Badger culling to control bovine TB: its potential role in a science-led policy Professor Christl Donnelly MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Review of Aspects of the Epidemiology of TB in the Irish Cattle Herd 1 Department of Agriculture and Food,Agriculture House, Kildare Street, Dublin,
Advertisements

Epidemiological effects of badger culling and vaccination Rosie Woodroffe Zoological Society of London.
Ireland’s TB Eradication Policy Margaret Good SSVI Margaret Good SSVI.
Rushcliffe Borough Council Development Management Process Changes to Planning Legislation Andrew Pegram Service Manager, Communities February 2015.
Last Gasp John Baker the potential of spatial planning to contribute to air quality.
Dr Chris Boomer Development Plans Manager (DoE Northern Ireland)
An independent assurance of the methodology for estimating future pupil numbers and its application Dr Peter Boden April 2008.
Badger Bother To cull or not to cull?. Why cull badgers? Badgers are blamed for spreading the bovine tuberculosis (bTB) disease to dairy cows... by some.
Research on Pre-Movement Testing in Ireland Tracy Clegg Centre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, University College Dublin.
The influence of endemic infections on cattle culling and movement David Carslake, Laura Green, Habtu Weldegebriel and Graham Medley University of Warwick,
Regulation, Law and Animal Health and Welfare The role of legal regulation GOLD John McEldowney, School of Law, University of Warwick.
The reform of A level qualifications in the sciences Dennis Opposs SCORE seminar on grading of practical work in A level sciences, 17 October 2014, London.
Lecture(3) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
Meeting the challenge of housing growth in Birmingham
Draft Code of Practice – General Consultation / Implementation Sue Woodgate.
Infection Control- Issues in the Community Dr Yimmy Chow Interim Director and Consultant in Communicable Disease Control NW London Health Protection Team,
WHO COURSE FOR THE CARs MONITORING AND AUDITING OF FOOD LAW COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT.
European Commission, DG Competition Fifth Annual Conference on Competition Enforcement in the CCE Member States 21 February 2014, Bratislava 1 Due Process.
The Policy Company Limited © Control of Infection.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
Overview report of a series of FVO fact- finding missions and audits carried out in 2012 and 2013 in order to evaluate the systems put in place to give.
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
Findings from bTB dissertation research Jacquetta Whyatt Watts Chelsea Hayward Camilla Shipley.
Badger Cull Bassetsbury Badgers. Why cull badgers? Badgers are blamed for spreading the bovine tuberculosis (bTB) disease to dairy cows... by some people.
The inspection of local area responsibilities for disabled children and young people and those who have special educational needs Charlie Henry HMI National.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Arthur Rylah Institute Management of on-farm risk to livestock from bovine TB in white-tailed deer within Deer Management Unit 452: Predictions from a.
Agriculture’s Dual Challenge of Delivering Food While Protecting the Environment Tamsin Cooper A Future for a Strong CAP – European Symposium.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
DESTINATION MEASURES AND RAISING THE PARTICATION AGE REQUIREMENTS Simon Gentry Business Manager, Services for Young People, Education.
Developing policy for the use of TB vaccines in badgers and cattle in England Vaccination in the control of bovine tuberculosis Thursday, 3 rd October.
Association of Childrens Welfare Agencies Conference 2006 Improving Care Through Accreditation- The Role of the NSW Children’s Guardian.
Geographical Enlargement of CERN Associate membership Principles and criteria S. Intoudi / 8 July
EXPERIMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Badger vaccination: impacts and implementation in the field Gavin Wilson National Wildlife Management Centre Rich Yarnell©
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
REMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATED LAND IN SOUTH AFRICA Part 8 of the Waste Act Ms Mishelle Govender Chemicals and Waste Management.
ENZOOTIC BOVINE LEUKOSIS
Badger cull Should badgers get killed for the protection of cows.
Developing policy for the use of TB vaccines in badgers and cattle in Wales Christianne Glossop CVO Wales Vaccination in the control of bovine tuberculosis.
PHE Local Intelligence Contribution David Meechan, Director for Knowledge & Intelligence (East Midlands), Public Health England.
Muston planning for Bath & North East Somerset Council 3 June 2015 Councillor Training – Planning Mike Muston – Muston Planning.
Badger Bother To cull or not to cull?.
EPIC Use of Agriculture Data Aaron Reeves, MS PhD Quantitative Epidemiologist Epidemiology Research Unit SRUC.
The draft Marine Bill A New Framework for UK Seas 20 May 2008.
PIC EU-28 Conference Paris, 26 – 27 November 2015 PIC An EU Approach Assurance Maps An Introductory workshop Nathan Paget United Kingdom.
1 News from the Smoking Toolkit Study: December 2012 University College London December 2012 Robert West.
Nigel Hannam and David Phillips Parish Conference – 11th September 2013 Balancing Development.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS.
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
Neighbourhood Planning in Haringey Myddleton Road Strategic Group 7 th November 2013.
Qualifications Wales Update. -To ensure that qualifications and the qualification system in Wales are effective for meeting the reasonable needs of learners.
Planning Explained Module 4 – Engaging with Neighbourhood Planning.
Helen Green Public Health Registrar (ST3) West Midlands
Is medical revalidation building trust and assurance in doctors
GD211 Training Module 5 Conclusions.
Managing future water resources
Badgers and bovine tuberculosis
Quality Workshop The Local Council Award Scheme is a great guide for good practice in our sector and a way for councils to build confidence in their.
Health Education England Workforce Strategy - Key Points
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
Implementing and Evaluating KiVa in the UK
Health Education England Workforce Strategy - Key Points
Structure and Terminology
Harrow CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Adherence to Evidence Based Medicine Programme Evidence Summary Pack (Version 2) Correction of Ptosis Local commissioners working with local people for.
Programme 1: Responsibilities
Badgers and bovine tuberculosis
Ethics of the Use of Animals in Scientific Research: Legislation
Presentation transcript:

Badger culling to control bovine TB: its potential role in a science-led policy Professor Christl Donnelly MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology Imperial College London

Percentage of total herds with reactors (confirmed and unconfirmed) Rest of England and Wales South-West England 1962 to 1996 Gassing 1975 Clean Ring 1982 Interim 1986 Percentage of total herds with reactors (confirmed and unconfirmed)

What is the national picture? Released 17 Nov 2010, “according to the arrangements approved by the UK Statistics Authority”. 3

No culling Reactive culling Proactive culling Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT) areas Randomised to 30 roughly 100km 2 areas where the incidence of confirmed TB breakdowns was greatest No culling outside the field trial areas 4

Triplet-specific TB incidence in reactive trial areas observed and predicted had these areas received no culling. Reactives show consistently higher than expected TB incidence in cattle Donnelly et al. Nature 426, ,

Policy Advice: Reactive Culling The reactive treatment was associated with a 27% increase in the incidence of cattle TB (p=0.0145; standard 95% CI of % increase) when compared with no culling areas. After adjustment for overdispersion, the CI expands to: 2.4% decrease to 65% increase. “… we conclude that reactive culling of badgers, as carried out in the trial, is unlikely to contribute to the control of cattle TB. … as our results show that reactive culling is unlikely to offer a viable base for future policy, we support the decision to discontinue it as an experimental treatment.” Donnelly et al. Nature 426, ,

One hypothesis put forward to explain the reactive culling / increased TB in cattle finding: Culling may disrupt badgers’ territorial organization, so that the remaining animals travel more widely, coming into contact with (and potentially infecting) more cattle herds 7

Bait marking is a standard technique for mapping badger home ranges colour marked bait matching bait returns to setts 8

To investigate the effect of culling on spatial organization, we carried out bait marking in all three treatments of the RBCT no culling reactive cullingproactive culling 16km 2 study area 24km 2 study area 2004: G, H G, H G, H 2005: B, D B, D B, C, D study areas vary in their culling history with B>C>H>D>G=0 9

no culling Triplet D The first comparison: reactive culling Data from the bait marking study were consistent with the hypothesis that badgers range more widely when densities are reduced by reactive culling data from triplets B, D, G & H reactive culling no culling 10

Furthermore… Badger densities were slightly reduced, and badger movements expanded, on land immediately outside proactive culling areas badger density badger movement data from triplets B, C, D, G & H This means that, if disruption of badger spatial organization caused the increased cattle TB incidence in reactive culling areas, we should see the same effect on farms neighbouring proactive culling areas 11

0 100km Results from inside proactive culling areas The incidence of cattle TB inside proactive culling areas was 19% lower than that inside no-culling areas (95% CI: 6.2 to 30% lower) Proactive Survey-only Donnelly et al. Nature,

0 100km Results from just outside proactive culling areas The incidence of cattle TB up to 2km outside proactive culling areas was 29% higher than that on farms up to 2km outside no-culling areas (95% CI: 5.0 to 58% higher) Proactive Survey-only Donnelly et al. Nature,

Consistency of effects Observed numbers of confirmed breakdowns (following initial culls) and numbers predicted with no culling. Whole trial areas Neighbouring areas Observed Predicted Fewer observed than predicted More observed than predicted 14

Effect of repeated widespread culling Trend p=0.17 Trend p=

The ISG Final Report The Independent Scientific Group on Cattle TB published its final report on the Randomised Badger Culling Trial in June “After careful consideration of all the RBCT and other data presented in this report, including an economic assessment, we conclude that badger culling cannot meaningfully contribute to the future control of cattle TB in Britain.” 16

In Dec 2007, Sir David King met with ISG members “Sir David said he agreed with the ISG’s conclusions regarding the requirements for badger culling to bring about a beneficial effect. He confirmed that badger culling would have to be undertaken competently and sustained for a minimum period of four years over a land area of at least 265km 2. … In response to a question from Dr Woodroffe, Sir David confirmed that conducting badger culls simultaneously over such an area would have to be an essential element of any culling programme that was deemed to have been undertaken competently.” [emphasis added] 17

In Dec 2007, Sir David King met with ISG members All present agreed …that sustained, coordinated culling conducted simultaneously over the whole area would be necessary to achieve any improving temporal trend in the effects of culling on cattle TB incidence, and that culling conducted over short time periods or in an uncoordinated manner would be very likely to cause detrimental effects.” [emphasis added] 18

In Dec 2007, Sir David King met with ISG members Sir David “confirmed that he accepted that badger culling will: cause immigration of badgers into the culled area and the periphery; disturb badger populations in culled areas; disrupt badger social groups in culled areas; cause some badgers to expand their ranging behaviour; reduce spatial clustering of bovine TB infection in badgers; elevate bovine TB infection prevalence in the reduced badger population in culled areas.” 19

Ongoing monitoring of TB incidence in RBCT areas Jenkins, Woodroffe & Donnelly PLoS ONE Feb (Mar & July) 2010 Defra-funded research 34.1% lower (95% CI: 23.0% to 43.6% lower) 5.6% lower (95% CI: 31.0% lower to 29.1% higher) 20

Extrapolating to areas of different sizes Jenkins, Woodroffe & Donnelly Based on PLoS ONE July 2010 Update Defra-funded research 21

“The most pressing animal health problem in the UK today is bovine tuberculosis (bTB), which has led to the slaughter of over 250,000 cattle since As part of a package of measures, we will introduce a carefully- managed and science-led policy of badger control in areas with high and persistent levels of bTB.” 22

Bovine Tuberculosis: The Government’s approach to tackling the disease and consultation on a badger control policy “There is no single solution to tackling bovine TB – we need to use every tool in the toolbox.” “The main body of evidence on the impact badger culling has on incidence of bovine TB in cattle is the Randomised Badger Culling Trial (RBCT).” “The results of this trial demonstrate that badger culling, done on a sufficient scale, in a widespread, coordinated and efficient way, and over a sustained period of time, would reduce the incidence of bovine TB in cattle in high incidence areas.” 15 September

Defra culling proposals “Defra is consulting on a proposal to issue licences to farmers and landowners who wish to cull and/or vaccinate badgers at their own expense. These licences would be subject to strict licence criteria to ensure badger control is done effectively, humanely and with high regard for animal welfare.” 24

Defra culling proposals – Culling method Licences will only permit culling by cage-trapping and shooting, and by shooting free-running badgers, carried out by trained, competent operators with appropriate firearms licences. Defra ruled out gassing and snaring on the basis that we do not have sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they are humane and effective methods of culling. 25

