The University of Texas-Pan American S. J. Sethi, Ph.D. Assistant Director Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness Faculty Survey of Student Engagement.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.

Advertisements

Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.

2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Leslie Croot, M.S., Analyst.

DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.

Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.

First Year & Senior Student Experiences The National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011 Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies.

Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.

GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)

Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.

Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.

General Education Courses and the Promotion of Essential Learning Outcomes Thomas F. Nelson Laird Amanda Suniti Niskodé George D. Kuh Center for Postsecondary.

Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Getting Faculty Involved in the Student Engagement Conversation: The Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Thomas.

Want to be first in your CLASSE? Investigating Student Engagement in Your Courses Want to be first in your CLASSE? Investigating Student Engagement in.

Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.

SURVEY OF RECENT GRADUATES AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR ASSISTING IN THE ASSESSMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Dr. Teresa Ward Ms. Beth Katz Office of Institutional.

Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.

Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.

Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.

Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.

Selected Results of NSSE 2003: University of Kentucky December 3, 2003.

The Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) measures faculty expectations for student engagement in educational practices that are known to be empirically.

National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.

Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.

Student Engagement at Northeastern Illinois Analysis and Use of the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2009.

CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.

Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.

2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.

National Survey of Student Engagement, 2008 Results for UBC-Vancouver.

Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.

APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.

2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.

March 3, TAIR, Waco, TX Now You See Them, Now You Don’t! The Role of Part-Time Students and Faculty in Student Engagement.

Primary Factors of Student Engagement at UTBTSC in 2002 Deborah Suzzane, Ph.D., Director Institutional Research & Planning.

2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.

ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.

National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.

CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)

Measuring the Gap Between Faculty and Student Perceptions of Engagement: Results from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement University Assessment Office.

1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.

NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.

Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.

Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.

De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.

Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.

NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.

Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness April 25, 2011 QEP DATA ANALYSIS.

1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.

UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.

Diversity at Stetson: Perspectives of Students and Faculty John Tichenor Associate Professor of Decision and Information Science.

GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 27% (down 5%)  First Year: 25% (down 5%)  Seniors: 28% (down 5%)  GGC  Overall: 35% (up 7%)  First.

A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008.

The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.

Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.

The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.

The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.

National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.

The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.

2007 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Most & Least Frequent Activities.

The University of Texas-Pan American

Dissertation Findings

The University of Texas-Pan American

The University of Texas-Pan American

2017 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services

Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement

FSSE-G RESULTS Faculty Survey of Student Engagement for Graduate Student Instructors.

Director, Institutional Research

GGC and Student Engagement

University of South Carolina Upstate

Faculty In-Service Week

Presentation transcript:

The University of Texas-Pan American S. J. Sethi, Ph.D. Assistant Director Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Results & Observations Presented by:

What is FSSE? (pronounced “fessie”) An instrument designed to measure faculty expectations of student engagement in educational practices that are linked with high levels of learning and development.

FSSE 2004 Completed at 132 colleges/universities Completed by over 20,000 faculty members All institutions participated in NSSE also

FSSE 2004 at UTPA Completed by 193 faculty members (35% response rate) (145 in 2003) 60% males, 40% females (58% males, 42% females in 2003)

Types of Questions Included  Gender, race & ethnicity, discipline taught.  Time spent preparing for class.  Course emphasis.  Expectations from students.  Class & homework assignments.  Time spent in class (lecture, discussion, etc.).  Emphasis on engaging students in cognitive activities.

Some Results NeverSometimesOftenVery Often NeverSometimesOftenVery OftenNeverSometimesOftenVery Often

Some Results In your selected course, how important to you is it that your students: Not ImportantSomewhat ImportantImportantVery Important Not ImportantSomewhat ImportantImportantVery Important Not ImportantSomewhat ImportantImportantVery Important

2004 FSSE – 2004 NSSE Areas of Greatest Discrepancies Between Faculty & Students LD Faculty UD Faculty FY Students SR Students Students use electronic medium to discuss or complete assignments - often/very often. 27% 36% 54% 64% Students receive prompt feedback (written or oral) from instructor on their academic performance - often/very often. 83% 91% 44% 57% Coursework emphasizes memorization - very much/quite a bit. 29% 28% 76% 71% Courses are structured so students learn and develop skills in using computing and information technology - very much/quite a bit. 44% 41% 82% 83% Courses are structured so students learn and develop skills for working effectively with others - very much/quite a bit. 64% 57% 73% 84% UTPA requires students to spend significant amounts of time studying and on academic work - very much/quite a bit. 55% 51% 76% 72%

Questions & Discussion Contact Information: Dr. S. J. Sethi: Phone: This presentation is online at: