Overview of the MEG * CDCH * one of the following ( MEG UP MEG2 MEG + ) Marco Grassi on behalf of the CDCH Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of the ATLAS MM project
Advertisements

2/9/2004DC status - BVR1 1.Mechanics 2.Foil 3.Frame and Print Anode Inner cathode Hood 4.Pressure control + He bag + target 5.Electronic 6.Schedule Status.
The Intermediate Silicon Layers detector OUTLINE ISL inside CDFII Why the ISL? Conceptual Design Ladders and Spaceframe Rasnik Online Alignment System.
7/5/05,MEG DC,je MEG DC 1.Foils 2.Wires 3.Frames + tools 4.Preamplifier 5.Gas pressure control 6.final.
Mechanical Status of ECAL Marc Anduze – 30/10/06.
GlueX Simulations Status Report on CD3 geometry Richard Jones GlueX Collaboration Meeting, Newport News, January 10-12, 2008.
1 Peter Monaghan“Hall C January 2011 Users Meeting”15 th January 2011 SHMS Wire Chamber Update RECAP from August Review: Vendor price quote 5x larger than.
1 PSI 27/6/2006 C.Bemporad “THE TAMING OF MEG” News on Calibration Methods Cockcroft-Walton Accelerator  -sources on wire  -lines from neutron capture.
1 EMCal design MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.
Status of IPBSM Improvement N. Terunuma, KEK 2012/July/13 ATF2 Weekly Meeting.
H. Alvarez Pol - NUSTAR Calorimeter WG R3B/EXL Collaboration Meeting - Santiago Sept Geometrical design, simulation progress and first detector.
1 SBS Spectrometer / GEP5 Conf.. 2 Tracking Requirements Requirements Tracking Technology DriftMPGDSilicon High Rate: MHz/cm 2 (Front Tracker)
G. Martellotti CERN 22/04/20021 Tooling / Test Stations for MWPC (Meeting LNF, Roma1/Pz ) Production rate : 408 chambers (Fe + LNF) :192 R4 M1.
October 28-th, 2005Straw tracker 1 Status of Straw Tracker for P236 P.L. Frabetti, V.Kekelidze, K.Kleinknecht, V.Peshekhonov, B.Peyaud, Yu.Potrebenikov,
T. Kawamoto1 Small Wheel upgrade project Muon week, upgrade meeting T. Kawamoto.
1 E906 Pre-Amplifier Card 2009/10/07. 2 E906 Wire Chambers Station1 MWPC: –build a new E906 MWPC. –4500 channels in total. Station2 DC: –recycle old E866.
ALCPG11-Peterson1 Development of a Low-Material TPC Endplate for ILD Dan Peterson Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, Cornell University.
1 Advanced Endplate - mechanics: Development of a Low-Material TPC Endplate for ILD Dan Peterson Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, Cornell University.
L. Greiner 1IPHC meeting – May 7, 2012 STAR HFT Plans for the next year A short report on HFT/PXL plans for post May 2012 TPC – Time Projection Chamber.
HPS Collaboration Meeting JLAB, May Tracker Design Status M.Oriunno, SLAC.
Muon Detector Jiawen ZHANG Introduction The Detector Choices Simulation The structure and detector design The Expected performance Schedule.
1 CLAS12/Central Tracker review. Saclay 12/09 Stéphan AUNE Central Tracker review Micromegas central & forward tracker  R&D and prototypes  CAD implantation.
MEG DC (report June 04) DC report june_04,J.E. a)Foil stability and quench related problems b)How to get more stability c)Frame design d)Measurement of.
09/03/2010 ADO-PO section meeting Beam Pipe Extraction/Insertion R. Vuillermet.
Mechanical Status of EUDET Module Marc Anduze – 05/04/07.
GEM chambers for SoLID Nilanga Liyanage University of Virginia.
Tungsten as HCal-material for a LC at multi-TeV energies CALICE AHCAL Meeting, DESY 17 July 2009 Christian Grefe for the Linear Collider Detector Group.
1 HBD update Itzhak Tserruya DC Upgrades meeting, January 14, 2005 NIM paper II: Generic R&D ~ completed Full scale prototype construction Pending issues.
EUDET JRA3 ECAL in 2007 : towards “The EUDET module” C. de La Taille IN2P3/LAL Orsay.
Update on the Triple GEM Detectors for Muon Tomography K. Gnanvo, M. Hohlmann, L. Grasso, A. Quintero Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL.