Defra culling proposals - Size This will include a requirement that any culling must take place over a minimum area of 150km 2 so we can be confident it will have a net beneficial effect. This means that we would expect to receive licence applications from groups of farmers and landowners rather than individuals. Applicants will also need to demonstrate that they have considered taking further steps to minimise the potential detrimental effect at the edge of a culling area. 26

Defra culling proposals - Funding The Government will fund the cost of the licensing operation and monitor the effects of the policy. We expect the farming industry to bear the direct costs of badger control. 27

Defra culling proposals – Other proposed licence criteria include The area has high and persistent levels of TB in cattle There is land access for culling for over 70% of the area A commitment to sustaining culling over the area at least annually for a period of at least 4 years 28

Wales – badger culling order The draft Badger (Control Area) (Wales) Order 2010 would allow for a Government-managed cull of badgers, alongside additional cattle measures, in an Intensive Action Area in west Wales. “Under the proposals, there would be an annual cull of badgers over a five year period. Based on the available evidence, at the end of a cull and post cull period (total of 10 years), through culling alone we expect to have reduced bovine TB in cattle in the area by approximately 22%, preventing an estimated 83 confirmed herd breakdowns that would otherwise have occurred in the absence of culling badgers in the area.” 29

Welsh Assembly Government: Intensive Action Area We currently have the capability and equipment to deliver initially a cull in one area for five years. Expanding above this at this time would have a significant impact on our ability to deliver an effective cull. It is 288km² with a boundary of approximately 97.6km. In defining the boundary of the Intensive Action Area officials have taken the following criteria into consideration: – Level of disease in cattle. – Making best use of geographic and natural boundaries. – Inclusion of whole farms where land is contiguous. – Land usage e.g. cattle, sheep, arable, forestry. 30

Although primarily in North Pembrokeshire, it also includes an area of the county of Ceredigion, to the south of the River Teifi, near the village of St Dogmaels, and a small area of the county of Carmarthenshire, to the south of the village of Llanfyrnach. 31

Intensive Action Area: Land Access “It is important that we have access to land within the Intensive Action Area so that culling is undertaken efficiently to remove infection, which could result in continual re-infection of cattle. We would hope to gain voluntary cooperation from all landowners in the Intensive Action Area. However, Section 22 of the Animal Health Act 1981 confers power on the authorised officer to enter land to destroy wildlife for the purposes of disease prevention.” 32

Respond to your consultation! To respond to Defra (by 8 Dec 2010): TBBC mailbox, Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London, SW1P 3JR To respond to the Welsh Assembly Government (by 17 Dec 2010): TB Team, Office of the Chief Veterinary Officer, Department of Rural Affairs, Welsh Assembly Government, Cathays Park, CF10 3NQ Or use the online form! 33

Defra Question 8: Do you agree with the proposed monitoring? Government will take responsibility for monitoring the effectiveness, humaneness and impact of badger control 148. A policy to reduce the reservoir of disease in badgers will need to be monitored in terms of protecting animal welfare, sustainability of the local badger population and observing the effect of the control measures on the disease incidence in cattle. We propose monitoring of the following will take place: – compliance with the licence criteria; – badger welfare – spot-checking carcases to examine whether badgers are being culled in line with the licence criteria; – monitoring the status (numbers) of the badger population to ensure effective control operations and that there will not be local extinction; – incidence of bovine TB in cattle – this will be monitored through active surveillance as at present; and – monitoring protected sites (e.g. Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs), Special Protection Areas (SPAs)). 34

What is the national picture? Released 17 Nov 2010, “according to the arrangements approved by the UK Statistics Authority”. 35

The picture in Wales The most recent estimates for Wales show that up to the end of February 2010 there were 1,482 herds under movement restrictions, of which, 702 were under restriction because of an overdue test…. Comparative figures for the same period in 2009 were … But for the reduction in overdue tests, these figures would have remained fairly stable. Under TB restrictions Of which, for an overdue test Not due to an overdue test Feb 20081,8011, Feb 20091,8901, Feb 20101,

The Independent Scientific Group on TB in Cattle 37