Pat T. Flora, Education Associate Office of Career and Technology Education October 21, 2015.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Instructional Leadership for the 21 st Century University of South Alabama in collaboration with Baldwin and Mobile County Public Schools.

Advertisements

Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.

What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.

1 THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. 2 WHAT IS A SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL, AND WHO ARE MEMBERS? The School Site Council (SSC) is an elected or selected group representative.

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Special Education Self-

1 TITLE I COMPARABILITY – Determinations & Reporting Thomas Chin October 5, 2010.

CONSOLIDATED PROGRAM REVIEW COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR TITLE I, PART C, MIGRANT EDUCATION PROGRAM MEP STATE CONFERENCE AUGUST 2013.

August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.

Monitoring Accommodations in Florida Karen Denbroeder Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Uniform Complaint Procedures Monitoring Requirements Training.

Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)

Application for Approval of Funding for Residential Placement

Academic Improvement & Accountability

2015 Spring Professional Development Meeting FY15 CATE Progress Report & FY16 CATE Program of Study Pat T. Flora.

Financial and Programmatic Monitoring ESEA/Act 807 ACSIP Arkansas Department of Education Division of Academic Accountability.

Monitoring Accommodations in South Dakota Linda Turner Special Education Programs.

1 Role of the Case Manager Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District 2009.

Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.

Los Angeles County Office of Education Division for School Improvement School Site Council (SSC) Training September 9 th 2008 Anna Carrasco From presentation.

Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.

Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,

New CATE Administrators September 26, 2013 Pat T. Flora Office of Career and Technology Education.

Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Patrick McMenamin, Administrator Categorical Program Monitoring.

School Improvement Plans & EESACs Charter Schools August 6, 2010 Charter Schools August 6, 2010.

2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Participation of the State Advisory Panel and State Interagency.

Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.

Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.

TITLE I COMPARABILITY Determinations & Reporting Title I Technical Assistance Session School Improvement Grant Programs October 6, 2011.

1 DRAFT Monitoring/Evaluation Overview September 20, 2010 Title III Director’s Fall Meeting.

1 SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL Academic Improvement & Accountability.

NESTOA September 20, 2011 Safeguards Program Briefing.

Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Chris McLaughlin Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.

Annual Report. Submission of UCEDD Annual Report DD Act: required each center to submit annual report to the Secretary (ADD) DD Act: required each center.

Successful Practices Network CTE Technical Assistance Center Work Plan 1.Improve CTE data collection to create an accurate picture.

Martha Thurlow Laurene Christensen Courtney Foster April 22, :15-2:15 MONITORING ACCOMMODATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT.

Contra Costa County Office of Education May 2015 Local Control Funding Formula: Supporting Continuous Improvement.

1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.

Statewide System of Support The Ohio Story: Federal Response.

Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa. us Compliance Monitoring for Gifted Education COMPLIANCE MONITORING.

Virginia Association of Federal Education Program Administrators (VAFEPA) October 15, 2014 Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.

1 Palo Verde Unified School District Curriculum & Instruction Department Malcolm Butler, Director of Curriculum & Instruction Single Plans for Student.

Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results Reviewed & Revised with COP April 2011.

Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.

1 Monitoring/Evaluation Program Overview December 3, 2008 Title III Director’s Meeting.

1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring

Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.

ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.

School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.

Title I, Part A COMPARABILITY. What is the purpose of Comparability? To ensure that participating Title I schools receive the same level of services from.

Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Lynn Sodat Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.

School Site Council Committee SSC. What is the School Site Council The school site council is a group of teachers, parents, classified employees, and.

Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.

CATE Local Plan for FY14 ( ) Career and Technology Education Merri Long September 26, 2013.

Technical Assistance Compliance Financial Report Internal Controls New CATE Administrators Training Presenters: Melissa Benton & Abby Lawson October 21,

Patricia Williams & Anita Castro Special Education Team 1 Sample IEP Forms College and Career Ready.

U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs General Supervision: Developing an Effective System Implications for States.

7/6/2016LCBE/gcm Department of Exceptional Children School Year Information Leslie County Schools.

School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.

N.J.A.C. 6A:30, Evaluation of the Performance of School Districts: New Jersey Quality Single Accountability Continuum (NJQSAC) Adoption Level Robert.

Alabama Teacher Mentoring Program

Berkeley County School District

School Site Council (SSC) Training

ESSA Updates for Title V, Part B, Subpart 2

Guide to the Single Plan for Student Achievement

THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL

Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring

2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019

Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Title I, Part D, Subpart 1

Presentation transcript:

Pat T. Flora, Education Associate Office of Career and Technology Education October 21, 2015

 What are Quality Review Measures (QRM) and who needs to use them?  Where do we find the QRM?  How do we use the QRM?  What is included in the QRM?

 Original QRM developed in Aligned with 10 Vision Themes of the 2020 Vision for Career and Technology Education (CATE) in South Carolina  Designed to provide guidance and direction in establishing, maintaining, and evaluating CATE programs in districts and schools/centers  EEDA components added in 2005; Revised in 2013 to bridge current CATE program quality elements with state/federal compliance and accountability

 An annual self-evaluation of CATE programs using the QRM is required for all LEAs that receive state and federal CATE funds (Local Plan Assurances)  QRM help teachers and administrators analyze program effectiveness, take corrective actions, and identify exceptional CATE programs and activities  QRM help ensure accountability for the uses of state and federal funds to improve CATE programs and CATE student performance  A copy of the completed QRM evaluation and results will be requested during scheduled on-site monitoring visits conducted by the OCTE

 CATE Coordinator/Director should lead the annual evaluation process to ensure appropriate individuals complete the applicable QRM sections  Allow time in the review schedule for all QRM components to be completed and returned to the CATE Coordinator/Director for evaluation and determination of where improvement is needed  Discuss the results and recommendations among the QRM review participants and with the CATE Advisory Council and Superintendent for support in implementing needed action

 Section A—School District Administration  Completed by District/MDCC CATE Administrators  Section B—High School/Career Center Administration  Completed by High School/Career Center Administrators  Section C—Student Services  Completed by Guidance, Career Development, Placement Personnel  Section D—Curriculum and Instruction  Completed by CATE Teachers

 Measures applicable to each component  Evidence that can be used as documentation to support each Measure  The Evidence examples for selected Measures are intended to illuminate strengths and where potential problems may exist (if limited or no evidence)

 See Handout – Print Copy (Reissued 2015)  Sampling of QRM Measures and Examples of Evidence  Share Your Experiences with the QRM  Ask Any Questions You May Have Today