Ignacio Ruiz Assistant Superintendent

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Building a Strategic Management System Office for Student Affairs, Twin Cities Campus Ground Level Work Metrics Initiatives Managing Change Change Management.
 A strategic plan is a guiding document for an organization. It clarifies organizational priorities, goals and desired outcomes.  For the SRCS school.
PORTFOLIO.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
The Anatomy of Systemic Support for Immersion Programs.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Calhoun County School System Jacksonville, Alabama April 27-30, 2014.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Alaska School Leaders Institute Moving Toward Implementation of Alaska’s ELA & Math Standards.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Listening, Learning, and Leading Emmanuel Caulk August 24, 2015.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Ensure All Students are Prepared for Success District and Schools’ SACS Accreditation Plans.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
College Board EXCELerator Schools Site Visit Preparation.
WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SUSTAINABLE CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT.
WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SETTING THE STAGE Planning for BC’s Future 2015—2018.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Full-Service Community Schools TASK FORCE Staff Lead: Jane Nicholson.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Administrators Academy August 9, Closing the Achievement Gap.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Maxey Elementary December 9 and 10, 2013.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
WASC Western Association for Schools and Colleges.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Superintendent Formative Evaluation April 26, 2015.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
MINT MENTORING AND INDUCTION FOR NEW TEACHERS Miami Dade County Public Schools Office of Professional Development and Evaluation.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
English Learner Strategic Plan
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
“Where Learners Become Leaders!”
English Learner Parent Academy
District Mission & Vision Cluster Mission & Vision
College Community School District Ten-Year Strategic Plan
Presentation transcript:

Clark County School District Master Plan for English Language Learner Success Ignacio Ruiz Assistant Superintendent English Language Learner Division Lorna James-Cervantes Assistant Chief Student Achievement Officer

ELL Master Plan Development Process Phases and Timeline Planning the project Gathering information to define issues that lead to ownership Creating a Vision, Language Development Approach, Theory of Action with Strategic Objectives Drafting a Sustainable ELL Master Plan with stakeholder input and feedback Finalizing the ELL Master Plan August-September October-November November-December December-March March- April

How did we gather evidence to create the ELL Master Plan? 4 Leadership Team Work Sessions 3 Extended Planning Team Work Sessions 26 Focus groups with 229 participants including teachers, parents, and students 560 classroom visits in 35 schools 52 English language learners “shadowed” for 4 hours Extensive data review of quantitative (e.g., student demographic and performance data ) and qualitative measures (e.g., ELL student observation and shadowing protocols, focus groups)

How did we gather evidence to create the ELL Master Plan? 349 Participants attended and gave input at 11 Town Hall Meetings 2,730 Survey responses from parents, students, community members, teachers, and administrators were received and analyzed Interviews of CCSD staff and community members were conducted to obtain valuable input and perceptions about ELL students and instructional needs

What did we learn? CCSD leaders, administrators, teachers, parents, and students hold high aspirations for ELL students’ success in school, future careers, and to become successful, productive citizens. CCSD schools overall exhibit a safe and inclusive learning environment for ELL students.

What did we learn? Inconsistent opportunities currently exist for teachers and administrators to improve their knowledge and skills on how to serve ELLs Limited capacity exists Districtwide in English Language Development (ELD) and effective content instruction with appropriate supports Limited capacity exists Districtwide in dual language instruction  

What did we learn? ELL students experience limited opportunities to engage in content and language learning Current ELL teaching and learning practices are out of alignment with NVACS, ELD Standards, NEPF and highly effective ELL instructional practices District educational policies and practices do not strategically leverage and build on ELLs assets

What did we learn? Limited opportunities currently exist in providing ELLs strategies for: Engaging in practices that analyze what is being learned Applying learned knowledge in new situations Developing the language needed to understand and explain new learning Developing independence in their own learning

Clark County School District Vision for English Language Learners In partnership with families and communities, Clark County School District empowers all English Language Learners by providing high-quality, rigorous, engaging instruction in a supportive and safe learning environment that values their cultural and linguistic diversity so that they graduate as college- and career-ready, biliterate, productive, and global-minded citizens.

The ELL Master Plan is designed to reinforce the Clark County School District’s Pledge of Achievement by

ELL Master Plan for Success Roadmap

ELL Master Plan for Success Roadmap Which will… We will… Theory of Action Strategic Drivers Oversight Increase Language and Content Achievement Rates Increase Graduation Rates Decrease percentage of Long Term English Language Learners Decrease Dropout Rates Strengthen Professional Learning Provide Effective Language and Content Instruction Improve Instructional Models and Policies Enhance Family Engagement and Support

Five Strategic Objectives Strategic Objective 1: Advance quality teaching for ELLs Strategic Objective 2: Diversify instructional program options for ELLs Strategic Objective 3: Hire, retain, and continually support high-quality educators of ELLs Strategic Objective 4: Foster a climate and culture that values the diverse needs of all ELLs and engages their families Strategic Objective 5: Align policies, structures, and practices across schools and departments for equitable learning opportunities for ELLs

Strategic Drivers

Language Development Approach Develop the language needed to understand and explain new learning Engage in practices that analyze what is being learned Apply learned knowledge in new situations Development of Content and Language

Six Principles of Effective Instruction

Core Competencies Essential skills that all CCSD educators need to provide quality instruction for all students. Plan and deliver instruction focused on key concepts for each content area Develop content understanding and the language needed to analyze, understand, and explain new learning Use appropriate supports that guide ELLs into academic practice Focus on using what a student brings to learning— language, culture, prior knowledge—to help prepare students to succeed Choose materials that engage ELLs in practices that analyze how authors use language to convey meaning Implement lessons that engage students in quality interactions and participation in learning that culminates in accomplished performance and products Regularly assess student progress in language and content learning to guide instruction Model cross-cultural communication among students, and build their skills to live in a multicultural society Partner with families to encourage student interests, aspirations, and academic achievement

Academic Language and Content Achievement Model The Academic Language and Content Achievement Model (ALCA-M) will be rolled out to all schools in stages using a cohort group strategy and virtual learning model in order to maximize resources and ensure optimal coverage in schools with the highest need.   Virtual Orientation to Professional Learning Site-based Instructional Leadership Team (ILT) consisting of site-based administrators, teacher leaders, and/or the ELL SSA will attend a monthly webinar to review content. An on-line forum for the ILT will be available for reciprocal learning and to answer questions. ILT will facilitate the activities for each of the two monthly 64 minute sessions: session 1 to deliver content, session 2 to debrief on classroom application.   Professional Learning Institutes Upon completion of 90 hours (three 5-day Institutes -Level 1, Level 2, Level 3), teachers will earn the Academic Language & Content Achievement Certificate (ALCA-C). Pending collaboration with higher education institutes and NDE, teachers may apply the 90-hour certificate toward TESOL/ELAD endorsement.

Four Instructional Models Academic Language and Content Achievement Model All students, in all classrooms Strengthens grade-level, standards-based instruction (Tier I) Newcomer Model For students with less than 2 years of schooling in the U.S.. Personalized learning plan and extensive instructional support. Strategic Academic Language & Literacy Model Intentional and intensive supports to develop academic discourse and literacy. Typically, students classified as ELLs for more than five years. Dual-Language Model For ELL and non-ELL students who aspire to become bilingual and biliterate.

ELL Master Plan for Success Oversight Structure Oversight Committee District leaders Representatives from key stakeholder groups Milestones Evaluation of Plan Implementation Evaluation of Outcomes Communication Strategies Annual summary reports Newsletter posted online describing promising practices and insights from implementation practices Communication forums between educators

"Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress "Coming together is a beginning. Keeping together is progress. Working together is success." - Henry Ford