Analysis Meeting, November 9-11, 2003 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez Heavy Flavor Working Group Heavy Flavor in ‘04: Prospects for J/ . Heavy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Advertisements

Strangeness analysis in ALICE o genuine p+p physics o PbPb physics o analysis status, studies in PPR2 o prospects K0s and hyperons Ludovic Gaudichet, INFN.
 Trigger for Run 8 Rates, Yields, Backgrounds… Debasish Das Pibero Djawotho Manuel Calderon de la Barca Analysis Meeting BNL October 16, 2007.
Photon-Jet Correlations at RHIC Saskia Mioduszewski Texas A&M University 18 July, 2007.
Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in p+p collisions at E CM =200 GeV Mike Miller (MIT) For the STAR collaboration.
Maki Kurosawa for the PHENIX Collaboration RIKEN Nishina Center 5/11/2015RHIC/AGS User's Meeting Maki Kurosawa 1 Recent Open Heavy Flavor Results from.
Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC Coherent Coupling Coherent Coupling to both nuclei: photon~Z 2, Pomeron~A 4/3 Small transverse momentum p t ~ 2h 
A probe for hot & dense nuclear matter. Lake Louise Winter Institute 21 February, 2000 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez.
Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics, Heavy Ion Physics with CMS: Day-One Measurements Olga Barannikova for the CMS Collaboration.
Quarkonium progress in STAR Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez UC Davis Heavy Flavor Working Group, STAR; XXII Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics La.
FPCP 2002, 05/16-18/2002 p. 1 Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityCDF Run II Status Status of CDF and Prospects Flavor Physics and CP Violation.
Ali Hanks - APS Direct measurement of fragmentation photons in p+p collisions at √s = 200GeV with the PHENIX experiment Ali Hanks for the PHENIX.
Topological D-meson Reconstruction with STAR Using the Silicon Vertex Tracker (SVT) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University SVT review, BNL, July 7 th /8.
 production in p+p collisions in Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez UC Davis STAR Collaboration 23 d Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky, Montana.
 (  ->ee) production in d+Au collisions at STAR Haidong Liu For the Collaboration.
Upsilon production in STAR Pibero Djawotho Indiana University Cyclotron Facility October 12, 2007 DNP 2007.
STAR J/  Simulations for RUN III Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Analysis Meeting at BNL October 23, 2002.
ALICE EMCal Physics and Functional Requirements Overview.
 production in d+Au collisions at STAR Haidong Liu University of California, Davis For the STAR Collaboration.
Non-photonic electron production in STAR A. G. Knospe Yale University 9 April 2008.
Υ Measurements at PHENIX Shawn Whitaker RHIC/AGS Users’ Meeting June 20, /20/20111Shawn Whitaker - RHIC/AGS Users Meeting.
Sevil Salur for STAR Collaboration, Yale University WHAT IS A PENTAQUARK? STAR at RHIC, BNL measures charged particles via Time Projection Chamber. Due.
Measurements of  Production and Nuclear Modification Factor at STAR Anthony Kesich University of California, Davis STAR Collaboration.
Pavel Nevski ATLAS detector performance in Heavy Ion Collisions at LHC ATLAS detector performance in Heavy Ion Collisions at LHC Pavel Nevski BNL Motivations.
D 0 Measurement in Cu+Cu Collisions at √s=200GeV at STAR using the Silicon Inner Tracker (SVT+SSD) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University For the STAR Collaboration.
 production in p+p and Au+Au collisions in STAR Debasish Das UC Davis (For the STAR Collaboration)‏
Studies of the jet fragmentation in p+p collisions in STAR Elena Bruna Yale University STAR Collaboration meeting, June
The status of high p T Non-photonic electron-hadron correlations in AuAu 200GeV collisions Wenqin Xu University of California, Los Angeles For the STAR.
☍ Studying bottmonium in hot/cold QGP medium. ☍ Triggering on ϒ production in STAR ☍ Baseline measurement: ϒ cross section in pp collisions. ☍ ϒ and CNM.
Open charm hadron production via hadronic decays at STAR
Heavy flavor production at RHIC Yonsei Univ. Y. Kwon.
