Measurements of   Denis Derkach Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire – ORSAY CNRS/IN2P3 FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

Measurements of the angle  : ,  (BaBar & Belle results) Georges Vasseur WIN`05, Delphi June 8, 2005.
Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR PHENO06 Madison,15-18.
B  D ( * ) K GLW, ADS Y. Horii (Nagoya) and K. Trabelsi (KEK) Referees: Z. Dolezal, N. Muramatsu, K. Sakai Thanks to very active refereeing! 1.
Measurements of sin2  from B-Factories Masahiro Morii Harvard University The BABAR Collaboration BEACH 2002, Vancouver, June 25-29, 2002.
6/2/2015Attila Mihalyi - Wisconsin1 Recent results on the CKM angle  from BaBar DAFNE 2004, Frascati, Italy Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
Feasibility of sin  Measurement From Time Distribution of B 0  DK S Decay Vivek Sharma University of California San Diego.
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
CP Violation Reach at Very High Luminosity B Factories Abi Soffer Snowmass 2001 Outline: Ambiguities B  DK B  D*     etc. B  D*  a 0   etc. (“designer.
   Abi Soffer Colorado State University Super B Workshop, UH, Jan 19, 2004.
24/08/2005LHCb UK Meeting, Dublin1 First steps toward γ from B + →D 0 (K 0 π + π - )K + with Tom Barber, Val Gibson, Cristina Lazzeroni and Jim Libby.
A. BondarModel-independent φ 3 measurement August 6, 2007Charm 2007, Cornell University1/15 γ/φ 3 model-independent Dalitz analysis (Dalitz+CP tagged Dalitz.
Marina Artuso 1 Beyond the Standard Model: the clue from charm Marina Artuso, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K-
Aug 6, Charm γ/φ 3 Impact from CLEO-c Using CP-Tagged D→K S,L ππ Decays Eric White - University of Illinois Qing He - University of Rochester for.
Beauty 06, Oxford, 27 Sept Marco Zito1 Measurements of gamma using ADS, GLW and other methods & future projections Marco Zito CEA-Saclay, Dapnia-SPP.
7th February Determination of γ from B ± →DK ± : Input from CLEOc Jim Libby (University of Oxford)
Sin2  1 /sin2  via penguin processes Beauty 2006 Sep.25-29, Univ. of Oxford Yutaka Ushiroda (KEK)
B Decays to Open Charm (an experimental overview) Yury Kolomensky LBNL/UC Berkeley Flavor Physics and CP Violation Philadelphia, May 18, 2002.
7/4/08 Flavour physics at CLEO-c - Jim Libby 1 Jim Libby (University of Oxford) On behalf of the CLEO-c collaboration  Introduction to CLEO-c  Measurements.
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
Φ 3 measurements at B factories Yasuyuki Horii Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Japan Epiphany Conference, Cracow, 9th Jan
DPF 2009 Richard Kass 1 Search for b → u transitions in the decays B → D (*) K - using the ADS method at BaBar Outline of Talk *Introduction/ADS method.
CP Violation and CKM Angles Status and Prospects Klaus Honscheid Ohio State University C2CR 2007.
A window for New Physics in B s →KK decays Joaquim Matias Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona David London & JM, PRD (2004) David London &JM & Javier Virto,
D 0 D 0 bar Mixing and CP Violation at BESIII Kanglin He June 2006, Beijing.
August 20, 2007 Charmless Hadronic B decays at BaBar1 Charmless Hadronic B Decays at BaBar Woochun Park University of South Carolina Representing the BaBar.
Todd K. Pedlar The Ohio State University for the CLEO Collaboration Recent Results in B and D Decays from CLEO BEACH 2002, Vancouver June 26, 2002.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
25/9/2007 LHCb UK meeting 1 ADS determination of γ with B→(Kπ) D K, B→(hh) D K and B→(K3π) D K Jim Libby (University of Oxford)
1 Multi-body B-decays studies in BaBar Ben Lau (Princeton University) On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration The XLIrst Rencontres de Moriond QCD and.
Search for CP Violation in B 0  h decays and B 0  h decays with B A B AR International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, July 17 th -23.
