Developing a Vision for the Next-Generation Air Quality Modeling Tools: A Few Suggestions Mike Moran Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some recent studies using Models-3 Ian Rodgers Presentation to APRIL meeting London 4 th March 2003.
Advertisements

Computational Challenges in Air Pollution Modelling Z. Zlatev National Environmental Research Institute 1. Why air pollution modelling? 2. Major physical.
U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development October 30, 2013 Prakash V. Bhave, Mary K. McCabe, Valerie C. Garcia Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division.
AIR POLLUTION. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMICAL TRANSPORT MODELS Why models? incomplete information (knowledge) spatial inference = prediction temporal inference.
A Comparative Dynamic Evaluation of the AURAMS and CMAQ Air Quality Modeling Systems Steven Smyth a,b, Michael Moran c, Weimin Jiang a, Fuquan Yang a,
Overview of ROMS features (numerics and boundary layer parameterizations) ROMS developments: boundary layers, data assimilation, nesting, Prototype model.
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
U SING G EOGRAPHY TO S TRENGTHEN THE D ECISION -M AKING P ROCESS.
Academic Developer’s Perspective Talât Odman Georgia Institute of Technology and Amir Hakami Carleton University, Canada 9 th Annual CMAS Conference October.
10th CMAS Conference Special Session on AQ Modeling Applications In Memory of Dr. Daewon Byun.
Oct. 13, Afternoon: Discussion: 1.What kinds of needs from other direction? 1.1characterization of uncertainties: exposure better quality vs higher resolution.
A Modeling Investigation of the Climate Effects of Air Pollutants Aijun Xiu 1, Rohit Mathur 2, Adel Hanna 1, Uma Shankar 1, Frank Binkowski 1, Carlie Coats.
Jerold A. Herwehe Atmospheric Turbulence & Diffusion Division Air Resources Laboratory National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 456 S. Illinois.
COMPARISON OF LINK-BASED AND SMOKE PROCESSED MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS OVER THE GREATER TORONTO AREA Junhua Zhang 1, Craig Stroud 1, Michael D. Moran 1,
1 Addressing Critical Skills Shortages at the NWS Environmental Modeling Center S. Lord and EMC Staff OFCM Workshop 23 April 2009.
Planning for Arctic GIS and Geographic Information Infrastructure Sponsored by the Arctic Research Support and Logistics Program 30 October 2003 Seattle,
Report to WGOMD on GFDL Ocean Modelling Activities Stephen Griffies NOAA/GFDL (and CSIRO) IPCC AR4 activities Model developments.
Environmental Modelling, Security Measures and Decision Making Zahari Zlatev National Environmental Research Institute Frederiksborgvej 399, P. O. Box.
Understanding Globes Lines of Latitude – Imaginary horizontal lines around the globe. *Also called Parallels Lines of Longitude – Imaginary vertical lines.
Chapter 6 Section 4 Addition and Subtraction of Rational Expressions.
Implementation of GEM-MACH10, A New Higher-Resolution Version of the Canadian Operational Air Quality Forecast Model Mike Moran 1, Sylvain Ménard 2, Radenko.
Simulation Experiments for GEO-CAPE Regional Air Quality GEO-CAPE Workshop September 22, 2009 Peter Zoogman, Daniel J. Jacob, Kelly Chance, Lin Zhang,
Data assimilation/Fusion Directions for ARQI & AQRD V. Bouchet, Manager, AQRD/ARQI.
World Climate Research Programme Climate Information for Decision Making Ghassem R. Asrar Director, WCRP.
Analysis of TraceP Observations Using a 4D-Var Technique
Design and Development of MAQM, an Air Quality Model Architecture with Process-Level Modularity Weimin Jiang, Helmut Roth, Qiangliang Li, Steven C. Smyth,
Ambient Air Monitoring Networks 2010 CMAS Conference Chapel Hill, NC October 13, 2010 Rich Scheffe, Sharon Phillips, Wyatt Appel, Lew Weinstock, Tim Hanley,
Preliminary Study: Direct and Emission-Induced Effects of Global Climate Change on Regional Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter K. Manomaiphiboon 1 *, A.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division S.T. Rao Director, NERL/AMAD U.S.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Environmental Programs Models-3 Adel Hanna Carolina Environmental Program University of North Carolina.
Research Progress Discussions of Coordinated Emissions Research Suggestions to Guide this Initiative Focus on research emission inventories Do not interfere.
Evaluation of Emission Control Strategies for Regional Scale Air Quality: Performance of Direct and Surrogate Techniques Presented at the 6 th Annual CMAS.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 SRNWP Lead Centre Report on Data Assimilation 2005 for EWGLAM/SRNWP Annual Meeting October 2005, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Session 5, CMAS 2004 INTRODUCTION: Fine scale modeling for Exposure and risk assessments.
Model evolution of a START08 observed tropospheric intrusion Dalon Stone, Kenneth Bowman, Cameron Homeyer - Texas A&M Laura Pan, Simone Tilmes, Doug Kinnison.
A Five-Year Performance Evaluation of Environment Canada’s Operational Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System M.D. Moran 1, J. Zhang 1, R.
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
© Crown copyright Met Office Downscaling ability of the HadRM3P model over North America Wilfran Moufouma-Okia and Richard Jones.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
1 Modeling challenges in policy-relevant PM assessments in the U.S. Air Quality Applied Sciences Team 10th Semi-Annual Meeting, January 5-7, 2016 James.
Further Developments and Applications for the Adjoint of CMAQ
AQ Emissions Data Considerations and Needs Greg Frost NOAA, University of Colorado Two key kinds of AQ data on chemical species: Emissions and Ambient.
Breakout Session 1 Air Quality Jack Fishman, Randy Kawa August 18.
Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy Jonathan Pleim, Shawn Roselle,
NOAA Northeast Regional Climate Center Dr. Lee Tryhorn NOAA Climate Literacy Workshop April 2010 NOAA Northeast Regional Climate.
Summary of the Report, “Federal Research and Development Needs and Priorities for Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion Modeling” 22 September 2004 Walter.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
CMAS Conference 2014 Community Forum Developing a Vision for the Next Generation Air Quality Modeling Tools Facilitator: Zac Adelman Panelists: Jon Pleim.
SLCP Benefits Toolkit:
Emerging Research Opportunities at the Climate Modeling Laboratory NC State University (Presentation at NIA Meeting: 9/04/03) Fredrick H. M. Semazzi North.
Global Circulation Models
Model Future: Nesting with Regional Models
XACML and the Cloud.
Section 8.1 Multiplication Properties of Exponents
Recent Updates to the Canadian Operational Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System Michael Moran, Sylvie Gravel, Verica Savic-Jovcic, Alexandru.
Changes to the Multi-Pollutant version in the CMAQ 4.7
Impact on Recent North American Air Quality Forecasts of Replacing a Retrospective U.S. Emissions Inventory with a Projected Inventory Michael Moran1,
Impact of GOES Enhanced WRF Fields on Air Quality Model Performance
Modeling the Atmos.-Ocean System
Models of atmospheric chemistry
Junhua Zhang and Wanmin Gong
Science Objectives contained in three categories
Development of a New Parameterization for Below-Cloud Scavenging of Size-Resolved Particles by Rain and Snow Xihong Wang1, Leiming Zhang2, and Michael.
Science Update Ross Bannister, DARC PI Meeting, Oct. 17th 2005
M. Samaali, M. Sassi, V. Bouchet
5 Themes of Geography.
7th EU Research FP has ten themes defined in order:
Michael Moran Air Quality Research Branch
Measurement Needs for AQ Models
Presentation transcript:

