Using Online Courses to Link Research to Practice in Mathematics Classrooms JoAnn Cady P. Mark Taylor Thomas E. Hodges.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
October 12, A Look at Pedagogical Content Knowledge Overview Curriculum: Biology Content Pre-Assessment using CPS Reflection Instruction: What do.
Advertisements

ETL339: E-Learning Is it all just smoke and mirrors... bells and whistles?
Jim Rahn LL Teach, Inc.
PORTFOLIO.
Preparing Teachers to Enact Ambitious Teaching Practices during Secondary Preservice Teacher Education: Challenges and Successes Rebekah Elliott Ron Gray.
Mathematics Learning Communities (MLC) MLC Facilitator Training Overview Regional Science Resource Center Regional Science Resource Center University of.
Specialized Understanding of Mathematics: A Study of Prospective Elementary Teachers Meg Moss.
School Technology Inquiry Groups as Professional Development by: Joan E. Hughes Ann Ooms.
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education PROM/SE Ohio Spring Mathematics Associate Institute April 27, 2005.
Meeting the Challenge for the Preparation of Pre-service Teachers of Middle School Mathematics —The Fayetteville State University (FSU) Answer Presenters:
0 Professional Development. 1 PD Design: Distributed Expertise Focal unit is District, not individual teachers Goal is to elevate aggregate level of knowledge.
Collaborating for Student Success Using Collaborative Inquiry with Student Teachers to Support Teacher Professional Development Sponsored by Teachers for.
Principles & Standards for School Mathematics & Group Presentation Overview NCTM, 2000.
1 Massachusetts Intel ® Mathematics Initiative (MIMI)
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
This work was supported in part by MSP grant # through the National Science Foundation. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily.
CENTER FOR THE INTEGRATION OF RESEARCH, TEACHING, AND LEARNING A national network of 25 research universities committed to using graduate education to.
Developing Mathematics Learning Communities Focusing on Student Work NCTM Regional Conference Baltimore, 2010 Dona T. Apple Research and Mathematics Staff.
 Common Core State Standards Or College and Career State Standards CCSS.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
NCTM Overview The Principles and Standards for Teaching Mathematics.
Universal Design for Learning in the College Classroom Abstract This Faculty Learning Community (FLC) integrated components of Universal Design for Learning.
Delaware Professional Teaching Standards 3.0 Content Knowledge 4.0 Human Development and Learning 5.0 Diverse Learners 6.0 Communication 7.0 Learning Environment.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
1 PROFESSIONAL LEARNING within a COLLABORATIVE INQUIRY FRAMEWORK The professional learning cycle: serves as a process for professional learning is driven.
Chapter 11 – Teaching and Learning with Technology in Mathematics and Science Instruction Cullen Byrne and Abby Harnack.
Math & Science Collaborative Analyzing Mathematical Tasks and the Mathematical Task Framework.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions High School
Universal Design for Learning Valerie Gerdes November 21, 2010 Walden University.
Welcome to Project PRIME/AFA Day 1 – Project Overview December 14, 2011.
Inquiry-based Learning Linking Teaching with Learning.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
Community Context Series of Community Math Nights Leadership Development for Math Support Team Mathematics Content Courses for K-20 Teachers Ongoing support.
Pedagogy for the 21 st Century LSS Retreat, November, 2010.
1. An Overview of the Standards for School Mathematics? 2.
Professional Development in Challenged Environments A Model for Effective PD.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership High School Labs Kevin McLeod and DeAnn Huinker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional.
Introduction to Curriculum Topic Study – Bridging the Gap Between Standards and Practice.
Mathematical Preparation and Development of Teachers at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee DeAnn Huinker, Mathematics Education Kevin McLeod, Mathematics.
CNA REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL LAB ~ APPALACHIA The Effects of Kentucky Virtual High School’s Hybrid Course in Algebra I on Teaching Practices, Classroom Quality,
School of Education, CASEwise: A Case-based Online Learning Environment for Teacher Professional Development Chrystalla.
Karen Pegler Terri-Lynn Brown. Who Are We? What is 21 st Century PD? Successful 21 st century professional development programs: ·Ensure educators understand.
Adrian Jones M.A.(Ed.) Candidate
National Study of Education in Undergraduate Science: – What Was Learned Dennis Sunal, Cynthia Szymanski Sunal, Erika Steele, Donna Turner The.
MH502: Developing Mathematical Proficiency, Geometry and Measurement, K-5 Seminar 1 September 28, 2010.
Tuning Indiana: Education. Originally focused on: Elementary education Math education Special education.
A Framework for Integrating Technology Mark Grabe.
Assessing the Impact of the Interactive Learning Space Initiative on Faculty Morale and Student Achievement Ball State University 2015 Spring Assessment.
21 st Century Skills Jason McLaughlin Kean University EMSE
Use of Technology in Course and Clinical Experiences The University of Toledo UToledo. UTeach.UTouch the Future (UT 3 ) Program Add Corporate Logo Here.
Grade 7 & 8 Mathematics Reporter : Richard M. Oco Ph. D. Ed.Mgt-Student.
Situating Teacher Learning in the Practice of Science and Mathematics Teaching Monica Hartman University of Michigan Pre-Oral Defense Meeting May 3, 2004.
Fostering Sustained Impact: Lessons Learned from Geoscience Faculty Workshops Ellen Roscoe Iverson, Cathryn A. Manduca, Science Education Resource Center,
Field Fridays: Immersing Preservice Teachers in Learning Inquiry Mathematics Instruction Eula E. Monroe & Damon L. Bahr Brigham Young University Joseph.
EVALUATING A MIDDLE SCHOOL MATH M.ED. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. Knowledge, Pedagogy, Practice or Student Achievement:
Engineering and Education Partnership: Preparing the Next Generation of Cross Disciplinary Trained STEM Teachers Dr. Michael de Miranda School of Education.
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
Inquiry, Pedagogy, & Technology: Automated Textual Analysis of 30 Refereed Journal Articles David A. Thomas Mathematics Center, University of Great Falls,
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Effective Design Practices
Mathematical Problem Solving and Critical Thinking for Elementary School Teachers NSF Site Visit June 8, 2005.
NC Elementary Mathematics Add-on License
Jack Smith & Raven McCrory Michigan State University
LESSON DESIGN WORKSHOP
The Effect Of Social Context On The Reflective Practice Of Preservice Science Teachers: Leveraging A Web-Supported Community Of Teachers Jim MaKinster.
Meeting the challenge of teaching research methods online Findings from the Pedagogy of Methodological Learning study Debbie Collins.
Learning to Teach and Teaching to Learn via Visualization
Pedagogical Content Knowledge – Elementary Mathematics
Project Overview PRIME/AFA is a continued partnership of the Michigan Mathematics and Science Centers Network, (MMSCN) Wayne RESA, the Michigan Department.
Presentation transcript:

Using Online Courses to Link Research to Practice in Mathematics Classrooms JoAnn Cady P. Mark Taylor Thomas E. Hodges

The preparation of this presentation was supported in part by a grant from the Appalachian Mathematics and Science Partnership. Any opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Appalachian Mathematics and Science Partnership. Acknowledgements

Teacher Preparation  Middle School licensure  K-8  7-12  Neither licensure adequately addresses National Middle School Association Standards

Goals of Online Classes 1. To encourage beliefs that support inquiry-based practices 2. To provide opportunities to enhance both content and pedagogical content knowledge 3. Focus the teachers’ decision-making processes on evidence of student learning 4. To provided easy access to professional development

Course Development Rationale  Identify teachers’ beliefs  Beliefs influence instructional decisions  Beliefs influence learning from a cognitive perspective  Building teachers’ content knowledge by focusing on the development of students’ content knowledge  Pedagogy  PCK  Content Knowledge  Pedagogy  PCK  Content Knowledge

Course Development Rationale  Teachers as learners of mathematics (Ball, 1996; Loucks-Horsley, Hewson, Love, & Stiles, 1998; Ma, L.,1999)  Using standards-based middle school curricula in professional development (Ball & Cohen, 1996; Beckmann, et.al., 2004; Reys, Reys, Beem, & Papick, 1999)

Course Development Rationale  Using cases of mathematics instruction (Merseth, 1996; Stein, Smith, Henningson, & Silver, 2000)  Collaborative examination of student work in order to increase teachers’ flexibility in mathematical thinking (Franke & Kazemi, 2001; Wilcox & Jones, 2004)

Course Design  Synchronous, asynchronous, & face-to-face  Centra software  Blackboard software

Course Design  4 Courses  rational number  algebra  geometry  data analysis and probability  Cohort groups  3-5 local schools  Each Tuesday 4-7 pm

Centra Software

Centra Software & Notetaker

Data Sources  Class assignments  Online class recordings  Discussion Board postings

Data Analysis  Constant comparative  Generating themes  Grounded Theory

Results  Emerging Themes  Language - mathematical terms  Use of multiple representations  Use of activities that encourage social construction of ideas  Autonomous learners  Integration with other concepts & disciplines

Results  Language - mathematical terms  Inverses, reciprocals, and opposites  Capacity vs. volume  Variables vs. Symbols

Results  Use of multiple representations  Division of fractions  Probability problems selected

Results  Use of activities that encourage social construction of ideas  Geometric definitions  Pythagorean theorem  Algebra sorting activities

Results  Autonomous Learners  Big Ideas  Respectfully challenging peers  Shift in roles of instructor and students

Results  Integration with other concepts & disciplines  Algebra and geometry  Measurement and science  Data and science

Challenges  Technology  Learning curve  Speed & Down time  Shift in thinking from deficit model to an abundance model

Challenges  Students could “ hide”  Modeling inquiry practices  Making instructional decisions based on student work  Using manipulatives

Contact Information JoAnn Cady P. Mark Taylor Tommy Hodges