Presenter : Yang Wu McMaster University Work conducted at IHEP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISS meeting, (1) R. Garoby (for the SPL study group) SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities SPL-based Proton Driver for Facilities at CERN:
Advertisements

ISIS Accelerator Division
CW neutron source Benjamin Cheymol, Angel Jesus Romero Serrano, Jesus Alonso, Lali Tchelidze 6/30/11 Benjamin Cheymol, Angel Jesus Romero Serrano, Jesus.
Proton / Muon Bunch Numbers, Repetition Rate, RF and Kicker Systems and Inductive Wall Fields for the Rings of a Neutrino Factory G H Rees, RAL.
Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
Catalina Island Meeting May, Proton Drivers for Neutrino Factories: The CERN Approach Presented by B. Autin, CERN.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
Development of new power supplies for J-PARC MR upgrade Yoshi Kurimoto (KEK) for J-PARC accelerator group.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
CAT-KEK-Sokendai School on Spallation Neutron Sources 1 Rapid Cycling Synchrotron (I) CAT-KEK-Sokendai School on Spallation Neutron Sources K. Endo (KEK)
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Proton Plans at Fermilab Robert Zwaska - Fermilab Science and Engineering at Henderson- DUSEL Capstone Workshop Stony Brook University May 5, 2006 Outline.
Proton Driver Status ISIS Accelerator Division John Thomason.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda, H. Sako, H. Suzuki,
Related poster [1] TPAG022: Slow Wave Electrode Structures for the ESS 2.5 MeV Chopper – Michael A. Clarke-Gayther Status Funding bids have been prepared.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
1 Design of Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory NuFact Workshop 2006 Irvine, CA, Aug/25, 2006.
June 23, 2005R. Garoby Introduction SPL+PDAC example Elements of comparison Linacs / Synchrotrons LINAC-BASED PROTON DRIVER.
J. Pasternak First Ideas on the Design of the Beam Transport and the Final Focus for the NF Target J. Pasternak, Imperial College London / RAL STFC ,
Alexander Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
HWDB: Operations at the Spallation Neutron Source Workshop on Accelerator Operations August 6-10, 2012 Glen D. Johns Accelerator Operations Manager.
Proton FFAG Accelerator R&D at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Fermilab Proton Driver Project Weiren Chou for Bill Foster Fermilab, U.S.A. October 20, 2004 Presentation at the Proton Driver Session ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim,
PHYSICAL PROJECT OF BOOSTER FOR NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Alexey Tuzikov, Nikolay Agapov, Andrey Butenko, Alexey Eliseev, Viktor Karpinsky, Hamlet Khodzhibagiyan,
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
WG2 (Proton FFAG) Summary G.H. Rees. Proton Driver Working Group  Participants: M. Yashimoto, S. Ohnuma, C.R. Prior, G.H. Rees, A.G. Ruggiero  Topics:
Fermilab and Muons Proton Driver (for ν-Factory, μ + -μ - Collider, …) David Neuffer Fermilab.
DESIGN OF THE BNL SUPER NEUTRINO BEAM FACILITY W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory Neutrino Super Beam, Detectors and Proton Decay BNL/UCLA/APS Workshop.
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
Comparison of Fermilab Proton Driver to Suggested Energy Amplifier Linac Bob Webber April 13, 2007.
THE DESIGN OF THE AGS-BASED PROTON DRIVER FOR NEUTRINO FACTORY W.T. WENG, BNL FFAG WORKSHOP JULY 7-11, 2003 KEK, JAPAN.
High-Power Proton Drivers Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG 03 KEK International Center Japan, July , 2003.
4 MW, 50 Hz, 10 GeV, 1 ns (rms), FFAG Proton Driver Study G H Rees, RAL.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
NuFACT06 Muon Source at Fermilab David Neuffer Fermilab.
F D F November 8, 2006Alessandro G. Ruggiero1 of GeV 10-MWatt Proton Driver Target 200-MeV DTL 1.0-GeV FFAG H – Stripping Foil Injection Energy,
Longitudinal aspects on injection and acceleration for HP-PS Antoine LACHAIZE On behalf of the HP-PS design team.
U.S. Plans for High Power Proton Drivers Steve Holmes Fermilab Workshop on Physics with a Multi-MW Proton Source CERN May 25, 2004.
Neutrino Factory by Zunbeltz, Davide, Margarita, Wolfgang IDS proposal.
Using step-like nonlinear magnets for beam uniformization at target in high intensity accelerarors Zheng Yang, Jing-Yu Tang, IHEP, China P.A. Phi Nghiem,
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Summary Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab, USA.
FCC-ee injector complex including Booster Yannis Papaphilippou, CERN Thanks to: M.Aiba (PSI), Ö.Etisken (Ankara Un.), K.Oide (KEK), L.Rinolfi (ESI-JUAS),
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Introduction Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab,
Towards a Common Proton Driver for a Neutrino Factory
Considerations on RF systems of SPPC collider and its injector chain
1- Short pulse neutron source
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS
Superbeams with SPL at CERN
ADS Accelerator Program in China
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS/i-RCS
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
Progress towards Pulsed Multi-MW CERN Proton Drivers
A Superconducting Proton/Electron Linac
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
JLEIC ion fullsize booster (2256m) space charge limit (Δν=0
RF system for MEIC Ion Linac: SRF and Warm Options
Presentation transcript:

