Strategic Information on ART Scale up Kevin O'Reilly Department of HIV/AIDS WHO.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Information technology for surveillance Can information tools improve surveillance? Denis Coulombier ECDC.

Advertisements

Key Criteria/Principles in selecting indicators Follow-up consultation on TFI Recommendations on Communication for EPI/Polio Dakar - Senegal, 05 and 07.

Overview/Importance of HMIS

A Guide to Monitoring and Evaluating HIV/AIDS Care and Support.

The MERG Where do we go from here? l Current context for M&E –Global level –Country level l Proposed Scope of Work l Proposed Composition l Next steps.

New Challenges in M&E Lets go. Scaling Up Monitoring & Evaluation Strategic Information PROGRAM GUIDANCE RESULT NEEDS OPPORTUNITIES Resources New directions.

TREATMENT DATA INDICATORS IN THE UNODC DATA COLLECTION SYSTEM.

Strategic Information for Anti-RetroViral Treatment Programmes Workshop WHO and UNAIDS Geneva June 30- July Ties Boerma HIV Department Surveillance,

An operational package for Integrated Management of HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment and care ICASA - Abuja, Nigeria 5 December 2005.

Priority Issues and Strategic Information Needs for Kenya in scaling up ART.

Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation

Towards a model M&E system for AIDS programs Kampala April

February Dakar, Senegal

Malawi Ministry of Health With funding from Sylvester Kathumba, Nutritionist, Malawi Ministry of Health Kate Golden, Senior Nutrition Adviser, Concern,

CDC Mozambique Transition Monitoring Approach 8 th Annual Track 1 meeting, August 12, 2010 Charity Alfredo CDC-Mozambique.

An Introduction to HIV Incidence Surveillance (HIS) in California California Department of Public Health Office of AIDS.

John Aberle-Grasse CDC GAP Strategies for Building National-Scale Longitudinal Patient Monitoring Systems for HIV Treatment and Care Lusaka, October 2-5,

TRENDS IN DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEMS FOR AIDS RESPONSE Kevin Kelly Inaugural SAMEA Conference March 2007, Johannesburg.

PARIS 21 Meeting Ghana July Challenges in health information Health Metrics Network HMN Framework and profiling tool.

Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks Kyiv, Ukraine May 23, 2006 MEASURE Evaluation.

Comprehensive M&E Systems

Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks   What is an M&E Framework?   Why do we use M&E Frameworks?   How do we develop M&E Frameworks? MEASURE Evaluation.

What is H(M)IS?. Purpose of HIS “is to produce relevant information that health system stakeholders can use for making transparent and evidence-based.

Elizabeth Mason Department of Child and Adolescent Health and Development New Strategic Directions Tracking progress in child survival Countdown to 2015.

Importance of Health Information Systems Information explosion during 1990s  It is estimated that in the next 50 years, the amount of knowledge currently.

HIV Patient ART Monitoring Meeting: International Conference Centre, Geneva March 2004 Defining the variables.

Development and Implementation of a National Multisectoral Output Monitoring System (SHAPMoS) for HIV Responses in Swaziland: Challenges and lessons learned.

Morbidity Monitoring Project Data for Resource Planning and Evaluation A.D. McNaghten Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

A Sourcebook for Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural and Rural Development Measuring Results in less-than-ideal Conditions Global Donor Platform for.

Overview Burkina--- ART Population: 11 millions Prevalence: 6.6% (surveillance data) Estimate of 650,000 PLWHA 300 peoples with red cross 2000 people to.

Leveraging HIV Scale Up for HIS Strengthening Interdisciplinary Partnerships for HIS and Health System Strengthening John.

Evidence and Information for Policy Health Metrics Network Strengthening Country-Level and Global Tracking of Health Outcomes.

Unit 10. Monitoring and evaluation

Elements and Applications of the NACS Approach Serigne Diene, Senior Nutrition and HIV Advisor (FANTA/FHI360) AIDS Turning the Tide Together.

Framework for evaluation of scaling up of programmes Consultative workshop on Health Impact Accounts Brussels 6 February 2012.

Evidence and Information for Policy Christopher J.L. Murray Executive Director Evidence and Information for Policy World Health Organization National Capacity.

Primer on Monitoring and Evaluation. The 3 Pillars of Monitoring and Evaluation  Identifying the Performance Indicators  Collecting information using.

Global Trends in HIV/AIDS Monitoring and Evaluation Deborah Rugg, PhD Associate Director for Monitoring and Evaluation HHS/US Centers for Disease Control.

M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH. UNAIDS M&E Senior Adviser 12 th May 2009.

Challenges in monitoring ARV therapy A clinical and public health view of the issues involved Charlie Gilks SRM team, HIV department.

Strategic Information for Anti-RetroViral Treatment Programmes Workshop WHO and UNAIDS Geneva June 30- July

Monitoring &Evaluation System in Health Program. Brief overview of NACP Reporting units and quality aspects Data sets Learning/ Analysis of the data sets.

