GMRPTC System and Criteria Tutorial Planning for Regional Parks & Trails in Greater Minnesota Tutorial instructions and information provided in red.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Advertisements

General Management Planning Public Input Open House 2011 DNR Parks & Recreation Division Assisted by Birchler Arroyo Associates.
Grant-Writing A non-profit’s guide to preparing grant proposals.
Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission 1 Coalition Annual Meeting Presentation October 15, 2014 Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails.
Michener’s Chesapeake Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan.
COLLEGE SPARK WASHINGTON 2012 Community Grants Program LOI Webinar 9/27/2011 9:30 AM 9/28/2011 2:00 PM.
Division of Local Assistance Office of Special & Discretionary Programs December 2, 2010.
Performance Appraisal System Update
Noyce Program Evaluation Conference Thursday, December 6, 2007 Frances Lawrenz Michelle Fleming Pey-Yan Liou Christina Madsen Karen Hofstad-Parkhill 1.
Lotterywest Grants Workshop (opportunities & demystifying the process)
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
Feasibility Studies National Heritage Areas. Initiating National Heritage Areas National Heritage Area designations have been initiated in four different.
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
1 ACCESS to QUALITY CULTURAL, RECREATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL and LEISURE OPPORTUNITIES Collaboratively encourages and supports opportunities to focus on the.
Second Annual Friends Group Summit – Ralph A. MacMullan Conference Center Future Project Collaborations Fund matching for success.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 29 Writing Proposals to Generate Evidence.
Bullard Education Foundation Investing in Our Future Grants Fall 2012.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CAPITAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT PROCESSES Citizens Capital Budget Advisory Committee Presentation November 1,
Recommended Strategic Plan Board of Trustees August 27, 2012 Moravian Manor.
Open Forum Educational Master Plan (EMP) Toyon Room June 4, 2015 E. Kuo FH IR&P.
Instructore: Tasneem Darwish1 University of Palestine Faculty of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning Software Engineering Department Requirement engineering.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT Rebecca Cohen Policy Specialist, Chief Executive’s.
Instructions: Developing a Presentation for Communicating with Board This PowerPoint template is meant to serve as a starting point for the development.
Headwaters Communities in Action Building A Better Quality of Life Together.
ADOT Multimodal Planning Division Planning Assistance for Rural Areas (PARA) Program Overview December 4, 2013.
Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 National Training and Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreements (NCA) Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) HRSA Objective.
Community Impact Workshop ORGANIZING A GRANTMAKING PROCESS WITH BEST PRACTICES April 22, 2005 Ames, Iowa.
1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,
University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Landscape Architecture Franklin-Simpson County Greenways enhance the visual character and walkability of.
Preparing Your Budget to Meet the ASBO Meritorious Budget Award Criteria Illinois ASBO Annual Conference May 20, 2010.
Greater MN Regional Parks and Trails Coalition Strategic Planning Process Greater MN Regional Parks & Trails Coalition & Schoenbauer Consulting, LLC 1.
How to Write Grants By: Dom Corcuera. Does this sound familiar?  “I would really like to help you obtain new computers for the science department…but.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
United States Bicycle Route System: Draft Corridor Plan.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
2013 Common Block Development Evaluation and Feedback February 26, 2014.
2015 HUD Continuum of Care NOFA Bidder’s Conference 1.Review of Community Input Session 2.Local Process and Strategic Changes 3.Application Highlights.
Outdoor Heritage Fund. Established on August 1, 2013 by the Legislature. Continuing Appropriation of $20,000,000 annually from oil and gas taxes. Outdoor.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
FOCUSING ON GETTING THE PERFECT SCORE Robin Ward District Grant Writer Brevard Public Schools.
Understanding Cultural Planning Considering a Cultural Plan for Erie and Niagara Counties Impact and Issues Presented to the Greater Buffalo Cultural Alliance.
Quality Enhancements in After- School and Out-of-School Time (ASOST-Q) Competitive Grant (FC 530) Grant Information Session (ESE, Malden) June 6, 2014.
Chapter 7 Planning and Decision Making. Planning Planning is the process of creating a direction for one or more parts of the organization. The purposes.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
Outlines Overview Defining the Vision Through Business Requirements
Community Redevelopment for Eastside Report on Advisory Committee Input and Request for Board Direction June 26, 2012.
Minnesota State Planning Conference September 28, 2011.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
Livingston County Transportation Connectivity Plan Final Report December 2013.
Our Mission The mission of the Mississippi River Collaborative is to promote the magnificence and diversity of the Mississippi River as a national treasured.
Accessibility Self- Evaluation and Transition Plan Oregon Caves National Monument and Preserve December 11, 2015 E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I.
River Walk & Water Transportation System Imagination – Innovation - Creation November 2, 2011 Wasser Strasse & Transportainment TM.
Asian Pacific Endowment 2015 Grantmaking Information Packet July 14, 2015.
Need For The Project SPDG Competition FY The NEED FOR THE PROJECT is the foundation of the SPDG application  Scoring criteria: the range of points.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
D ESIRED RSC S. D ESIRED RSC S O VERVIEW D ESIRED R ECREATION S ETTING C HARACTERISTICS L EARNING O BJECTIVES : Students will understand: 1) The link.
Voorhees Town Center Vision
Office of Greenways & Trails
Jefferson County SA Red Rocks Site Approval
VCU Strategic Plan 2025: Excellence and Access
6/12/2018 Grant Programs Review.
Race to the Top—Early Learning Challenge Letters of Support Webinar
VCU Strategic Plan 2025: Fall Town Halls
NVTA Countywide Pedestrian Plan of July 2016
Grants Academy Session Four
Menu of Tool Topics (Choose 4 out of the 11 listed)
STP Shared Local Fund: Project Evaluation Criteria
PRO PLAN UPDATE– GOALS & OBJECTIVES
Presentation transcript:

GMRPTC System and Criteria Tutorial Planning for Regional Parks & Trails in Greater Minnesota Tutorial instructions and information provided in red.

Greater Minnesota Regional Parks & Trails Commission The GMRPTC was established in 2013 to undertake system planning for parks and trails of regional significance and provide recommendations to the legislature for grants funded by the Legacy Parks and Trails Fund to counties and cities outside the seven-county metropolitan area. Notice that the Commission’s first job is as a system planning organization. Funding recommendations flow from that plan. That’s why the most important step for Cities and Counties in Greater Minnesota is to apply for Regional Designation and inclusion in the system plan.

Organizational Structure The GMRPTC is created by and reports to the Legislature, who makes the final determination on all funding allocations. The District Planning Committees (DPC) and Evaluation Team (Eteam) were created to support the Commission’s work. The Eteam provides independent evaluation and scoring of all applications against the criteria established in the Strategic Plan.

Commission Documents  Website:  Strategic Plan 2015  System Plan & Work Plan 2014  Updated plan due in June, 2016  DPC Discussion Outline (8/2014)  ETeam Report 2014 & 2015 These documents, located on the Commission’s website, provide potential applicants with critical information about the Commission’s strategic vision and criteria.

Online Application – 2016  dms.gmrptcommission.org - OR –  GMRPTCommission.org/Applications We recommend using the “Applications” tab on the new Commission website to access support material and the application itself.

Regional Designation Application Process All applicants will need to complete a Master Plan to be Regionally designated and become eligible for funding. Applicants without a Master Plan (Red Track) requesting Step 1 Screening/Ranking will have time to complete their Master Plan before a full evaluation is completed. Master Plan requirements can be found on page 61 of the Strategic Plan. Sample plans are located on the “Applications” tab.

Funding Program Process  Once included in the System Plan, facilities become eligible for funding  The facility’s funding/development plan from the Unit Master Plan will be reviewed as a part of a complete Funding Application  The ETeam reviews regional designation and funding applications and suggest priorities  GMRPTC assembles Greater Minnesota funding program for recommendation to the legislature for funding Only facilities that achieve “Regional” designation and are formally included in the System Plan are eligible to apply for the funding program.

