Cavity Supporting Scheme Paulo Azevedo, CERN – TE/MSC SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2.2 STRUCTURAL ELEMENT BEAM
Advertisements

MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.
SPL Intercavity support Conceptual design review 04/11/ A. Vande Craen TE/MSC-CMI.
1 Design and drawing of RC Structures CV61 Dr. G.S.Suresh Civil Engineering Department The National Institute of Engineering Mysore Mob:
Beams and Frames.
NEW DESIGN FOR RF FINGERS C. Garion 5 June, 2012TE-VSC1 Acknowledgements to A. Lacroix and H. Rambeau for materials and help.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
Designing for Stiffness
Status of the SPL cavities at CERN I.Aviles & N. Valverde on behalf of SPL team 1I. Aviles & N. ValverdeLund, 11 December 2013.
Integration of Cavities and Coupling Coil Modules Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting March 28 – April 1, 2004.
CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 14: Stresses in Beams
NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 NEUTRAL BEAM ARMOR PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS.
Analysis of Basic Load Cases Axial Stress
BFC (Mechanics of Materials) Chapter 2: Shear Force and Bending Moment
Beams Beams: Comparison with trusses, plates t
1 RF-Structures Mock-Up FEA Assembly Tooling V. Soldatov, F. Rossi, R. Raatikainen
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe MLC external review October 03, 2012.
Ofelia Capatina on behalf of the CERN specification team
SPL cryo-module conceptual design review Cavity, helium vessel and tuner assembly N. Valverde, G. Arnau, S. Atieh, I. Aviles, O. Capatina, M. Esposito,
RF-Accelerating Structure: Cooling Circuit Modeling Riku Raatikainen
University of Palestine
R&D Status and Plan on The Cryostat N. Ohuchi, K. Tsuchiya, A. Terashima, H. Hisamatsu, M. Masuzawa, T. Okamura, H. Hayano 1.STF-Cryostat Design 2.Construction.
V.Parma, CERN, TE-MSC On bahalf of the Cryomodule development team
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15.
WP3 Required interfaces for cryostat design / integration Patxi DUTHIL SPL 3 rd Collaboration Meeting, CERN, Geneva November 12 th 2009.
Structural option for the Jinping neutrino central detector Contributor : Yuanqing Wang, Zongyi Wang Speaker : Zongyi Wang Department of civil engineering,
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 to 06/07/15 1.
Arnaud Vande Craen (TE-MSC) 27/02/20131 EUCARD : ESAC Review – CEA Saclay.
Stress and Cool-down Analysis Yun HE MLC Internal Review 9/5/2012Yun HE, MLC Internal Review1.
Status of Activities at CERN
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 1. Introduction Both cavities will be supported by the fundamental power coupler and a number of blade flexures.
CLIC Module meeting, 22/08/2011 N. Chritin (EN/MME) Cradles design for CLIC module supporting system (EDMS )  General principle  Main inputs an.
56 MHz SRF Cavity Cryostat support system and Shielding C. Pai
56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai
56 MHz SRF Cavity and Helium vessel Design
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 1.
SLHC WG3 (Cryomodule) summary & plan with recommendation to the CB V.Parma, CERN TE-MSC P. DUTHIL, IN2P3-CNRS 3rd SPL collaboration meeting, CERN
Rossana Bonomi R. Bonomi TE-MSC-CMI SPL Seminar 2012.
S1 global: thermal analysis TILC09, April 19th, 2009 Serena Barbanotti Paolo Pierini.
SPL cryomodule specification meeting, CERN 19th October 2010 SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of the meeting SPL cryomodule specification: Goals of.
The SPL Short Cryo-module: Status Report V.Parma, CERN, TE-MSC On bahalf of the Cryomodule development team SPL seminar December 2012, 6-7 December 2012,
Gravity load on SAS – comparison between real and mock-up April 13 th, 2016.
Results Verification Has the model been correctly implemented?
Adam Carreon July 19, 2012 Technical Division SRF Department Dressed SSR1 Cavities.
Mechanical design considerations for beta=1 cavities OC, 28/July/20111SRF2011 Chicago O. Capatina, S. Atieh, I. Aviles Santillana, G. Arnau Izquierdo,
SPS movable table Joanna Swieszek, Kurt Artoos (EN-MME) 14/04/2016.
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF D2 MECHANICAL STRUCTURE (DOUBLE COLLARING OPTION) S. Farinon, P. Fabbricatore (INFN-Sezione di Genova) Sept. 24 th 2015.
19-Sept-2012] «BE-RF-PM» TEST MODULES in the LAB DB girders (epucret) for T1 & T4: Optimization of the V-shaped supports Nick Gazis, Dmitry Gudkov, Vadim.
14-Jun-161 Status of Horizontal Test Stand (HTS-2) Development Efforts Pradeep Kush, Prashant Khare, RRCAT, India Team Members: S.Gilankar, Rupul Ghosh,
Status of the SPL cryo-module design V.Parma, CERN, TE-MSC On behalf of the SPL cryomodule development team (CERN, CEA-Saclay, CNRS-IPNO Orsay, ESS)
R. Bonomi - SLHiPP2, Catania 3-4/5/20121 SPL Thermal Studies R. Bonomi Superconducting linacs for high power proton beams - Catania, 2012.
ILC : Type IV Cryomodule Design Meeting Main cryogenic issues, L. Tavian, AT-ACR C ryostat issues, V.Parma, AT-CRI CERN, January 2006.
F LESEIGNEUR / G OLIVIER LUND January 9th, ESS HIGH BETA CRYOMODULE ESS CRYOMODULE STATUS MEETING HIGH BETA CRYOMODULE LUND JANUARY 9TH, 2013 Unité.
Status of the SPL cryomodule study Rossana Bonomi Lund, 6 th Dec R. Bonomi.
PANDA Magnet Iron Yoke Strength Analysis
SPL RF coupler: integration aspects
CERN – Zanon discussions
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule
Torsion of opened cross sections.
Present status of the flux return yoke design
Shear in Straight Members Shear Formula Shear Stresses in Beams
Status of design and production of LEP connection cryostat
A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN
By Arsalan Jamialahmadi
CERN Cryomodule Requirements for Crab Cavities
Theory of Simple Bending
Design of a SHORT Cryomodule for the Superconducting Proton Linac of CERN IPNOrsay – CNRS Sébastien ROUSSELOT Patxi DUTHIL Patricia DUCHESNE Philippe DAMBRE.
Magnetic shielding and thermal shielding
Status of QQXF cryostat
Presentation transcript:

Cavity Supporting Scheme Paulo Azevedo, CERN – TE/MSC SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/2010

Contents 1.Introduction 2.Power coupler as support 3.Inter-cavity support 4.Vacuum vessel and vacuum vessel interface 5.Conclusion SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/20102 / 24

1. Introduction Requirements of cavity supporting system Provide support of components: cavities, helium vessels, tuners, etc. Guarantee cavity (beam axis) alignment during entire life cycle Minimize thermal load SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/2010 All calculations described in this presentation were carried out or are valid for an 8 cavities cryomodule 3 / 24

1. Introduction Approximate weights and dimensions SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/2010 *According to estimations by CMI Enteprise Weights (kg) Dressed cavity200 Short vacuum vessel*7000 Long vacuum vessel*10000 Lengths (mm) Double tube300 Cavities pitch (distance between consecutive double walled tubes) 1500 Short vacuum vessel* Long vacuum vessel*12000 – Diameters (mm) Helium vessel400 Vacuum vessel / 24

1. Introduction SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/20105 / 24 Cavities positioning tolerance with respect to beam axis

Two-support preferable (isostatic - well defined forces on supports) If cavity straightness not enough... Fixed support Sliding support Inertia beam Invar longitudinal positioner External supports (jacks) RF coupler (with bellows) 1. Introduction SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/20106 / 24 Possible supporting schemes: “standard” supporting scheme Courtesy of Vittorio Parma

...add 3rd support  becomes hyperstatic (forces depend on mech. coupling vessel/inertia beam) 1. Introduction SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/2010 Cross section of XFEL cryomodule, from TESLA Technical Design Report 7 / 24 Possible supporting schemes: “standard” supporting scheme with third support Courtesy of Vittorio Parma

The coupler is also a supporting/aligning element Intercavity support structure RF coupler + longitudinal positioner + vertical support External supports (jacks) 1. Introduction SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/2010 This solution simplifies the design of the cryostat and enhances thermal performance to 2 K by limiting the number of heat conduction paths from RT Why? 8 / 24 Possible supporting schemes: power coupler as support Courtesy of Vittorio Parma

Calculations performed with the aim of estimating the stiffness which the support system (“Standard “supporting solution) of the SPL cavities would have to provide for the string of cavities to be kept inside a certain alignment tolerance. - Beam simply and symmetrically supported on two points, loaded by the weight of the cavities and by its own weight - Loads are distributed uniformly along the beam -The cavities and the supports are considered to be rigid -maximum beam deflection is a measure of the maximum cavity misalignment SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/ Introduction 9 / 24 Possible supporting schemes: required stiffness

L=13 m, m cav =200 Kg, n cav =8, g=9.8 m/s 2 Stainless steel 304 L: ρ=8000 kg/m 3 ; E=1.93e 11 Pa SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/ Introduction For a circular tube with a thickness of 10 mm and a maximum 0.1mm deflection / 24 Possible supporting schemes: required stiffness

