GIPSA’s Role in Aflatoxin Testing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Verification of Eligibility for School Meals.
Advertisements

Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
Monitoring the Product Production, Import, Wholesale and Retail Level Monitoring.
Grade “A” Laboratory Evaluation Program Ronald G. Brown Dairy Product Specialist/Laboratory Evaluation Officer NYS Department of Agriculture and Markets.
QUALITY ADJUSTMENT AND SAMPLING/GRADING OVERVIEW Risk Management Agency.
Procedure for QuickTox™ Kit for Aflatoxin Bulk Grain
FIPS 201 Personal Identity Verification For Federal Employees and Contractors National Institute of Standards and Technology Information Technology Laboratory.
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development CONTROL OF PLANT PROTECTION PRODUCTS ON MARKET IN ROMANIA Nicoleta Predescu, PhD., Chem. Eng. Central Laboratory.
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION AVECO July 14 – 18, 2014 Centralized Certification.
1 OSHA FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (OSHA) OF 1970 George Mason University College of Nursing and Health Science Regulatory Requirements.
Contractor Safety Management
World Health Organization
Determine impurity level in relevant batches1
Other Items for Consideration. Cash Change Funds The library board may permit any of its officers or employees having a duty to collect cash revenues.
Lecture 8. Quality Assurance/Quality Control The Islamic University of Gaza- Environmental Engineering Department Environmental Measurements (EENV 4244)
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
Instructions for VCU’s Internal Approval Form Form is required to obtain Authorized Official’s signature on proposals and awards OSP – 8/2006.
Quality Assurance in the clinical laboratory
Whole Grains in the School Meal Programs Healthy Kids, Healthy Programs Summit Four Points by Sheraton, Norwood, MA May 21, 2015 Presented by: Linda Fischer,
1 MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE NATION’S FOODSERVICE AND RETAIL FOOD PROTECTION SYSTEM.
Counting and Claiming Presented by: Linda Stull Grants Coordination and School Support School Nutrition Training and Programs.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Corrective Action.
Good Laboratory Practices (GLPs)
World Health Organization
Current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP’s). Biotechnology using living cells and materials produced by cells to create pharmaceutical, diagnostic,
Regulatory Overview.
Reinsurance Supervision The US Perspective ASSAL XIV Annual Meeting Alessandro Iuppa, Superintendent Maine Bureau of Insurance, USA.

Maricopa County Air Quality Department Performance Test Specifics Rob Arpino Environmental Engineering Specialist.
1 Facilitating the Marketing of America’s Grain Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration John B. Pitchford Director of International Affairs.
Allen Hughes State Materials Office
OFFICE OF THE TEXAS STATE CHEMIST Texas Feed and Fertilizer Control Service Agriculture Analytical Service Aflatoxin Risk Management Tim Herrman Professor,
FDA Recommendations: Sampling Plans for Blood Establishments Lore Fields MT(ASCP)SBB Consumer Safety Officer OBRR/CBER/FDA October 19, 2012.
BIM Bridge Inspection and Maintenance Technical Standards Branch Class B Bridge Inspection Course Inspection Policies and Procedures INSPECTION POLICIES.
QSR and GLP What exactly are these?.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
Tier I: Module 5 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Element 4: Verification & Certification.
Overview of FDA's Regulatory Framework for PET Drugs
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Approvals and Permits Division Isreal Mallard Transportation Specialist,
1 1 Poultry Slaughter Exemptions Under the Federal Poultry Products Inspection Act and the SC Poultry Products Inspection Law SC Poultry Products Inspection.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Kenneth Petersen, DVM, MPH Assistant Administrator Office of Field Operations.
Biochemistry Clinical practice CLS 432 Dr. Samah Kotb Lecturer of Biochemistry 2015 Introduction to Quality Control.
Copyright FDA Inspections: Where Do Things Go Wrong? Diana Naser RN, MS, CCRP Executive Director Clinical Research Administration Clinical Research.
System of Reinspection NACMPI August 27, 2008 Mary Stanley Office of International Affairs Food Safety and Inspection Service.
FOOD IMPORT CONTROL- A national perspective, Italy Romano Marabelli°, Paolo Aureli*, Agostino Macri’**, ° Direction General of Veterinary Public Health,
United States Department of Agriculture GRAIN INSPECTION ADVISORY COMMITTEE DENISE RUGGLES ASSISTANT TO THE DIRECTOR JUNE 18,2013.
CLOSE PROJECT OR PHASE CLOSING PROCESS GROUP PROJECT INTEGRATION MANAGEMENT.
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
Control On the Imported Food in the Jordan Procedure and Strategic plan (2011 to 2015)
Lecture 10 ANALYTICAL METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION IN HPLC AND GC. Lecture 10 – Chromatography, Dr. Rasha Hanafi 1© Dr. Rasha Hanafi, GUC.
1 CHALLENGES IN REGULATING QUALITY AND RATIONAL USE OF ANTIBIOTICS ALLIANCE FOR THE PRUDENT USE OF ANTIBIOTICS: INAGURAL MEETING COURTYARD.
Conformity Assessment Requirements to Access the U.S. Market - An Overview - Steven Bipes Program Manager – Regional & Bilateral Policy.
Quality Control significance in pharmaceutical industry
NAFDAC AND AFLATOXIN TESTING Oluwabamiwo B. F. Technical Manager NAFDAC Mycotoxin Laboratory, Oshodi, Lagos & Denloye Stella (Director laboratory services.
Final Rule for Sanitary Transportation. Background Proposed Rule: February 5, 2014 Public Comments: More than 200 Final Rule: On Display April 5, 2016.
Good Laboratory Practice
High Level Symposium to Enhance Regulator Expertise on Good Regulatory Practices and the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program eAuthentication Initiative eAuthentication Solution Screens Review Meeting October 7, 2003.
GROUP CERTIFICATION: THE INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEM Istituto per la Certificazione Etica ed Ambientale.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Draft Labeling Policy Guidance for N- 60 Testing Claims for Boneless Beef Manufacturing.
LABORATORY SAMPLES AND CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
Appendix 3. HISTAMINE ANALYSIS and SENSORY TEST PACKS
QUALITY ADJUSTMENT AND SAMPLING/GRADING OVERVIEW
Quality Assurance in the clinical laboratory
Clinical Engineering Lecture (3).
Chemical Purchasing.
Waiver Assurances and Performance Measures
World Health Organization
Worker’s Compensation
EU Food Safety Requirements: - Hygiene of Foodstuffs -
Presentation transcript:

GIPSA’s Role in Aflatoxin Testing

GIPSA's Objective Provide the market with rapid, accurate Aflatoxin testing services. Monitor the official Aflatoxin testing program in place. Work with the FDA to safeguard the public's health.

GIPSA provides Aflatoxin testing service as official criteria for corn, sorghum, wheat, and soybeans, as official criteria under the United States Grain Standards Act. (USGSA)

Additionally, all corn exported from the United States is required to be tested for Aflatoxin. As required by the Grain Quality Incentives Act of 1990 unless buyer and seller stipulate that Aflatoxin is not required

Testing is also provided for rice, popcorn, corn meal, corn gluten meal, corn/soy blend, and other processed products governed by the Agricultural Marketing Act. (AMA)

Number of Grain Aflatoxin Inspections 2003 2004 2005 GIPSA 29,016 32,526 29,391 Official Agency/Delegated States 82,249 69,725 67,264 Total 111,265 102,251 96,655

Types of Service Aflatoxin testing services are available nationwide, upon request and for a fee, as either a qualitative (screening above or below a threshold determined by the customer) or as a quantitative (actual results in parts per billion) service using several different types of test kits approved by GIPSA.

All official Aflatoxin testing is performed as prescribed in the GIPSA directive by authorized employees of GIPSA or licensed official agency personnel.

Official Aflatoxin testing available at: 56 Private official agencies 8 State delegated agencies GIPSA field office locations

Official Service Providers in Iowa and Illinois Cairo Grain Inspection Agency Cairo 618-734-0689 Central Illinois Grain Inspection Inc. Bloomington 309-827-7121 Central Iowa Grain Inspection Service Iowa Falls 641-648-3467 Champaign-Danville Grain Inspection Departments Inc. Champaign 217-398-0723 D. R. Schaal Agency Belmond 641-444-3122 Decatur Grain Inspection, Inc. Decatur 217-429-2466 Eastern Iowa Grain Inspection and Weighing Service, Inc. Davenport 563-322-7149 Fremont Grain Inspection Department Denison 402-721-1270 John R. McCrea Agency Clinton 815-589-9955 Kankakee Grain Inspection Essex 815-365-2268 Keokuk Grain Inspection Service Keokuk 319-524-6482 Lincoln Grain Inspections Service Hamburg 402-435-4386 Mid-Iowa Grain Inspection Cedar Rapids 319-363-0239 North Dakota Grain Inspection Service Cahokia 618-332-3409 Omaha Grain Inspection Red Oak 402-341-6739 Schneider Inspection Service Lake Village 219-992-2306 Sioux City Inspection and Weighing Service Company Sioux City 712-255-8073 Springfield Grain Inspection Springfield 217-522-5233

Quality Assurance Program The Technical Services Division (TSD), located at the Kansas City Technical Center, conducts an Aflatoxin check sample program for all specified service points and laboratories providing testing services. Field offices are responsible for routine supervision to assure all laboratories in their circuit provide accurate results and that all sampling and sample handling protocols are followed.

Approved Tests GIPSA has approved 14 quick test kits (7 qualitative and 7 quantitative) that can be used at field locations. All test kits are capable of providing results in 30 minutes or less. GIPSA also provides High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) testing for Aflatoxin. The HPLC testing procedure is performed, upon request, for Board Appeal inspections only.

Test Kits Approved for Official Use Qualitative AflacardT20 AflaCup AgraStrip AgriScreen Quicktox RevealP ROSA®

Test Kits Approved for Official Use Quantitative Veratox-AST Veratox MycoP Ridascreen Fast SC Aflatest Fluoroquant ROSA

Qualitative Test Kits Rapid Test Performance Evaluation Program The rapid test manufacturer submits a data package supporting their claims. The GIPSA staff reviews the data submitted by the manufacturer. If the data package is complete and the claims of the rapid test are supported by the data, GIPSA conducts an in-house performance verification of the rapid test. If the manufacturer's claims are verified by the GIPSA in-house performance testing, a Certificate of Performance is issued to the manufacturer for the rapid test.

Quantitative Test Kits Design Criteria & Performance Specifications Time required for analysis Limit of Detection Comparative accuracy on naturally contaminated samples Avoidance of toxic or hazardous substances Sensitivity to electromagnetic Fields Temperature sensitivity Stability GIPSA Certificate of Conformance

Official Sampling Methods Same Sampling Methods and Equipment as used for obtaining official grade results or other official criteria.

Sample Requirements Official Samples Carrier Min. Amount (lbs.) Sample obtained using official personnel , approved methods and equipment. Entire sample ground to required particle size. 50 gram test portion cut from whole sample to maintain accuracy. Carrier Min. Amount (lbs.) Barges/Sublots 10 Railcars 3 Trucks 2

Options If requested by the applicant, a larger sample size may be obtained. Approved sampling rates and/or probe patterns established to provide representative sample.

Diverter Type Mechanical Sampler (DT)

Pelican sampler

Ellis Cup

Probe Double-tubed compartmented Probe appropriately sized to the carrier.

Submitted Sample Analysis based on the sample submitted by the applicant for service. Does not represent the lot (carrier), only the amount of grain in the sample. Qualified certificate. Minimum size 500 grams preferably same as an official sample. Not subject to FDA agreement.

Certification Upon the request of the applicant, separate certificates may be issued for grade and for Aflatoxin when both are determined on the same lot.

Certification of Qualitative Testing Certify results as being equal to or less than a threshold. If a quantitative method is used the actual result can be recorded on the work record but the results are certified like a qualitative method was used.

Certification of Quantitative Testing When test results indicate that Aflatoxin is present at a level of less than 5 ppb, certify the results as "Aflatoxin does not exceed 5 ppb.“ Certify test results that are between the lower testing range (5 ppb) and the upper testing range (e.g., 80 ppb) to the nearest whole ppb. "Aflatoxin (result rounded to the nearest whole number) ppb.“ Test results greater than the upper testing limit of the test kit are certified as exceeding the test kit range unless a supplemental analysis is performed. "Aflatoxin exceeds 80 ppb.“

Optional Certification Statements At the request of the applicant, use the following statement when Aflatoxin is not detected (0 ppb). "Aflatoxin not detected." Can also be shown converted to parts per million (ppm) or Milligrams (mg) per kilogram (kg), or Micrograms (µg) per Kilogram (kg).

Review Inspections Review inspection services for Aflatoxin are provided on either a new sample or the file sample. Board appeal inspection services are limited to the analysis of file samples. Applicants may request either qualitative or quantitative analysis unless the original test was quantitative. Then, only a quantitative analysis is available.

Reinspection Service The laboratory providing original testing services also provides reinspection services.

Appeal Inspection Service FGIS field offices provide appeal testing services for Aflatoxin.

Board Appeal Inspection Services Limited to the file sample and are provided by the Board of Appeals and Review (BAR) in Kansas City. The HPLC method is also available for determining Aflatoxin in Board appeal samples. The applicant must specify the HPLC method as the desired determination method.

Reporting Lots Exceeding FDA Action Levels Under the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), GIPSA and officially delegated/designated agencies report to FDA, on a lot-by-lot basis, each lot that, during the course of an official sample-lot inspection, exceed the action limits.

FDA RECONDITIONING GUIDELINES The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) will permit reconditioning of Aflatoxin-contaminated corn lots at export locations by mechanical cleaning under the following conditions: a. Only one attempt at reconditioning is allowed. The analytical results from the reconditioned lot will be the final determination for disposition of the entire lot. b. To assure proper reconditioning, the grain company must mechanically clean the lot at a rate not to exceed 50 percent of the rated cleaner capacity.

FDA RECONDITIONING GUIDELINES c. FGIS must oversee the cleaning process, sample the reconditioned lot (cleaned corn) using a diverter-type mechanical sampler, and analyze the samples for Aflatoxin. d. FGIS must sample the cleanings/screenings using the most practical procedures available and test the cleanings and/or screenings for Aflatoxin contamination. At interior locations, the local FDA office may modify the reconditioning procedures to provide for a cost effective process.

Additional Information http://www.gipsa.usda.gov