SPIE - WARSAW, August 30, 2005Institute of Electronics Systems, ELHEP Group TESLA Cavity driving with FPGA controller Tomasz Czarski WUT - Institute of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CAVITY LOCK ELECTRONICS Dan Sexton, Sirish Nanda, and Abdurahim Rakhman.
Advertisements

Basic Electronics Ninth Edition Grob Schultz
Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
Lorentz force detuning measurements on the CEA cavity
Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan RF System The AREAL RF system will consist of 3 RF stations: Each RF station has a 1 klystron, and HV modulator,
Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan RF System The AREAL RF system will consist of 3 RF stations: Each RF station has a 1 klystron, and HV modulator,
Lutz Lilje DESY -MPY- XFEL Tuner Lorentz Force Detuning System Setup New Saclay design.
Phase Locked Loop Design Matt Knoll Engineering 315.
Chapter 6 FM Circuits.
AM Modulation & Demodulation. Modulation Definition: Modulation: The process by which some characteristics of a carrier are varied in accordance with.
CHAPTER 6 VOLTAGE REGULATOR POWER SUPPLIES (VOLTAGE REGULATORS) Fig. 6.1 Block diagram showing parts of a power supply. Power supply Power supply: a.
XFEL The European X-Ray Laser Project X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Review of LLRF system based on ATCA standard, Dec 3-4, 2007 Piezodriver and piezo control.
The tendency to reduce the cost of CVGs results in metallic resonator. In comparison to quartz resonator CVG, it has much lower Q-factor and, as a result,
Electronics Involves the use of devices and circuits to control the flow of electric current to achieve some purpose. These circuits contain: Resistors,
E. KAKO (KEK) 2009' Sept. 30 Albuquerque Global Design Effort 1 Cavity Test Items in S1-G Cryomodule Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)
Vector Modulator AMC board Marcin Smelkowski Warsaw University od Technology PERG – ISE Presentation is based on „Draft.
Digital Signal Processing and Generation for a DC Current Transformer for Particle Accelerators Silvia Zorzetti.
18/10/20151 Calibration of Input-Matching and its Center Frequency for an Inductively Degenerated Low Noise Amplifier Laboratory of Electronics and Information.
XFEL The European X-Ray Laser Project X-Ray Free-Electron Laser Tomasz Czarski, Maciej Linczuk, Institute of Electronic Systems, WUT, Warsaw LLRF ATCA.
COMMUNICATION SYSTEM EEEB453 Chapter 2 AMPLITUDE MODULATION Dept of Electrical Engineering Universiti Tenaga Nasional.
RF Cavity Simulation for SPL Simulink Model for HP-SPL Extension to LINAC4 at CERN from RF Point of View Acknowledgement: CEA team, in particular O. Piquet.
LLRF Cavity Simulation for SPL
Grzegorz Jablonski, Technical University of Lodz, Department of Microelectronics and Computer Science XFEL-LLRF-ATCA Meeting, 3-4 December 2007 XFEL The.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS Dr. Hugh Blanton ENTC 4307/ENTC 5307.
LLRF ILC GDE Meeting Feb.6,2007 Shin Michizono LLRF - Stability requirements and proposed llrf system - Typical rf perturbations - Achieved stability at.
LLRF-05 Oct.10,20051 Digital LLRF feedback control system for the J-PARC linac Shin MICHIZONO KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (JAPAN)
