A 3D-MHD Model Interface Using Interplanetary Scintillation (IPS) Observations B.V. Jackson 1, H.-S. Yu 1, P.P. Hick 1, A. Buffington 1, D. Odstrcil 2,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
K. Fujiki, H. Ito, M. Tokumaru Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory (STELab), Nagoya University. SOLAR WIND FORECAST BY USING INTERPLANETARY SCINTILLATION.
Advertisements

H.-S. Yu Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California at San Diego, LaJolla, CA, USA 3D-MHD Models Driven by IPS
Global Properties of Heliospheric Disturbances Observed by Interplanetary Scintillation M. Tokumaru, M. Kojima, K. Fujiki, and M. Yamashita (Solar-Terrestrial.
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
Understanding Magnetic Eruptions on the Sun and their Interplanetary Consequences A Solar and Heliospheric Research grant funded by the DoD MURI program.
When will disruptive CMEs impact Earth? Coronagraph observations alone aren’t enough to make the forecast for the most geoeffective halo CMEs. In 2002,
February 26, 2007 KIPAC Workshop on Magnetism Modeling/Inferring Coronal And Heliospheric Field From Photospheric Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University.
Identifying Interplanetary Shock Parameters in Heliospheric MHD Simulation Results S. A. Ledvina 1, D. Odstrcil 2 and J. G. Luhmann 1 1.Space Sciences.
Coronal and Heliospheric Modeling of the May 12, 1997 MURI Event MURI Project Review, NASA/GSFC, MD, August 5-6, 2003 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
The “cone model” was originally developed by Zhao et al. ~10 (?) years ago in order to interpret the times of arrival of ICME ejecta following SOHO LASCO.
UCB MURI Team Introduction An overview of ongoing work to understand a well observed, eruptive active region, along with closely related studies…..
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
Modeling suprathermal proton acceleration by an ICME within 0.5 AU: the May 13, 2005 event K. A. Kozarev 1,5 R. M. Evans 2, M. A. Dayeh.
CASS/UCSD SALE 2014 An Account of Space Weather at Comet 67P/C-G H.-S. Yu, P.P. Hick, A. Buffington University of California at San Diego, LaJolla, California,
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
CASS/UCSD AFOSR 2014 IPS 3D Velocity and Density Analysis B.V. Jackson Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California at San Diego,
CASS/UCSD KSSS D Analysis of Remote-sensed Heliospheric Data B.V. Jackson, H.-S. Yu, P.P. Hick, A. Buffington University of California at San Diego,
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
Solar Mass Ejection Imager (SMEI) Analysis of the 20 January 2005 CME B.V. Jackson, P.P. Hick, A. Buffington, M.M. Bisi, and E.A. Jensen Center for Astrophysics.
Solar System Physics Group Heliospheric physics with LOFAR Andy Breen, Richard Fallows Solar System Physics Group Aberystwyth University Mario Bisi Center.
Newark, Wiegelmann et al.: Coronal magnetic fields1 Solar coronal magnetic fields: Source of Space weather Thomas Wiegelmann, Julia Thalmann,
Comparison of the 3D MHD Solar Wind Model Results with ACE Data 2007 SHINE Student Day Whistler, B. C., Canada C. O. Lee*, J. G. Luhmann, D. Odstrcil,
CASS/UCSD - Jeju 2015 A Jets in the Heliosphere: A Solar Wind Component B.V. Jackson, H.-S. Yu, P.P. Hick, and A. Buffington, Center for Astrophysics and.
Faraday Rotation: Unique Measurements of Magnetic Fields in the Outer Corona Justin C. Kasper (UM), Ofer Cohen (SAO), Steven Spangler (Iowa), Gaetan Le.
1 Acceleration and Deceleration of Flare/Coronal Mass Ejection Induced Shocks S.T. Wu 1, C.-C. Wu 2, Aihua Wang 1, and K. Liou 3 1 CSPAR, University of.
Extremely Fast Coronal Mass Ejection on 23 July Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland,20723, USA 2 NOAA Space Weather.
1 University of California, San Diego, U.S.A., 2 NASA - Goddard Space Flight Center, U.S.A., 3 George Mason University, U.S.A., 4 Naval Research Laboratory,
11. Assessing the Contribution of Heliospheric Imaging, IPS and other remote sensing observations in Improving Space Weather Prediction Bernie Jackson,
Measurements of White-Light Images of Cometary Plasma as a Proxy for Solar Wind Speed J.M. Clover, M.M. Bisi, A. Buffington, B.V. Jackson, P.P. Hick Center.
CASS/UCSD ILWS 2009 SMEI 3D reconstructions of density behind shocks B.V. Jackson, P.P. Hick, A. Buffington, M.M. Bisi, J.M. Clover, S. Hamilton Center.
1 Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive #0424, La Jolla, CA , U.S.A
1 Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive #0424, La Jolla, CA , U.S.A
1 Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive #0424, La Jolla, CA , U.S.A
1 Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive #0424, La Jolla, CA , U.S.A
IPS 3D reconstructions and their comparison with STEREO and Wind spacecraft Mario M. Bisi 1 Bernard V. Jackson 1, John M. Clover 1,
1 Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive #0424, La Jolla, CA , U.S.A
Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive #0424, La Jolla, CA , U.S.A
Heliospheric Simulations of the SHINE Campaign Events SHINE Workshop, Big Sky, MT, June 27 – July 2, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil 1,2 1 University of Colorado/CIRES,
1 Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive #0424, La Jolla, CA , U.S.A
Bernard V. Jackson, P. Paul Hick, Mario M. Bisi, John M. Clover, Andrew Buffington Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California,
CASS/UCSD Dusan_CCMC_2013 Heliospheric Solar Wind Forecasting Using IPS Slides For A Possible CCMC Presentation 2013 Introduction:
State of NOAA-SEC/CIRES STEREO Heliospheric Models STEREO SWG Meeting, NOAA/SEC, Boulder, CO, March 22, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
1 CASS, University of California, San Diego, U.S.A. ; 2 STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK; 3 George Mason University, U.S.A.; 4 NASA/GSFC,
CASS/UCSD-STELab AOGS_2009 Solar Mass Ejection Imager (SMEI) 3D-reconstructions of the Inner Heliosphere Bernard V. Jackson, P. Paul Hick, Andrew Buffington,
IPS tomography IPS-MHD tomography. Since Hewish et al. reported the discovery of the interplanetary scintillation (IPS) phenomena in 1964, the IPS method.
CASS/UCSD STEL 2016 Iterated Time-dependent IPS 3D-MHD Models B.V. Jackson Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California at San.
CASS/UCSD RSW Space Weather Forecasting from IPS Data Sets M. Tokumaru Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University, Nagoya ,
CASS/UCSD SWG SMEI observations and comparison with STEREO SMEI direct observations and 3D-reconstruction measurements and their comparison with.
Solar System Physics Group Heliospheric physics with LOFAR Andy Breen, Richard Fallows Solar System Physics Group Aberystwyth University Mario Bisi Center.
H.-S. Yu 1, B.V. Jackson 1, P.P. Hick 1, A. Buffington 1, M. M. Bisi 2, D. Odstrcil 3,4, M. Tokumaru 5 1 CASS, UCSD, USA ; 2 STFC RALab, Harwell Oxford,
Using World Interplanetary Scintillation Systems
B.V. Jackson H.-S. Yu, P.P. Hick, A. Buffington,
B.V. Jackson, H.-S. Yu, P.P. Hick, and A. Buffington,
Driving 3D-MHD codes Using the UCSD Tomography
Observations of Heliospheric Faraday Rotation
H.-S. Yu1, B.V. Jackson1, P.P. Hick1,
Determination of the North-South Heliospheric Magnetic Field from Inner-Corona Closed-Loop Propagation B.V. Jackson Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences,
ICME in the Solar Wind from STEL IPS Observations
B.V. Jackson, and P.P. Hick, A. Buffington, M.M. Bisi, J.M. Clover
2014SWW - S9 3D Reconstruction of IPS Remote-sensing Data: Global Solar Wind Boundaries for Driving 3D-MHD Models Hsiu-Shan Yu1, B.V. Jackson1, P.P. Hick1,
ST23-D2-PM2-P-013 The UCSD Kinematic Global Solar Wind Boundary for use in ENLIL 3D-MHD Forecasting Bernard JACKSON1#+, Hsiu-Shan YU1, Paul HICK1, Andrew.
IPS Heliospheric Analyses (STELab)
Bernard V. Jackson1, Hsiu-Shan Yu1, P
Exploration of Solar Magnetic Fields from Propagating GONG Magnetograms Using the CSSS Model and UCSD Time-Dependent Tomography H.-S. Yu1, B. V. Jackson1,
B.V. Jackson H.-S. Yu, P.P. Hick, A. Buffington, M. Tokumaru
Bernard V. Jackson, P. Paul Hick, Andrew Buffington, John M. Clover
D. Odstrcil1,2, V.J. Pizzo2, C.N. Arge3, B.V.Jackson4, P.P. Hick4
B.V. Jackson H.-S. Yu, P.P. Hick, A. Buffington, M. Tokumaru
Investigation of Heliospheric Faraday Rotation Due to a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) Using the LOw Frequency ARray (LOFAR) and Space-Based Imaging Techniques.