Developing a Vision for the Next-Generation Air Quality Modeling Tools: A Few Suggestions Mike Moran Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2014 CMAS Conference Chapel Hill, North Carolina Oct. 2014

DRAFT – Page 2 – June 30, 2016 Looking backward: What are the shortcomings and limitations of current AQ modelling systems? What lessons can be learned from past model development efforts? Looking forward: What are the issues to be addressed and the questions to be answered? (e.g., population exposures, impact of climate change, …) What capabilities does the model need to have? (forecasts? hindcasts? source attribution? grid nesting? adjoint?) Vision and Scope

DRAFT – Page 3 – June 30, 2016 Desirable Features: Science Ability to accommodate new science Support for 2-way meteorology/chemistry interactions (e.g., in-line model) Support for chemical data assimilation (may require support for a simplified or reduced-form model) “Instrumented” model (to diagnose and understand model behaviour and responses)

DRAFT – Page 4 – June 30, 2016 Desirable Features: Numerics Future computing environments are likely to be massively parallel (  fine and coarse grain parallelization?) Support for multiple spatial scales (i.e., global vs. regional vs. urban) and grid nesting Consideration of conservation properties and order of error in fundamental choices regarding horizontal and vertical coordinates, grid discretization, time solver, operator sequence, advection scheme, …

DRAFT – Page 5 – June 30, 2016 Desirable Features: Flexibility Ability to add new species (e.g., selected toxics) Ability to choose different parameterizations of same process Ability to choose different numerical techniques Ability to choose different PM size distribution representations (modal vs. sectional) Ability to include/exclude chemical and physical processes (e.g., coagulation, horizontal diffusion, …)