AUSA 2016 Global Force Symposium and Exposition 15 – 17 March 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air Force Core Functions
Advertisements

Combat Systems Where We Are… Where We’re Going…
Maneuver Warfighter Conference Concept Implications on BCT Design Workgroup BCT 2020 Designs Read Ahead 11 September 2014 KENNETH J. HARVEY COL / AR.
Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below (FBCB2) Communications System
ARNG FUNDED TADSS AFIST XXI, Abrams Full Crew Interactive Skills Trainer: AFIST XXI is a appended precision gunnery trainer. It is the only precision gunnery,
Fort Benning, Home of the MCoE Maneuver Center of Excellence - Team of Soldiers, Families, and Civilians from the Best Army in the World! Infantry Commandant’s.
The Brigade Combat Team (BCT)
1/11 TARDEC Technical Director (Acting) Dr. Marilyn Freeman presentation on Force Protection to the Science & Engineering Technology Conference TARDEC.
United States Marine Corps
PM AAVS Program Brief For 2005 Combat Vehicles Conference.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 1 Supporting Expeditionary Aerospace Force (EAF) Getting lighter, leaner, and more responsive Col.
Army Test and Evaluation Command Developmental Testing: Industry/Government Roundtable – Perspectives on Transforming DT and OT Brian Simmons Technical.
Chief of Army Media Briefing
Commodity Architectures and Army Research Challenges Workshop on Edge Computing Using New Commodity Architectures (EDGE) 24 May 2006 J. Michael Coyle Program.
Integrating COIN and Full Spectrum Training LtCol M. B. Barry 23 Sep 2010.
Force Packaging. Overview Principles of War Process of Force Packaging Developing Packages.
“America’s Most Deployed
Good morning ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the 2004 National Defense Industrial Association Combat Vehicle Conference and to Fort Knox, the Home.
USMC LAV Modernization Plan
1st Battalion 23rd Infantry Operations Sergeant Major
Sustainability/Logistics – Transportation and Distribution Management (4b) Technology Enabled Capability Demonstration Alan Santucci
11 UNCLASSIFIED//REL TO NATO/ISAF/GIRoA ANA Mobile Strike Force Tactical Employment Concepts & Capability Development GSG7 Doctrine Directorate.
May 11, Ordnance and Tactical Systems Advanced Crew Served Weapons (ACSW) 2004 Small Arms Symposium & Exhibition National Defense Industrial Association.
Keynote Address 2004 Tactical Wheeled Vehicles Conference
POLISH CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT FOR ARMOURED AND MECHANISED FORCES
20 th ISMOR COL Jeff Appleget TRAC-WSMR 28 August 2003 Future Combat System (FCS) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Metrics for Transformation.
FIELD ARTILLERY WEAPONS BREIF
CAPT RUSTY STILES Deputy Fleet Surgeon U.S. Fleet Forces Command
Maneuver Center of Excellence
Reconnaissance and Surveillance Leader Course OPFOR TTP.
Detachment 645, The Ohio State University Integrity - Service - Excellence Military Capabilities.
Directorate of Combat Developments Small Arms Division Directorate of Combat Developments Small Arms Division MAJ Kevin Finch Chief, Small Arms Division.
Previous Slide TRADOC DCSINT Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command TRADOC DCSINT.
Mine Warfare - A Total Force Approach for the Future
By CPT Robert L. Crabtree
Directorate of Combat Developments Small Arms Division Directorate of Combat Developments Small Arms Division MAJ Kevin Finch Chief, Small Arms Division.
ASA(ALT)/AAE Perspective The Honorable Claude M. Bolton, Jr. Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) and Army Acquisition.
Force Packaging >. Overview  Force Packaging  Process of Force Packaging  Detached Support  Developing Packages.
Guardian Overview Brief
III Armored Corps and Fort Hood
Fires Center of Excellence MG David D. Halverson Infantry Warfighting Conference September 2010.
As of Sep 121 “The ultimate determinant in war is a man on the scene with a gun. This man is the final power in war. He is control, he determines.
Employment Considerations: Considerations at the Outset of Combat
Army Aviation in MOUT.
GORT Planning/Guidance Session with LTG Barclay
Combat Feeding Directorate R&DA 71st Annual Spring Meeting
Current Event Brief!.
U.S. Army RDE Command (Prov) - Supporting the Objective Force -
“Partnering to Reset, Recapitalize, and Restructure the Force”
Tactical Decision Games
US Marine Corps
National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA)
2011 Reconnaissance Summit IBCT Back brief
CIO G-6 Signal Conference
Fires Conceptual Framework Supporting Multi-Domain Battle
2011 Reconnaissance Summit SBCT Back brief
CIO G-6 Signal Conference
Multi-Domain Battle: Achieving Cross-Domain Synergy
Software, & Integration Realignment
Why We are Changing the Army
Air Armament Center (AAC)
Force Packaging.
“TWV: Fixing the current fleet while preparing for the future”
Colonel Michael Manning
AGCCC Battle Analysis Adjutant General School - Advanced Officer Training Division.
Program Manager Light Armored Vehicles
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
“US Army Precision Fires”
DDR&E Advanced Capabilities Overview
Presentation transcript:

AUSA 2016 Global Force Symposium and Exposition 15 – 17 March 2016 Von Braun Center (VBC) Huntsville, AL COL William Chlebowski Maneuver, Aviation, and Soldier Division Chief Army Capabilities Integration Center (ARCIC) UNCLASSIFIED

Combat Vehicle Modernization Strategy (CVMS) Why do we need it? Threats to Army combat vehicles are growing rapidly. Nations are modernizing conventional armored forces. Combat vehicles across the world are nearing or surpassing parity with U.S. vehicles.

Capability Delta and Risk What are the Problems? Current Capability IBCT: Can move quickly by strategic lift, but unable to maneuver upon arrival SBCT: Mobile upon arrival, but lacks the lethality to exploit its mobility advantage. ABCT: Maneuver capable, but pace of improvement lags threat evolution and tech innovation Desired Capability Combat Vehicles Provide required combinations of mobility, protection and lethality Overmatch threat – Joint Combined Arms Maneuver Strategic Deployability and Sustainability – Expeditionary Maneuver Autonomous systems and platforms – manage risk Capability Delta and Risk Without IBCT maneuver capability, US forces cannot execute forcible entry under various threat scenarios Without sufficient lethality and range, SBCTs are vulnerable to defeat by some contemporary hybrid/insurgent enemies Without advances in vehicle protection, proliferating weapons challenge the ABCT differential advantage Priorities Tactical Mobility IBCT Stryker Lethality upgrades missile/cannon Mobile protected firepower IBCT/SBCT Replace obsolete vehicles ABCT Develop advanced and autonomous solutions ABCT/SBCT

Combat Vehicle Modernization Strategy (CVMS) What is it? The CVMS establishes the ends, ways and means to modernize Army combat vehicles in the near-, mid- and far- terms to meet the mobility, protection and lethality capability requirements of future Army formations.

Combat Vehicle Modernization Strategy (CVMS) What will it give us? Combat vehicle modernization efforts must design combat vehicles to protect Soldiers against threats and deliver precision lethality, while providing both tactical mobility and global responsiveness.

Combat Vehicle Modernization Strategy (CVMS) How do we get it? The Army must simultaneously pursue short-term solutions for current challenges while developing new capabilities over the mid- to long- terms to ensure overmatch in future missions.

Combat Vehicle Modernization Strategy (CVMS) When do we get it? Timeframes: Near Mid Far 2016-2021 2022-2031 2032-2046

Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT) CVMS IBCT Elements Primary Systems Ground Mobility Vehicle (GMV) Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF) Light Reconnaissance Vehicle (LRV) Autonomous Technology applications Enabling Systems Vehicle Protection System (VPS) Cannon Air Burst Technology Combat Vehicle Prototyping (CVP)

