Date of download: 6/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Fourier Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography and Scanning Laser Polarimetry Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements in the Diagnosis of Glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(9): doi: /archopht Mean retinal nerve fiber layer(RNFL) thickness estimates plotted for 42 glaucomatous and 38 healthy eyes using the scanning laser polarimeter (GDx) (Laser Diagnostic Technologies, San Diego, Calif) (A) and the ocular coherence tomograph (OCT) (OCT 2000; Zeiss Humphrey Systems, Dublin, Calif) (B). Error bars represent ±1 SEM. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 6/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Fourier Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography and Scanning Laser Polarimetry Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements in the Diagnosis of Glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(9): doi: /archopht Normalized retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness estimates plotted for both devices (scanning laser polarimeter [GDx] [Laser Diagnostic Technologies, San Diego, Calif] and ocular coherence tomograph [OCT] [OCT 2000; Zeiss Humphrey Systems, Dublin, Calif]) together for the healthy (A) and glaucomatous (B) eyes. The thickness estimates were normalized by dividing each data point by the groups' maximum value. Error bars represent ±1 SEM. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 6/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Fourier Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography and Scanning Laser Polarimetry Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements in the Diagnosis of Glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(9): doi: /archopht Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves based on scanning laser polarimeter (GDx) (Laser Diagnostic Technologies, San Diego, Calif) data are shown along with the area under the ROC curve for the GDx number (A), the University of California–San Diego linear discriminant function (UCSD LDF) (B), and the Fourier-based LDF (C). Figure Legend:

Date of download: 6/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Fourier Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography and Scanning Laser Polarimetry Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements in the Diagnosis of Glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(9): doi: /archopht Receiver operating characteristics(ROC) curves based on ocular coherence tomography (OCT) data (OCT 2000; Zeiss Humphrey Systems, Dublin, Calif) are shown along with the area under the ROC curve for mean thickness (A), inferior thickness (B), and the Fourier-based linear discriminant function (LDF) (C). Figure Legend:

Date of download: 6/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Fourier Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography and Scanning Laser Polarimetry Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements in the Diagnosis of Glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(9): doi: /archopht Scatterplot illustrating the lack of a significant relationship between average thickness of individuals' retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) as measured by the scanning laser polarimeter (GDx)(Laser Diagnostic Technologies, San Diego, Calif) and ocular coherence tomography(OCT) devices (OCT 2000; Zeiss Humphrey Systems, Dublin, Calif). The axes are drawn using an aspect ratio that compensates for the difference in the units of the 2 devices. Least squares regression line is shown. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 6/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Fourier Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography and Scanning Laser Polarimetry Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements in the Diagnosis of Glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(9): doi: /archopht Average amplitude in the inferior quadrant (average of nasal and temporal quadrants subtracted from the average inferior quadrant thickness) determined by the ocular coherence tomograph(OCT) (OCT 2000; Zeiss Humphrey Systems, Dublin, Calif) and scanning laser polarimeter (GDx) (Laser Diagnostic Technologies, San Diego, Calif) devices plotted against each other for all subjects. Like other amplitude measures, the measurements from the 2 devices are significantly related. Least squares regression line is shown. Figure Legend: