NTSB Board Meeting AA Flight 587 NTSB Board Meeting AA Flight 587 Structures Investigation Brian K. Murphy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Failure criteria for laminated composites
Advertisements

Aerospace Materials Failure Modes
Chapter 11 Mechanical Properties of Materials
A300 VERTICAL TAIL STRUCTURAL EVALUATION DESIGN FLAW IN LOWER REAR SPAR By Xavier J. Maumus.
NTSB Board Meeting AA Flight 587 NTSB Board Meeting AA Flight 587 Rudder Control System Steven Magladry.
Office of Highway Safety Girder Failure Dan Walsh.
Accident Summary Cargo smoke warning during approach to PHL Smoke filled cockpit after landing Crew evacuated via slide at left forward (L1) door Major.
LOSING CONTROL of a Perfectly Good Airplane Janeen Kochan.
LECTURE 3 WEIGHT CONTROL, EFFECT OF WEIGHT & WEIGHT CHANGE MASS (WEIGHT) & BALANCE 1 MBC SIR ARIFF AMC.
National Transportation Safety Board
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 7.1 Stress Analysis 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Columns 10/23/07.
Air Transportation How Does an Airplane Fly?. Paper Planes  Create a paper airplane –Choose a paper airplane from the following site and fold it according.
CLARKSON UNIVERSITY Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering Introduction to AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES Ratan Jha (CAMP 364, ,
Office of Research and Engineering Finite Element Analysis Carl R. Schultheisz.
Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: 1) Define load factor. 2) Describe the two reasons for understanding load factors.
Safety Report Treatment of Safety-Critical Systems in Transport Airplanes Office of Research and Engineering.
Aviation Safety “ Can the Universities make a difference?” Ralph A’Harrah Strategy & Analysis Manager, Aviation Safety Office of Aerospace Technology December.
Safety By Design Flight Certification AE 6362 Airbus Derivative Team Project Dr. Daniel P. Schrage Course Instructor.
How detailed should a model be? Pierre Hoogenboom Delft University of Technology.
NTSB Part 830 AST 425. NTSB PART 830 Applies to the notification and reporting of: Incidents Accidents Certain other occurrences involving:
Office of Aviation Safety Air Tahoma Flight 185 Convair 580 August 13, 2004 Covington, Kentucky.
Airplane Motion and Vertical Stabilizer Loads
Office of Aviation Safety Platinum Jet Bombardier CL-600 Teterboro, New Jersey February 2, 2005 Teterboro, New Jersey February 2, 2005.
Structures and Mechanisms Subsystems AERSP 401A. Introduction to Structural Estimation Primary Structure: load-bearing structure of the spacecraft Secondary.
A Piloted Simulator Evaluation of Transport Aircraft Rudder Pedal Force/Feel Systems Eric C. Stewart NASA Langley Research Center 98 th Aerospace Control.
Office of Aviation Safety Pinnacle Airlines Flight 3701 Jefferson City, Missouri Lorenda Ward Investigator-in-Charge.
M. Gilchriese Sector Status Module Loading Task Force Meeting November 18, 2004.
Lecture 2: Composition of Aircraft Weight
Introduction to Control / Performance Flight.
Managing Rotorcraft Safety During Frequently Performed Unique Missions September 28, 2005 AHS International Helicopter Safety Symposium 2005 Philip G.
ITA – Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica
1 ABS Spar Web Investigation Report to Wichita ACO/ FAA Small Airplane Directorate Wichita, Kansas July 23, ABS-ASF Proprietary Data 7/23/2009.
MAE Intermediate Mechanics of Materials Tuesday, Aug. 24, 2004 Textbook Sections 4.1 – 4.3 Forces, Equilibrium, Failure.
Office of Aviation Safety Opening Remarks Joseph Sedor.
1 National Wind Technology Center Wind Turbine Design According to IEC (Onshore) and -3 (Offshore) Standards Overview for NWTC November 8, 2005.
Homework 2, Problem 4 United Airlines flight 232 crashed near Sioux City, IA, on July 19th, 1989 due to a hardware failure. Use Google with the key words.
Forging new generations of engineers. Factors of Design and Safety.
Mechanical Properties: Review l0l0 A0A0 F  (stress)  (strain) Y nominal (engineering)true plastic – rearrange chemical bonds elastic – stretch chemical.
AMS-02 Delta CDR Structural Analysis and Certification Process Carl Lauritzen Structural Analysis Lead Jacobs Engineering
American Airlines Flight 587 Ryan Adams April 4, rd period.
Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: 1) The intensity or strength of the vortices is directly proportional to the ________.
Zuliana-July Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION AIRCRAFT MASS (WEIGHT) & PERFORMANCE By: Zuliana Ismail, 2010.
Structural Integrity UNDERSTAND STRUCTURAL STRENGTH OF LOAD BEARING COMPONENTS IN MECHANICAL SYSTEM.
A New Design Custom TMJ Prosthesis Philip McLoughlin Eric Abel Jyothi Chandramohan Peter Bowman Maxillofacial Unit, Ninewells Hospital & Dept of Biomechanical.
Dr. Hatem Elaydi Engineering Technical English Islamic University of Gaza March 19, 2016 Load, Stress and Strain Unit 30.
Comet aircraft Fatigue failure Group 6. Background  de Havilland –Jet powered aircraft –Comet became first commercial jet airliner  First prototype.
Airbus training support & services Rudder and Loads.
GARA, Preemption, Warsaw/Montreal, FTCA, and Forum Non Conveniens: Current Developments Shalem Massey, Jack Veth and Alisa Brodkowitz What To Do After.
Unit 31: Force, deformation and failure Dr
Basics Of Seismic Vibration Control
1970's DC-10 Disasters By: Clark Mosley.
UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING DESIGN II FME 461 PART 5 GO NYANGASI November 2008.
Warm-Up – 12/13 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: Define the Rate of Turn. Define Radius of Turn. What.
Four Forces of Flight Lift Weight Thrust Drag
Machine Design: An Overview
Aerospace Engineering Experimentation and Laboratory II Vibration of Beam by NAV.
Design of parts for static loading
1.6 Allowable Stress Allowable Load < Failure Load
Airplane Parts and Theory of Flight
West Point Aviation Club Private Pilot Ground Instruction
Welcome to the VMC Club Meeting
Stress Analysis of Universal Tilt Kit Attachment Points
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING
Unit 31: Force, deformation and failure Dr
Weight and Balance Private Pilot Ground School
Chapter 1 Introduction.
Grab their Attention with Active Learning!
Unit 31: Force, deformation and failure Dr
Unit 31: Force, deformation and failure Dr
Presentation transcript:

NTSB Board Meeting AA Flight 587 NTSB Board Meeting AA Flight 587 Structures Investigation Brian K. Murphy

NTSB Board Meeting AA Flight 587 Certification Requirements (Vertical Stabilizer Loads) lateral gust engine failure Several conditions dictate the development of the aerodynamic loads used to design the vertical stabilizer: The first officer of flight 587 performed a maneuver for which the airplane was not certificated. yawing maneuver

NTSB Board Meeting AA Flight 587 Certification The vertical stabilizer was designed and manufactured in accordance with the applicable certification requirements. During the full-scale test, a rear lug fractured in tension at nearly twice the design limit load, as expected. The analysis and testing done during the certification program were valid and complete. The vertical stabilizer was designed and manufactured in accordance with the applicable certification requirements. During the full-scale test, a rear lug fractured in tension at nearly twice the design limit load, as expected. The analysis and testing done during the certification program were valid and complete.

Main Attachment Fittings FORWARD UP Rear Lug Clevis Fitting Titanium Bolt

NTSB Board Meeting AA Flight 587 Lug Strength Determination The strength of the lug was determined by: finite element analysis progressive failure analysis post accident lug tests The strength of the lug was determined by: finite element analysis progressive failure analysis post accident lug tests

Finite Element Analysis of the Lug FWD Highest Stressed Region Highest Stressed Region

Progressive Failure Analysis Extensive Damage

Lug Tests

Test/Analysis Results Normalized Lug Resultant Force Certification Test Limit Load Ultimate Load Lug Fracture Load Comparison

Test/Analysis Results Normalized Lug Resultant Force Certification Test Limit Load Ultimate Load Lug Test 1 Lug Test 2 Lug Test 3 Lug Fracture Load Comparison

Test/Analysis Results Normalized Lug Resultant Force Certification Test Limit Load Ultimate Load Lug Test 1 Lug Test 2 Lug Test 3 Flight 587 Lug Fracture Load Comparison

NTSB Board Meeting AA Flight 587 Structural Analysis Findings The vertical stabilizer was designed in accordance with the applicable certification requirements. The right rear lug fractured at a load above ultimate load, in accordance with its design strength. The vertical stabilizer was designed in accordance with the applicable certification requirements. The right rear lug fractured at a load above ultimate load, in accordance with its design strength.

National Transportation Safety Board American Airlines Flight 587 Belle Harbor, New York November 12, 2001 NTSB Board Meeting October 26, 2004 American Airlines Flight 587 Belle Harbor, New York November 12, 2001 NTSB Board Meeting October 26, 2004