Presentation transcript:

A 3D-MHD Model Interface Using Interplanetary Scintillation (IPS) Observations B.V. Jackson 1, H.-S. Yu 1, P.P. Hick 1, A. Buffington 1, D. Odstrcil 2, T.K. Kim 3, N.V. Pogorelov 3, C.-C. Wu 4, M. Tokumaru 5, J. Kim 6, and S. Hong 6 Abstract We at UCSD for over two decades have developed a remote-sensing iterative time-dependent three- dimensional (3D) tomographic reconstruction technique which provides volumetric maps of density, velocity, and magnetic field. These extend from an inner boundary out to nearly the whole inner heliosphere. This modeling requires a “traceback” to the boundary, from any element within the heliospheric volume, which specifies the element origin, time, and change from a 2D location on a set of Carrington maps. Moreover, this process has recently included a traceback from any input volume to yield an updated boundary in velocity, density, temperature, and magnetic field components, based on fitting to data from interplanetary scintillation (IPS) or other remotely- sensed heliospheric measurements. This traceback from an external volume is the most difficult step needed to implement a future UCSD iterative tomographic analysis from any given solar-wind model. Up to now, the iterative UCSD tomographic analysis (fitting STELab, Japan, IPS data) has used an internal solar wind model that conserves mass and mass flux, and as a first step allows an inner boundary to be extracted to drive heliospheric 3D-MHD (magnetohydrodynamic) forward models. Here, three examples are shown where this IPS inner boundary has been used in this way: 1) Analysis of the 2014 September 9-10 halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) using the ENLIL 3D- MHD code at Earth and at the Rosetta spacecraft situated at 3.7 AU; 2) Analysis of the period during two halo CMEs on 2011 September 24 using the UAH MS-FLUKSS 3D-MHD heliospheric code; 3) Analysis of the 2015 March 15 halo CME and its associated three component magnetic fields with the NRL H3D-MHD code. The UCSD time-dependent Computer-Assisted Tomography program uses the outward motion of structures and an outward-changing weight along the LOS to provide global time-varying 3D reconstructions. So far, this time-dependent reconstruction technique has incorporated a purely kinematic solar wind model that enforces conservation of mass and mass flux and assumes radial outflow (Jackson et al., 2008). The LOS segment 3D weightings are projected back in space and time using a programming algorithm we term a “traceback matrix” to a solar wind inner boundary reference surface (sometimes also called the "source surface") that is usually set at 15 solar radii (Rs). 1. The UCSD Time-Dependent Tomography Analysis IPS weighting response with distance from Earth 1 Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 1 Center for Astrophysics and Space Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive #0424, La Jolla, CA , USA Tel: Gilman Drive #0424, La Jolla, CA , USA Tel: George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA, and NASA/GSFC M/C 674, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA 3 Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research, University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH), Huntsville, AL, USA 4 Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), 4555 Overlook Ave., Washington, DC 20375, USA 5 Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya , Japan 6 Korean Space Weather Center, National Radio Research Agency, 198-6, Gwideok-ro, Hallim-eup, Jeju, , South Korea Lines of sight traced back from their location in space to the source surface at two given times 2000 July July 13 In the traceback matrix as used in the UCSD kinematic model, the location of the upper level data point (starred) is an interpolation in x of Δx 2 and the unit x distance - Δx 3 distance or (1 - Δx 3 ). Similarly, the value of Δt at the starred point is interpolated by the same spatial distance. Each 3D traceback matrix contains a regular grid of values ΣΔx, ΣΔy, ΣΔt, ΣΔv, and ΣΔm that locates the origin of each point in the grid at each time and its change in velocity and density, etc. from the heliospheric model. Traceback matrix concept in 2D 2. IPS Global Solar Wind Boundaries Interpolation from the kinematic IPS tomography model provides sample inner boundaries of (a) density, (b) velocity, and (c) radial and (d) tangential magnetic field for ENLIL extracted in Earth- centered Heliographic Coordinates at 0.1AU using STELab IPS observations and NSO SOLIS magnetograms (see Yu et al., 2015). Zeeman splitting provides vertical magnetic fields at the solar surface using the Current Sheet Source Surface (CSSS: Zhao and Hoeksema, 1995) model to give accurate vertical fields at a source surface. These fields are extrapolated outward using the global velocity model derived by the IPS to provide radial and tangential field components (in RTN coordinates) anywhere within the volume. *

