CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF D2 MECHANICAL STRUCTURE S. Farinon, P. Fabbricatore (INFN-Sezione di Genova) Sept. 17 th 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mechanical Analysis of Dipole with Partial Keystone Cable for the SIS300 A finite element analysis has been performed to optimize the stresses in the dipole.
Advertisements

Mechanical Design & Analysis Igor Novitski. Outlines Electromagnetic Forces in the Magnet Goals of Finite Element Analysis Mechanical Concept Description.
Manufacturing Technology
EuCARD-HFM ESAC review of the high field dipole design, 20/01/2011, Maria Durante, 1/40 EuCARD-HFM ESAC Review of the high field dipole design Fabrication.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQS Progress Report High Field Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration Meeting – CM11 FNAL October 27-28, 2008.
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole Progress Report V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
LARP QXF 150mm Structure Mike Anerella / John Cozzolino / Jesse Schmalzle November 15, nd Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting.
CERN/CEA Collaboration agreement No. KE2275/TE WP5 – HTS insert Kick-off meeting 07/07/2014.
H. Felice - P. Ferracin – D. Cheng 09/19/2013 Update on structure CAD model.
H. Felice - P. Ferracin – D. Cheng 09/11/2013 Update on structure CAD model.
2 nd Joint HiLumi LHC – LARP Annual Meeting INFN Frascati – November 14 th to 16 th 2012 Helene Felice Paolo Ferracin LQ Mechanical Behavior Overview and.
Fred Nobrega. 9 Dec 2014 Model Design & Fabrication – FNAL Fred Nobrega 2 Outline Background Mechanical Design Model Magnet Features Coil Technology and.
The construction of the model of the curved fast ramped superconducting dipole for FAIR SIS300 synchrotron P.Fabbricatore INFN-Genova The construction.
2D STRESS ANALYSIS OF THE TS MAGNET PROTOTYPE Stefania Farinon and Pasquale Fabbricatore.
Development of the EuCARD Nb 3 Sn Dipole Magnet FRESCA2 P. Ferracin, M. Devaux, M. Durante, P. Fazilleau, P. Fessia, P. Manil, A. Milanese, J. E. Munoz.
First approaches J. García, F. Toral, J. Munilla – CIEMAT.
ANSYS Structural Analyses of sPhenix Magnet Coil at Full Current John Cozzolino July 10,
MQXF support structure An extension of LARP experience Helene Felice MQXF Design Review December 10 th to 12 th, 2014 CERN.
Superconducting Magnet Group Superconducting magnet development for ex-situ NMR LDRD 2003 Paolo Ferracin, Scott Bartlett 03/31/2003.
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
GROUP C – Case study no.4 Dr. Nadezda BAGRETS (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) Dr. Andrea CORNACCHINI (CERN EN Dept.) Mr. Miguel FERNANDES (CERN BE.
Hybrid Structure with Cooling John Cozzolino LARP Collaboration Meeting Port Jefferson, NY November 4-6, 2009.
Magnet design, final parameters Paolo Ferracin and Attilio Milanese EuCARD ESAC review for the FRESCA2 dipole CERN March, 2012.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 3 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
Update on Q4 DSM/IRFU/SACM The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
16 T Dipole Design Options: Input Parameters and Evaluation Criteria F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT-VC, Sept. 4th, 2015.
S. Lassiter, P. Brindza, M. Fowler, E. Sun - Jefferson Lab G. Markham - NovaTech, B. Wands - Fermi Lab Abstract—Jefferson Laboratory is developing a set.
4th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting D2 Design, Status, Plan P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon INFN Genova Presented by E.Todesco (CERN)  INFN Genova is.
CERN MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team.
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF D2 MECHANICAL STRUCTURE (DOUBLE COLLARING OPTION) S. Farinon, P. Fabbricatore (INFN-Sezione di Genova) Sept. 24 th 2015.
FNAL Workshop, July 19, 2007 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V.Kashikhin 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole (ILC HGQ1) V. Kashikhin.
1 Long QXF Mirror Fabrication (MQXFPM1) Rodger Bossert HiLumi-LARP Collaboration Meeting May 18-20, 2016 SLAC R. Bossert - HiLumi Collaboration Meeting.
1 MQXFS Mirror Fabrication R. Bossert, G. Chlachidze, S. Stoynev HiLumi-LARP Collaboration Meeting May 11-13, 2015 FNAL.
September 27, 2007 ILC Main Linac - KOF 1 ILC Main Linac Superconducting Quadrupole V. Kashikhin for Magnet group.
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
Mechanical behavior of the EuroCirCol 16 T Block-type dipole magnet during a quench Junjie Zhao, Tiina Salmi, Antti stenvall, Clement Lorin 1.
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
HQ Mirror Assembly R. Bossert
6th BINP-FAIR-GSI Workshop,
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
WP-7 / Task 4 Very high field magnet
Mechanical tolerance analysis for the MQXF prototype structures
Hervé Allain, R. van Weelderen (CERN)
D2 Status The contract for the construction of the short model
16 T Cosq DIPOLE Mechanical Analysis
Segreti, Lorin, Durante 11 July 2017
Cosq configuration - Mechanics
JLAB MEETING FDR – April 23-24th 2013
Plans for the PSI Canted-Dipole Program
Mechanical Modelling of the PSI CD1 Dipole
FRESCA2 Update on the dipole design and new calculations
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Bore quench field vs. critical current density
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
16T Cosθ Dipole Configuration
MKQXF FEA Model Haris Kokkinos
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
Structural analysis of the CBM magnet coil
MQXF coil cross-section status
P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Updated concept of the CBM dipole magnet
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
FRESCA2 - Coils 1+2 scenario
Q4 development M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet, E. Todesco
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
Presentation transcript:

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF D2 MECHANICAL STRUCTURE S. Farinon, P. Fabbricatore (INFN-Sezione di Genova) Sept. 17 th 2014

Sept. 17 th Introduction  the basic idea is to fill with collars the grey area between windings and iron

Sept. 17 th The concept  Packs of collars are kept together by pins  In each pack, the two different kind of collars are alternating  The packs of collars are assembled under pressure by inserting rods  Collars, pins and rods are made of stainless steel

Sept. 17 th Steps of the mechanical analysis  The magnetic design is performed using the conductor warm 50 MPa  The windings undergo an azimuthal thermal expansion that brings them from 50 MPa to 0 MPa  The collars are closed and the rod inserted  The collared coils are cooled down and energized, using the Lorentz forces coming from the magnetic analysis  TO BE NOTICED: the mechanical design is done to get the warm collared 50 MPa. This stress level will be partly reduced by cooling down

Sept. 17 th Material properties Material Young modulus (GPa) Thermal expansion coefficient (10 -3 ) conductor (including insulation) kapton2.59 copper (wedges) steel (collar, pins and rods)2203  All materials are elastic, no temperature dependence is taken into account

Sept. 17 th Windings at 0 MPa (1/2)

Sept. 17 th Windings at 0 MPa (2/2)  To check the validity of this approach, I made the following «ad hoc» model: E=10 E steel F col F col =2*156.5 tons/m P col =F col /(4*15.35 mm)=50 MPa =43 MPa

The collars fit exactly the magnetic design of the coils, i.e. their warm 50 MPa Nominal collaring

Sept. 17 th Nominal collaring (1/5)  Both collar assemblies are present in the mechanical model and are connected via the pins

Sept. 17 th Nominal collaring (2/5): stress in the windings (MPa) pole interface (MPa) 1 - collaring after collaring (pressure released) cool-down energization leftright  Collars have to be overpressed by 0.1 mm:  F col =2*203 tons/m  P col =F col /(4*15.35 mm)=65 MPa 12 34

Sept. 17 th Nominal collaring (3/5): stress in the collars

Sept. 17 th Nominal collaring (3/5): stress in the collars

Sept. 17 th Nominal collaring (3/5): stress in the collars

Sept. 17 th Nominal collaring (3/5): stress in the collars

Sept. 17 th Nominal collaring (4/5): effect on b2/b3 harmonics

Sept. 17 th Nominal collaring (5/5): effect on higher harmonics

Is it possible to increase the stress in the coils so to guarantee continous contact between collar and winding? The easiest way is to insert a shimming Collaring with 0.3 mm thick shimming

Sept. 17 th Collaring with 0.3 mm thick shimming (1/2): stress in winding (MPa) pole interface (MPa) leftright 1 - collaring after collaring (pressure released) cool-down energization F col =2*348 tons/m P col =F col /(4*15.35 mm)=111 MPa

Sept. 17 th Collaring with 0.3 mm thick shimming (2/2): effect on b2/b3

Is it really necessary to insert an additional shimming? Our experience with DISCORAP dipoles tells us that windings are usually bigger than expected (0.3 mm at minimum). Could it be enough? Winding 0.3 mm bigger

Sept. 17 th Collaring a 0.3 mm bigger winding (1/3) P col 0.3 mm

Sept. 17 th Collaring a 0.3 mm bigger winding: stress in the windings (2/3) (MPa) pole interface (MPa) leftright 1 - collaring after collaring (pressure released) cool-down energization F col =2*353 tons/m P col =F col /(4*15.35 mm)=113 MPa

Sept. 17 th Collaring a 0.3 mm bigger winding: effect on b2/b3 (3/3)

Sept. 17 th Conclusions  We made a conceptual design of the mechanical structure of D2 dipoles  We investigated its mechanical behavior in various conditions as well as its effects on field quality  Further work will be dedicated to the collar geometry refinement and to include the effects of material properties nonlinearities  As final steps, iron yoke and outer shell will be also included in the mechanical model

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION S. Farinon, P. Fabbricatore (INFN-Sezione di Genova) Sept. 17 th 2014