9 September 2004The Straw Tube Chamber1 The CDC Curtis A. Meyer Carnegie Mellon University Physics Requirements and Specifications Prototype Construction.
LEPP meeting Dan Peterson ILC highlights : Development of a TPC for the ILD detector at the ILC There are some significant differences between.
Progress on the beam tracking instrumentation Position measurement device Tests performed and their resolution Decision on electronics Summary.
Status of the PSD upgrade - Problems with PSD in Be runs - Modification of cooling system - New temperature control - Upgrade of HV control system - MAPD.
2007 Oct 21 GEM Panel for LP1 Akimasa Ishikawa (Saga University) For CDC group.
HEP Tel Aviv UniversityLumical - A Future Linear Collider detector Lumical R&D progress report Ronen Ingbir.
Forward Tagger Simulations Implementation in GEMC Moller Shield Tracking Studies R. De Vita INFN –Genova Forward Tagger Meeting, CLAS12 Workshop, June.
BENE MECC detector Pasquale Migliozzi INFN – Napoli.
David Silvermyr Lund University for the PHENIX Collaboration Early global event results using the PHENIX Pad Chambers at RHIC.
A. Baldini PSI July 05 Overview of the experiment MEG is being built (Beam line, Magnet, LXe, DC, TC, Elect., Software) Delays in some items: O(months)
Oct/12/07 Su DongSiD Tracking Meeting1 Thoughts on VXD Sensor Configuration Su Dong.
Redesign of LumiCal mechanical structure W.Daniluk, E.Kielar, J.Kotula, K.Oliwa, Wojciech Wierba, L.Zawiejski Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN Cracow,
Brief Status of LHC Experimental Vacuum Project Ray Veness CERN TE/VSC.
RD program on hybrids & Interconnects Background & motivation At sLHC the luminosity will increase by a factor 10 The physics requirement on the tracker.
Presentazione delle richieste immediate per l’upgrade di MEG (gruppo di Roma) Cecilia Voena Mar 15 th, 2013.
The new MEG tracker Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa Overview Timescale Tasks Funding.
Technical Design for the Mu3e Detector Dirk Wiedner on behalf of Mu3e February Dirk Wiedner PSI 2/15.
Upgrade of the MEG liquid xenon calorimeter with VUV-light sensitive large area SiPMs Kei Ieki for the MEG-II collaboration 1 II.
SiW ECAL Marcel Reinhard LLR – École polytechnique LCWS ‘08, Chicago.
The new MEG tracker Marco Grassi MEG Italia. CSN1 25/09/20122 Present system  16 chambers composed as follow 4 x12  m of kapton (cathodes) 50  m BeCu.
Stereo Collab Meeting | CEA Saclay July-2015 Conclusions.
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
Overview of the MEGII CDCH Marco Grassi INFN Pisa.
Concept for LOKI detector system. Rear Detector 2 Spider Cob (central detector) Octant (Out detector) Maybe subdivided in two parts.
Marc Anduze – EUDET Meeting – PARIS 08/10/07 Mechanical R&D for EUDET module.
Developing Radiation Hard Silicon for the Vertex Locator
An Active TARget for MEG-II, a status report
An active target for MEG2, a status report
Test Beam Request for the Semi-Digital Hadronic Calorimeter
FCAL R&D towards a prototype of very compact calorimeter
new straw end plug: D=10.6 mm straws support frame Levan option
Hcal Geometry and Assembly
- STT LAYOUT - SECTOR F SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR E SECTOR D SECTOR C
Hybrid Pixel R&D and Interconnect Technologies
SiD Calorimeter R&D Collaboration
Vertex Detector Mechanical R&D Design Questions and Issues
IFR detector mechanics
IDEA Detector Simulation Status
Final Design CGEM Workshop HIEP, 14/03/2017 M. Melchiorri - INFN FE.
Michail Anastasopoulos Lead Detector – Design Engineer
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the MEG * CDCH * one of the following ( MEG UP MEG2 MEG + ) Marco Grassi on behalf of the CDCH Group

Introduction Fukuoka, Oct The upgrade completion is planned for autumn 2015 The current estimates for the New Chamber production is 18 months During this Collaboration Meeting 1.the external constraints to the chamber geometry have to be checked and agreed on 2.the azimuthal coverage needs to be fixed definitely A brief report has been submitted to the collaboration as suggested during the last bi weekly meeting

Report Fukuoka, Oct

Index Fukuoka, Oct

External constraints Fukuoka, Oct mm 128mm 140 / 115mm Minimum distance between foil and bellow = 10 mm External constraints from COBRA R_Cobra_min297.0mm R_Cobra_safe3.0mm R_bellows114.0mm Bellows_Sag13.0mm Bellows_Safe30.0mm MaxLoadXxxkg Z_Cobra_max1420.0mm chamber allowed space R_ext_max294.0mm R_ext_min157.0mm Z_max1420.0mm

Bellow system Fukuoka, Oct Equal sharing of the 20 mm distance between the bellow system and the wire minimum radius

Other dimensions and weight Fukuoka, Oct Outer radius Planned measurement of the soldering ribs with respect to COBRA flange Length “natural” chamber length of 2840 mm, including “extension volumes” Weight 250 Kg, mainly flanges, electronics cooling and cables He He / iB air

Costraints on wires R_ext_max mm R_safe_fiber5.000mm Fiber_thick2mm R_wire_max mm R_ext_min mm R_safe_foil10.000mm R_wire_min mm Internal safety margins Fukuoka, Oct mm 156 mm R_safe_ext R_safe_int Tests with long prototype

endplate Fukuoka, Oct End Plate ichamR_iZ_iTh_i2*Alpha_iArc_iCt_incell_iCw_iCt/Cw mm deg mm guard field signal field signal field signal field signal field signal field signal field signal field signal field signal field signal field guard

center Fukuoka, Oct Center ichamRm_iDR_iCt_iCw_iCt/Cw mm guard field signal field signal field signal field signal field signal field signal field signal field signal field signal field signal field guard

Chamber length Fukuoka, Oct The chamber length defines the geometrical matching with the timing counter: as long as possible Long chamber has reduced longitudinal resolution: effects seen in MC at half-length=100 cm Construction concerns Measurable volume 2550x1500x1350 mm 3

Chamber length Fukuoka, Oct Construction concerns 1.Long cells have larger gravitational sag and impose more stringent constraints on wiring position: functioning long prototype with half-length=90 cmOK 2.Wiring machine needs a larger cylinder: increased inertial momentumunder study 3.Assembly under measuring machine with a total length of 2600 mm: half-length≤95 cm need double check 1900 mm 60 mm 150 mm 120 mm

Limited azimuthal coverage Fukuoka, Oct The chamber described in the upgrade proposal has an azimuthal coverage with both U and V views of ~240 deg at Z=0 ~180 deg at end plate The wire suspension at the end-plates spans 300 deg The choice was suggested only by the comparison with the present detector configuration in which the target is hung to the chamber system. The limited azimuthal coverage is possible even if not optimal for the tracker.

