1 Unfolding Study Closure test on SHERPA 08/10/12.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Data Analysis II Beate Heinemann UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Hadron Collider Physics Summer School, Fermilab, August 2008.
Advertisements

Interjet Energy Flow. Patrick Ryan, Univ. of Wisconsin Collaboration Meeting, June 6, Patrick Ryan University of Wisconsin Claire Gwenlan Oxford.
RooUnfold unfolding framework and algorithms
QCD Meeting October 1, 2004 Is it due to the hard collision? Is it due to fragmentation? Strong polarization seen in fixed-target experiments where jet.
Lots of Plots Andrea Bangert Scipp meeting, March 2 nd, 2010.
 K K L  +.  + component, ME  + component, LE Difference.
QCD Meeting July 1, 2005 Is it due to the hard collision? Is it due to fragmentation? Strong polarization seen in fixed-target experiments where jet NOT.
Developments with the Cone Algorithm in Run II John Krane Iowa State University MC Workshop Oct , Fermilab Part I: Data vs MC, interpreted as physics.
10. Unfolding ctd… K. Desch – Statistical methods of data analysis SS10.
Ttbar jets E T >30 GeV, ||20 GeV, ||
Dijet Mass Sherpa vs Pythia Multi-Threshold e.t.c. for H/Abb->4b’s Kohei Yorita University of Chicago FTK Meeting 12/19/2006.
CTEQ workshop November 14, 2013 Jeffrey Berryhill (Fermilab) On behalf of the CMS and ATLAS collaborations Tests of Vector Boson plus Jets Production at.
November 1999Rick Field - Run 2 Workshop1 We are working on this! “Min-Bias” Physics: Jet Evolution & Event Shapes  Study the CDF “min-bias” data with.
Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Jets Production Association with a Z boson in pp Collision at 7 and 8 TeV with the CMS Detector Kittikul Kovitanggoon Ph. D. Thesis.
Unfolding algorithms and tests using RooUnfold
Quark Compositeness Study and Progress Satyaki Bhattacharya, Sushil S. Chauhan, Brajesh C. Choudhary & Debajyoti Choudhury Department of Physics & Astrophysics.
W/Z + jets measurements at D0 On behalf of the DØ Collaboration N.Skachkov (JINR, Dubna)
1 2vtx tagged diBjets mass cross section measurement Univeristy of Notre Dame Hong Luo Mar 3 th 2005.
Unfolding jet multiplicity and leading jet p T spectra in jet production in association with W and Z Bosons Christos Lazaridis University of Wisconsin-Madison.
A measurement of the Ratio of Tree over Two Jet Cross Sections with CMS at 7TeV P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas, I.Evangelou, N.Manthos University.
Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets Trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK.
RooUnfold unfolding framework and algorithms Tim Adye Rutherford Appleton Laboratory ATLAS RAL Physics Meeting 20 th May 2008.
RooUnfold unfolding framework and algorithms Tim Adye Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Oxford ATLAS Group Meeting 13 th May 2008.
Rjets (W+jets/Z+jets) : Status Report Evelin Meoni On behalf of the Rjets group: G. Arabidze, C. Chavez Barajas, H. Beauchemin, M. Bona, G. Brandt, B.
Update ON the Study of Subjet Multiplicity at CMS 7TeV Manuk Zubin Mehta, Manjit Kaur Panjab University, Chandigarh 11/27/
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
Hadronic Event Shapes at 7 TeV with CMS Detector S,Banerjee, G. Majumdar, MG + ETH, Zurich CMS PAS QCD M. Guchait DAE-BRNS XIX High Energy Physics.
PHENO 2008 April 29th Tom Schwarz University of California Davis Measurement of the Forward-Backward Asymmetry In Top Production with 1.9 fb -1.
Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Jets Production Association with a Z boson in pp Collision at 7 and 8 TeV with the CMS Detector Kittikul Kovitanggoon Ph. D. Thesis.
Update : Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas, I.Evangelou, N.Manthos University of Ioannina, Greece Senior Editor.
Data-based background predictions for new particle searches at the LHC David Stuart Univ. of California, Santa Barbara Texas A&M Seminar March 24, 2010.
8th December 2004Tim Adye1 Proposal for a general-purpose unfolding framework in ROOT Tim Adye Rutherford Appleton Laboratory BaBar Statistics Working.
1 NCC Task Force Richard Seto NCC Task Force Meeting Jan 8, 2007 BNL.
22 January 2009 David1 Look at dead material and fake MET in Jx samples mc08 10 TeV simulations, release J0 to J6 are tag s479_r586, ‘ideal geometry’