( (ftp://cass185.ucsd.edu/data/IPSBD_Real_Time/) Real-Time IPS forecasting ( IPS ENLIL Boundary (ftp://cass185.ucsd.edu/data/IPSBD_Real_Time/) ( and a Real-Time IPS Boundary-Driven ENLIL ( or at the Korean Space Weather Center (KSWC) see: The UCSD kinematic analyses of IPS data provide global measurements over a time cadence of about one day for both density and velocity, and slightly longer cadences for some magnetic field components. These currently provide boundaries from three different 3D-MHD models. The 3D-MHD simulation results using IPS boundaries as input compare fairly well with in-situ measurements. Real-time IPS boundary data for driving MHD model (ENLIL) are now available. We are well on our way in providing a system whereby the UCSD IPS tomography updates each 3D-MHD model iteratively for a refined-propagation analysis using these heliospheric models. References McKenna-Lawlor, S., Ip, W., Jackson, B., Odstrcil, D., Nieminen, P., Evans, H., Burch, J., Mandt, K., Goldstein, R., Richter, I., and Dryer, M., 2015, “Space Weather at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko before its perihelion”, Earth, Moon, and Planets (submitted). Jackson, B.V., Hick, P.P., Buffington, A., Bisi, M.M., Clover, J.M., and Tokumaru, M., 2008, “Solar Mass Ejection Imager (SMEI) and Interplanetary Scintillation (IPS) 3D-Reconstructions of the Inner Heliosphere”, Adv. in Geosciences, 21, Jackson, B.V., Odstrcil, D., Yu, H.-S., Hick, P.P., Buffington, A., Mejia-Ambriz, J.C., Kim, J., Hong, S., Kim, Y., Han, J., and Tokumaru, M., 2015, “The UCSD IPS Solar Wind Boundary and its use in the ENLIL 3D-MHD Prediction Model”, Space Weather, 13, 104, doi: /2014SW Kim, T.K., Pogorelov, N.V., Borovikov, S.N., Jackson, B.V., Yu, H.-S., Tokumaru, M., 2014, “MHD heliosphere with boundary conditions from a tomographic reconstruction using interplanetary scintillation data”, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 7981, doi: /2013JA Odstrcil, D., et al in ASP Conference Series Proceedings - Numerical Modeling of Space Plasma Flows, eds. N. V. Pogorelov, E. Audit, & G. P. Zank, “Numerical Simulations of Solar Wind Disturbances by Coupled Models”, 385, 167. Yu, H.-S., Jackson, B. V., Hick, P. P., Buffington, A., Odstrcil, D., Wu, C.-C., Davies, J. A., Bisi, M. M., and Tokumaru, M., 2015, “3D Reconstruction of Interplanetary Scintillation (IPS) Remote-Sensing Data: Global Solar Wind Boundaries for Driving 3D-MHD Models”, Solar Phys., doi: /s Wu, C.-C., Liou, K., Jackson, B.V., Yu, H.S., Hutting, L., Lepping, R.P., Plunkett, S., Howard, R.A., and Socker, D., 2015, “The first super geomagnetic storm of solar cycle 24: The St. Patrick day (17 March 2015) event”, submitted to the SCOSTEP-WDS Workshop, NICT, Tokyo, Japan September. Zhao, X.P., and Hoeksema, J.T., 1995, “Prediction of the interplanetary magnetic field strength,”, J. Geophys. Res., 100 (A1), Summary 3. Real-Time ENLIL and Rosetta Archival Analyses ENLIL driven by an IPS archival boundary provides a large, density enhancement at the Rosetta spacecraft situated 60° from the Sun- Earth line at 3.7 AU. The enhancement arriving at Rosetta was marked by an energetic solar wind plasma event at Rosetta on September 19 at 12 UT and is a combination of the 2014 September 9 &10 halo CMEs, the latter associated with an X1.6 flare at 17:30 UT and a geomagnetic storm at Earth ( McKenna-Lawlor et al., 2015 ) September 24 Halo CMEs Using the UAH MS-FLUKSS ftp://cass185.ucsd.edu/data/IPS_Rosetta_Real_Time/ (For a Real-Time Rosetta IPS Kinematic Analysis see: ftp://cass185.ucsd.edu/data/IPS_Rosetta_Real_Time/ ) March 15 Halo CMEs Using NRL’s H3D-MHD MS-FLUKSS driven by an archival IPS boundary analysis (see Kim et al., 2014) here provides a large, velocity enhancement from the 2011 September 24 Halo CMEs from a 0.1 AU boundary. Left) Time series showing radial velocity, from the IPS kinematic tomography and the IPS-driven MS-FLUKSS compared with OMNI data. Right) A radial cut at 1 AU from the MS-FLUKSS IPS- driven model at the time indicated by the blue arrow on the left plot. Pre-CME Solar Wind 1.0 AU Velocity CME Time of Radial Cut H3D-MHD driven by an archival IPS boundary analysis (Wu et al., 2015) provides a large enhancement from the 2015 March 15 Halo CMEs from a 40 Rs boundary. UCSD fields are input as Br, Bt, and Bn boundaries (RTN kinematic model B in-situ fits to the ACE spacecraft are shown). (see Jackson et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2015; Odstrcil et al., 2008)