Recent LFD Control Results from FNAL Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert TTF/FLASH 9mA Meeting on Cavity Gradient Flatness June 01, 2010.
Estimation of IQ vector components of RF field - Theory and implementation M. Grecki, T. Jeżyński, A. Brandt.
RF Cavity Simulation for SPL
Marc Ross Nick Walker Akira Yamamoto ‘Overhead and Margin’ – an attempt to set standard terminology 10 Sept 2010 Overhead and Margin 1.
Frank Ludwig, DESY Content : 1 Stability requirements for phase and amplitude for the XFEL 2 Next LLRF system for optimized detector operation 3 Limitations.
ECE 662 – Microwave Electronics
ESS LLRF and Beam Interaction. ESS RF system From the wall plug to the coupler Controlled over EPICS Connected to the global Machine Protection System.
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Kirk Davis.
GDE 4/Mar/20081 Lorentz Detuning Calculation for the transient response of the resonant cavity Introduction “Two modes” model Method of the.
SIGNAL GENERATORS.
LLRF_05 - CERN, October 10-13, 2005Institute of Electronic Systems Superconductive cavity driving with FPGA controller Tomasz Czarski Warsaw University.
Guide Presented by Mr.M Cheenya V.Abhinav Kumar 11E31A0422 Asst.Professor K.Shiva Kumar 11E31A0423 K.Rajashekhar 11E31A0424 K.Chaithanya Sree 11E31A0428.
Crystal Oscillator Circuit and Its Working
FLASH RF gun developments. Sven Pfeiffer for the LLRF team FEL Seminar Hamburg,
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility 6 March.
LFB, LLRF, TFB Alessandro Drago Annecy, March 2010.
Matthias Liepe. Matthias Liepe – High loaded Q cavity operation at CU – TTC Topical Meeting on CW-SRF
BE-RF-FB THE LINAC4 LOW LEVEL RF 02/11/2015 LLRF15, THE LINAC4 LOW LEVEL RF2 P. Baudrenghien, J. Galindo, G. Hagmann, J. Noirjean, D. Stellfeld, D.Valuch.
A diagnosis method of DC/DC converter aging based on the variation of parasitic resistor 1/11 1. Introduction The power converter system supplies power.
CI Lecture Series Summer 2010 An Overview of IQ Modulation and Demodulation Techniques for Cavity LLRF Control.
LLRF regulation of CC2 operated at 4˚K Gustavo Cancelo for the AD, TD & CD LLRF team.
ESS LLRF and Beam Interaction
Areal RF Station A. Vardanyan
SIGNAL CONDITIONING Signal conditioning is stage of instrumentation system used for modifying the transduced signal into a usable format for the final.
Analog Communications
CHAPTER 6 VOLTAGE REGULATOR Tulus Ikhsan Nasution.
Demodulation/ Detection Chapter 4
Introduction to Electronics
LLRF Research and Development at STF-KEK
LLRF System Project Plan for WP 2.2 Low Level Applications
Ping-Pong Ball Levitation
Feedback No feedback : Open loop (used in comparators)
SCRF 21-25/Apr/2008 Measurement & Calculation of the Lorentz Detuning for the transient response of the resonant cavity Introduction “Two.
ILC LLRF Status Ruben Carcagno, Brian Chase
Experiment # 1 The displayed Vpp on FG is half of the real Vpp because the displayed value represents the value with a load at maximum power transfer.
Linear Prediction Simple first- and second-order systems
Cavity Theory Feng QIU.
Harmonic Distortion Analyzer, Wave Analyzer and Function Generator
LLRF Functionality Stefan Simrock How to edit the title slide
Chapter4 Bandpass Signalling Bandpass Filtering and Linear Distortion
Chapter 6: Voltage Regulator
High gradients in TESLA nine-cell cavities
Simon Lineykin and Sam Ben-Yaakov*
Presentation transcript:

SPIE - WARSAW, August 30, 2005Institute of Electronics Systems, ELHEP Group TESLA Cavity driving with FPGA controller Tomasz Czarski WUT - Institute of Electronic Systems PERG-ELHEP-DESY Group

SPIE - WARSAW, August 30, 2005Institute of Electronics Systems, ELHEP Group Low Level RF system introduction Superconducting cavity modeling Cavity features Recognition of real cavity system Cavity parameters identification Control system algorithm Experimental results Main topics

SPIE - WARSAW, August 30, 2005Institute of Electronics Systems, ELHEP Group Functional block diagram of Low Level Radio Frequency Cavity Control System DOWN- CONVERTER 250 kHz VECTOR MODULATOR CAVITYENVIRONS ANALOG SYSTEM FPGA CONTROLLER FPGA I/Q DETECTOR KLYSTRON PARAMETERS IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM MASTER OSCILATOR 1.3 GHz CONTROLBLOCK PARTICLE FIELD SENSOR COUPLER DAC ADC DIGITAL CONTROL SYSTEM CAVITY RESONATOR and ELECTRIC FIELD distribution

SPIE - WARSAW, August 30, 2005Institute of Electronics Systems, ELHEP Group Superconductive cavity modeling dv/dt = A·v + ω 1/2 ·R·i A = -ω 1/2 +i∆ω v n = E·v n-1 + T·ω 1/2 ·R·i n-1 E = (1-ω 1/2 ·T) + i∆ω·T State space – continuous and discrete model Input signal I(s)↔i(t) RF current I(s–iω g ) RF voltage Z(s)∙I(s–iω g ) Output signal Z(s+iω g )∙I(s)↔v(t) Low pass transformation Z(s+iω g ) ≈ ω 1/2 ·R/(s +ω 1/2 – i∆ω) half-bandwidth = ω 1/2 detuning = ∆ω CAVITY transfer function Z(s) = (1/R+ sC+1/sL) -1 Modulation exp(iω g t) Demodulation exp(-iω g t) Analytic signal: a(t)·exp[i(ω g t + φ(t))] Complex envelope: a(t)·exp[iφ(t)] = [I,Q]

SPIE - WARSAW, August 30, 2005Institute of Electronics Systems, ELHEP Group Cavity features Field sensor Coupler Particle Carrier frequency Pulse time Repetition time Field gradient Beam pulse repetition Average beam current 1.3 GHz1.3 ms100 ms25 MV/m1µs1µs8 mA Resonance frequency Characteristic resistance Quality factor Half- bandwidth Detuning ω 0 = (LC) -½ 2π·1.3 GHz ρ = (L/C) ½ 520 Ω Q = R/ρ 3 · 10 6 ω 1/2 = 1/2RC 2π·215 Hz ∆ω = ω 0 - ω g ~ 2π· 600 Hz Cavity parameters: resonance circuit parameters: R L C

SPIE - WARSAW, August 30, 2005Institute of Electronics Systems, ELHEP Group Algebraic model of cavity environment system Internal CAVITY model Output calibrator Input offset compensator Input calibrator + u v Input offset phasor u0u0 Input distortion factor D C C’ + u’ 0 D’ Input phasor Output phasor External CAVITY model v’ k = E k-1 ·v’ k-1 + C·C’·D·[u 0 + D’·(u’ k-1 + u’ 0 )] – C·C’·(u b ) k-1 v’ u’ Output distortion factor FPGA controller area Internal CAVITY model CAVITY environs v k = E k-1 ·v k-1 + u k-1 - (u b ) k-1 E = (1-ω 1/2 ·T) + i∆ω·T

SPIE - WARSAW, August 30, 2005Institute of Electronics Systems, ELHEP Group Functional black diagram of FPGA controller And control tables determination I/Q DETECTOR FEED-FORWARD TABLE + GAIN TABLE – + CALIBRATION & FILTERING F P G A C O N T R O L L E R SET-POINT TABLE C O N T R O L FEED-FORWARDSET-POINT Filling Cavity is driven in resonance condition i(t) = Io·exp(iφ(t)) dφ(t)/dt =  (t) v(t) = i(t)·R(1– exp(-ω 1/2 ·t)) Flattop Envelope of cavity voltage is stable i(t) = V 0 ·(1-iΔω(t)/ω 1/2 )/Rv(t) = V 0 = V 0 ·exp(iΦ 0 )

SPIE - WARSAW, August 30, 2005Institute of Electronics Systems, ELHEP Group Cavity parameters identification idea External CAVITY model v k = E k ·v k-1 + F·u k-1 E k = (1-ω 1/2 ·T) + i∆ω k ·T Time varying parameters estimation by series of base functions: polynomial or cubic B-spline functions Linear decomposition of time varying parameter x:x = w * y w – matrix of base functions, y – vector of unknown coefficients Over-determined matrix equation for measurement range: V = W*z V – total output vector, W – total structure matrix of the model z – total vector of unknown values Least square (LS) solution:z = (W T *W) -1 *W T *V

SPIE - WARSAW, August 30, 2005Institute of Electronics Systems, ELHEP Group Functional diagram of cavity testing system CAVITY SYSTEM CONTROLLER CONTROL DATA PARAMETERS IDENTIFICATION CAVITY MODEL ≈ MEMORY FPGA SYSTEM MATLAB SYSTEM v u

SPIE - WARSAW, August 30, 2005Institute of Electronics Systems, ELHEP Group Feed-forward cavity driving CHECHIA cavity and model comparison

SPIE - WARSAW, August 30, 2005Institute of Electronics Systems, ELHEP Group Feedback cavity driving CHECHIA cavity and model comparison

SPIE - WARSAW, August 30, 2005Institute of Electronics Systems, ELHEP Group Cavity model has been confirmed according to reality Cavity parameters identification has been verified for control purpose CONCLUSION