G. Cowan CERN Academic Training 2012 / Statistics for HEP / Lecture 41 Statistics for HEP Lecture 4: Unfolding Academic Training Lectures CERN, 2–5 April,
Measurement of the 3-jet to 2-jet Cross Sections Ratio in pp Collisions at 7TeV Update : Pythia8 tune 2C P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas University.
1 The comparisons between with and without JES uncertainty. jet with pt > 30 GeV, |eta| 40. Jet Y is calculated by 0.5*log[(E+pz)/(E-pz)] CMS Data.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.
ICSHEP 8, Apr , CMS BOnia physics: J/Psi & Inclusive b(  J/PsiX) production x- Section Xiangwei Meng Guoming Chen Institute of.
A measurement of the Ratio of Three over Two Jet Cross Sections with CMS at 7TeV 70 nb -1 P.Kokkas, I.Papadopoulos, C.Fountas, I.Evangelou, N.Manthos University.
网上报账系统包括以下业务: 日常报销 差旅费报销 借款业务 1. 填写报销内容 2. 选择支付方式 (或冲销借款) 3. 提交预约单 4. 打印预约单并同分类粘 贴好的发票一起送至财务 处 预约报销步骤: 网上报账系统 薪酬发放管理系统 财务查询系统 1.
1 RA1 Analysis Exclusive n-jet + MET search Overview and Status Report Tanja Rommerskirchen on behalf of the RA1 group Universitaet Zuerich SUSY Workshop;
1 Unfolding Study 07/11/12. 2 RooUnfold Using the RooUnfold In this study we make response.
1 Unfolding Study Closure test on SHERPA 08/16/12.
Improving ATLAS hard diffraction measurements with the STEP award Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 18/10/2013.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Analysis Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Soft QCD / Diffraction WG Meeting 27/01/2014.
Klaus Rabbertz Hamburg, Germany, Terascale Workshop Klaus Rabbertz, KIT 6. Physics at the Terascale Workshop, Hamburg, 2012 Determination.
Update on A FB Myfanwy Liles μ-μ- μ+μ+ q q θ*θ*. A FB Reminder  Forward-Backward Asymmetry  Due to parity violation of the weak interaction  Interference.
Report Jet-veto SF and Uncertainties Jet smearing
More Precision, Less Work
CDS comments on supporting note
Measurement of the γ,W,Z with ATLAS for the ATLAS Collaboration
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Tips Need to Consider When Organizing a College Event
Inclusive Jet Cross Section Measurement at CDF
ماجستير إدارة المعارض من بريطانيا
Fake Jet Rejection: Sum Jt
Modeling Min-Bias and Pile-Up University of Oregon February 24, 2009
The Big 6 Research Model Step 3: Location and Access
W/Z and Di-Boson Results from ATLAS Srivas Prasad Harvard University On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pheno Madison, Wisconsin May 09, 2011.
W/Z and Di-Boson Results from ATLAS Srivas Prasad Harvard University On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pheno Madison, Wisconsin May 09, 2011.
½ of 6 = 3.
Booster prograss Code in Mathematica: from thin to thick. SVD and response matrix. Code for orbit correct is in progress.
C.2.10 Sample Questions.
W polarization and ttbar spin correlation study
C.2.8 Sample Questions.
Booster prograss Code in Mathematica: from thin to thick. SVD and response matrix. Code for orbit correct is in progress.
C.2.8 Sample Questions.
Rick Field - Florida/CDF
W and Z+ Jets Comparing event generators for Vector Boson events
Presentation transcript:

1 Unfolding Study Closure test on SHERPA 08/10/12

2 RooUnfold Using the RooUnfold In this study we make response matrix from MADGRAPH MC and use it to unfold the SHERPA sample Plots we are interested are rapidity of Z and jet in Z+1jet events i.e. Yz, Yjet, different of Yz and Yjet, and sum of Yz and Yjet The unfolding methods are  Bayes with number of iteration = 4  Svd with ktern =15 (total number of bins) i.e. just inverts matrix  Bin by Bin

3 Response Matrix MADGRAPH

4 |Y of Z| BayesSvdBin by Bin The corrections for all 3 methods are small. The corrections are almost the same for all 3 methods.

5 |Y of jet| BayesSvdBin by Bin The corrections are small. The corrections are almost the same for all 3 methods.

6 0.5|Y z +Y jet | BayesSvdBin by Bin Y sum again shows the small and consistent corrections for all methods (except the last bin).

7 0.5|Y z -Y jet | BayesSvdBin by Bin Y diff shows the small corrections but not the bin before last..

8 Keng's Comments 1. By using MADGRAPH response matrix, the corrections for SHERPA are small and consistent. 2. The correction also look the same for all methods. 3. The bin before the last of Ydiif show big corrections. We saw the same effect in PYTHIA