Facility Classifications  NEW for 2015 – Regional Trail - Motorized All applicant facilities will fall into one of these four classifications. Use the criteria and descriptions in Section 3 of the Strategic Plan to determine which is right for you.

Regional Trail Classification (Non-Motorized) Criteria #1 – Provides a High-Quality “Destination” Trail Experience Criteria #2 – Well-located (i.e., Convenience of Access/Adequate Length) to Serve Regional Population and/or Tourist Destination Criteria #3 – Enhances Connectivity to Regional Destinations Criteria #4 – Fills a Gap in Recreational Opportunity within a Region Each classification has four criteria that are used to evaluate potential facilities in that class.

Regional Trail Classification (Motorized) Criteria #1 – Provides a High-Quality “Destination” Trail Experience Criteria #2 – Well-located (i.e., Convenience of Access/Adequate Length) to Serve Regional Population and/or Tourist Destination Criteria #3 – Enhances Connectivity to Regional and State Level Trails within the Region, and Connects to Regional Destinations Criteria #4 – Fills a Gap in Recreational Opportunity within a Region Be sure to read and fully understand the criteria and supporting ranking information in your class before applying!

Natural Resource-Based Regional Park Classification Criteria #1 – Provides a High-Quality Outdoor Recreation Experience Criteria #2 – Preserves a Regionally-Significant and Diverse Natural or Historic Landscape Criteria #3 – Well-located and Connected to Serve a Regional Population and/or Tourist Destination Criteria #4 – Fills a Gap in Recreational Opportunity within the Region Natural Resource- based parks are typically very large parks that can accommodate a wide variety of outdoor recreation amenities.

Special Recreational Feature Regional Park Classification Criteria #1 – Provides a Special High-Quality Outdoor Recreation Experience Criteria #2 – Provides a Natural and Scenic Setting Offering a Compelling Sense of Place Criteria #3 – Well-located to Serve a Regional Need and/or Tourist Destination Criteria #4 – Fills a Gap in Recreational Opportunity within the Region Special Rec Feature parks will typically be smaller, focusing on one or two unique natural, cultural or historic features that support outdoor recreation.

Sample Criteria Natural Resource-Based Regional Park Classification Criteria #1 – Provides a High Quality Outdoor Recreation Experience Overview: Places a priority on providing facilities/amenities that are relevant to existing/common user groups and also serve to broaden the appeal of outdoor recreation to new or expanded populations. Park serves as a destination unto itself, attracting regional users and (potentially) drawing tourists from outside the regional area. Premium is placed on quality of experience to encourage visitors to return time and again. Provided facilities/amenities must be consistent with, or expand upon, previous listing of desirable/appropriate facilities. Each of the four criteria is described more completely by an “Overview.” A sample overview is provided here. See Section 3 of the Strategic Plan at for more detail on all of the criteria.

Rating Scale Sample – 5 Points  Located in a highly scenic and natural setting that innately appeals to visitors; “standout” features are present that make the park an appealing destination unto itself.  Provides a very robust cross-section of recreational facilities/features (consistent with the listing) that will attract a wide-range of user groups and populations.  Well-designed facilities (relative to the most current design standards) that meet the contemporary needs of targeted user groups; examples: natural- surface trails that are purpose-built for a specific use, such as hiking or mountain biking, or campgrounds that accommodate a broad range of camper- types – tents to RV’s – with modern support facilities.  Overall uniqueness is a “cut above” other regional parks, in terms of sense of place coupled with having many high quality recreational opportunities to choose from. Each of the four criteria in your classification has a unique rating scale that will be used by the Eteam to score your proposal. The best applications will clearly speak to these points in all four criteria.

Tips for Success  Know your story – How does your facility connect users from across the region with high-quality outdoor recreation?  Self-analyze your potential carefully against the criteria in the Strategic Plan, Section 3.  Address the criteria specifically in your narrative section for each criteria. Be clear. Points are only awarded based on how well the application describes the facility’s achievement of the very specific criteria.  Be prepared that if successful, your facility will have to have or complete a Unit Master Plan. Sample Master Plans can be found on the Applications tab of the website, along with the Master Plan requirements from page 61 of the Strategic Plan.