Presenter : Yang Wu McMaster University Work conducted at IHEP

 Introduction  Design goals  Overall design considerations  Scheme I  Scheme II  Comparison  Summary

 CSNS (China Spallation Neutron Source) is a multi-disciplinary research facility  CSNS accelerator complex consists of: ◦ 80MeV H - Linac ◦ 1.6Gev proton rapid cycling synchrotron(RCS) ◦ Beam transport lines

 The post-acceleration scheme studies are based on the CSNS II accelerator CSNS ICSNS II Beam Power (kW) Proton energy (GeV)1.6 Repetition rate (Hz)25 Protons per pulse (10 13 ) RCS circumference (m) Linac energy (MeV)80250 Linac peak current (mA)2040 Linac RF frequency (MHz) 324

 To extend CSNS to a super-beam facility which could be used for neutrino oscillation studies by adding a post-acceleration complex  To minimized the influence to CSNS applications, 10% of the RCS beam is used for post-acceleration.  To be competitive, the proton driver is to have an energy of 128GeV and beam power of 4MW.

 Two-step acceleration:  Using accumulator ring ◦ Reducing the repetition rate of the MR ◦ Satisfying the limitation of the ramping rate of SC- magnets.  Two-step acceleration:  Using accumulator ring ◦ Reducing the repetition rate of the MR ◦ Satisfying the limitation of the ramping rate of SC- magnets. ‣ Booster and Accumulator are sharing the same tunnel Booster 1.6GeV-20GeV Accumulator 20GeV Main Ring 20GeV-128GeV

RCS 1pulse 2bunches Booster 1 pulse 2 bunches Accumulator 1 pulse 2 bunches Main Ring 2 pulses 4 bunches

25Hz 2.5Hz 1.25Hz 1.25Hz

Booster 1 pulse 2 bunches Accumulator 5 pulses 10 bunches Main Ring 6 pulses 12 bunches Superconducting magnet Smaller Main Ring

25Hz 2.5Hz Hz Hz

 No scheme shows evident advantages  Circumference: Accumulator Ring  Four more RF cavities: Circumference → RF voltage BOOSTER parametersScheme I (RT-MR)Scheme II (SC-MR) Circumference (m ) Dipole field ( T ) Dipole ramping rate during rising period (T/s) Curvature radius (m) RF Voltage (kV ) Number of ferrite cavities (or MA cavities) 16 (8)20 (10) RF harmonics911

 SC-MR scheme has obvious advantages  Circumference, dipole ramping rate and RF voltage MAIN RING parametersScheme I (RT-MR)Scheme II (SC-MR) Circumference (m ) Repetition rate (Hz) RF Voltage (kV ) Dipole field (T) Dipole ramping rate during rising period (T/s) Curvature radius (m) Number of ferrite cavities (or MA cavities) 143 (71)54 (27) RF harmonics4030

 A post-acceleration system for CSNS Neutrino Superbeam has been studied, with two slightly different schemes.  Both schemes exploit only 10% of CSNS/RCS beam.  The scheme with SC magnets in the MR is favored due to lower construction and operational cost.  With the beam energy of 128 GeV and beam power of 4 MW, CSNS superbeam will be very competitive in long-baseline neutrino physics.