October 20, 2015 UNAIDS Monitoring and Evaluation of HIV Programs for MSM Linking data to Program Planning, Implementation, and Advocacy UNAIDS/S.NOORANI.

Monitoring UA 2010 in health sector 1 |1 | Monitoring progress towards Universal Access 2010 in the health sector Kevin M De Cock Ties Boerma.

21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 1. 21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 2 Family and Community Medicine Department.

Global Monitoring & Evaluation of HIV Prevention Among Most-at-Risk Populations: Update on existing guidance Priscilla Akwara, PhD Senior Advisor, Statistics.

1 Pharmaceutical System Strengthening: Is There a Need for a New Paradigm? Douglas Keene, PharmD, MHS ICIUM-3 Pre-Conference Session 14 November 2011.

Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.

Breastfeeding rates and practices: Monitoring, evaluation and research gaps.

Dr Rochelle Adams ACC Project Manager On behalf of the ACC team AWACC November 2015 Health systems Strengthening for Success and Sustainability.

Linking Data with Action Part 1: Seven Steps of Using Information for Decision Making.

HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific Review in slides Mongolia Last updated: December 2014.

New M&E Requirements Increased Accountability USA versus South Korea.

IMPROVING THE HIV, SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH OF SEX WORKERS TURNING GOOD POLICY INTO GOOD PRACTICE Module 5: Measuring Outcomes.

Roadmap & Actions Expert Consultation Health in All Policies.

Comprehensive M&E Systems: Identifying Resources to Support M&E Plans for National TB Programs Lisa V. Adams, MD E&E Regional Workshop Kiev, Ukraine May.

Implementing operational research for HIV treatment scale-up in resource-limited settings TB/HIV Research Priorities in Resource-Limited Settings Expert.

HIV and AIDS Data Hub for Asia-Pacific Review in slides Pakistan.

Available measurement tools and methods Current efforts, priorities Available measurement tools and methods Current efforts, priorities.

MONITORING, EVALUATION & REPORTING UPDATES 2014 Annual Partners Forum 15 April 2014.

Introduction to the NMSF The National Multi-Sectoral Strategic Framework (NMSF) on HIV&AIDS  Translates the National Policy of HIV&AIDS. 

Thailand experience in implementing collaborative HIV/TB activities Anupong Chitwarakorn, MD Ministry of Public Health, Thailand TB/HIV Satellite symposium.

NATIONAL HIV&AIDS M&E FRAMEWORK

Monitoring and Evaluation Frameworks

M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH

Central American Certificate Course: HIV Monitoring and Evaluation for HIV/AIDS Policy and Program Management BZ Unit 2 – Post test CR ES GT NI PA January.

Selected events in tracking the epidemic

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.

China 2010 UNGASS Country Progress Report

monitoring & evaluation THD Unit, Stop TB department WHO Geneva

Presentation transcript:

Strategic Information on ART Scale up Kevin O'Reilly Department of HIV/AIDS WHO

Strategic Information for ART: agreement with key partners Framework for strategic information national level indicators (being finalised) estimating need district level capacity (SAM) (under development) patient tracking and clinical monitoring –assessing resistance

Input Process Output Outcome Impact A FRAMEWORK for Monitoring and Evaluation People Money Equipment Policies etc. Training Logistics Management IEC/BCC etc. Services Service use Knowledge Behavior Safer Practices (population level) HIV/STI transmission Reduced HIV impact

Input Process Output Outcome Impact Data collection and frequency for Monitoring and Evaluation HIV/STI surveillance population-based Household Surveys, Facility Surveys, Coverage Surveys Programme Monitoring Frequency: on-going 1/ 2-3 years 1/ 1-3 years

Input Process Output Outcome Impact Initiatives, Indicators, and Tools for Strategic Information HIV/STI Surveillance Patients’ tracking Programme Monitoring Second Generation HIV Surveillance Second Generation HIV Surveillance HMIS in PEPFAR, CDC, MAP, GFATM DHS, AIDS Indicators Surveys, Service Availability Mapping (SAM), Health Facility Surveys, Coverage Surveys DHS, AIDS Indicators Surveys, Service Availability Mapping (SAM), Health Facility Surveys, Coverage Surveys Core consensus Indicators for all Initiatives based on United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS) and recent meetings Household Surveys Facility Surveys Coverage Surveys

Basic Principles for Strategic information Use or reinforce the existing system identify and co-ordinate with all partners in country (PEPFAR, Clinton, etc) make the information “strategic”-- planning to use the data public and private--what to include?

Basic Principles for Patient Monitoring Use or reinforce the existing system to extent possible co-ordinate with all partners on agreed approach feasibility…everywhere “strategic”—collecting only what is needed and will be used

Linking Clinic level and National data National level indicators Clinic level data

Key issues Clinical variables –Local level: patient progress and response –National level: outcome, impact, resistance Programme monitoring –Local programme performance & operational challenges –National programme monitoring Logistics –Performance and problem identification

We must keep it simple!!!