beam delivery with SC magnets

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
Advertisements

HLAB MEETING -- Paper -- T.Gogami 30Apr2013. Experiments with magnets (e,eK + ) reaction.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  So far, we’ve talked about nice, periodic lattice, but that may not be all that useful in the real world. In particular, we generally.
Experience, Expertise and a Commitment to Excellence™
Capture, focusing and energy selection of laser driven ion beams using conventional beam elements Morteza Aslaninejad Imperial College 13 December 2012.
Magnetic Field Design of a Superconducting Magnet for the FFAG Accelerator T.Obana, T.Ogitsu A,T.Nakamoto A,K.Sasaki A A.Yamamoto A, M.Yoshimoto A, Y.Mori.
Magnetic design of a superconducting magnet for the FFAG accelerator T.Obana, T.Ogitsu A,T.Nakamoto A,K.Sasaki A A.Yamamoto A, M.Yoshimoto A, Y.Mori A,T.Origasa.
Quadrupole Magnetic Design for an Electron Ion Collider Paul Brindza May 19, 2008.
Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.
Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
Solenoid-Based Focusing Lens for a Superconducting RF Proton Linac Presentation prepared for AEM 11/08/20101I. Terechkine.
LCWS14 Benoit CURE - CERN/PH Dept.1 International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders October 2014 Organized by the Vinca Institute of Nuclear.
Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Transfer Line -2 Optics Design For CTF3 Amalendu Sharma, Abdurrahim, A.D.Ghodke, Gurnam Singh and V.C. Sahni Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Extraction from the Delivery Ring November 19, 2013 J. Morgan.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our previous discussion, we implicitly assumed that the distribution of particles in phase space followed the ellipse defined.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
GlueX Two Magnet Tagger G. Yang University of Glasgow Part 1, 3 D Tosca analysis. Part 2, Preliminary Drawings. Part 3, Proposed Assembly Procedures (i)
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
Activation around dump shielding, and design of beam line mask Mathieu Baudin, RP Genevieve Steele, EN-STI Helmut Vincke, RP.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.
New Gantry Idea for H + /C 6+ Therapy G H Rees, ASTeC, RAL 4 th September, 2008.
BDS Lattice Design : EDR plans GWP03 Meeting 04/12/2007.
FrontierScience G.P.1 MATRIX an innovative Pixel Ionization Chamber for Online Monitoring of Hadrontherapy Treatments Giuseppe Pittà.
Odds and Ends on Gantries Rob Edgecock & Akram Kahn Neither of us knew much about gantries ~1 week ago Neither of us know much about gantries now Will.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
Emittance reduction by a SC wiggler in the ATF-DR September 16 th, 2009 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU and Rogelio TOMAS ATF2 weekly meeting.
Development of a superconducting rotating-gantry for carbon therapy
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
Medical Applications 6 contributions on Particle therapy: Magnets for
Varian Medical Systems
Medical application of proton accelerators
Narrow plasma & electron injection simulations for the AWAKE experiment A. Petrenko, K. Lotov, October 11,
Beam dynamics and linac optics studies for medical proton accelerators
J-Parc Neutrino Facility Primary Proton Beam Design A. K. Ichikawa(KEK), Y.Iwamoto(KEK) and K.Tanabe(Tokyo) et.al. 7 th Nov. 2003,
April 17, Dejan TrbojevicFFAG07 -Non-Scaling FFAG gantries1 Non-Scaling FFAG Gantries Introduction: Motives: The most challenging problem in the carbon/proton.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design Jim Kellie Glasgow University.
Yingshun Zhu Design of Small Aperture Quadrupole Magnet for HEPS-TF
HTS and LTS Magnet Design and Prototyping for RAON
Ranko Ostojic AT/MEL 1.Beam heat loads 2.Magnet design issues related to heat loads.
Progress in the Application
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
Test of Optical Stochastic Cooling in CESR
Injector Cyclotron for a Medical FFAG
Kuanjun Fan Institute of applied electromagnetic engineering
A Design of a Gantry with Superconducting Magnets for 350 MeV Protons
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
MQYY: superconducting Quadrupole magnet for Hl-lhc
The design of interaction region
Progress of SPPC lattice design
CEPC main ring magnets’ error effect on DA and MDI issues
Pulsed Ion Linac for EIC
Optic design and performance evaluation for SPPC collimation systems
ELENA Extra Low ENergy Antiproton Ring
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Pulsed Sextupole Injection for Beijing Advanced Photon Source
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Presentation transcript:

beam delivery with SC magnets Innovative developments for proton therapy at PSI: beam delivery with SC magnets Marco Schippers, Alex Gerbershagen, David Meer Paul Scherrer Institut

Contents Dose spreading in proton therapy Gantries PSI’s Gantry-2 with SC magnets Conclusions & WHAT DO WE NEED ?

Dose delivery techniques: Width transversal spread: scattering scanning Collimator Scatter syst.

scanning Down-stream scanning: + small aperture, - large radius because of SAD - small spots difficult X Y Rgantry X Y Rgantry SAD = 1.5 m Up-stream scanning: + parallel + small gantry radius + small spots possible - wide aperture SC magnet

3D Pencil beam scanning: DEPTH E=155 MeV E=150 MeV E=145 MeV Scanning Magnets pencil beam Proton energy => depth (scan plane) 5

3D Pencil beam scanning: DEPTH After each layer: Energy change in 100 ms (~1% dB/B) 6

Using large momentum acceptance: Static Delivery of Spr.Out Bragg Peak SOBP can be delivered without magnetic field changes

Gantry design Some typical gantries…..

IBA & Optivus Gantry for protons R ≈ 6 m ~90 t Loma Linda (Optivus)

PSI Gantry-2: fast 3D scanning scanning magnets (x & y) for 2D // scanning R=3.5 m 90 degr. magnet: 1.5 T 15 cm gap, 45 Tons, dB/B 1% in 80-100 ms PSI-”Gantry-2” Eros Pedroni David Meer Field: 20 x 12 cm2

PSI-Optics for 350 MeV originaly from: 235 MeV 350 MeV PSI optics: SCAN y-plane x-plane 14 m 5 cm IN-Beam (2): x = y = 3.0 mm , x’ = y’ = 7.0 mr δ = 0% δ = 3% 350 MeV PSI optics: Point-to-point imaging Positive pole face rotations  Large emittance and momentum acceptance: ε = 21π mm.mrad and δ = ± 3%

Gantry 2 Layout Gantry 2 Superconducting gantry Three dipoles with -60°, 60° and 90° bending Scanning magnets upstream from the 90° bending section: parallel scanning Radius = 3.2 m Length = 8.9 m Weight = 200 t Scanning field: 12 x 20 cm2 Gantry 2 Radius = 4.5 m (can be reduced for upstream scanning version) Length = 8.4 m Weight < 50 t Scanning field: 20 x 25 cm2 Superconducting gantry

Beam Optic Gantry-2 & SC version Gantry 2 optics: Momentum acceptance: Δp/p = 0.7 % Q M L 1 2 A 3 4 5 6 7 W T U K B P G D H C S I O E N D=0 Dispersion (1%dp) SC Bending sections: dipole +combined Q+D : dispersion suppression => Very large momentum acceptance: Δp/p > 10 % S M D 5 Q 1 3 4 A L B C 2 E F 6 7 K U P G H 2 x 45° bending magnets +3 quadrupoles 3 x 20° bending magnets 3 x 20° bending magnets S W M

Required magnet properties Types of used magnets B-Field (T) Maximal gradient (T/m) Aperture radius (mm) Normal conducting quadrupoles 31.7 30 Superconducting combined function magnets for the first two bending sections 3 23 Superconducting combined function magnet for the last bending secton 4 14 125 Superconducting quadrupoles 9.8

Magnets in consideration Canted Coil Solenoid Cosine Theta Race rack with much less iron

Conclusions on SC-Gantry Not much smaller in diameter. Much less weight New beam optics possible  large energy acceptance

What do we need ? Faster: dB/dt > 10%/s (≈ 0.8 T/s) Lighter: 20 tons Stronger fields: 4 T + 30 T/m But „no“ stray fields: <0.5 T but at patient < 0.5 mT SC: no LHe AND no quenching Radiation resistant

The End