- Three vertical displacements (simple supports) - Loads remain the same - One support in the middle of the beam, the other two at a distance of 0.16 L from each end of the beam S [m 2 ]I [m 4 ] Deflection; 2 supports (analytical) [mm] Deflection; 3 supports (FE beam analysis) [mm] Circular tube tck. 6 mm diam. 300 mm E Circular tube tck. 12 mm diam mm E SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/ Introduction 11 / 24 Possible supporting schemes: required stiffness, third support

Standard, 2 supports Standard, 3 supports PC as support Design simplicity--+ Thermal load+/--+ Need for extra supports++- Proven concept++- Vacuum vessel structural demands ++/-- Vacuum vessel dimensional stability ++/-- Vacuum vessel size-+/-+ Longitudinal positioning of cavities Introduction SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/ / 24 Possible supporting schemes: table of comparison

SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/ Power coupler as support Power coupler double tube as cavity support to vacuum vessel and longitudinal positioner Vacuum vessel acts as “ inertia beam” Adjustable connection between vacuum vessel and power coupler double tube Additional support may be needed to guarantee cavities alignment 13 / 24

SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/ Power coupler as support Active cooling of PC double walled tube Courtesy of Ofelia Capatina The active cooling of the double walled tube was not conceived to cope with its support function. However, due to the cavity alignment requirements, the thermal profile of the double tube and its reproducibility become a fundamental issue. Further work on this subject is being carried out by Rossana Bonomi (TE/MSC). 14 / 24

SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/ Power coupler as support The helium vessel provides rigidity to the dressed cavity assembly. Supporting options: Cantilever and simply supported Loads: Weight and weight plus transport loads (0.5g in all directions) – including weight of tuner, cavity and power coupler double tube Interface with vacuum vesselSimple support FE calculations of helium vessel 15 / 24

SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/ Power coupler as support deformed shape amplified 20x Cantilever Weight loadsWeight plus transport loads Supported Max: 8.8 mm Max: 0.01 mm Max: 5.5 mm Max: 0.02 mm Additional support required for cavity alignment 16 / 24 FE calculations of helium vessel: vertical displacement Models by EN/MME

SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/ Power coupler as support Stresses in MPa, red for values above 190 MPa Cantilever Weight loadsWeight plus transport loads Supported Additional support should be required for structural integrity of helium vessel, for transport loads at least 17 / 24 FE calculations of helium vessel: von Mises stress Models by EN/MME

SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/ Power coupler as support 1 st step: weight of helium vessel, cavity, double tube 2 nd step: weight of helium vessel, cavity, double tube and tuner Von Mises stress [MPa] for helium vessel in cantilever under weight loads: 18 / 24 FE calculations of helium vessel: detailed model Models by EN/MME Additional support should be required for structural integrity of helium vessel at all times, and not only during transport

Interface WeightWeight + Transport CantileverSupportedCantileverSupported Fx (N) Fy (N) Fz (N) Mx (Nm) My (Nm) Mz (Nm) SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/ Power coupler as support See Arnaud Vande-Craen’s presentation – SPL test mock-up F supp F int M int Support WeightWeight + Transport Fx (N)0-579 Fz (N) / 24 FE calculations of helium vessel: loads on interface and support Balance of forces largely dependent on nature of additional support y z

l - couple cavities - hyperstatic Yes inter-cavity supports - If sag small enough - If strenght OK - isostatic No Equivalent sketch Layout 2. Power coupler as support SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/2010 Why an inter-cavity support: double tube can take full compressive load, heat load, assembly simplicity, thermal transients Need for support : cavities alignment, structural integrity 20 / 24 Courtesy of Vittorio Parma

SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/ Inter-cavity support BarL (m)E (Pa)D e (m)D i (m) 1 Double tube*0.4252e He vessel1.42e Inter – cavity support 0.32e Double tube*0.4252e * Equivalent simple tube. Position of articulation Second Double Tube Displacement Method FEM AFlexible BFlexible0.21 ARigid BRigid / 24 Best position for spherical / sliding joint 2 degrees of freedom constrained AB

SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/ Vacuum vessel and vacuum vessel interface CNRS presentation will deal with the vacuum vessel in detail The importance of the structural stability of vacuum vessel is not limited to the integrity of the vessel itself (buckling, plastic yield). It will also affect the alignment of the string of cavities. Displacement of vacuum vessel interfaces with double tube must be minimized, especially between cryostating and vacuum pumping – no further adjustment of the interfaces will be permitted. 22 / 24

5. Conclusion SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/2010 Cavity (measured by ends only) Helium vessel Helium vessel, inter-cavity support, string of cavities Vacuum vessel, interfaces. Loads: Self weight and weight of components 23 / 24 Models above are obsolete or conceptual

24 / Conclusion SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/2010 Transport and handling: transport loads Testing and operation: cavity tuning, thermal transients, vacuum...

Thank you for your attention SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/2010

Spare Slides SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/2010

Supporting system: Position of 2 supports The position of the supports which minimizes the maximum deflection is a / L=0.208 SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/2010