur (pop 17,833)  Lake St. Louis (pop 14,545)  Manchester (pop 18,074)  O’Fallon (pop 80,860)  St. Charles City (pop 65,794)  St. Charles County (pop 360,485)  St. Peters (pop 52,575)  SLACMA  SLAPCA  Occupational Employment Statistics (DOL & BLS)  Duckett Creek

Job Description Review & Update  123 Job Descriptions were reviewed  Five Levels of Review  Employee  Supervisor  Department Director  Human Resources  Final Department Director  Focus of Review  Essential Duties & Responsibilities  Skills & Qualifications  Compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act  Compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act

Job Description Review & Update  Standard Elements Added for Performance Review  Customer Service  Policy Compliance  Cooperation  Employee Development  Performance Management  Purchasing  Budgeting

External Equity Process  Benefit Survey  General Industry Data – BLS Employee Contributions & Copays  Health Insurance Plan Design  Spousal Surcharge  Salary Survey  General Industry Data – DOL and BLS  Positions Matched to Job Description NOT Title

Internal Equity Process  Market Minimum Salary Grade Established  Minimum of Municipal Comparators  Median of DOL for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area Less 20%  Remove the High/Low  Place in Closest Grade  Grade Placement Internal Review  Director Positions Reviewed by Mayor and Acting City Administrator  Positions below Director Level Reviewed by Directors

Benefit Review History  Medical Insurance  Contributions and Plan Design  Dental Insurance  Contributions and Plan Design  Vision Insurance  Life Insurance  Long Term Disability  Flexible Spending Accounts  Employee Assistance Program  Retirement  Tuition Assistance  Sick Leave Buy-Back – Included in Union Agreement  Sick Leave Pay-Out  Leave Accruals

Areas of Special Interest  Spousal Surcharge  Not Substantiated by Market Review  Self Funded Program  6 Comparators – Self-Funded  Average Stop Loss Level $130,000 – Wentzville $75,000  2 Comparators – Insurance Pool  2 Comparators – Fully Insured  LAGERS Retirement Program  7 of 9 Comparators Offer LAGERS (Defined Benefit)  1 Offers a Lower level Plan Design than Wentzville  6 Offer a Higher Level Plan Design than Wentzville  2 of 9 Comparators Offer 457 b Plan (Defined Contribution)  Note the funding levels average 8% of salary  1 Comparator Did not Report  General Industry  Funding levels average 6% of salary – no limit on employee contribution

Benefit Results 2012 COMPENSATION STUDY SUMMARY OVERALL MARKET COMPARISON FACTOR WENTZVILLE CURRENT COMPARE TO WENTZVILLE MARKET +INCREASE/-DECREASE TO MEET MARKET PEPM BASE SINGLE HEALTH CONTRIBUTION$0> $38 BASE FAMILY HEALTH CONTRIBUTION$10> $225 ENHANCED SINGLE HEALTH CONTRIBUTION$60> $62 ENHANCED FAMILY HEALTH CONTRIBUTION$160> $264 SINGLE DENTAL CONTRIBUTION$0> $4 FAMILY DENTAL CONTRIBUTION$5> $30 SINGLE VISION CONTRIBUTION$0> $6 LIFE INSURANCE EMPLOYEE ONLY$0= FSA ALLOWED$1,500< $2,830 DEPENDENT CARE ALLOWED$5,000= EAP$0= LAGERS$0= TUITION ASSISTANCE MAX$2,500= SICK LEAVE BUY-BACK$0 3 comparators offer an incentive SICK LEAVE PAY-OUT720 hours 4 comparators offer a similar program SPOUSAL SURCHARGE$0= INDIVIDUAL DEDUCTIBLE$0> $1,000 FAMILY DEDUCTIBLE$0> $2,000 INDIVIDUAL OUT OF POCKET MAX$1,500= FAMILY OUT OF POCKET MAX$3,000> $3,500 OFFICE VISIT COPAY$25= SPECIALIST COPAY$25> $40 EMERGENCY ROOM COPAY$150> $250 URGENT CARE COPAY$50=

Salary Review History - Matrix  Salary Matrix  Grade Established for Each Position  Minimum – New Hire Rate  Midpoint – Average Market Value for Experienced Individual  Maximum – Highest Achievable Salary w/o Promotion