IBCT Capability Transition Near Mid Far Sustain Improve Develop Replace Assess Current fleet Reduction of Soldier load New systems Obsolete systems Evaluate effectiveness -IBCT -9-man Squad -Ground Mobility Vehicle -Light Recon Vehicle -Mobile Protected Firepower -M1151 (HMMWV) -JLTV as LRV -Expeditionary Maneuver “SIDRA” M1151A1 MK-19 M1151A1 .50 CAL M1151A1 TOW/ITAS Ground Mobility Vehicle (GMV) S&T, RDECOM, Combat Vehicle Prototyping (CVP) Light Reconnaissance Vehicle (LRV) Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF) Commercial Off the Shelf (COTS) Weapon Systems Track & Suspension Lightweight Structures Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF) Developmental Architecture Blast Migration MAPS

Stryker Brigade Combat Team (SBCT) CVMS SBCT Elements Primary Systems Stryker Family of Systems (FoS) Double “V” Hull Upgrade Stryker Mobile Gun System (MGS) Enabling Systems Engineer Change Proposal (ECP) Lethality Up-Grade (Medium Caliber Cannon, Remote Weapon Station, Javelin (RWS-J)) Vehicle Protection System (VPS) Combat Vehicle Prototyping (CVP)

SBCT Capability Transition Near Mid Far Sustain Improve Develop Replace Assess Current fleet ECPs Engineer Change Proposals New systems, Combat Vehicle Prototyping Obsolete systems Evaluate effectiveness -SBCT -Fleet Recap -Stryker DVH -Stryker Lethality -VPS -MPF -Flat bottom fleet -MGS -SBCT Maneuver “SIDRA” M1129 Mortar M1135 RV M1132 ESV M1127 RV M1130 CV M1133 MEV M1128 MGS M1131 FSV M1134 ATGM M1126 ICV M1126 DVH M1126 RWS-J Track & Suspension Weapon Systems Architecture MAPS Lightweight Structures Blast Migration S&T, RDECOM, Combat Vehicle Prototyping (CVP) M1126 30mm Cannon Mobil Protected Firepower (MPF)

Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT) CVMS ABCT Programs and Initiatives Primary Systems Abrams Main Battle Tank (M1A2SEP) Bradley Family of Systems (M2A3/4) Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV) Future Fighting Vehicle (FFV) Future Tank (FT) Autonomous Technology applications Enabling Systems Engineer Change Proposals (ECP)* Vehicle Protection System (VPS) Medium Caliber Canon Combat Vehicle Prototyping (CVP) 120mm Advanced Multi-Purpose Round *An engineering change proposal is a limited improvement on a combat system that does not require development and approval of a new requirement. ECPs are limited to returning combat vehicles to the original required level of capability, but are faster and less costly than full modernization efforts.

ABCT Capability Transition Near Mid Far “SIDRA” Sustain Improve Develop Replace Assess Current fleet (ECPs) Technology improvements New systems Obsolete systems Evaluate effectiveness -Abrams -Bradley -Stryker -Hercules -3rd GEN FLIR -120mm AMP -Vehicle Protection System (VPS) -AMPV -FFV -Future Tank -M113 -Paladin M88A2 M113A3 Mortar M113A3 CP Paladin PIM M113A3 AMB M2A3 M113A3 MT M113A3 GP M1A2 SEP V3 M1A2 SEP V2 Paladin PIM M88A2 XM 1283 GP AMPV FoS M2A4 XM 1284 ME Track & Suspension Weapon Systems Architecture MAPS Lightweight Structures Blast Migration S&T, RDECOM, Combat Vehicle Prototyping (CVP) XM 1285 MT XM 1286 MC XM 1287 Mortar Future Fighting Vehicle Future Tank Robotic Wingman

Combat Vehicle Modernization Formations possess the appropriate combination of mobility, protection and lethality to win or achieve overmatch against likely threat, under anticipated mission variables Priorities IBCT Mobility Protection Lethality Tactical Mobility (near) Light recon and security capability (near) Mobile protected firepower (near/far) Protection and power upgrades (near) Lethality upgrades missile, cannon (mid) Mobile protected firepower (near/far) SBCT Mobility Protection Lethality Replace obsolete vehicles (near) Future Fighting Vehicle (mid) Future tank / autonomous capabilities (far) ABCT Mobility Protection Lethality FFV Residual Risk

Back-up