1 ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2  in Loop-Dominated Decays with B A B AR The Measurement of sin2β (eff) in Loop-Dominated B Decays.
LHCb status of CKM  from tree-level decays Stefania Ricciardi, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Stefania Ricciardi,
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Fernando Martínez-Vidal, On behalf of the BaBar Collaboration Measurements of the CKM angle  at BaBar.
Pavel Krokovny, KEK Measurement of      1 Measurements of  3  Introduction Search for B +  D (*)0 CP K +  3 and r B from B +  D 0 K + Dalitz.
 3 measurements by Belle Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus Method Method Results Results Summary Summary.
CP violation at B-factoris Introduction  1 /   2 /   3 /  Vub, D mixing, Bs Conclusion Pavel Krokovny KEK, Tsukuba, Japan KEK.
WIN-03, Lake Geneva, WisconsinSanjay K Swain Hadronic rare B decays Hadronic rare B-decays Sanjay K Swain Belle collaboration B - -> D cp K (*)- B - ->
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
Maria Różańska, INP Kraków HEP2003 Europhysics Conference –Aachen, July 18th 1 CPV in B → D (*) K (*) (and B → D K  ) in BaBar and Belle Outline: CPV.
1 Absolute Hadronic D 0 and D + Branching Fractions at CLEO-c Werner Sun, Cornell University for the CLEO-c Collaboration Particles and Nuclei International.
F. Martínez-Vidal IFIC – Universitat de València-CSIC (on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration)  from B ±  D (*)0 [K S     ]K (*)±  in BaBar Outline.
Review ADS+GLW P. Krokovny CKM 2006, Nagoya Experimental review of ADS and GLW methods Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus.
Andrzej Bożek for Belle Coll. I NSTITUTE OF N UCLEAR P HYSICS, K RAKOW ICHEP Beijing 2004  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 ) at Belle  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 )
Update on Measurement of the angles and sides of the Unitarity Triangle at BaBar Martin Simard Université de Montréal For the B A B AR Collaboration 12/20/2008.
Prospects for  at LHCb Val Gibson (University of Cambridge) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Physics at the LHC Split, October 3 rd 2008.
Andrzej Bożek (IFJ PAN, Kraków) B hadron decays to open charm production in B-factories BEACH B hadron decays to open charm production in B-factories.
1 G. Sciolla – M.I.T. Beauty in the Standard Model and Beyond Palm tree and CKM Beauty in the Standard Model and Beyond Gabriella Sciolla (MIT) CIPANP.
Direct CP violation in D  hh World measurements of In New Physics: CPV up to ~1%; If CPV ~1% were observed, is it NP or hadronic enhancement of SM? Strategy:
New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at Justin Albert Univ. of Victoria 20 July, 2013 Representing the BaBar.
Measurements of  at LHCb Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) 14th December 2006.
Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.
CLEO-c Workshop 1 Data Assumptions Tagging Rare decays D mixing CP violation Off The Wall Beyond SM Physics at a CLEO Charm Factory (some food for thought)
Measurements of  1 /  Flavor Physics and CP Violation 2010, May 25, 2010, Torino, Italy, K. Sumisawa (KEK)
V.Tisserand, LAPP-Annecy (IN 2 P 3 /France), on behalf of the B A B AR collaboration. Aachen (Germany), July 17 th -23 rd Charmed B hadrons with.
Present status of Charm Measurements
Search for b → u transitions in B+ → {Kpp0}DK+
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
Max Baak, NIKHEF on behalf of the BABAR and BELLE Collaborations
ВД в эксперименте по измерению масс
Measurements of g and sin(2b+g ) in BaBar
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
D0 Mixing and CP Violation from Belle
f3 measurements by Belle
B DK strategies in LHCb (part II)
Study of the suppressed decay B-DK- and B-D(*)CPK- decays at Belle
Measurement of f3 using Dalitz plot analysis of B+ D(*)K(*)+ by Belle
Presentation transcript:

Measurements of   Denis Derkach Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire – ORSAY CNRS/IN2P3 FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 2 Wolfenstein parameterization   CKM angle   FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 3 Motivation and importance of measuring   is still the less precisely known UT angle. Its determination is important also because (together with V ub contraint) it selects  value valid in most of the NP extensions Experiments providing most of analyses today Experiments that can also give results in near future Planned facilities 3.5 GeV e + 8 GeV e – 657M BB pairs 3.1 GeV e + 9 GeV e – 468M BB pairs FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 4  measurements from B→D (*) K (*) u b u c V cb V us u s u b u u V cb V us c s u b u c V ub V cs u s V ub V cs u b s c u u relative phase  b→cb→c b→ub→u Related variables (depend on the B meson decay channel): Advantages: Only tree decays. Largely unaffected by the New Physics scenarios Clear theoretical interpretation Disadvantages: Rare decays and low r B For charged B mesons For neutral B mesons  B strong phase (CP conserving) Experimentally not easy to measure. Three ways to extract the information: GLW ADS Dalitz FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010 B+B+ D0D0 K+K+ B+B+ D0D0 K+K+ B+B+ D0D0 K+K+ B+B+ D0D0 K+K+ * * * *

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 5  measurements from B → D (*) K (*) d b u V cb V us c s d b d c V ub V cs u s relative phase  b→c (V cb, real) b→u (V ub, = |V ub | e -i  ) Related variables (depending on the B meson decay channel): Advantages: Only tree decays. Largely unaffected by the New Physics scenarios Clear theoretical interpretation Disadvantages: Rare decays and low r B For charged B mesons For neutral B mesons  B strong phase (CP conserving) Experimentally not easy to measure. Three ways to extract the information: GLW ADS Dalitz d B0B0 B0B0 D0D0 D0D0 K* 0 FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 6 Results from B + → D 0 K + GGSZ, arXiv: * ADS, DK, D 0 →K  preliminary* GLW, PRD 77, ADS, DK, D 0 →K    PRD  ADS, D 0  D 0 →K  preliminary GGSZ, arXiv: * ADS, D 0 K, D 0 → K  PRD 78, GLW, PRD 73, FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 7 GGSZ, arXiv: ADS, DK, D 0 →K  preliminary GLW, PRD 73, GGSZ, arXiv: GLW, PRD 73, Results from B + → D *0 K +, D *0 → D 0   (D 0  ADS, D 0  D 0 →K  preliminary FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 8 Results from B + → D 0 K *+ FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010 GGSZ, arXiv: ADS, DK, D 0 →K  PRD 80, GLW, PRD 80, GGSZ, PRD 73,

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 9 ADS Method Modes: K +  -, K     , K        GLW Method D 0 Modes: CP+ CP-  measurements from B → DK (GGSZ) A. Giri, Yu. Grossman, A. Soffer, J. Zupan, PRD 68, (2003) Dalitz Method Modes: K s  +  - K s K + K -  +  -  0 strong phases varying over the Dalitz plane Advantages: large interferences in some Dalitz regions FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 10 ADS Method Modes: K +  -, K     , K        GLW Method D 0 Modes: CP+ CP-  measurements from B → DK (BaBar) Dalitz Method FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010 BaBar 425 fb -1 (468 MBB) arXiv: Signal is separated from background using m ES, Fisher (on event shape variables),  E, (s−, s+). The reconstruction efficienciy is 22% Fit for yields and CP violating parameters Resonance structure provides an important information on the phases B+B+ B-B- BaBar only!

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 11 ADS Method Modes: K +  -, K     , K        GLW Method D 0 Modes: CP+ CP-  measurements from B → DK (Belle) Dalitz Method    FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010 B+B+ B-B- Resonance structure provides an important information on the phases Belle 605 fb -1 (657 MBB) arXiv: Signal events yield (K s   (K s   (K s   B ± → DK ± 757 ± ± ± 14

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 12  measurements from B → DK Dalitz Method FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010 Not an easy task to average the results, the model errors are not easy to be combined Main differences in D 0 → K s π + π - : – BaBar: K-matrix formalism for ππ S-wave, LASS model for Kπ S-wave. – Belle: Includes σ 1 and σ 2 ππ scalar resonances. K*0(1430) for Kπ Swave. BaBar result now also includes D 0 → K s K + K - See Nicola Neri’s talk!

