Legislative Requirement 2013 House File 215. Category Cut Scores Based on a Normal Distribution across Measures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Advertisements

Simpson County Schools Accountability Results, Fall of 2013 Franklin-Simpson High School 97 th Percentile* DISTINGUISHED *percentile rank based on 2012.
Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets
Dec. 14, 2010 APS BOE Workshop Graduation Requirements High School Presented By: Division of Instruction PACESetters!
Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011.
A-F School Grading Presentation October 2, History of A to F School Grading System Preliminary grades based on data from SY08-09 through SY10-11.
Overview of Wyoming Accountability in Education Act (WAEA)
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
School Performance Measure Calculations SY Office of Achievement and Accountability.
Understanding Wisconsin’s New School Report Card.
ILLUMINATING COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS State Report Cards for Districts and Schools.
Data Riverside Community Schools. Schoolwide Trends Riverside Community Schools.
P t G T P ersistence t o G raduation T ool A tool designed to identify students who may be off-track for graduating.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
School Performance Index School Performance Index (SPI): A Comprehensive Measurement System for All Schools Student Achievement (e.g. PSSA) Student Progress.
What is the SQRP?  The School Quality Rating Policy (SQRP) is the Board of Education’s policy for evaluating school performance.  It establishes the.
Measuring Charter Quality Eric Paisner, NAPCS Anna Nicotera, NAPCS Lyria Boast, Public Impact.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability Model June 2011.
Springville CSD Where every child will become a successful reader ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 2008.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
WBCSD District Strategic Goals Update August 10, 2015.
A Closer Look at Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski Conference.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Collecting data & information Talking with teachers, administrators, service providers Progress Monitoring Consolidated Planning /Use of Data Alternative.
ACT Aspire Data: What Does It Tell Us? October 27, 2015 Developed by the WISExplore Content Work Team WISExplore Content Work Team Members: Mary Ann Hudziak,
Iowa School Report Card (Attendance Center Rankings) December 3, 2015.
Brad McMillen and Sonya Stephens Data and Accountability September 19, 2013.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
FIFTH ANNUAL 50-STATE PROGRESS REPORT on the Alignment of High School Policies with the Demands of College and Careers 2010 Closing the Expectations Gap.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
TENNESSEE SUCCEEDS.. In the spring of 2007, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce released an education report card for all states. Tennessee received an “F” in.
Review Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
Kentucky Department of Education, Office of Assessment and Accountability, July 2012 Questions: or
Novice Reduction & Non-Duplicated Gap Group
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
South Carolina Succeeds
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE NETCONG SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER 15, 2015 Dr. Gina Cinotti, CSA.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
MARCH 2, 2016 ACCOUNTABILITY WEBINAR Kim Gilson, Doni CashRegion 10 ESC 1.
Data Riverside Community Schools. Schoolwide Trends Riverside Community Schools.
Huntsville City Schools School Year School Instructional Targets October 3,
Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,
Assessment & Accountability Session 3: Content and School Scores.
A-F Report Card Law, Reporting Phases, and Indicator Descriptors.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Legislative Requirement 2013
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Future ready PA Index Update 5/23/17.
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
TESTING, RESEARCH & ACCOUNTABILITY
Annual WBWF Student Achievement Report 2017
Kentucky’s New Accountability Model
New Statewide Accountability System
ESSA Update “Graduation Rate & Career and College Readiness”
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
Birmingham City Schools Report Card Indicators
College/Career Ready for All
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
Closing the Expectations Gap
Spencer County Public Schools
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Legislative Requirement 2013 House File 215

Category Cut Scores Based on a Normal Distribution across Measures

Percent of Schools in Each Category Exceptional3% of schools High-Performing12% of schools Commendable35% of schools Acceptable35% of Schools Needs Improvement12% of schools Priority3% of schools A high level view of student performance across multiple measures to determine an overall performance rating Two years of data More stable indicator

Educational Measures and Their Weights MeasuresHigh School (9-12) Middle School (6-8) Elementary School (PK-5) Proficiency22.2%25.0%28.6% Closing Achievement Gap 22.2%25.0%28.6% College & Career Ready Growth 11.1%12.5%14.3% Annual Expected Growth 11.1%12.5%14.3% College and Career Readiness 11.1%12.5%N/A Graduation Rate11.1%N/A Attendance5.6%6.3%7.1% Staff Retention5.6%6.3%7.1% Total100.0%

Cut Points for Each Category CategoryHigh SchoolsMiddle SchoolsElementary Schools Exceptional 75.0 and above 71.0 and above 79.0 and above High Performing70.0 to to to 78.9 Commendable65.4 to to to 72.9 Acceptable60.0 to to to 66.9 Needs Improvement56.0 to to to 60.0 Priority55.9 and below52.9 and below54.9 and below

Educational Measures Proficiency Percent of students scoring proficient on the Iowa Assessment Across reading and math Across two school years College and Career Readiness Growth Based on a national standard score needed to reach college/career readiness by 12 grade (306) 5 th grade student NSS of 220 Needs a 306 in 12 grade = 86 across 7 years = 12.3 NSS units that year Recalculated every year If a student is already CCR they count FAY students for two years

Educational Measures Annual Expected Growth using NSS units FAY students for two years GradeReadingMath 3 rd to 4 th 15 4 th to 5 th 14 5 th to 6 th 13 6 th to 7 th 12 8 th to 8 th 11 8 th to 9 th 10 9 th to 10 th th to 11 th 77

Educational Measures Closing the Achievement Gap Score Grade 3-8 and used to compute an achievement gap score Iowa Assessments Notice in this example the gap decreased by 5% A T-scale score is calculated from the percentage Group Percent Proficient math and reading combined Percent Proficient math and reading combined ELL, IEP and/or students receiving FRL 60.0%65.0% All other students75.0% GAP15.0%10.0%

Educational Measures College and Career Readiness The percent of students that are at or above a college readiness benchmark on the Iowa Assessments in reading and math 2 years of data CCR means the acquisition of knowledge and skills a student needs to enroll and succeed in credit bearing first year courses at a postsecondary institution without the need for remediation Grade 5-11 = 75 NPR ACT Cut Scores in Reading = 22 and Math = 22 that represent CCR

Graduation Rate The percent of students who complete high school in 5 Year Years A two year composite score is used

Attendance The average daily attendance rate of students The aggregate days of student attendance (days present) in the school or school district divided by the aggregate days of enrollment Across two years

Staff Retention The percent of licensed staff who are retained All licensed staff members except nurses and coaches Only full time staff members are retained in the base year Retirements, move outs of state, or staff dismissals are all treated the same Fall Basic Educational Data Survey (BEDS) Staff Collection Additional School Report Measures to come Parental Involvement Community Activities and Involvement

Connection between State Report Card and Differentiated Accountability None This is a stand alone School Report Card to fulfill HF 215