OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18 th & 19 th March 2010 Indicators.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Results Based Monitoring (RBM)
Advertisements

Introduction to Impact Assessment
South Africas MTEF Effective expenditure for development Malawi Poverty Monitoring System Workshop July 2002.
From Research to Advocacy
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Becoming a High Impact Board Susan Salter Director of Board Development Alabama Association of School Boards.
Gender Training Workshop
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Indicator Baseline Target Milestones PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS.
How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs
RESEARCH DESIGN.
UNICEF Turkey Country Programme
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
GENDER PROJECT Eliminating Violence – 28 August 2014.
Gender Analyze in Project cycle. The pre-planning stage of a project is the stage when you or your partner organisation start to draw up ideas for a project.
Nine steps of a good project planning
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
Advocacy.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 4: Maternity Protection at work: Who are the main stakeholders?
Measuring Governance with Pro- Poor and Gender Sensitive Indicators: Process flow chart as a tool for promoting gender-responsive governance & identifying.
Indicators Dr Murali Krishna Public Health Foundation of India.
How to Write Successful Grant Proposals Carmichael Centre Facilitator: Caroline Egan, Consultant & External Relations Manager.
Developing Indicators
The National Development Plan, Iraq 6 July 2010 “Developing Objectives & Indicators for Strategic Planning” Khaled Ehsan and Helen Olafsdottir UNDP Iraq.
Framework for Monitoring Learning & Evaluation
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
Operationalizing structural programming for HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment James Hargreaves Centre for the Evaluation of Public Health Interventions.
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH. UNAIDS M&E Senior Adviser 12 th May 2009.
1 CORAT AFRICA MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP FOR IMBISA/AMECEA COMMUNICATION COORDINATORS, MAPUTO, MOZAMBIQUE.
21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 1. 21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 2 Family and Community Medicine Department.
UK Aid Direct Introduction to Logframes (only required at proposal stage)
Structural, Policy and Legal Assessment Presented by Ms. Kokuteta Mutembei HIV/AIDS BI-ANNUAL REVIEW 2008.
Indicators to Measure Progress and Performance IWRM Training Course for the Mekong July 20-31, 2009.
Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.
The P Process Strategic Design
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
1 Results-based Monitoring, Training Workshop, Windhoek, Results-based Monitoring Purpose and tasks Steps 1 to 5 of establishing a RbM.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Application of Human Rights Principles in Results Based Management Muhammad Usman Akram, Evaluation Advisor Adapted from RBM training held for UNDP BRC.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
Deeping Skill in Working with Logical Frameworks Examples.
ROOTS 1+2 Advocacy toolkit
YONECO SRHR POLICY. SHAREFRAME CONFERENCE Salima - Malawi Mr. Samuel Bota Board Member.
Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.
So You Think You’ve Made a Change? Developing Indicators and Selecting Measurement Tools Chad Higgins, Ph.D. Allison Nichols, Ed.D.
Middle Managers Workshop 2: Measuring Progress. An opportunity for middle managers… Two linked workshops exploring what it means to implement the Act.
Assessment/Evaluation Make evaluation a central part of planning – not an afterthought 1) Determine Needs 2) Determine Desired Outcomes 3) Determine Activities.
Module 3: Ensuring Sustainability Session 1. Empowerment of the Community 1 CBDRR Framework Training - Myanmar Red Cross Society.
Supporting community action on AIDS in developing countries ‘Evaluating HIV and AIDS-related advocacy’ Skills Building Session International.
National Coalition Academy Summary
Equality and Human Rights Exchange Network
Module 2 Basic Concepts.
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH
Module 9 Designing and using EFGR-responsive evaluation indicators
Session 1 – Study Objectives
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.
Assessing Trust Fund Performance
Monitoring and Evaluation
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Monitoring and Evaluation in Communication Management
Presentation transcript:

OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18 th & 19 th March 2010 Indicators

2 Indicators can be process or impact Indicators can be direct or indirect (proxy), quantitative or qualitative Provide the basis for monitoring, reviews and evaluation A specific measure that, when tracked systematically over time, indicates successful implementation, and progress (or not) towards an outcome or impact.

Targets and indicators Indicators tell us what we want to measure Targets have specific values attached to show what has to be achieved by when Targets need to be achievable and realistic and are usually set against the baseline data A good indicator is a combination of indicator and target

Types of Indicators Process Indicators / Milestones Typically track “Activities” or “Outputs” Help to manage implementation Examples could be: Number of community events held Number of research papers developed Outcome and Impact Indicators Track specific measurable features of the changes the intervention is aiming to bring about Help to monitor performance Examples could be: Number of issue mentions in policymaker speeches Regulation formally established Equitable access to healthcare

Types of Indicators cont.’ Direct Indicators Used for objectives that relate to directly observable change Usually a more precise, comprehensive and operational restatement of the respective objective Indirect (proxy) indicators Used when: The achievement of the objective is not directly observable (quality of life) Measurement will incur high costs or resources for measurement are not available The achievement is measurable only after long periods beyond the life of the activity

Why develop outcome indicators? Helps us answer the question: “How will we know success when we see it” Allow us to track progress and test out our theory of change Can help to ensure alignment among different intervention activities “What gets measured, gets done” Drives all subsequent data collection, analysis, and reporting

7 Developing good outcome indicators Clear: precise and unambiguous Relevant: appropriate for the subject at hand Economic: available at a reasonable cost Adequate: able to provide sufficient basis to assess performance Monitorable (reliable) : amendable to independent validation Gender Sensitive: reflecting the different interests of and effects on women and men

Developing good outcome indicators Avoid vague/ambiguous terms like… –To increase awareness –Appropriate use –Beneficiary involvement –Increased participation –Good understanding You may know what you mean, others may not!!

9 Developing good outcome indicators Consider what would indicate to you that the outcome or impact has been achieved. What would success look like? You can’t measure everything – For each outcome you want the minimum number of indicators that helps you to answers the question: “Has this outcome been achieved?” Identifying good indicators is an iterative process – they should not be thought of as cast in stone – expect to add new one, and drop old ones Involve key stakeholders

Safe sex education Develop and deliver training on safe sex to teenagers in Sandton Teenagers in Sandton know how HIV is transmitted; the effects of HIV/Aids & how safe sex protects them from transmission Sandton teenagers believe that safe sex is important Teenagers in Sandton practice safe sex Sandton teenagers know how to have safe sex Assumptions Lack of knowledge/ skills is the underlying root problem Group training is an effective means of imparting knowledge/ skills Increase in knowledge leads to a chain in behaviours

Developing indicators Choose an interim outcome, and identify your ‘so that’ (20 min) Identify assumptions/ critical success factors (15 min) Brainstorm ideas for indicators (30 min) This should be real brainstorming. Don't worry about how feasible an idea is, or whether it is possible to measure, or whether any data exists. The point is to get as many ideas on the table as possible. Review indicators (30 min) Are they CREAM – y? Are they process/output indicators? Or outcome indicators? Are they quantitative (ie/ numbers) or are they qualitative (measuring subjective experiences). What ‘population of interest’ are they measuring? Ie/ a system or structure? Or an individual, family or community? Select one or two indicators to present to the larger group.

Develop and deliver training on safe sex Teenagers in Sandton know how HIV is transmitted; the effects of HIV/Aids & how safe sex protects them from transmission Sandton teenagers believe that safe sex is important Teenagers in Sandton practice safe sex Sandton teenagers know how to have safe sex Sandton teenagers knowledge of…

Examples – Process Indicators New website developed Number of press releases developed & distributed Number of rallies or marches held (and attendance) Number of meetings held with decision maker Number of policy papers distributed Funding secured Number of outreach attempts to reporters

Example: Measuring Empowerment Societal Behavior Individual and Collective Agency Opportunity Structure Enabling Environment

Example: Measuring Empowerment AgencyOpportunity Structure Societal Behavior Youth, especially girls are increasingly aware of, and willing to use, the social resources available to them in the face of violence. New municipal initiatives passed and resourced to create safer spaces for women, and new police task forces devoted to gender violence. Greater municipal budget expenditures on gender violence prevention. Basic principles of interpretation of the Domestic Violence Law are more consistently carried out by judicial actors, such as public action, accessibility, secrecy and cost- free service.

Examples – Interim Outcome Indicators Awareness Percentage of target population with knowledge of an issue Website activity for portions of website dealing with advocacy-related information Number of followers on social media websites

Examples – Interim Outcome Indicators Organisational Capacity Increased knowledge about strategic advocacy planning & implementation Improved media skills Increased ability to get and use M&E data Political Will Number of issue mentions in policymaker speeches Number of votes for or against specific legislation Increased decision- maker inquiries

Examples – Outcome Indicators Policy Goals New proposals or guiding principles developed Policy formally introduced Policy formally established Policy implemented in accordance with requirements Funding levels established/ sustained for policy implementation

Examples – Impact Indicators Improved services and systems Affordable access to services More services Better quality services Positive social and physical conditions Decreased maternal mortality Reduced greenhouse gas emissions