CHRIS ZADAK AND RACHEL OLMANSON, METR0-ST. CROIX WATERSHED UNIT WATERSHED RESTORATION AND PROTECTION STRATEGY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marylands Approach to Success Stories Presented to the Region III States Meeting May 12, 2009 Presented by Jim George.
Advertisements

1 Watershed Planning: A Key to Integrated Planning FHWA Environmental Conference Ann Campbell Wetlands Division.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
TMDL Development Upper Kanawha River Watershed August 18, 2011 WV DEP WV DEP Dave Montali.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan.
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1251(a) The objective of this chapter is to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s.
Chase Fanning Period 3 AP Environmental Science. Clean Water Acts Clean Water Act of 1977: Officially Amended in National amendment that did the.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
1 State Water Quality Assessments Under the Clean Water Act Charles Spooner Assessment and Watershed Protection Division Monitoring Branch National Water.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Presented by Insert your name, title, and district Lower Hudson Coalition of Conservation Districts Volunteer Streamwalk Program Developed by the Westchester.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Federal Clean Water Act Monitoring and assessments completed statewide Standards not met? Section 303 (d) requires placing the water body on the “Impaired.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Sustaining Long Term Regional Coordinated Monitoring Programs Todd Running, H-GAC May 9, 2006.
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
BACKRIVER TMDL PROJECT Technical Outreach Prepared by MDE/TARSA Prepared for the Baltimore Harbor Stakeholder Advisory Group September 10, 2002.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should: be designed to restore water quality from nonpoint source impairments using sufficiently analyzed.
Source Identification Stormwater Work Group March 24, 2010.
Protecting our Watershed. What is a watershed? A watershed is an area of land that drains into a body of water: –Stream –River –Lake (Let’s take a look!)Let’s.
State of the Streams Loudoun County: 2005 Loudoun Strategic Watershed Management Planning Conference February 23, 2006 Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun.
Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDLs) Justin Watkins and Barb Peichel, MPCA.
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Stream Health Outcome Biennial Workplan Neely L. Law, PhD Center for Watershed Protection Chesapeake Bay Program Sediment & Stream Coordinator Habitat.
Protecting Alabama’s Water Resources “It’s A Data Driven Process” Presented by: Chris Johnson Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) 2006.
Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Powerpoint Jeopardy Water Resources Water Treatment Biological pollution Chemical Pollution Controlling Pollution Sediment/ Thermal
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.
Ashley Wendt Texas State Soil & Water Conservation Board NPS Project Manager.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Using RMMS to Track & Report BMP Implementation
Cleaning Pollution.
Henrico County Stream Assessment / Watershed Management Program
North Dakota’s Alternative Plans
Fitting the pieces together
Mike Bira EPA Region 6 NPS Program
Review of 20 Years of UOWN Data Trouble-Spots and Trends Todd Rasmussen UGA Hydrology & Water Resources.
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should:
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Jon Capacasa, Director Water Protection Division U.S. EPA Region III
The Nine Elements that Must Be Included in a 319 Watershed Based Plan
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Question: Why should we monitor the quality of our rivers, lakes and streams? Water Quality A measure of the physical, chemical and biological factors.
Presentation transcript:

CHRIS ZADAK AND RACHEL OLMANSON, METR0-ST. CROIX WATERSHED UNIT WATERSHED RESTORATION AND PROTECTION STRATEGY

WHAT IS A “WRAPS”? Clean Water Legacy Act: Subd. 13. Watershed restoration and protection strategy or WRAPS. "Watershed restoration and protection strategy" or "WRAPS" means a document summarizing scientific studies of a major watershed no larger than a hydrologic unit code 8 including the physical, chemical, and biological assessment of the water quality of the watershed; identification of impairments and water bodies in need of protection; identification of biotic stressors and sources of pollution, both point and nonpoint; TMDL's for the impairments; and an implementation table containing strategies and actions designed to achieve and maintain water quality standards and goals.

GENERAL WRAPS PROCESS: Year 1 & 2: Monitoring – biological/chemistry Year 3: Assessment (what’s impaired; what’s not); stressor ID for biologically-impaired streams Year 4: TMDL development for: Streams—turbidity/sediment, low oxygen, E. coli Streams—biota, in which stressor = pollutant (sediment, nitrate, ???) Lakes—phosphorus Implementation prioritization + strategy development for restoration + protection  WRAPS Report Year 5+: WDs/WMOs/LGUs incorporate WRAPS strategies into local water plans and make progress