H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
Advertisements

Recent Results on the Possibility of Observing a Standard Model Higgs Boson Decaying to WW (*) Majid Hashemi University of Antwerp, Belgium.
1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
1 previously, when I calculated event selection efficiencies, I defined efficiencies as the following: efficiency in electron channel = (total number of.
September 27, 2005FAKT 2005, ViennaSlide 1 B-Tagging and ttH, H → bb Analysis on Fully Simulated Events in the ATLAS Experiment A.H. Wildauer Universität.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
LHC pp beam collision on March 13, 2011 Haijun Yang
W’  tb  lnubb efficiency VS. electron/muon P T cut muon channel electron channel.
Higgs Detection Sensitivity from GGF H  WW Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan, Ann Arbor ATLAS Higgs Meeting October 3, 2008.
1 introduction sample: W’  tb  Wbb  eνbb/μνbb generator: PYTHIA five samples with W’ mass: 300GeV, 500GeV, 1000GeV, 1500GeV, 2000GeV number of events.
1 Viktor Veszprémi (Purdue University, CDF Collaboration) SUSY 2005, Durham Search for the SM Higgs Boson at the CDF Experiment Search for the SM Higgs.
In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to efficiently identify photons and electrons.
1 4 th June 2007 C.P. Ward Update on ZZ->llnunu Analysis and Sensitivity to Anomalous Couplings Tom Barber, Richard Batley, Pat Ward University of Cambridge.
VH (H->bb) Cut Flow Status. Introduction Hoping to start the mini-ntuple etc production now Some push over last few days but still not as much as would.
4/10/12 Contribution in ATLAS Collaboration 1 Talk “Multi-jet balance for high pT jet calibration” presented on ATLAS Hadronic Calibration Workshop 2011(SLAC.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
S. Li 1,2, Y. Liu 1 E. Monnier 2, Z. Zhao 1 Center of Particle Physics and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China 1 & Centre de Physique.
H->ZZ->4l Update Trying to re-do CSC note: MC Sample Trigger Eff. Electron Selection Eff. Muon Selection Eff.
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
10 TeV Updates on Efficiencies and Event Shapes Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona) Single lepton + jets channel.
Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Hadronic W Decays in the Jets + MET Final LHC Kittikul Kovitanggoon * & Sung-Won Lee Texas Tech University Michael Weinberger.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
Study of the to Dilepton Channel with the Total Transverse Energy Kinematic Variable Athens, April 17 th 2003 Victoria Giakoumopoulou University of Athens,
F. Ahmadov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia Institute of Physics, ANAS, Baku, Azerbaijan 41th ITEP Winter School of Physics February.
1 c. mills (Harvard U.) 20 September, 2010 W and Z Physics at ATLAS Corrinne Mills Harvard DOE Site Visit 20 September 2010.
Higgs to WW Analysis in CDF and ATLAS R StDenis. Higgs to WW CDF and ATLAS Reproduction of Previous Results:Identifying, datasets, Rows and columns Data.
1 ttbar Cross-Section Studies D. Jana*, M. Saleem*, F. Rizatdinova**, P. Gutierrez*, P. Skubic* *University of Oklahoma, **Oklahoma State University.
1 Silke Duensing DØ Analysis Status NIKHEF Annual Scientific Meeting Analysing first D0 data  Real Data with:  Jets  Missing Et  Electrons 
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.
First ed. board for CERN Council note Ed.board meeting on Friday:
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using radiative Z decays (update) E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI” Outline:
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
Issues with cluster calibration + selection cuts for TrigEgamma note Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 12/08/2010.
Using Track based missing Et tools to reject fake MET background Muhammad Firdaus Mohd Soberi UMichigan-CERN Semester Program Thursday, 12 th February.
Hggs-D meeting MPI 11/20061 Higgs Physics – Activities in Bonn/Siegen Jörn Große-Knetter ATLAS-Higgs-D Treffen München,
28/4/2006Chris Collins-Tooth tth, (h → bb) with EventViews Chris Collins-Tooth, Christian Shaw 03-May-2006.
== Electron Mis-Charge Rate Measurement of WWW Analysis Cristinel Diaconu, Yanwen Liu, Emmanuel Monnier,Ruiqi Zhang.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
Trigger study on photon slice Yuan Li Feb 27 th, 2009 LPNHE ATLAS group meeting.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.
Aug _5071 Top stop by charm channel analysis using D0 runI data OUTLINE physics process of top to stop Monte Carlo simulation for signal data.
OverView Rel.16 SM D3PD skimmed(130GB) for local use with custom di-lep filters requiring at least ONE pair out of e/e, e/μ, μ/μ leptons which satisfying.
News from H->bb Ricardo Gonçalo on behalf of H->bb Note group HSG5 Meeting – 3 Dec
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
1 H → γγ analysis Maosen Zhou 02/04/ For the coupling measurement,the categories are chosen to probe different Higgs production models,such as.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Higgs to  at CDF Amit Lath Rutgers University Tev4LHC Workshop, Sep
The ATLAS Muon Landscape towards a common Muon Reconstruction Rosemarie Aben, Peter Kluit, John Ottersbach, Egge van der Poel, Marcel Raas, Nicole Ruckstuhl,
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
1 Status of the W→τν Analysis: new event selection & comparison data/MC Lidia.
2nd lepton veto, in the one-lepton SUSY analysis
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
ttbar τ + jets: Update on QCD Estimation
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Sphericity Lee Pondrom June 13, 2011.
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
ZZ→llnn Analysis Thomas Barber University of Cambridge
tth, (h→bb) with EventViews
ttbar + jets AOD analysis
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Northern Illinois University / NICADD
Presentation transcript:

H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben

2 Topics Improvements in analysis Used dataset and selections Cutflow μμ- and ee-channel for data and MC Results for μμ-channel, data and MC Results for ee-channel, data and MC Conclusions and outlook

33 Analysis improvements 1 and 2 jet channels added MC signal sample analysis (smearing, event reweighting,..) Proper ee-channel analysis Implemented all cuts and selections for the cut flow, including topological cuts and overlap removal

4 Used samples Dataset used for ee-channel (3.5M events processed): data10_7TeV physics_Egamma.merge.NTUP_SMEW. f299_m639_p273_tid185741_00 Dataset used for μμ-channel (3.2M events processed): user10.HaijunYang.data10_7TeV physics_Muons.merge.AOD. f299_m639.D3PD_v _tag Dataset used for MC (0.2M events processed): mc09_7TeV McAtNlo_JIMMY_H160_WpWm_lnunu.merge. NTUP_SMEW.e526_s765_s767_r1306_p273_tid1787XX_00 These samples are currently used for the “acceptance challenge”: to see if every group finds the same cut flow. Twiki acceptance challenge: twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasProtected/HiggsWWdilConfNote2011WinterA C2

5 Baseline selection For MC: event reweighting (new) GRL for periods A-I from SMWW group Primary vertex selection Event cleaning Trigger requirement: Data: EF_mu13_MG_tight and EF_e15_medium MC: L1_MU10 and L1_EM14 (new) Exactly two leptons First leading lepton pt > 20 GeV Two leptons have opposite charge Δ z0 (l1,l2) < 0.8 mm removed M ll > 15 GeV Z mass veto: |M ll -M Z | > 10 GeV MET > 30 GeV MC trigger: Should use EF_e15_medium and EF_mu10_MG (luminosity reweighted triggers). However EF_e15_medium is not filled in the sample we currently need to use.

6 Additional baseline selection Overlap removal: ΔR(e-mu) Keep muon, remove electron ΔR(e-e) Keep higher pt electron, remove lower pt electron ΔR(e-jet) Keep electron, remove jet Additional to the exactly 2 leptons cut: In μμ-channel: require no electrons! In ee-channel: require no muons (muon and staco)!

7 Jet selection Used algorithm: AntiKt4H1TopoJet Basic selections: Pt > 20 GeV, |η| < 4.5, jet veto: |η|<2.5 && JVF < jet selection: Pt ll > 30 GeV 1 jet selection: Reject jet with SV0 > 5.70 Pt total < 30 GeV Z -> ττ veto 2 jet selection: (ask for at least 2 jets) η (j1) * η (j2) < 0 Δη > 2.5 Mjj > 250 GeV No additional jets with pt > 25 GeV && |η| < 3.2 Plus the one jet selections

8 Muon selection For both MuID and StaCo: Pt > 15 GeV |η|<2.4 ≥ 1 pixel hit && ≥ 6 SCT hits on the ID track For |η| 5 and n TRT outliers < 0.9 n total For |η| ≥ 1.9. If n total > 5, then require n TRT outliers < 0.9 n total |z0| < 10 mm (new) d0 significance < 10 etcone30/Pt < 0.15 Ptcone30/pt < 0.1 Additional cuts for StaCo muons: (changed) χ 2 match < 150 |P MS,extrap. -P ID | > -0.4Pt ID and Pt MS,extrap. < 50 GeV Added for MC: pt smearing according to MCP procedure

99 Electron selection Author 1 or 3 (egamma) Pt(cluster) > 15 GeV |η(cluster)|<2.47, exclusion of crack region: 1.37<|η(cluster)|<1.52 OTX cleaning cut Robuster tight quality for 0,1,2 jet analysis (changed) |z0| < 10 mm (new) d0 significance < 10 etcone30/Pt < 0.15 Ptcone30/pt < 0.1 Added: Electron energy scale correction for data

10 Selection to take into account the Higgs decay topology. To be applied after the jet selections. Optimization in progress. Different cuts for high (> 170 GeV) and low Higgs masses Used M(Higgs) in acceptance challenge is 160 GeV M ll < 50 (65) GeV for low (high) mass and M ll < 80 GeV for 2jet analysis Δ Φ (ll) < 1.3 (1.8) for low (high) mass 0.75*M(Higgs) < m T < M(Higgs) Topological selections (new)

11 Cut flow μμ- and ee-channels Data Cut:μμ(StaCo) μμ(MuID) ee Total GRL Vertex Event cleaning Trigger leptons Leading lepton Pt Opposite sign InvMass cut Z mass veto cut MET cut jet cut 000 0jet + topo000 1jet cuts 321 1jet + topo 000 2jet cuts 001 2jet + topo000

12 Cut flow μμ- and ee-channels MC Cut:μμ(StaCo) μμ(MuID) ee Total Event Weight Vertex Event cleaning Trigger leptons Leading lepton Pt Opposite sign InvMass cut Z mass veto MET cut jet cut jet + topo jet cuts jet + topo jet cuts jet + topo

13 Results Data and MC Plots for data (separate for 1,2 jet analysis): - After 2 lepton cut - After baseline selection - After 1 jet cuts Plots for MC (separate 0,1,2 jet analysis): - After baseline selection - After (0,1,2) jet cuts - After topological selection Results for following variables: transverse mass, invariant mass, pt of leading lepton, pt of both leptons, Δφ between both leptons. We only show plots for staco muons since these are alike the ones for muid muons and the staco muons are currently used for the acceptance challenge. NB. Data and MC results not yet comparable, since it only concerns the MC signal sample at the moment (no lumi renormalisation, nor bg) NB. 2jet channel plots have a log scale on the vertical axis for MC. Added: plots with data results compared for muid and staco after 2good lepton cut. For data: no events left after 0 jet cuts, so no plots. 2 jet analysis also not plotted for μμ- channel because of lack of statistics.

14 Transverse Mass Data 1 jet, staco μμ ee 1 jet, muidstaco vs muid 1 jet2 jet

15 Transverse Mass MC 1 jet0 jet2 jet μμ ee

16 Invariant Mass Data μμ ee 1 jet, staco1 jet, muidstaco vs muid 1 jet2 jet

17 Invariant Mass MC 1 jet0 jet2 jet μμ ee

18 Pt leading lepton Data μμ ee 1 jet, staco1 jet, muidstaco vs muid 1 jet2 jet

19 Pt leading lepton MC 1 jet0 jet2 jet μμ ee Updated: double peak structure was due to bug in code.

20 Pt ll Data μμ ee 1 jet, staco1 jet, muidstaco vs muid 1 jet2 jet

21 Pt ll MC 1 jet0 jet2 jet μμ ee

22 Δφ ll Data μμ ee 1 jet, staco1 jet, muidstaco vs muid 1 jet2 jet

23 Δφ ll MC 1 jet0 jet2 jet μμ ee

24 Conclusions and outlook Results that were obtained before the latest selection changes were in agreement with other groups. Code is adapted to improved selections. Awaiting the results of the other groups for comparison. ToDo: eμ-channel (update: code is updated for this channel now) Write out all the variables that pass our selections at each stage to a tree and then to an ntuple. Running over MC background samples, merging these with signal sample and reweighting the luminosity, so that comparison for data and MC is possible Find a Higgs in the MC by running on all datasets on the grid.

25 Back up: to be aware of Check 2 nd lepton if 1 st lepton is affected by the isolation criterion Since we veto on events with extra leptons, it can happen that we lose events in which an isolated electron is coming from a b-jet. Find a solution for this… Z->tautau veto Signed pt in MCP recommendation, find out if this can cause problems. Other comments?