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 13 Final Dalitz interpretation BaBar obtains γ = ( −14 ± 4 ± 3)° (from DK−, D*K−, DK*−) Belle obtains φ 3 = ( −12 ± 4 ± 9)° (from DK− & D*K−)

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 14 Dalitz Method Modes: K s  +  - K s K + K -  +  -  0  measurements from B → DK (ADS) D. Atwood, I. Dunietz and A. Soni, PRL 78, 3357 (1997). ADS Method Interplay between Doubly-Cabibbo-Suppressed and Cabibbo allowed D meson decay B+B+ B+→D0K+B+→D0K+ B+ →D0K+B+ →D0K+ V ub V cb D 0 → f DCS CA Same final state Branching fraction of processes is quite low (~10 -7 ) Parameters: {  ; r B ;  B } External Inputs: {r D ;  D ; k D } D 0 Modes: K +  -, K     , K        (CLEO-C, see talk by Chris Thomas) FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 15 Dalitz Method Modes: K s  +  - K s K + K -  +  -  0  measurements from B → DK (BaBar) ADS Method FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010 Two decay chains: Same sign Opposite sign Simultaneous fit to m ES and NN (based on Event shape variables Tagging variables) for both decay chains. Fitting directly R ADS and R +, R - to reconstruct asymmetry. BaBar 425 fb -1 (468 MBB) 26.3 opposite sign events fitted

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 16 Dalitz Method Modes: K s  +  - K s K + K -  +  -  0  measurements from B → DK (results) ADS Method FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 17 Dalitz Method Modes: K s  +  - K s K + K -  +  -  0  measurements from B → DK (GLW) M. Gronau, D. London, D. Wyler, PLB253,483 (1991); PLB 265, 172 (1991) ADS Method Modes: K +  -, K     , K        GLW Method D 0 Modes: CP+ CP- Theoretically very clean to determine γ (with four observable) Many D 0 Modes reconstructed: FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010 CDF also gave the results with this type of analysis Coombination of A cp+ measurements gives > 3  difference from no CPV case

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 18 Combination of the methods The combination of all the methods can be performed giving

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 19 Results from B 0 → D 0 K *0 FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010 GGSZ, 371M BB ADS, 476M BB, DK, D 0 →K , D 0 →K   , D 0 →K  Promising channel at future experiments for measuring  due to large value of r B. More statistics needed D sector measurements play an important role.

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 20 Conclusions Combining all B-factory results, there is a strong evidence of CP violation in B → D 0(*) K (*) The combination of all the method gives Well compatible with the prediction from SM Many analyses contribute. Big contributors are DK decay modes using Dalitz method. FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010 Need to reduce the error in order to see possible deviations: (Bayesian approach) (Frequentist approach) (Bayesian approach) (Frequentist approach)

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 21 Current Setups 3.5 GeV e + & 8 GeV e – beams L = 1.7 x cm –2 s –1 ∫Ldt = 820 fb Υ(4S)+off(~10%) 3.1 GeV e + & 9 GeV e – beams L = 1.2 x cm –2 s –1 ∫ L dt = 428 fb Υ(4S)+off (~10%) FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 22 Results from B + → D 0 K + GGSZ ADS GLW KK K   KK A CP– A CP+ R CP– R CP+ Y- Y+ X- X+ FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 23 ADS GLW Results from B + → D *0 K +, D *0 → D 0   (D 0  Dalitz A CP– A CP+ R CP– R CP+ D* → D   D* → D  D* → D   D* → D  Y- Y+ X- X+ FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010

D. Derkach, Measurements of γ/φ3 24 Results from B + → D 0 K *+ GGSZ ADS GLW A CP– A CP+ R CP– R CP+ KK KK Y- Y+ X- X+ FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010