Limited azimuthal coverage Fukuoka, Oct The support structure limits the space available for target movement The structure is more robust and simple 1.E field is not well defined everywhere: up to 50% noise increase on 50% of the wires 2.The carbon fibre support is “straight-forward” 3.The end-plate structure is simplified 4.Kapton foil structure and tensioning is simplified

2  azimuthal coverage Fukuoka, Oct The 2  solution eliminates zones with weak E fields (only HV is needed, not FE nor DAQ) opens up extra physics channels with e- facilitates chamber construction but Impacts on the target system Is more expensive (wire PCB and HV) The design of the azimuthal limited chamber is pursued but the 2  solution is strongly preferred

Target system location Fukuoka, Oct Simple proposal Target holder Inside US extension R in 130 ÷ 155 mm Target displacement 25 cm Target Light rohacell support (or even lighter) Simulation of the background induced on the Calorimeter is in progress

Beam line interference Fukuoka, Oct cm Interference with muon beam line seems negligible

Fukuoka, Oct

Fukuoka, Oct

Electronics and cables Fukuoka, Oct Chamber FE electronics placed in 2 “extensions” maintained in 294 mm < R < 156 mm Cables through “extensions” circular covers Check of available space

He He / iB Gas volumes Fukuoka, Oct air Support structure stiff enough to rotate the chamber in vertical position Gas sealing directly on end-plates by potting Selection of potting material

He He / iB Coupling to COBRA, BTS and Bellows Fukuoka, Oct air Coupling flanges ending at 1420 mm (end og COBRA) –Stress release by mean of bellows Mechanical coupling to COBRA via cable flange

Presentations Fukuoka, Oct Construction – End plates (Miccoli) – FE electronics (Grancagnolo) – HV (Piredda) Prototypes – Long prototype (Baracchini) – cosmic telescope (Galli) Reconstruction and analysis – LXe – CDCH alignment (Kang) – Pattern recognition (Cei) – Reconstruction (Renga) – Single hit resolution (Cascella)

Summary Fukuoka, Oct The CDCH group endorses a 2  azimuthal coverage and asks the Collaboration to approve it Decision could be revised in case of sensitive increase of background on the calorimeter (ongoing study with an heavy target system) Decisions or checks on the following items are needed – gas volumes separation – constraints on external dimension – coupling to COBRA, BTS and bellow system Construction aspects are under discussion within the chamber group – chamber length – electronic location and service – end plates structure

End

Timing summary Fukuoka, Oct TaskStartcompletion Geometry01/201306/2013 Assembly procedure01/201306/2013 End plate design05/201310/2013 Support struct. design05/201312/2013 Material procurement10/201306/2014 Mounting tool10/201306/2014 Wiring tool10/201306/2014 Assembly06/201402/2015 Laboratory test03/201504/2015 Integration at PSI05/201506/2015 Contingency06/201509/2015

Wires Fukuoka, Oct Wire types 20 um W gold plated 40 um Al silver plated 50 um Al silver plated Pre production for long prototypes was expected by September 7 th Not delivered yet Solicited twice by and phone call … Producer California Fine Wires Already funded for the full production (84 kEu) waiting for delivery and acceptance test.

Revision of baseline geometry Fukuoka, Oct Option 3 presently used in Geant4 simulation 10 layer fixed sector width  = 60 deg planar EndPlate at  = 900 mm Equal number of cells per sector (power of 2) nC_i = {32, 32, 32, 32, 32, 32, 32, 32, 32, 32,} Cell Width C W from nC_i Cell Thickness C T equal to C W Radial position R from C T Stereo angle  fixed by R Total  coverage = 240 deg at Z=0

End plates Fukuoka, Oct History Two end-plate prototypes have been designed Last week the two option were reviewed Status Delays with the prototype production of the baseline solution (Lecce) In production the alternative solution (Pisa)

End Plate Fukuoka, Oct

End plates Fukuoka, Oct Agreed strategy Fully test the alternative solution If ok -> { end} If fail -> { Combine mechanical design of the alternative solution with the PCB stacking up method of the baseline solution } In both cases PCB similar to the one shown