Salary Review History – Current Pay Plan  Annual Market Pay Adjustments  Given Across the board Annually Based on Budget  Employees on progressive discipline DO Not Receive Increase  Promotion  Individuals Promoted receive Minimum of new Grade or 0-7% per grade increased  Individuals Serving Temporarily Receive Increase to Minimum  New Hires  Starting pay from Minimum to Midpoint – CA Approval  Special Adjustments – NEVER UTILIZED  Increase Outside of Annual Adjustment or Promotional Increase  Requires Written Documentation of Superior Performance  Requires Consensus of ALL Department Directors

Salary Review History  2010 Last Study Implemented  Market Adjustment  Recommended 2.5%  Budgeted 1.5%  No Grade/Range Adjustment  Internal Equity Adjustments  Recommended 2.5%  Budgeted 0%  Adjustments to Minimum  Implemented  2011  Average Comparator 2.01%  Budgeted 0%  No Grade/Range Adjustment  2012  Average Comparator 1.7%  Budgeted 0%  No Grade/Range Adjustment

Salary Results  Grade Minimum Established  Average Grade Minimum for Comparators was Established  Position Match – 5 or more comparators  Position Non-Match – Less than 5 comparators  The High and Low were removed from the data  Range Placement Review  Human Resources Review – External Equity  Positions with Match were placed in the closest Grade either up or down  Positions with No Match were left in current Grade or adjusted with Job families  Additional Review – Internal Equity  Mayor and Acting City Administrator Reviewed Director Level Positions  Directors Reviewed Positions Below Director Level  Final Range Placement

Salary Results SALARY MARKET ADJUSTMENTS0%< 3.37% SALARY RANGE MINIMUMS < SALARY INTERNAL EQUITY ADJUSTMENTS<

Cost Models Meet Average Market (ESTIMATES ONLY)  Benefit Contributions to Meet Market  Health/Dental/Vision - $450,000  Benefit Plan Design Changes to Meet Market  Several Options w/ Estimated Savings of $100,000-$700,000 Annually  Self Insurance Pools  Fully Insured Plans  High Deductible Plans  Continue Self Funded Plan – Increase Stop Loss Level, Change Plan Design to Meet Market

Option #1Option #2 Cost Models to Meet Average Market (ESTIMATES ONLY)  Adjustments to Minimum in Recommended Pay Grades - $188,000 – plus  Internal Equity Adjustment –  Not to Exceed Midpoint A.2% - $287,000 B.2.5% - $359,000 C.3.0% - $431,000 D.3.25% - $467,000 E.3.5% - $503,311 F.3.75% - $539,263 G.4.0% - $575,214  Market Adjustment Only - $391,000 - plus  Adjust to Minimum - $72,000 - plus  Internal Equity Adjustment  Not to Exceed Midpoint A.2% - $287,000 B.2.5% - $359,000 C.3.0% - $431,000 D.3.25% - $467,000 E.3.5% - $503,311 F.3.75% - $539,263 G.4.0% - $575,214

Next Steps  Mid Year Budget  Requested Positions  Eliminate Lieutenant Support Services  Add - Sergeant – Professional Standards  Add - Sergeant – Special Services  Add – Communications Officer  Unfreeze – Records Clerk  Unfreeze – Code Compliance Inspector  Unfreeze – Building Safety Inspector  Add – Public Information Officer (Midyear or 2013)  Sick Buy Back Program  Included in the Union Agreement  2013 Budget Preparations  Insurance Renewal – Plan Design Changes  Employee Contribution Amounts  Salary Adjustments  Additional Personnel Requests

HR Next Steps  Position Appeal Process for Employees  Develop a Pay for Performance Plan  Update Policies  Review Leave Program

Questions?

SUMMARY HISTORY OF CITY FUNDING LEVELS FOR BENEFITS MEDICAL EE (PEPM)$380 $405$396$474 $520 MEDICAL FAMILY (PEPM)$942 $1014$1016$1336 $1435 DENTAL EE (PEPM)$25$20 $25 DENTAL FAMILY (PEPM)$65$50 $82 VISION EE (PEPM)$4 LIFE EE (PER $1000 SALARY)$2 LONG TERM DISABILITY (PER $100 SALARY)----$.42 FSA DEPENDENT CARE EAP (PEPM) RETIREMENT REGULAR (% OF SALARY)8.20%7.60% 8.60%9.60% 9.80%9.30% RETIREMENT POLICE (% OF SALARY)8.50%8.10%7.90%8.90%9.90% 10.40%9.80% TUITION, SICK LEAVE BUY BACK, SICK LEAVE BUY OUT, VACATION LEAVE PAYOUT ARE BASED ON UTILIZATION