Quarkonia spectra in PbPb at 2.76 TeV Abdulla Abdulsalam (Dr. Prashant Shukla) BARC, Mumbai Outline Motivation Event selection Kinematic cuts Acceptance.
Peak extraction Because of scarcity of statistics, the peak parameters are fixed from embedded MC. The relative suppression of the excited states is taken.
Photon 2003Falk Meissner, LBNL Falk Meissner Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory For the STAR Collaboration Photon 2003 April 2003 Coherent Electromagnetic.
Quarkonium Physics with STAR Mauro Cosentino (University of Sao Paulo/BNL)
M. Muniruzzaman University of California Riverside For PHENIX Collaboration Reconstruction of  Mesons in K + K - Channel for Au-Au Collisions at  s NN.
FTPC status and results Summary of last data taken AuAu and dAu calibration : Data Quality Physic results with AuAu data –Spectra –Flow Physic results.
10/15/2007Dunlop, Welcome and Overview, Analysis Meeting Analysis Meeting 2007: Welcome and Overview James Dunlop Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Aug 2003 Craig Ogilvie 1 Progress High pt D=>Kpi, need  rates  S/B vs DCA cut and S/  B vs DCA cut strategy reminder  B=0  Fit Si hits with a line,
 -bin Number Tower Calibration (ch/GeV) Desired E T matched gain s  =1.0  =2.0 from electrons slopesMIPs EEMC Towers Calibration Run 3 p+p Used 4 methods.
Z, W bosons: well calibrated probe in pp LHC energies: access to Z, W in pA and AA Electroweak bosons in dilepton channel: No final state modification.
Non-photonic electron production in p+p collisions at √s=200 GeV Xiaozhi Bai for the STAR collaboration Central China Normal University University of Illinois.
STAR J/  Trigger in dA Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Trigger Workshop at BNL October 21, 2002.
BNL May 17, 2002Falk Meissner, LBNL Jim Thomas for Falk Meissner Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory The STAR Collaboration Workshop on Diffraction and.
Study of b quark contributions to non-photonic electron yields by azimuthal angular correlations between non-photonic electrons and hadrons Shingo Sakai.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry and Cross Section of Inclusive  0 Production in Polarized p+p Collisions at 200 GeV Outline  Introduction  Experimental.
 Production and Suppression in Heavy Ion Collisions at STAR Anthony Kesich University of California, Davis STAR Collaboration February 5, 2013.
Multi-strange Baryon Correlations in p+p and d+Au Collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV Betty Bezverkhny Yale University For the Collaboration Hot Quarks ’04,
Study of J/  ->e + e - in d-Au Collision with Electron Triggers in PHENIX W. Xie (UC. Riverside) PHENIX Collaboration April APS in 2003.
NCC simulation update DC meeting Oct 3, 2007 BNL.
1 Guannan Xie Nuclear Modification Factor of D 0 Mesons in Au+Au Collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of Science.
D.Arkhipkin, Y. Zoulkarneeva, Workshop of European Research Group on Ultra relativistic Heavy Ion Physics March 9 th 2006 Transverse momentum and centrality.
PHENIX results on J/  production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at  S NN =200 GeV Hugo Pereira Da Costa CEA Saclay, for the PHENIX collaboration Quark.
On the possibility of stop mass determination in photon-photon and e + e - collisions at ILC A.Bartl (Univ. of Vienna) W.Majerotto HEPHY (Vienna) K.Moenig.
Outline Motivation The STAR/EMC detector Analysis procedure Results Final remarks.
Quarkonium Physics with STAR Mauro Cosentino (University of Sao Paulo/BNL)
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
 -jet measurements Table of Contents:  Motivation  Preliminary QA of  -trigger Data  Shower Shape Analysis  Experimental Challenges  Summary  
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
200 and 62 GeV Cu-Cu Minbias 2 particle correlations Duncan Prindle For the STAR Collaboration October 26, 2008.
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
Winter Workshop in Nuclear Dynamics, February 10, 2005 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez Indiana Unviersity Heavy Flavor in STAR.
Tatia Engelmore, Columbia University
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Lc+ Status Report Heavy Flavor Working Group
J/Y Simulations for Trigger
Presentation transcript:

Analysis Meeting, November 9-11, 2003 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez Heavy Flavor Working Group Heavy Flavor in ‘04: Prospects for J/ . Heavy Flavor in ‘04: Prospects for J/ .

2 Status of Studies for 2004 Full document on the web H Estimated Production Trigger H Implementation, Efficiency and Rejection Simulations and Tests in d+Au and Prospects for Measurements in Plans and Beam Use

3 Production Rates are H per event, into e + e -, per unit rapidity at y=0 H Ok, how many do we see? W Acceptance, centrality selection, offline cuts…  J/  : Requiring E electron >1.2 reduces the signal MinbiasTop 5%Top 10%Top 20% J/  1.35 x x x x ’’ 4.96 x x x x  1.18 x x x x  ’+  ’’ 4.31 x x x x 10 -7

4 Production Rates II J/  Yield: 24 J/   e + e -, p>1.2 GeV per 1M min-bias events 98 J/   e + e -, p>1.2 GeV per 1M 10% central events  Yield:   e + e -, p>3 GeV per 1M min-bias events 0.19   e + e -, p>3 GeV per 1M 10% central events (Triggered event ~ central) Include: - f AB (hard fraction) - 1 unit  4  - Acceptance (3/4 Barrel) - momentum cut

5 Simulations for 200 Background H Hijing Signal  Pythia; settings tuned for J/ , modifications for Processed Background and signal in Mixed 1 quarkonium event with 1 Hijing event H Done at ZEBRA bank level (M. Run algorithms H Hijing dataset : Background Rejection Power H Hijing + quarkonium : Trigger Efficiency

6 EMC Topology Trigger  Divide  into 6 Find a tower above a threshold  Look in the 3 opposite sections in If another tower above threshold, trigger.

7 J/  Trigger: L0 Efficiency and Rejection Efficiency Rejection Cutting at E= GeV is the region where we can work. Less than that: Tower calibration No rejection power More than that: Little signal left. Efficiency is 10% at 1.6 GeV

8 J/  Trigger: L0 Efficiency and Rejection No free lunch: High rejection only for peripheral events. Most signal in central events. 98% of the yield is in top 60% central.

9  Trigger: L0 Efficiency and Rejection Compare 2 approaches at L0, the topology trigger and the single High-Tower trigger.

10  Trigger: 1/Rejection vs Efficiency High-Tower trigger at L0 gives better efficiency for the same rejection power. Decision: use High-Tower at L0 for the upsilon trigger.

11 J/  : L0 & L2 Efficiency and Rejection Most of the work is done by the topology trigger. Again, high rejection only for peripheral events.

12 J/  : L0 & L2 Efficiency and Rejection For central collisions, every event fires Trigger works for low multiplicity, where yield is small. Not much to gain…

13  Trigger: L2 Efficiency and Rejection Using High-Tower at level 0 and L2 fast invariant mass: Sample the parameter space of the triggers in tandem. Minimum Bias Central Can achieve rejections of 10 3 keeping the efficiency above 80%.

14  Trigger Performance  RCuts L0L2 High- Tower ADC Cluster Energy Cos  Mass Efficiency Balanced Rejection Trigger works beautifully. Large rejection power and good Efficiency. The problem is that there is not much signal! Need Luminosity!!

15 Putting it all together: J/  Rates Rejection is good only in peripheral trigger. Yield is small in peripheral. Trigger enhances by only a factor ~2 there. Killer: Would require 14% of STAR’s bandwidth Simply take minbias and central triggers, obtain a good sample. }

16  Rates  Trigger enhances yield by more than a factor of 10. Trigger works! Even at the highest L, L0 Rate is ~100 Hz L2 Rate is ~ 3 Hz Low rate. L2 Rate can be reduced by ~3 keeping efficiency high Room to move.

17 Heavy Quarks in Run IV: Charm  J/  Trigger works only in peripheral H Very well suited for UPC (F. Yield is small (2% in % Background rate is high H Would require 14% of STAR’s Given this, enhancement of only a factor of We will not request a dedicated trigger.  J/  Analysis will rely on large minbias and central data sets. H 50 x 10 6 minbas + 50 x 10 6 central  3  signal + 5  signal in central W Based on very conservative estimates on background rejection (significance ~ e/h)

18 Heavy Quarks in Run IV: Trigger looks promising H Efficiency can be kept above 85% H Rates are low!! W Take advantage of full luminosity O Same applies to ALL rare triggers (High-Tower) W Shift crews need to be FAST. W Will rely on L3 Express stream for quick turnaround W Conservative estimate: ~100 Upsilons in 2004   has never been measured in heavy ions Next step, implementation and testing online. (Hank, Falk, Tonko, Chris)

19 Effect of Cos  Cut Topology trigger, limit by  /3, Limits J/  p  to ~ 5 GeV/c. L2 cut on cos  < -0.2 is still quite safe for .